EPTTL Mafia LXIV: A Game of Intrigue - Page 52
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
WaveofShadow
Canada31495 Posts
| ||
|
DoctorHelvetica
United States15034 Posts
| ||
|
DoctorHelvetica
United States15034 Posts
On January 12 2014 11:14 WaveofShadow wrote: People are welcome to comment on suchdoge as well since nobody has yet... talking about it in irc right now, will you get on irc i'd like to talk to you in particular actually. i have confidence that if you are town it will be productive | ||
|
WaveofShadow
Canada31495 Posts
On January 12 2014 11:13 yamato77 wrote: Or BC But he SHOULD play more soon. I have no doubt that BC is telling the truth as either alignment. Do you think he's scum yamato? | ||
|
WaveofShadow
Canada31495 Posts
On January 12 2014 11:15 DoctorHelvetica wrote: talking about it in irc right now, will you get on irc i'd like to talk to you in particular actually. i have confidence that if you are town it will be productive Don't have it on this computer. Give me a bit. | ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
| ||
|
Aquanim
Australia2849 Posts
On January 12 2014 11:08 DoctorHelvetica wrote: let's talk about how derrida is scum Yeah, OK. Reasons to think he's scum: list post, but that's a heuristic in which I have only limited confidence bases his mayoral preferences first on "enjoying reading their filter because it is srs" and second his read on them Reasons to think he's town: I got nuffin, but I do have... Reasons I'm not certain yet: he has like 2 posts and being a newbie his thinking about "is this relevant to whether they should be mayor or not" probably isn't expected to be entirely accurate whatever his alignment tl;dr I'm not certain he's scum but he's a reasonable guess P.S. will go meta him now re. Marv's statement | ||
|
DoctorHelvetica
United States15034 Posts
| ||
|
DoctorHelvetica
United States15034 Posts
On January 12 2014 11:16 Aquanim wrote: Yeah, OK. Reasons to think he's scum: list post, but that's a heuristic in which I have only limited confidence bases his mayoral preferences first on "enjoying reading their filter because it is srs" and second his read on them Reasons to think he's town: I got nuffin, but I do have... Reasons I'm not certain yet: he has like 2 posts and being a newbie his thinking about "is this relevant to whether they should be mayor or not" probably isn't expected to be entirely accurate whatever his alignment tl;dr I'm not certain he's scum but he's a reasonable guess P.S. will go meta him now re. Marv's statement do you have a stronger read on someone else then? | ||
|
Aquanim
Australia2849 Posts
On January 12 2014 11:17 DoctorHelvetica wrote: do you have a stronger read on someone else then? No. I have a couple of similar strength though. All I see in justanothertownie's two-page filter is kinda pointless oneliners in which he commits to almost nothing. For all I know he's doing work in PMs, but based on his thread presence so far he's another possible scum for me. This one isn't a scumread as such, but as long as Captain Obvious continues to post only "obvious" stuff and committing to nothing he's going to be next to impossible to read I think. And then there's the eight or so other lurkers. Of the active players I reckon at least most are town. | ||
|
Aquanim
Australia2849 Posts
| ||
|
Aquanim
Australia2849 Posts
| ||
|
justanothertownie
16322 Posts
On January 12 2014 11:35 Aquanim wrote: No. I have a couple of similar strength though. All I see in justanothertownie's two-page filter is kinda pointless oneliners in which he commits to almost nothing. For all I know he's doing work in PMs, but based on his thread presence so far he's another possible scum for me. This one isn't a scumread as such, but as long as Captain Obvious continues to post only "obvious" stuff and committing to nothing he's going to be next to impossible to read I think. And then there's the eight or so other lurkers. Of the active players I reckon at least most are town. Maybe you could point out the scummy things in my 2 page filter then? Or is my thread presence the only reason for your read? You don't even have one filter page and call other people lurkers... | ||
|
Aquanim
Australia2849 Posts
On January 12 2014 11:43 justanothertownie wrote: Maybe you could point out the scummy things in my 2 page filter then? Or is my thread presence the only reason for your read? You don't even have one filter page and call other people lurkers... I already did. Your filter may be longer than mine but you haven't contributed a single read to the thread. And yes, I'm aware with my filter length calling people out for lurking is a shade hypocritical. I have two answers: 1) I'm pretty sure there's at least half a dozen people with filters shorter than mine 2) Just because I'm a hypocrite doesn't make it any less true. Deal with it. | ||
|
justanothertownie
16322 Posts
Who do you want to elect? | ||
|
justanothertownie
16322 Posts
| ||
|
Aquanim
Australia2849 Posts
On January 12 2014 12:06 justanothertownie wrote: I mean did you ever talk about that? Skimming through your filter I just saw your "maybe scummy maybe not" read on Derrida and your baseless attack against me. Until a mayoral aspirant actually says "I want to lynch X" I don't have a whole lot to pick and choose between them. In answer to your question though... I'd prefer yamato over rayn since while I reckon they're both probably town I get along with yamato better. DocH apparently doesn't want the job now, but if he did I could live with that too. (He's also town.) What exactly do you mean by "baseless attack"? Do you contest my statement that you've provided no reads and committed to basically no positions, or do you contest that that makes you likely scum? | ||
|
justanothertownie
16322 Posts
| ||
|
Aquanim
Australia2849 Posts
On January 12 2014 12:15 justanothertownie wrote: I contest that it makes me scum and if you are primarily looking for scum then I am surprised you didn't find anything better if you are town. Let me get this straight. You're saying that if I find somebody who in one and a half pages of filter hasn't given a read on anybody, meaning that they've made no committments that their future play will have to be consistent with, that isn't a good reason to have a scumread on them? Is this seriously the argument which you are making? | ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
| ||
| ||
