| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
Nafaltar
Germany302 Posts
Pre patch Beta: Repost of the rankings from 24.02. (link) Post Patch 0.4.0.14133: Rankings from 27.02. 23:07 GMT+1 link Rankings from 04.03. 17:20 GMT+1 *edit: with Div8(17:50)* Div1-8] +Div9 04.03. 18:00 GMT+1 div9 Rankings from 11.03. 18:25 GMT+1 Div 1-11 ![[image loading]](http://www.imgupload.org/images/271_eu_divisions_11.03.jpg) | ||
|
Rothbardian
United States497 Posts
On February 28 2010 07:31 Nafaltar wrote: I will probably try and update with more current rankings every few days. Pre patch Beta: Repost of the rankings from 24.02. (link) Post Patch 0.4.0.14133: Rankings from 27.02. 23:07 GMT+1 ![[image loading]](http://www.imgupload.org/images/221_eu_divisions_27.02.jpg) Holy shit at Division five.....500 games played @ RunA? Good lord. | ||
|
Pape
Serbia419 Posts
| ||
|
Polar_Nada
United States1548 Posts
| ||
|
Tsagacity
United States2124 Posts
Also, Div 7 is almost pure zerg right now  | ||
Liquid`Jinro
Sweden33723 Posts
On February 28 2010 07:34 Pape wrote: No offense to all of these top rank threads, but who really cares? To me it really doesn't matter when most of the good competition isn't even playing the beta. Most guys have admitted that it is easy to get into the platinum league, and although I believe its not a easy ride all the way to the top its not the hardest either. Us without a key could care less who is top 10, and those that have a beta can check themselves if they care right? Can check... yes, but not easily. You have to have a friend in each division, then you have to check each friends profile -_ - It takes forever cause there's no back button. RunA's record is wtf insane. That's a lot of games - can't be just one person? I like these threads, so thx! | ||
|
nTerra
Sweden21 Posts
| ||
|
Nafaltar
Germany302 Posts
 . | ||
|
Ruthless
United States492 Posts
| ||
|
Pape
Serbia419 Posts
On February 28 2010 07:38 FrozenArbiter wrote: Can check... yes, but not easily. You have to have a friend in each division, then you have to check each friends profile -_ - It takes forever cause there's no back button. RunA's record is wtf insane. That's a lot of games - can't be just one person? I like these threads, so thx! Oh, that's kind of stupid than! I thought this was for us without a key. Never mind, hopefully I don't get somebody to bash my post, but they should implement something so you can check all the leader boards otherwise you are totally disconnected by not having chats and from every other division. I guess on that note, do players from different leagues and divisions ever get matched with each other? | ||
|
Liquid`Jinro
Sweden33723 Posts
I dunno, I'd much rather just have 1 ranking  Or at least have 1600 pts mean the same regardless of what league or division you are in. | ||
|
Rothbardian
United States497 Posts
On February 28 2010 08:32 FrozenArbiter wrote: Yeah, constantly, which is why I'm so annoyed by this whole division system. They give different points for wins depending on what division you are in (or at least, this is what I've been told), so the players in smaller divisions get less points to keep the disparity between players smaller or something. I dunno, I'd much rather just have 1 ranking Or at least have 1600 pts mean the same regardless of what league or division you are in.I believe this is how it works. Those who are proposing the different points different division theory have no supporting evidence. The disparity with points comes from the sheer fact of Bonus/Rest points + those who play 300 games will always have more points than those who play 50 because if you are 240-60 and the other guy is 50-0, you will invariably have a much higher ELO, its just common sense. It's my belief that there is parity between the divisions, and you can rank by ELO and get accurate results (Though the B/R pts skew the whole system....). | ||
|
distant_voice
Germany2521 Posts
| ||
|
elow
Spain113 Posts
On February 28 2010 07:37 Tsagacity wrote: Wow @ Runa's games played o.O Also, Div 7 is almost pure zerg right now Runa's is on drugs (speed) he plays for 24 straight at least thats what he told me but he is probably joking... | ||
|
Liquid`Jinro
Sweden33723 Posts
On February 28 2010 08:39 Rothbardian wrote: I believe this is how it works. Those who are proposing the different points different division theory have no supporting evidence. The disparity with points comes from the sheer fact of Bonus/Rest points + those who play 300 games will always have more points than those who play 50 because if you are 240-60 and the other guy is 50-0, you will invariably have a much higher ELO, its just common sense. It's my belief that there is parity between the divisions, and you can rank by ELO and get accurate results (Though the B/R pts skew the whole system....). I want 1600 to mean the same across all divisions tho. Like, it sucks when someone can be in gold with 1600 points and someone in Platinum with 1200 points can be ranked higher. It makes no sense! Split the leagues in some other way, or at least give a "master ranking" - I want to see overall rankings not division by division/league by league. Also, maybe it is just a coincidence, but look at Orly in Division 7. The guy is 125-25. He's got 1539 points. Look at mTwMFkAra in division 6 - 125-48, 1554 pts. Look at OgerEli in Div 7: 135-41 -- 1422 pts Then let's look at me - JinrO, Division 3: 82-36 -- 1672 pts Or hell, let's look at the leader of my division since he's played about the same amount of games: Naugrim: 122-49 -- 1818 pts Does that really make sense? Why isn't there anyone in the big divisions who has a ton of games played, a good record, but a low score? | ||
|
DeMusliM
United Kingdom401 Posts
Although i dislike this division system - and much prefer everyone being in 1 division such as the war3 tft ladder, i guess too many people will be playing - and staying in the top 20 or so would be a nightmare. | ||
|
LaLuSh
Sweden2358 Posts
Elo is only absolute within your own division, or towards a division with the same amount of players (no doubt about it working like this). Feels like I've posted this in at least 5 threads, but some dude who's never played the beta always claims he knows better. | ||
|
DrainX
Sweden3187 Posts
On February 28 2010 07:34 Pape wrote: No offense to all of these top rank threads, but who really cares? To me it really doesn't matter when most of the good competition isn't even playing the beta. Most guys have admitted that it is easy to get into the platinum league, and although I believe its not a easy ride all the way to the top its not the hardest either. Us without a key could care less who is top 10, and those that have a beta can check themselves if they care right? For those of us without keys it can be interesting to see which races are dominating the ladders. Also it's interesting to see which old players from BW and wc3 are on the ladder and possible planning to play sc2 once it's released. | ||
|
Jyvblamo
Canada13788 Posts
| ||
|
DrivE
United States2554 Posts
| ||
| ||
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 League of Legends Counter-Strike Super Smash Bros Other Games |
|
WardiTV Weekly
Ultimate Battle
Rush vs BeSt
Replay Cast
Rogue vs Classic
Patches Events
PiGosaur Cup
Kung Fu Cup
Replay Cast
The PondCast
KCM Race Survival
IntoTheTV X SOOP
herO vs Rogue
Reynor vs Solar
ByuN vs SHIN
Clem vs MaxPax
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
