EPTIf you want to hear my reads you could question me you know? But you didn't do that. You did not try to figure out my alignment and instead just threw shit on me.
TL Mafia LXIV: A Game of Intrigue - Page 53
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
justanothertownie
16342 Posts
If you want to hear my reads you could question me you know? But you didn't do that. You did not try to figure out my alignment and instead just threw shit on me. | ||
|
Aquanim
Australia2849 Posts
On January 12 2014 12:33 justanothertownie wrote: If we would be talking about a normal game you would probably be right. But this is a mayor game. If you want to hear my reads you could question me you know? But you didn't do that. You did not try to figure out my alignment and instead just threw shit on me. See, the thing is that if somebody accused me in the way that I just accused you, as a townie I would not have attacked them back. I would have thought "hey, they have a point. I should post my reads and convince them I have actually been thinking about the game." Also, just because this is a mayor-election day doesn't mean we shouldn't talk about who is scum. | ||
|
justanothertownie
16342 Posts
On January 12 2014 12:39 Aquanim wrote: See, the thing is that if somebody accused me in the way that I just accused you, as a townie I would not have attacked them back. I would have thought "hey, they have a point. I should post my reads and convince them I have actually been thinking about the game." Also, just because this is a mayor-election day doesn't mean we shouldn't talk about who is scum. The bolded is obviously true but it is of secondary importance to me right now. If someone who looked townie accused me I probably would have reacted that way. But it was you who did next to nothing himself and to me it looks really suspicious that my lack of public reads is the scummiest thing you found in this game. | ||
|
justanothertownie
16342 Posts
| ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
On January 12 2014 12:47 justanothertownie wrote: The bolded is obviously true but it is of secondary importance to me right now. If someone who looked townie accused me I probably would have reacted that way. But it was you who did next to nothing himself and to me it looks really suspicious that my lack of public reads is the scummiest thing you found in this game. what in your opinion is the scummiest thing in the game? | ||
|
Mocsta
Australia9389 Posts
Aquanim. Why the need to counter a derrida wagon before it gains momentum? Why not let it evolve organically.. I.e. let derrida speak for himself. Do you not find it odd he posts freely in one fame and struggles in the other? Exacerbated by a similar summary/list post to his scum opener. Why go to that effort and then spoiler it too.? Plus. Thrawn I'm disappointed I'm not on ya nice list. Haven't pm yam but even he put 2+2 together. Unless marv spoke to him. | ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
| ||
|
Aquanim
Australia2849 Posts
On January 12 2014 12:55 Mocsta wrote: Hmmmm Aquanim. Why the need to counter a derrida wagon before it gains momentum? Why not let it evolve organically.. I.e. let derrida speak for himself. Do you not find it odd he posts freely in one fame and struggles in the other? Exacerbated by a similar summary/list post to his scum opener. Why go to that effort and then spoiler it too.? Don't get me wrong, I still think Derrida has a lot to prove to us. He's given me no reason to think he's a townie yet. | ||
|
justanothertownie
16342 Posts
On January 12 2014 12:49 thrawn2112 wrote: what in your opinion is the scummiest thing in the game? Good question. I thought some things BH said were pretty scummy but that was probably wrong obviously... and call it OMGUS but I think Aquanims wishy washy stance on Derrida (he himself felt the need to answer the question about Derrida which was directed at everyone and then only came up with this inconclusive statement - why even say anything about it then?) + his attack against me is scummy too. If someone wants my opinion on something/someone just ask me. It's not hard... But I have to leave for real now. | ||
|
justanothertownie
16342 Posts
On January 12 2014 13:00 thrawn2112 wrote: Has anyone talked to JAT in pms? I have been recently and I got the impression that he was making up his reads on the spot. Explanations were short and there weren't many conclusions. He also only talked about people that I mentioned first, something I noticed about my own scum mason play (esp the rayn chat) from Time to Die. Does anyone have similar or contrasting experiences with him in pm's? Well the reason for this is probably that some of those reads were indeed formed on the spot. I did not think deeply about all of the persons on your list and had to think about what my actual opinion on some of them is. | ||
|
Aquanim
Australia2849 Posts
On January 12 2014 13:04 justanothertownie wrote: Good question. I thought some things BH said were pretty scummy but that was probably wrong obviously... and call it OMGUS but I think Aquanims wishy washy stance on Derrida (he himself felt the need to answer the question about Derrida which was directed at everyone and then only came up with this inconclusive statement - why even say anything about it then?) + his attack against me is scummy too. If someone wants my opinion on something/someone just ask me. It's not hard... But I have to leave for real now. DoctorH asked for opinions on Derrida - I gave mine, 1) to show that I'm thinking about the game and 2) as a starting point for discussion in which myself and others can try to convince one another that our view is correct (and hopefully reach the correct conclusion re. Derrida's alignment). At present I'm not certain what Derrida's alignment is - dunno why you'd expect me to be from the handful of posts he's made. If I had strong, certain reads on everybody the game would be easy. And it's not. You'll also have to try harder than that to make an argument why me pushing you for posting no reads is scummy. | ||
|
Mocsta
Australia9389 Posts
Bum pm me Went nowhere. Maybe he went to bed | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
DocH I am disappoint. After reading (most) of the thread, I can't even think of who the other actual candidates are. I'll vote for Wave. ##Vote: WaveofShadow | ||
|
Aquanim
Australia2849 Posts
On January 12 2014 13:52 VisceraEyes wrote: I buy it. DocH I am disappoint. After reading (most) of the thread, I can't even think of who the other actual candidates are. I'll vote for Wave. ##Vote: WaveofShadow Is there anything in particular you're buying? | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
| ||
|
Aquanim
Australia2849 Posts
On January 12 2014 13:54 VisceraEyes wrote: The mason claim. If Hopeless claims it's true, I'll roll with it for now. They'll either die in the night or we'll lynch one of them eventually to find out the truth. Can you see any reason why Blazinghand wouldn't want hopeless to confirm him? cos I got nothing On January 12 2014 10:58 Blazinghand wrote: Would it be okay for hopeless1 not to have to confirm me? that might be easier in terms of avoiding scum nk | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
| ||
|
Aquanim
Australia2849 Posts
Do you have an opinion regarding my suspicions of justanothertownie? | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
| ||
|
bumatlarge
United States4567 Posts
| ||
| ||
