• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 07:20
CEST 13:20
KST 20:20
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL21] Ro24 Preview Pt2: News Flash10[ASL21] Ro24 Preview Pt1: New Chaos0Team Liquid Map Contest #22 - Presented by Monster Energy18ByuL: The Forgotten Master of ZvT30Behind the Blue - Team Liquid History Book20
Community News
$5,000 WardiTV TLMC tournament - Presented by Monster Energy1GSL CK: More events planned pending crowdfunding0Weekly Cups (May 30-Apr 5): herO, Clem, SHIN win0[BSL22] RO32 Group Stage4Weekly Cups (March 23-29): herO takes triple6
StarCraft 2
General
BGE Stara Zagora 2026 cancelled Blizzard Classic Cup @ BlizzCon 2026 - $100k prize pool Weekly Cups (May 30-Apr 5): herO, Clem, SHIN win Rongyi Cup S3 - Preview & Info Team Liquid Map Contest #22 - Presented by Monster Energy
Tourneys
RSL Season 4 announced for March-April $5,000 WardiTV TLMC tournament - Presented by Monster Energy Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) GSL CK: More events planned pending crowdfunding Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament
Strategy
Custom Maps
[D]RTS in all its shapes and glory <3 [A] Nemrods 1/4 players [M] (2) Frigid Storage
External Content
The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 520 Moving Fees Mutation # 519 Inner Power Mutation # 518 Radiation Zone
Brood War
General
so ive been playing broodwar for a week straight. Gypsy to Korea ASL21 General Discussion Pros React To: JaeDong vs Queen [BSL22] RO32 Group Stage
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL22] RO32 Group B - Sunday 21:00 CEST [BSL22] RO32 Group A - Saturday 21:00 CEST 🌍 Weekly Foreign Showmatches
Strategy
Muta micro map competition Fighting Spirit mining rates What's the deal with APM & what's its true value Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Starcraft Tabletop Miniature Game General RTS Discussion Thread Nintendo Switch Thread Darkest Dungeon
Dota 2
The Story of Wings Gaming Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
G2 just beat GenG in First stand
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas TL Mafia Community Thread Five o'clock TL Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Trading/Investing Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
The IdrA Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece [Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books Movie Discussion!
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion Cricket [SPORT] Tokyo Olympics 2021 Thread General nutrition recommendations
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
[G] How to Block Livestream Ads
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Loot Boxes—Emotions, And Why…
TrAiDoS
Broowar part 2
qwaykee
Funny Nicknames
LUCKY_NOOB
Iranian anarchists: organize…
XenOsky
FS++
Kraekkling
ASL S21 English Commentary…
namkraft
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1522 users

Work In Progress Melee Maps - Page 78

Forum Index > SC2 Maps & Custom Games
Post a Reply
Prev 1 76 77 78 79 80 217 Next
Keep our forum clean! PLEASE post your WIP melee maps in this thread for initial feedback. -Barrin
a176
Profile Blog Joined August 2009
Canada6688 Posts
September 12 2013 05:07 GMT
#1541
i needed to expand the map out a bit, the base density was a bit too high. the middle base and corner bases are pushed out. gives me some terrain options on the corner base now.

[image loading]
starleague forever
tooCasual
Profile Joined February 2013
Canada4 Posts
September 12 2013 05:12 GMT
#1542
http://imgur.com/a/UfZgW#0

Updated with a couple different options
I did bring the 5th in closer to use it as a possible clockwise 3rd, tightened the choke points (or changed them completely) and made the path to the 6th more open and direct as recommended.

I didn't realize until after I uploaded it that option 1 is VERY Cloud Kingdom ... might just toss this one out...

Option 2 is more chokey through the middle, but not sure if I have good ramp placement

Option 3 splits the map vertically instead of horizontally like I think I had originally planned and there's a lot of dead space along that bottom/top path to the 3rd

Maybe I could push where the 3rd is back a bit to use the space a bit better and make the 3rd and 5th kinda the same distance from the natural?

badgertk
Profile Joined December 2011
United States8 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-09-12 07:18:09
September 12 2013 07:00 GMT
#1543
Disclaimer: This is copy-pasted from the corresponding reddit thread found here (http://www.reddit.com/r/starcraft/comments/1m87il/new_mapmaker_requesting_feedback_on_2_bhekar_ro/)

Now onto the map itself. It is called Bhekar Ro Centaur III. According to StarCraft lore, Bhekar Ro is a fringe terran world. A centaur is considered a minor planet that exhibits behaviors of both comets and asteroids. The Roman numeral III is just arbitrary. The map is 2 player map with spawn positions at 4 and 10 o'clock positions. Its size is 206x168. There are 14 bases. There are no doodads on this map as of now. It is currently only published on the Americas server.

[image loading]

The main base contains 12 mineral patches and 2 gases but you initially get access to 6 of them. The other 6 can be optimally harvested by putting another cc/nexus/hatchery next to the starting position. This brings me to the next feature of the map: the small main base. The extra minerals take up valuable real estate. To counteract this, the natural base is excessively large. The natural ramp is 2 forcefields wide and you can wall off using a forge, gateway, pylon, and a zealot. There is also another ramp blocked by rocks that lead to an easy third base. You can wall this off using a pylon, 2 gateways, and a zealot. However, there is also an attack path from the backside. This attack path however requires the player to travel the perimeter of the map. The gold base setup is quite strange. There are 7 gold minerals and 2 rich geysers. However, one of the geysers is 2 spaces too far away so it requires 4 workers to optimally harvest. The geyser that is at a standard distance can be scouted by the enemy.

[image loading]

I am really curious as to what people will think about the 4 extra mineral patches in the main base. I think of it as a normal map but the players have an extra 6000 minerals bank. This pushes the mineral to gas ratio of the map up and so there should be more low tech units running about. I am slightly concerned about the extra ledge sticking out on the side of the main base. Will reapers or tank drops be too strong? A collosus can actually walk up it! Should it be removed? With the natural base being so large, it might make cc/nexus/hatch first too risky. Photon overcharge can't even cover the ramp! Concerning the base with the ledge that leads to the main, I have tried to avoid the Xel'Naga Caverns wall-off but to no avail. I especially like my precise Xel'Naga tower placements. I think Xel'Naga towers to scout gases have not been ever used and think they might be cool. I do have issue with the 1 and 7 o'clock Xel'Naga towers. Is there a better way to block it off than two rocks? Should it even be blocked off? The gold bases are interesting because they are actually really close to the natural ramp. Except for the closer gold base has the minerals facing the wrong way and there are rocks blocking the path. I am concerned about tanks just sitting there on the gold base cliff being too strong. This also caused be to removed the center path and have a hole in the middle of the map. To be honest, the hole isn't that bad looking. I might actually consider not filling the middle hole with doodads.

For more screenshots, follow this link (http://imgur.com/a/OpQZD).
"I don't have to shoot you, I can run you over."
-NegativeZero-
Profile Joined August 2011
United States2142 Posts
September 12 2013 09:03 GMT
#1544
@a176: Nice map, standard but effective.

@badgertk: You've got some interesting ideas but I think you're trying to break too many conventions at once - it'll be too difficult to predict how balance will turn out, and nobody would want to play the map. If you want to make something non-standard, I'd recommend focusing on a single non-standard feature as sort of the central "theme" for your map.

On an unrelated note, the map is far too large right now. You should try to condense or remove some of the narrow outer pathways, especially since they probably wouldn't be used very often anyway.

Also wtf is with the analyzer pic lol
vibeo gane,
a176
Profile Blog Joined August 2009
Canada6688 Posts
September 12 2013 16:21 GMT
#1545
On September 12 2013 14:12 tooCasual wrote:
http://imgur.com/a/UfZgW#0

Updated with a couple different options
I did bring the 5th in closer to use it as a possible clockwise 3rd, tightened the choke points (or changed them completely) and made the path to the 6th more open and direct as recommended.

I didn't realize until after I uploaded it that option 1 is VERY Cloud Kingdom ... might just toss this one out...

Option 2 is more chokey through the middle, but not sure if I have good ramp placement

Option 3 splits the map vertically instead of horizontally like I think I had originally planned and there's a lot of dead space along that bottom/top path to the 3rd

Maybe I could push where the 3rd is back a bit to use the space a bit better and make the 3rd and 5th kinda the same distance from the natural?



both 1 and 2 are too CCish. 3 has a problem with the 4th expo being a bit too forward/exposed, imo. its the base layout combined with somewhat generic pathing thats the problem; its hard to come up with unique base layouts nowadays so what you can try is to come up with some unorthodox pathing instead.
starleague forever
badgertk
Profile Joined December 2011
United States8 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-09-12 19:44:24
September 12 2013 18:43 GMT
#1546
On September 12 2013 18:03 -NegativeZero- wrote:

@badgertk: You've got some interesting ideas but I think you're trying to break too many conventions at once - it'll be too difficult to predict how balance will turn out, and nobody would want to play the map. If you want to make something non-standard, I'd recommend focusing on a single non-standard feature as sort of the central "theme" for your map.

On an unrelated note, the map is far too large right now. You should try to condense or remove some of the narrow outer pathways, especially since they probably wouldn't be used very often anyway.

Also wtf is with the analyzer pic lol


Someone else has convinced me to remove all 4 Xel'Naga towers. The only convention I see that I am breaking is the main-natural relationship. A really small main base to almost necessitate the player take the natural base just for real estate (zerg is exempt from this). The other idea is how players will respond to effectively an extra bank of minerals. The extra minerals should increase the number of low tech unit counter attacks (such as zealot warp-ins, ling runbys). To further reinforce this idea, I made a lot of attack pathways, some blocked by rocks or small mineral fields.

I don't really see a problem with making a large map. Yes nobody has made a map this large. Does that mean it is bad mapmaking? No. In fact, the larger maps have been more accepted than smaller maps. Currently there are 10 attack pathways and I am considering removing the path with the Xel'Naga tower on it. The fastest one goes through the gold base and is blocked by rocks. The next fastest one is open (I'm calling it the inner path). The next fastest one is blocked by 2 10 mineral patches and rocks if you want to backstab the third. The longest path is open (I'm calling it the outer path).

All of these values are from natural ramp to natural ramp:
Worker: 55s
Reaper: 30s
Overlord: 175s

Marine Inner: 70s
Marine Outer: 110s
Marine Gold: 50s
Marine Mineral: 100s

Speedling Inner: 35s
Speedling Outer: 55s
Speedling Gold: 25s
Speedling Mineral: 50s
"I don't have to shoot you, I can run you over."
And G
Profile Joined May 2012
Germany491 Posts
September 12 2013 20:09 GMT
#1547
On September 05 2013 08:36 And G wrote:
It wasn't originally intended as such, but here's an experimental layout for a 4 player map with all spawns enabled:

+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]


Main-to-main distances are 64/67/74.
+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]


The probably decisive factor whether this map works is the layout of the alternative thirds between the mains for vertical spawns. Hopefully even Z won't find it too difficult to expand there as it doesn't require breaking down the rocks beforehand, and if T tries to snipe an early hatchery there while the rocks are still in place, it may be impossible to keep the hatchery alive, but without medivacs that army has no hope of retreat. Also, to take the shorter attack route when spawning horizontally, you need to take down both rocks first and then move through a choke overlooked by your opponent's main.

So... will this work?

I just noticed the images aren't up anymore so let me repost them:
+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]

+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]


Comments?
not a community mapmaker
Yonnua
Profile Blog Joined October 2011
United Kingdom2331 Posts
September 13 2013 16:20 GMT
#1548
On September 10 2013 01:21 Yonnua wrote:
Work in Progress:
+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]


[image loading]

+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]
LRSL 2014 Finalist! PartinG | Mvp | Bomber | Creator | NaNiwa | herO
NewSunshine
Profile Joined July 2011
United States5938 Posts
September 15 2013 05:53 GMT
#1549
just an aesthetic note - the way the cracks are textured all over the map bumps me, it comes across as highly unnatural, and not even in a BW kinda way, which could be cool, it just doesn't use a very effective transition. Looks like the rock was cracked, and then dropped onto the sand, which sort of doesn't happen in nature.
"If you find yourself feeling lost, take pride in the accuracy of your feelings." - Night Vale
And G
Profile Joined May 2012
Germany491 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-09-16 14:51:15
September 16 2013 13:47 GMT
#1550
[image loading]

[image loading]

Originally the small cliff islands were supposed to be unpathable but actually I think they might be more interesting if you could drop units there or micro your colossi or whatever. Those kinds of islands seem to have gone out of style, though; why is that? Should I make them unpathable?
not a community mapmaker
EatThePath
Profile Blog Joined September 2009
United States3943 Posts
September 16 2013 18:35 GMT
#1551
^ I think we don't see cliff islands much because most map layouts are too tightly designed. All the available space is used and there is no opportunity to put a cliff island into or next to an open area. Newkirk is an example of a map where they might have been cool to add but might have been unfair if that building clump next to the lowground 3rd was a pod where you could put tanks/colossus/etc. And that map doesn't actually have enough open space once tanks are up on cliffs around the middle. I think they work pretty well here though the way you have them arranged, and it's a cool map feature. Just not something that fits into an SC2 map very often.
Comprehensive strategic intention: DNE
And G
Profile Joined May 2012
Germany491 Posts
September 17 2013 05:33 GMT
#1552
Yes, Newkirk is the map I had in mind when wondering why we don't see that kind of islands anymore. Your explanation makes a lot of sense, though.

Anyway, I've found I like the Newkirk main/nat/third layout a lot, so here's another (somewhat more standard) attempt at a macro map based on that layout:

[image loading]

[image loading]

Which map was the first with that layout anyway? Was it Newkirk?
not a community mapmaker
Namrufus
Profile Blog Joined August 2011
United States396 Posts
September 20 2013 01:58 GMT
#1553
Made this thing:
+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]
dimensions: 144x136
nat2nat: ~47s
Third base tucked back, but you have to watch the rocks in front (and for drops)
Two watchtowers in the middle like that old Abyssal Caverns map
entrance into the nat maybe a bit too open (3 gateways)
probably going to make that middle exposed base on the low ground a full base
probably also going to reduce the size of that big pod near the mains

Is this reasonable?
This is it... the alpaca lips.
Meavis
Profile Blog Joined September 2011
Netherlands1300 Posts
September 20 2013 06:10 GMT
#1554
On September 20 2013 10:58 Namrufus wrote:
Made this thing:
+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]
dimensions: 144x136
nat2nat: ~47s
Third base tucked back, but you have to watch the rocks in front (and for drops)
Two watchtowers in the middle like that old Abyssal Caverns map
entrance into the nat maybe a bit too open (3 gateways)
probably going to make that middle exposed base on the low ground a full base
probably also going to reduce the size of that big pod near the mains

Is this reasonable?

yes, not fond of highground behind 3rd though, unless you plan filling that with doodads
"Not you."
RFDaemoniac
Profile Joined September 2011
United States544 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-09-20 07:52:53
September 20 2013 06:27 GMT
#1555
On September 20 2013 15:10 19Meavis93 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 20 2013 10:58 Namrufus wrote:
Made this thing:
+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]
dimensions: 144x136
nat2nat: ~47s
Third base tucked back, but you have to watch the rocks in front (and for drops)
Two watchtowers in the middle like that old Abyssal Caverns map
entrance into the nat maybe a bit too open (3 gateways)
probably going to make that middle exposed base on the low ground a full base
probably also going to reduce the size of that big pod near the mains

Is this reasonable?

yes, not fond of highground behind 3rd though, unless you plan filling that with doodads


Just make the low ground base in front of the main a full base like you were already considering so that it can be a zerg third. It's closer to the opponent but very open. Seems like something that would really change how a match was played without forcing anything too drastic, and would make that high ground behind the third less of an issue since P and T both have tools to deal with it.

EDIT: Maybe also move the ramp to the high ground fourth a little closer to the third so that it can be opened to run around and defend the high ground? It would also allow an attacker to threaten both the third and fourth simultaneously. I like that you have to either go through the third or up the tiny ramp in order to get into the natural. I expect this to provide some interesting forced engagements, particularly since that small ramp will stay open when most players wall at the choke just outside the natural mineral line.
Meavis
Profile Blog Joined September 2011
Netherlands1300 Posts
September 20 2013 15:34 GMT
#1556
current 2v2 wip
[image loading]
"Not you."
IeZaeL
Profile Joined July 2012
Italy991 Posts
September 21 2013 14:46 GMT
#1557
Some trash shit , let me know what you think.
[image loading]
Author of Coda and Eastwatch.
a176
Profile Blog Joined August 2009
Canada6688 Posts
September 21 2013 15:12 GMT
#1558
^^ not a bad concept
starleague forever
IeZaeL
Profile Joined July 2012
Italy991 Posts
September 21 2013 17:04 GMT
#1559
Some changes.

[image loading]

Author of Coda and Eastwatch.
Namrufus
Profile Blog Joined August 2011
United States396 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-09-22 15:31:50
September 22 2013 15:31 GMT
#1560
Thanks for the feedback!

yes, not fond of highground behind 3rd though, unless you plan filling that with doodads


The, high ground will be open - That base is supposed to be easy to defend by ground (small choke) but vulnerable to drops or stuff coming up the rocked ramps (so that is a good idea to keep some other stuff up front to keep an eye on the rocks).

Just make the low ground base in front of the main a full base like you were already considering so that it can be a zerg third. It's closer to the opponent but very open. Seems like something that would really change how a match was played without forcing anything too drastic, and would make that high ground behind the third less of an issue since P and T both have tools to deal with it.


Yeah, that's what I was thinking; I'll definitely make that a full base.

EDIT: Maybe also move the ramp to the high ground fourth a little closer to the third so that it can be opened to run around and defend the high ground? It would also allow an attacker to threaten both the third and fourth simultaneously. I like that you have to either go through the third or up the tiny ramp in order to get into the natural. I expect this to provide some interesting forced engagements, particularly since that small ramp will stay open when most players wall at the choke just outside the natural mineral line.


hmm, maybe, I'll try to mess around with the geometry over there.
This is it... the alpaca lips.
Prev 1 76 77 78 79 80 217 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
The PondCast
10:00
Episode 89
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Lowko271
SortOf 141
ProTech98
StarCraft: Brood War
Calm 4198
Sea 2810
Jaedong 1731
Bisu 1706
firebathero 614
Hyuk 483
Leta 397
Rush 283
EffOrt 252
actioN 228
[ Show more ]
Stork 224
Mini 181
Light 145
Pusan 130
Killer 123
Soulkey 109
ZerO 106
Snow 96
Aegong 90
Free 66
sorry 60
hero 54
Sharp 53
ToSsGirL 47
NaDa 44
Shinee 41
[sc1f]eonzerg 35
Backho 33
Sea.KH 29
ggaemo 29
JYJ 24
Barracks 23
scan(afreeca) 16
JulyZerg 16
Bale 15
ajuk12(nOOB) 13
Nal_rA 13
Icarus 12
NotJumperer 12
GoRush 11
IntoTheRainbow 8
HiyA 8
SilentControl 7
Dota 2
Gorgc907
XaKoH 607
febbydoto9
Counter-Strike
olofmeister4876
shoxiejesuss664
edward63
markeloff58
Other Games
singsing1742
Liquid`RaSZi744
B2W.Neo463
crisheroes242
Mew2King43
ZerO(Twitch)11
Organizations
Counter-Strike
PGL25613
Other Games
BasetradeTV498
StarCraft 2
WardiTV132
StarCraft: Brood War
lovetv 7
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• CranKy Ducklings SOOP3
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• iopq 1
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Jankos2501
Other Games
• WagamamaTV37
Upcoming Events
CranKy Ducklings
12h 40m
WardiTV Team League
23h 40m
Replay Cast
1d 12h
CranKy Ducklings
1d 22h
WardiTV Team League
1d 23h
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
2 days
BSL
2 days
n0maD vs perroflaco
TerrOr vs ZZZero
MadiNho vs WolFix
DragOn vs LancerX
Sparkling Tuna Cup
2 days
WardiTV Team League
2 days
OSC
3 days
[ Show More ]
BSL
3 days
Sterling vs Azhi_Dahaki
Napoleon vs Mazur
Jimin vs Nesh
spx vs Strudel
Replay Cast
3 days
Replay Cast
3 days
Wardi Open
3 days
GSL
5 days
Replay Cast
5 days
Kung Fu Cup
6 days
Replay Cast
6 days
The PondCast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Elite League 2026
RSL Revival: Season 4
NationLESS Cup

Ongoing

BSL Season 22
ASL Season 21
CSL 2026 SPRING (S20)
StarCraft2 Community Team League 2026 Spring
Nations Cup 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League S23 Finals
ESL Pro League S23 Stage 1&2
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026

Upcoming

Escore Tournament S2: W2
IPSL Spring 2026
Escore Tournament S2: W3
Acropolis #4
BSL 22 Non-Korean Championship
CSLAN 4
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
HSC XXIX
uThermal 2v2 2026 Main Event
RSL Revival: Season 5
WardiTV TLMC #16
IEM Cologne Major 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 2
CS Asia Championships 2026
Asian Champions League 2026
IEM Atlanta 2026
PGL Astana 2026
BLAST Rivals Spring 2026
CCT Season 3 Global Finals
IEM Rio 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.