TL Mafia L

On January 13 2012 15:22 Ciryandor wrote:

LOL that's a good reason to get you voted in. Lynching someone for having an opinion.

On January 13 2012 13:49 Cyber_Cheese wrote:
Oh fail, didn't realise there was elections...
##Unvote

I'm going to run for mayor.

Lynch all lurkers/liars is standard pre-game chat, and it's mostly useless. Let's skip that.
It's all too situational, and we rarely follow through with it.

On January 13 2012 17:28 VisceraEyes wrote:

Look around you. Go on, go back to page 1 and take a good long look at the player-list in this game. I'll wait.

You'll see some familiar names, some you don't recognize, some you love playing with and some you hate playing with. You'll see seasoned veterans and raw newbies. You'll see professional e-sports figures and people fresh off super-secret-probation. This is possibly one of the most diverse player-lists since XLVII. With such a diverse cast of characters, do we really want the same ol' mayor calling the shots?

It's time for a change.

My name is VisceraEyes. Some of you might know me as 'that crazy guy who used to post insane nonsense but who has come back actually making sense at least half the time'. Others might know me as 'isn't he that guy who shot the GF on N1 of Election Mafia?' Still others of you may have never heard of me at all. It is for all of these reasons and more that I'm nominating myself for Mayor of Liquidia.

"But VE, surely you jest! No one would follow you!"

You have a point sir, but please allow me to explain. I don't intend to 'lead' the town. I intend to play the game as I always do - by being as open and transparent with my reads/thoughts as I can possibly be. I intend to lynch scum today, and I intend to relentlessly hunt for the remaining scum WITH town in the days to come. In this way, if town is interested in hunting scum, they have to follow me, because I'll already be doing that. It's called lead by example, and it's something the vets have forgotten about.

"VE, surely you can see the merit of having a proven veteran of TLMafia as the mayor, right?

At this point, no. In the games I've played, it seems to me like the vets are all mostly interested in surviving the first 2 night-kills (if they're town) before actually playing the game. I'm tired of electing someone into a position, only to have them waste it by lurking and throwing out random pro-town tidbits in an effort to avoid getting killed while they collect data. What does this serve to do? Get random players killed while the Mafia try and kill that vet before they become effective, that's what. I'll be active the whole game, not just from D3 on. I'll be lynching scum TODAY, and I'll be hunting scum with you guys starting X pages ago…not on D3.

All right that makes sense, but I've got to know: are you going to be as effective at scumhunting as a vet would?

I'm not going to lie, here. I'm probably not as good at scumhunting as some of the vets may be. But I'll tell you what I DO know. I know that I probably try harder than all of them. It's part of the reason I've improved as much as I have since I started playing: because I relentlessly look for the scums. And here's something else to think about: go over my last couple of games and tell me that my alignment was a mystery to you. Go on, look. I bet anyone here (including some of our fresher players) could go look through my filter of any given game and accurately predict my alignment. Can you say the same about any of the vets also running for mayor? I'm talking to you too, vets: can you honestly say that I'll be harder to read than, say, BloodyC0bbler? Or Meapak?

I'm almost convinced sir, but I have one final question for you: who would you lynch if chosen to be mayor?

I can honestly say that I have no idea yet who I'm going to lynch today (and who asks that at a time like this anyway?) But I promise that I'll take everyone's input into account should you choose to elect me, and the final decision will be a town decision.

On January 14 2012 08:25 evantrees wrote:
can be not is. If not chosen by the start of night 1 their roles get randomed, role to appear as must be chosen day 1, but yes they can wait till the election is pretty much decided to decide.

Also I missed the fact it's not the bodyguards providing the role check immunity oops.

I'm new so in general against pm games, only joined this one after that was changed, so don't have a problem supporting the just ignore pms from masons bit not so convinced on the masons claiming though.

whoever is elected consider outing a bodyguard particularly if you think they could use medic protection.

For now despite the picture kitaman27 has my vote.

this bugged me a bit, from bc's mayoral bid, nonsense but enough I will not vote for him.

On January 13 2012 16:40 BloodyC0bbler wrote:
I will actively harass lurkers to play in this game as opposed to lurking, failure to begin playing will result in advocacy of vig shots.

Threaten to lynch sure, but try to get vigs to waste their shots?

On January 16 2012 12:35 Lanaia wrote:
I noticed something. BM never posted who he was incarcerating.
If he were mafia, how do we think that power would be used? I'm just curious here.

However, this shortens the post I'm going to be making soon.


Possible, but kita's claim...

Is it typical for people to claim what happened to them?

On January 16 2012 12:45 Scamp wrote:
I was expecting a rash of modkills. I'm highly disappointed. Though the death of Ciryandor is nice.

Not really sure why WBG thinks he should still be talking right now.

On January 21 2012 11:02 VisceraEyes wrote:


BECAUSE I GOT SHOT LAST NIGHT YOU FUCKING TARD