EPT
Jaedong vs ZerODante's Peak SE
Circuit Breaker
La Mancha
Monte Cristo
Dante's Peak SE
ABC Mart MSL Ro4
| Forum Index > Polls & Liquibet |
|
Roffles
Pitcairn19291 Posts
Jaedong vs ZerODante's Peak SE Circuit Breaker La Mancha Monte Cristo Dante's Peak SE | ||
|
zenMaster
Canada761 Posts
| ||
|
Mogwai
United States13274 Posts
 | ||
|
Murderotica
Vatican City State2594 Posts
| ||
|
d(O.o)a
Canada5066 Posts
edit: added proof. ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/ePyLk.png) | ||
|
XsebT
Denmark2980 Posts
| ||
FlaShFTW
United States10241 Posts
| ||
|
Lucumo
6850 Posts
On May 24 2011 04:19 d(O.o)a wrote: My boy zero got this. edit: added proof. ![[image loading]](http://oi55.tinypic.com/2lca5bb.jpg) That picture makes absolutely no sense. | ||
|
pvzvt
Israel2097 Posts
| ||
|
Zeburial
Sweden1126 Posts
| ||
|
Jeremy Reimer
Canada1066 Posts
| ||
|
bITt.mAN
Switzerland3693 Posts
Proxy Hatchery, Hive-tech, you've got it with Zero. He is strong with force, yo! | ||
|
Ornithorynquez
430 Posts
| ||
|
Gaxton
Sweden2328 Posts
Heart: Zero Brain: Jaedong | ||
|
GenesisX
Canada4267 Posts
| ||
|
hacklebeast
United States5090 Posts
On May 24 2011 04:19 d(O.o)a wrote: My boy zero got this. edit: added proof. lol, nice. Serious note: should it only be one point? I thought semifinals were 3 or 5. | ||
|
d(O.o)a
Canada5066 Posts
Fine here's more proof, Zero beating Jaedong in the ace match: ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/TXE8Y.png) I have provided infallible proof that Zero will destroy Jaedong. | ||
|
doothegee
Korea (South)3011 Posts
ZerO Dante's Peak SE JaedongZerO Circuit Breaker JaedongZerO La Mancha JaedongZerO Monte Cristo JaedongZerO Dante's Peak SE JaedongI can dream, can't I? Voting Jaedong though lol | ||
BisuDagger
Bisutopia19299 Posts
| ||
|
Lucumo
6850 Posts
On May 24 2011 05:04 d(O.o)a wrote: Fine here's more proof, Zero beating Jaedong in the ace match: I have provided infallible proof that Zero will destroy Jaedong. It's not 2010, Grand Line is not a map that will be played, it's not Proleague and Jaedong is Jaedong and not Jaedon. | ||
| ||
