EPTEnough lurking, time to participate.
Newbie Mini Mafia XLII
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
LoneMeow
Finland1396 Posts
Enough lurking, time to participate. | ||
|
LoneMeow
Finland1396 Posts
On June 06 2013 11:44 Spicydinosaur wrote: + Show Spoiler + On June 06 2013 11:34 Xzavier wrote: Also the reason im for lynching a lurker night one is even if it is a noobie who realized they didnt have the time for it, then they arnt ever gonna be useful for us in this game, so it still would be more productive than a No-lynch. I disagree with this. I would rather have a no lynch than to lynch someone i think is a lurking town. We should only be lynching scum, not bad town. I don't see how lynching a townie lurker is more productive. If you think vote for someone because you think he's a lurking scum... fine, but a lurking town vote doesn't help I would very much rather lynch a lurker than go no-lynch. Would you rather: a) be at LYLO with one or more players that are completely unreadable b) be at LYLO slightly earlier with players you can at least try to get a read on Lurking townies aren't just "not useful to town", they're an actual liability later in the game. Obviously you should lynch scum reads over lurkers, but you shouldn't give lurkers a free pass either. | ||
|
LoneMeow
Finland1396 Posts
On June 06 2013 14:59 Umasi wrote: iVLosK, I think you are scum. Why? Make a case if you have a good read. I'm tempted to disagree though. Yes, iVLosK! is somewhat abrasive and irritating with his attitude, but that's not really alignment indicative. | ||
|
LoneMeow
Finland1396 Posts
On June 06 2013 12:40 Firere345 wrote: Yeah, the random lynch vote also leads me in that direction. Firere345, has your opinion changed? Do you still lean scum on iVLosK!? | ||
|
LoneMeow
Finland1396 Posts
On June 06 2013 15:28 Umasi wrote: I'll operate under the assumption that you're town, because everyone else thinks so, and it seems like more will get done this way. Do you still think he's scum though? If so, I'd like to see a short case explaining why, perhaps you can convince me? | ||
|
LoneMeow
Finland1396 Posts
Leaning slightly on town. Sure, he is somewhat abrasive but he was actively driving discussion. Definitely not a top lynch candidate for me right now. On June 06 2013 22:40 Yavanna wrote: In other news, I'm trying to discern atm about LoneMeow. He had some input on the lurker lynch issue but since he's just asked a couple questions without any real opinions of his own. Thoughts? I was thinking of pushing you a bit after this, because when you posted this you hadn't stated any real opinions of your own besides sucking up to Xzavier, however your later posts are better so I'm okay with it for now. On June 07 2013 15:14 fferyllt wrote: There is a player who hasn't looked paranoid at all, though. And that in a newb sets off a few alarms. I'd like to know if you think someone fits that description or if I'm making mountains from molehills. This I don't like at all. Looks a lot like trying to fish for an opinion to sheep on when you don't state who you actually suspect, and that I find rather scummy. | ||
|
LoneMeow
Finland1396 Posts
On June 07 2013 16:34 Xzavier wrote: Lonemeow what do you think of gotard and my case against him? Gotard's posts are extremely weird, jumping in and straight away pushing lynch on you who most seem to find the strongest town read at the moment. Even weirder that he's pushing his second best scum read instead of the best. On the other hand, this is such a suicidal move that it makes me wonder if scum would dare do something like that. Your case on him seems pretty good, but I still worry that he might be just overeager townie since as said, the move seems too suicidal for scum to dare try. I'm fine with lyching him if he doesn't provide better input, though. | ||
|
LoneMeow
Finland1396 Posts
On June 07 2013 19:19 Onegu wrote: Lonemeow what is your strongest scum read at this point? I would also ask yavanna the same thing. It's not really a strong scum read at all, but right now I'd want to lynch Firere345. Doesn't say much, sheeps the current "consensus". Promises to participate more but doesn't seem to be doing so. This situation with Gotard has me worried, I can understand why people would want to lynch him but I'm having hard time convincing myself scum would dare be so brash. | ||
|
LoneMeow
Finland1396 Posts
##Vote: Gotard | ||
|
LoneMeow
Finland1396 Posts
| ||
|
LoneMeow
Finland1396 Posts
Essentially, since voting is mandatory, I had to choose between Firere345 (who I mostly wanted to lynch for lurking so much and not really being very useful when he was around) and Gotard, on whom there was a relatively good case. Originally, I thought Gotard looked way too brash to be scum, but then he went on the "wasting time on me" tangent which felt scummy, discussing opinions on anyone is useful even if the target is later proven town. | ||
|
LoneMeow
Finland1396 Posts
Anyway, I want to revisit StiMaDDict's original case on me: On June 08 2013 04:11 StiMaDDict wrote: First thing that stuck out to me was that in both cases he is eager for someone other than himself to make a case against iVLosK! while holding back himself. He, not exactly encouraged, but led Umasi to go on with his rant on iV (which caused much dilema later on..) but on the very next line said that he disagrees(?) to what Umasi's not existing case.. Also despite the fact his comment on iV's behavior sounds somewhat reasonable, he doesn't make any case or assumption; only going as far as to say that iV's attitude is neither indication of town or scum. How exactly is asking for someone to explain how reasoning behind a scum claim scummy? At the time I asked for Umasi to present a case he seemed to be playing very emotionally instead of thinking logically and I hoped he would either present a logical case that could help me understand his reasoning for the claim or calm down and realize how weak his claim was. On June 08 2013 04:11 StiMaDDict wrote: His second quote asks Firere345 whether he changed his opinion which appears odd as well. Forget the fact that I have no fucking clue what Firere345 is saying or why he is commenting on Umasi, but why is LoneMeow asking Firere345 if he still thinks iVLosK! is scum. I went through Firere345 filter and he never proposed anything like that before. Given it should have been much more reasonable for LoneMeow to ask Umasi or Xzavier such question not Firere345 because they were voting on iVLosK!. The posts you quoted contain Firere345's scum read on iVLosK! which I was asking about, trying to both get a second opinion on my own read on iVLosK! and to see Firere345's reaction to get a better read on him, seeing how little he had posted at the time. On June 08 2013 04:11 StiMaDDict wrote: Once again, he keeps asking for case on iVLosK! that he neither support nor argue. He seems little too eager to hope on a bandwagon given the chance though. This is just a continuation of the earlier, Umasi still hadn't really presented a logically sound case and seemed to only be prepared to drop his attack on iVLosK! based on the "consensus" at the time, not because he had changed his own opinion. On June 08 2013 04:11 StiMaDDict wrote: I can go much more in detail. On fferyllt direct question, he once again slip passes. Nothing definite that will hurt him later. No concrete background to support his claim. Either he is as lazy as I am or he doesn't want to give anything away. I might add who is your top lynch candidate. The question by fferylt isn't a direct question to me if you read the context, and it's just objectively scummy to fish for opinion without even naming the suspect like that. I'm not sure what you meant by "no concrete background to support his claim", as I didn't make a scum claim, I simply pointed out that fishing for opinion is scummy. On June 08 2013 04:11 StiMaDDict wrote: Even though I have no idea what Gotard did but I can guess a little. It seems Xzavier, who is viewed by majority as town, pointed out something minor about Gotard and Gotard, who wasn't as active as Xzavier immediately engaged him with a vote and scum read possibly. (Correct me if I'm completely off the track) So what Lone Meow decides to do is basically say, "Oh this guy (Gotard) is doing something that is suicidal. He is likely a scum. But wait, this is too suicidal to be something a scum would do. He might be a townie after all." Lastly, his scum read on Firere345 is just plain weak. It seems to me as when he was asked he had to make a reply so he picked one of the lurker. He can probably further Essentially you're saying that my case on Firere345 was weak (well, yes, it was, I even said that much myself later) and that my defense of Gotard was scummy - however as it turns out Firere345 was mafia and Gotard seems likely town by the vote distribution, so I'd say this only makes you look slightly suspicious. | ||
|
LoneMeow
Finland1396 Posts
On June 10 2013 00:51 Onegu wrote: Hopefully the reason he was killed that being said I dont think he posted enough for that. Looking at his votes maybe the only clues but that is a reach. Perhaps the reason he was killed was exactly because there wasn't anything special in his posting history? | ||
|
LoneMeow
Finland1396 Posts
On June 08 2013 20:47 Gotard wrote: If you read my filter I didn't really try to lynch Xzavier on day 1. It was more like "Hey, this guy could be a scum but at the same time He's helping town so I don't really know". Ok I looked like a scum for a moment but you took my words and overreacted really heavily. At the end pressuring me gave us great results and we were able to find a scum. And about "jumping in and straight away pushing lynch" that was my first post because I only post during EU afternoons and evenings (but he couldn't know that) and I had to go through a lot of text before posting.. I'll have to admit that I must have misunderstood what you tried to say in your posts if that's what you really wanted to say. Xzavier's case had some convincing points, your case was pretty much just "he sheeped, so he must be scum" which isn't really too sound logic, since sheeping can be a townie trait too. On June 08 2013 20:47 Gotard wrote: And changes he's mind (is he trying to save his friend Firere?). Look at the timing Firere was going down hill at this point and it was really close (after his vote Firere345 (5), Gotard (4)) Consider how weak my read on Firere345 was. It was basically just "this person has lurked almost the whole game, and whenever he posts he's not really saying anything new", which isn't such a strong case when the game is still in day 1 and the person in question has less than 5 total posts. I had to make a quick decision on which wagon to follow and started doubting myself. | ||
|
LoneMeow
Finland1396 Posts
On June 10 2013 01:16 fferyllt wrote: This posits a subtle scum team. Have you looked at his filter? Yes. The only persons he pushes are Gotard and myself. His interaction with iVLosk! says he's probably at least somewhat experienced player on some other site, so that might also give some insight into the kill. | ||
|
LoneMeow
Finland1396 Posts
On June 10 2013 01:33 fferyllt wrote: What sort of thing would you look for in a post to indicate a player might be PR? During day 1 I'd expect someone with a power to "play safe" and try to avoid being lynched or night killed. So probably no super strong opinions but enough committing that he doesn't look suspiciously avoiding it. After day 1, someone who seems to be very certain about something vanillas cannot know. Doesn't really apply to veterans though, I'd expect a veteran to come on very strong during night 1 at least since he's essentially safe to do that. | ||
|
LoneMeow
Finland1396 Posts
On June 10 2013 01:43 fferyllt wrote: See, I did see something in his posts when I filtered him that in retrospect gave off that vibe. I think I would have picked up on it as scum. Then again, he did attack Gotard pretty strongly. I'm not so sure about that. | ||
|
LoneMeow
Finland1396 Posts
| ||
|
LoneMeow
Finland1396 Posts
On June 10 2013 01:56 Spicydinosaur wrote: 6. As for lone... I want to see more of his posts before I throw a vote on him. Also Lone... who are your scum reads atm. I know it sounds a bit OMGUS but I'd point my finger at StiMaDDict right now. The fact is, just about everyone else I am suspicious of currently has interacted with Firere345 in ways that make them look pro-town. It doesn't make me any less suspicious that StiMaDDict didn't bother update his case on me after Firere345 flipped red, even though a relatively large part of the case was based on my defense of Gotard and FoS on Firere345. So I very much want to see how he responds. | ||
|
LoneMeow
Finland1396 Posts
On June 10 2013 15:07 Sylencia wrote: VOTE COUNT FOR DAY 2 LoneMeow (1) - fferyllt Umasi (1) - Onegu Not Voting - The rest of you. Currently, LoneMeow is set to be lynched. Next deadline is in: [unparsable timestamp format]. You must vote, and remember to tell us if the vote count is wrong! You missed a vote here: On June 10 2013 00:15 StiMaDDict wrote: I didn't find anything particularly out of place from Skanjab1 filter.. anyway, time to die mafia motherfucker.. ##Vote: LoneMeow | ||
| ||
