|
On December 18 2012 00:04 Djodref wrote:Show nested quote +On December 18 2012 00:00 Djodref wrote:On December 17 2012 23:39 Mr. Cheesecake wrote: @Djo
Curious, who's you're top scummer read apart from Eywa? Have your opinions on the people you made cases on changed at all since the lynch? @ CheesecakeI'll keep this for before the deadline. I have one other strong scum read apart from Eywa. Still wary of Jx and MrZ, but I way more confident on Eywa and the other guy. By the way, what do you make of thrawn right now ?
Oh believe you me, I still think he's scum. My entire case beforehand make sense, and he just calls it bad and never defends or responds to it. Also, he thought I was scum and voted for me D1 but somehow left me out of his scumreads tonight.
|
On December 17 2012 23:57 Mr. Cheesecake wrote: Eywa,
Please, for God's sake if you're actually town, stop being an inconsiderate, blind, confirmation-biased asshole. If town, you're not playing to your win condition. You're just flailing your arms around like a complete buffoon.
Seriously. Make a decent case on Hapa or myself or Djo --- Convince people if you really don't want to be lynched today. If you're scum, keep doing what you're doing. The goal is not to not be lynched, the goal is to catch the scum. So I will be making a case on you guys, however, I'm not releasing it for at least another 24 hours.
|
I'm really interested in seeing these cases on me rofl. Lurked most of D1 cus irl, gave thrawn case, lynched scummy lurker because it's better than no-lynch, buddied Hapa because he's sexy and makes sense.
Gogogo make cases on me gogogo
|
On December 18 2012 00:09 Mr. Cheesecake wrote: I'm really interested in seeing these cases on me rofl. Lurked most of D1 cus irl, gave thrawn case, lynched scummy lurker because it's better than no-lynch, buddied Hapa because he's sexy and makes sense.
Gogogo make cases on me gogogo It seems like you just made a case against yourself... Short, but there's a lot of content you can read into there.
|
On December 18 2012 00:22 Eywa- wrote:Show nested quote +On December 18 2012 00:09 Mr. Cheesecake wrote: I'm really interested in seeing these cases on me rofl. Lurked most of D1 cus irl, gave thrawn case, lynched scummy lurker because it's better than no-lynch, buddied Hapa because he's sexy and makes sense.
Gogogo make cases on me gogogo It seems like you just made a case against yourself... Short, but there's a lot of content you can read into there.
If that's the stuff in the case against me, lol.
|
On December 18 2012 00:26 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:Show nested quote +On December 18 2012 00:22 Eywa- wrote:On December 18 2012 00:09 Mr. Cheesecake wrote: I'm really interested in seeing these cases on me rofl. Lurked most of D1 cus irl, gave thrawn case, lynched scummy lurker because it's better than no-lynch, buddied Hapa because he's sexy and makes sense.
Gogogo make cases on me gogogo It seems like you just made a case against yourself... Short, but there's a lot of content you can read into there. If that's the stuff in the case against me, lol. How many townies are actively trying to make alliances?
|
On December 18 2012 00:28 Eywa- wrote:Show nested quote +On December 18 2012 00:26 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:On December 18 2012 00:22 Eywa- wrote:On December 18 2012 00:09 Mr. Cheesecake wrote: I'm really interested in seeing these cases on me rofl. Lurked most of D1 cus irl, gave thrawn case, lynched scummy lurker because it's better than no-lynch, buddied Hapa because he's sexy and makes sense.
Gogogo make cases on me gogogo It seems like you just made a case against yourself... Short, but there's a lot of content you can read into there. If that's the stuff in the case against me, lol. How many townies are actively trying to make alliances?
Actively making alliances? Not so much, that's an exaggeration.
I always buddy someone.
Last game it was Kick, game before that it was SDM, game before that Debears to an extent. I buddy up with people I feel are townie and make sense.
If you're entire case is based on me enjoying the company of sir Hapa, then you're terribly scum or terribly bad.
|
On December 18 2012 00:32 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:Show nested quote +On December 18 2012 00:28 Eywa- wrote:On December 18 2012 00:26 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:On December 18 2012 00:22 Eywa- wrote:On December 18 2012 00:09 Mr. Cheesecake wrote: I'm really interested in seeing these cases on me rofl. Lurked most of D1 cus irl, gave thrawn case, lynched scummy lurker because it's better than no-lynch, buddied Hapa because he's sexy and makes sense.
Gogogo make cases on me gogogo It seems like you just made a case against yourself... Short, but there's a lot of content you can read into there. If that's the stuff in the case against me, lol. How many townies are actively trying to make alliances? Actively making alliances? Not so much, that's an exaggeration. I always buddy someone. Last game it was Kick, game before that it was SDM, game before that Debears to an extent. I buddy up with people I feel are townie and make sense. If you're entire case is based on me enjoying the company of sir Hapa, then you're terribly scum or terribly bad. Oh I haven't written up a case yet, I'm just pointing out that your description of your play doesn't make you seem any more innocent.
|
On December 17 2012 22:37 Hapahauli wrote:@JieXianWhere did you run off to? I asked you a question, and I expect responses for these things: @ EywaYou throwing around names without reasoning isn't doing town any good. Explain why you think Mr. CC and Djo are scum. You've given zero rationale for it.
Firstly, YOU're the one who has been avoiding my questions
On December 17 2012 02:34 JieXian wrote: DAT hapa and thrawn silence
On December 17 2012 03:37 JieXian wrote:Show nested quote +On December 16 2012 23:53 JieXian wrote:On December 16 2012 16:55 Hapahauli wrote: Speaking of the lynch, at this point I'm less interested in seeing you go after MrZ, and more interested in you read-dumping. The reads you've provided so far are pretty... non-controversial. For now the burning question is: What the hell are you contradicting yourself that badly? I made the most controversial post here and instantly got 4-5 votes on me. You yourself thought my reads were terrible let me leave this before i go
__________
and to answer the question, I've been getting everyone to NOT to vote for morbid DESPITE it being my life saver
On December 17 2012 05:42 JieXian wrote:shit it was about the acoltye = townie not a scumslip thing morbid is a bad idea I'm down for a mrcc lynch Show nested quote +On December 17 2012 03:54 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:On December 17 2012 03:49 JieXian wrote:On December 17 2012 01:22 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:Hey guys, shenanigans here being sorted out. I'm down for a Thrawn lynch, he's a sheeping scummy dude right meow. Thrawn is an Opportunist + Show Spoiler +On December 15 2012 11:11 thrawn2112 wrote:ok ##Vote DjodrefShow nested quote +On December 15 2012 10:26 Djodref wrote: Other than that, I would like everybody to give a little hindsight of their game experience, especially newbies, if there are some.
what kind of information are you looking for? Sheep on Djodref vote, hardcore. No explanation, just does it. Also, the question he asks is self-explanatory. On December 15 2012 12:13 thrawn2112 wrote: I didn't th9nk hapa's case was super good but dp's reaction to it seems insane Slightly discredits Hapa's case, and takes the opportunity to acknowledge that DP looks scummy after an OMGUS vote (duh). He then unvotes to keep his options open. When Hapa makes his more fortified case, he suddenly believes it's some god-given scumhunting then votes for DP. Wait, What's this?On December 15 2012 12:17 thrawn2112 wrote: dp I don't think it's fair to accuse djo based on setup speculation meta because of 2 reasons
1. start of the game and everyone is lurking 2. this game doesn't have standard mechanics
Didn't Thrawn V OTE for Djo based on this exact thing? He was being obsessed with blue roles / witchhunter and Thrawn sheeped the vote, supposedly because of this. Now he thinks it's not fair to accuse him? On December 16 2012 10:17 thrawn2112 wrote: oh sniped on the random lurker vote lol, sounds fun
##unvote ##Vote: Mr Cheesecake
pie is better and all you mo-fos need to start posting
Sheeps onto lurker vote opportunity. Underlined = scummiest shit ever townies like cheesecake over pie. On December 16 2012 11:38 thrawn2112 wrote: ok here's what I probably mean about kush...
you mention his terrible ideas... yes the things he's said he'll do this game have been crazy, but that's his meta right? this game however, it seems like they are intentionally dumb. scum kush says crazier things than town kush.
he said he's not going to lynch me no matter what... is that a joke? an actual plan? the problem is I couldn't really tell.... it's so different from town oriented thinking I don't know what to make of it. the only reason I have to suspect that town kush could possibly have said that is because he's lynched me over and over for the same reasons and I keep flipping town. PROBABLY mean? What? How do you probably mean something...? Town mean things genuinely, scum try to emulate they are meaning something. The rest of this post is garbage--he comes to no read on Kush at all, just flip-flops between the possibility of town kush not wanting to lynch him and the alternative scum motivation. Above all, Thrawn doesn't seem to care who is lynched:On December 15 2012 11:52 thrawn2112 wrote: this conversation between the few of us is getting very tiresome
i'll lynch lurkers
LURKERS
i will happily lynch you Okay so he wants to lynch a lurker. By all means, a viable strategy considering the circumstance. But he also wants to lynch Djo, JX, DP... I'm confused. I don't see strong scum reads from him other than on JX due to obvious scumslips. He is sheeping a ton and doesn't seem too caring of who he wants to get lynched. Just look at this flip-floppiness between lurker lynching and lynching his top scumread.On December 16 2012 20:05 thrawn2112 wrote: I suggest all town people be around during the lynch if (when?) we decide to lynch a rando lurker Maybe we could lynch a lurker! That sounds like a good idea! On December 16 2012 20:41 thrawn2112 wrote: i still really really like it But I still really really like a JX lynch! On December 16 2012 20:42 thrawn2112 wrote: but who knows, perhaps some lurker will die instead But maybe we could lynch a lurker! I'm all for that! Why is Thrawn so indecisive?On December 16 2012 14:04 thrawn2112 wrote:Show nested quote +On December 16 2012 01:06 JieXian wrote: I was out the whole day man relax. You guys didn't understand my post.
I found what Dp and hapa was saying to be weird BUT I changed my mind as I kept on reading the thread (notice how those 2 points were quite early on)
no this is a lie Show nested quote +On December 15 2012 14:47 JieXian wrote:Hi and sorry I'm late, I'm at +8GMT and I didn't wake up as early as DarthPunk At first I was really confused (scummy read) about hapa's mindless babbling about 13-3, which ISN'T RELEVANT to anything at all because you can't change anything except stir the discussion towards the wrong direction. but i think he's town because xLater I got a stronger read from DP from his ridiculous "pressuring" above all for a point that's completely moot. but now i think he's town because xDjo why did you vote for Mr Zentor But above all there's Mr Zentor's relative non-chalance to everything seems to trump everything else as doesn't seem to give a damn to anything as townies are well on their way to lynching one another ##Vote MrZentor the red parts are what I just now added to the 2nd post that would make the 1st post true. I bolded "but above all" because that implies you still hold your suspicions about hapa/dp. J scum-slipped hard, he lied about the scumslip, he's a lurker... and he's scum He states JX is scum. THEN WHY IS HE KEEPING HIS OPTIONS OPEN LIKE THIS? Town Thrawn would want to push this JX lynch into the ground, not be ready to jump off the wagon at the last minute to lynch a lurker. Thrawn's general posting in context of the thread seems very opportunistic. The way he jumps on JX's vote post of Mr.Z is just that, scum trying to find easy things to tackle people on. I have no clue, if town, why he's willing to lynch a lurker right now if he's set on JX being scum. ##Vote: Thrawn On December 17 2012 02:51 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:On December 17 2012 02:50 kushm4sta wrote: we really need a vote count... We only have 3 hours left... people should not be discussing anything but the lynch. Who are teh viable lynches at this point? Is anyone adverse to lynching a lurker? Yes we need a vote count. I want to lynch Thrawn but I don't think anyone is biting atm... Who'd you have in mind for lurkers? On December 17 2012 02:52 JieXian wrote:
read my filter please, I'm still waiting for his reply On December 17 2012 02:57 Mr. Cheesecake wrote: JX, that post wasn't even directed towards / had anything to do with you. So you posted your long wall of text case against thrawn for shits and giggles? I get it Jx, you're really paranoid. If I could lynch thrawn I would. But apparently everyone wants you dead, and I can see why. WHY ARENT YOU LYNCHING THRAWN NOW THEN?
On December 17 2012 05:55 JieXian wrote:Show nested quote +On December 17 2012 05:52 Djodref wrote:On December 17 2012 05:47 MrZentor wrote: Djo, read through Morbidiu's filter.
Then look through each of the cases against him.
Then read through Threesr's filter.
THERE IS NOTHING SCUMMY IN HIS FILTER.
We shouldn't be lynching a lurking town instead of an active scum.
If you want to lynch Threesr instead of Morb, list some reasons for why Threesr is scum, and Morb is town.
And if you can't find any reasons for why Threesr is scum, but still want to lynch him, that means you are lynching him solely on the fact that he is a lurker, and lynching a lurker should always be a last resort, when you can't find any scum..
lol Coming just before the deadline to drop his vote on the latest bandwagon is fucking scummy in my book. For mordi, I don't like his opening post and the way he reacted drazak's vote. But I like the fact that he is going after you. You made nothing to make me think that you are town. if you have to drop a vote for someone other than morbid, it should be mrz. I'll gladly join
On December 17 2012 05:58 JieXian wrote:Show nested quote +On December 17 2012 05:54 Mr. Cheesecake wrote: Lol JX, what reason do you have to vote thrawn? Also, didn't you think I was scum? Why would you agree with me. You seriously should have read my filter wth I'm trying to swing the vote away from morbidshit
On December 17 2012 05:35 JieXian wrote:Show nested quote +On December 17 2012 04:45 DarthPunk wrote:On December 17 2012 04:29 Morbidius wrote:On December 17 2012 04:16 MrZentor wrote: Kush, I'd rather lynch scum than a lurker.
We should kill Morbidius. Hmm i made some light accusations against you and now you're full on calling me scum? That's quite the overeaction,which certainly doesn't help your case. I already had in mind the fact that you're either very noob town or noobish mafia. Either way a flip is worth more than you.##unvote ##vote MrZentor The bolded part is incredibly scummy. Hedges bets, says he is a good lynch regardless of alignment. But is not policy lynching. ? He's been consistent in being against MrZ the whole game
Town Hapa can't possibly screw up his logic that badly
STRING HIM UP
and I supposedly "lurk" at times (don't even try to jump on this as a scumslip) because I have real life things to do too. I was at the gym, and I was at work earlier in the day
|
On December 18 2012 00:06 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:Show nested quote +On December 18 2012 00:04 Djodref wrote:On December 18 2012 00:00 Djodref wrote:On December 17 2012 23:39 Mr. Cheesecake wrote: @Djo
Curious, who's you're top scummer read apart from Eywa? Have your opinions on the people you made cases on changed at all since the lynch? @ CheesecakeI'll keep this for before the deadline. I have one other strong scum read apart from Eywa. Still wary of Jx and MrZ, but I way more confident on Eywa and the other guy. By the way, what do you make of thrawn right now ? Oh believe you me, I still think he's scum. My entire case beforehand make sense, and he just calls it bad and never defends or responds to it. Also, he thought I was scum and voted for me D1 but somehow left me out of his scumreads tonight.
@ Cheesecake
I agree with you that thrawn has been sheeping from time to time. But he was also the first to see JX slip (or scumslip). He also is quite reasonable and is doing stuff here and there, he is quite laid back also, so, yeah, I don't agree with you. But I've been playing with him and also reading him more than you.
Did you read the Mario Mini Mafia ? You can read just D1 if you want (lol) The link is in my filter, thrawn was scum with Hapa in this game.
The only thing we know about scum thrawn is that he lurks and doesn't engaged himself.
Tell me what you think after reading this game, would you ?
|
@ JX
How much are you familiar with Hapa play ?
"Town Hapa can't possibly screw up his logic that badly"
What logic are you talking about ? I told you that the fact that you are consistent doesn't make you town.
Town players don't know about any other players alignment. So it's natural for them to change their minds Because they have no fucking idea who is who...
|
On December 17 2012 05:45 Mr. Cheesecake wrote: If I could lynch thrawn I would. But apparently everyone wants you dead, and I can see why.
On December 17 2012 06:02 JieXian wrote:Show nested quote +On December 17 2012 05:58 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:On December 17 2012 05:58 JieXian wrote:On December 17 2012 05:54 Mr. Cheesecake wrote: Lol JX, what reason do you have to vote thrawn? Also, didn't you think I was scum? Why would you agree with me. You seriously should have read my filter wth I'm trying to swing the vote away from morbid shit And onto any other random ass person? Rofl. well you did post a case against the random ass person
On December 17 2012 05:53 JieXian wrote:Show nested quote +On December 17 2012 05:45 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:On December 17 2012 05:42 JieXian wrote:shit it was about the acoltye = townie not a scumslip thing morbid is a bad idea I'm down for a mrcc lynch On December 17 2012 03:54 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:On December 17 2012 03:49 JieXian wrote:On December 17 2012 01:22 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:Hey guys, shenanigans here being sorted out. I'm down for a Thrawn lynch, he's a sheeping scummy dude right meow. Thrawn is an Opportunist + Show Spoiler +On December 15 2012 11:11 thrawn2112 wrote:ok ##Vote DjodrefShow nested quote +On December 15 2012 10:26 Djodref wrote: Other than that, I would like everybody to give a little hindsight of their game experience, especially newbies, if there are some.
what kind of information are you looking for? Sheep on Djodref vote, hardcore. No explanation, just does it. Also, the question he asks is self-explanatory. On December 15 2012 12:13 thrawn2112 wrote: I didn't th9nk hapa's case was super good but dp's reaction to it seems insane Slightly discredits Hapa's case, and takes the opportunity to acknowledge that DP looks scummy after an OMGUS vote (duh). He then unvotes to keep his options open. When Hapa makes his more fortified case, he suddenly believes it's some god-given scumhunting then votes for DP. Wait, What's this?On December 15 2012 12:17 thrawn2112 wrote: dp I don't think it's fair to accuse djo based on setup speculation meta because of 2 reasons
1. start of the game and everyone is lurking 2. this game doesn't have standard mechanics
Didn't Thrawn V OTE for Djo based on this exact thing? He was being obsessed with blue roles / witchhunter and Thrawn sheeped the vote, supposedly because of this. Now he thinks it's not fair to accuse him? On December 16 2012 10:17 thrawn2112 wrote: oh sniped on the random lurker vote lol, sounds fun
##unvote ##Vote: Mr Cheesecake
pie is better and all you mo-fos need to start posting
Sheeps onto lurker vote opportunity. Underlined = scummiest shit ever townies like cheesecake over pie. On December 16 2012 11:38 thrawn2112 wrote: ok here's what I probably mean about kush...
you mention his terrible ideas... yes the things he's said he'll do this game have been crazy, but that's his meta right? this game however, it seems like they are intentionally dumb. scum kush says crazier things than town kush.
he said he's not going to lynch me no matter what... is that a joke? an actual plan? the problem is I couldn't really tell.... it's so different from town oriented thinking I don't know what to make of it. the only reason I have to suspect that town kush could possibly have said that is because he's lynched me over and over for the same reasons and I keep flipping town. PROBABLY mean? What? How do you probably mean something...? Town mean things genuinely, scum try to emulate they are meaning something. The rest of this post is garbage--he comes to no read on Kush at all, just flip-flops between the possibility of town kush not wanting to lynch him and the alternative scum motivation. Above all, Thrawn doesn't seem to care who is lynched:On December 15 2012 11:52 thrawn2112 wrote: this conversation between the few of us is getting very tiresome
i'll lynch lurkers
LURKERS
i will happily lynch you Okay so he wants to lynch a lurker. By all means, a viable strategy considering the circumstance. But he also wants to lynch Djo, JX, DP... I'm confused. I don't see strong scum reads from him other than on JX due to obvious scumslips. He is sheeping a ton and doesn't seem too caring of who he wants to get lynched. Just look at this flip-floppiness between lurker lynching and lynching his top scumread.On December 16 2012 20:05 thrawn2112 wrote: I suggest all town people be around during the lynch if (when?) we decide to lynch a rando lurker Maybe we could lynch a lurker! That sounds like a good idea! On December 16 2012 20:41 thrawn2112 wrote: i still really really like it But I still really really like a JX lynch! On December 16 2012 20:42 thrawn2112 wrote: but who knows, perhaps some lurker will die instead But maybe we could lynch a lurker! I'm all for that! Why is Thrawn so indecisive?On December 16 2012 14:04 thrawn2112 wrote:Show nested quote +On December 16 2012 01:06 JieXian wrote: I was out the whole day man relax. You guys didn't understand my post.
I found what Dp and hapa was saying to be weird BUT I changed my mind as I kept on reading the thread (notice how those 2 points were quite early on)
no this is a lie Show nested quote +On December 15 2012 14:47 JieXian wrote:Hi and sorry I'm late, I'm at +8GMT and I didn't wake up as early as DarthPunk At first I was really confused (scummy read) about hapa's mindless babbling about 13-3, which ISN'T RELEVANT to anything at all because you can't change anything except stir the discussion towards the wrong direction. but i think he's town because xLater I got a stronger read from DP from his ridiculous "pressuring" above all for a point that's completely moot. but now i think he's town because xDjo why did you vote for Mr Zentor But above all there's Mr Zentor's relative non-chalance to everything seems to trump everything else as doesn't seem to give a damn to anything as townies are well on their way to lynching one another ##Vote MrZentor the red parts are what I just now added to the 2nd post that would make the 1st post true. I bolded "but above all" because that implies you still hold your suspicions about hapa/dp. J scum-slipped hard, he lied about the scumslip, he's a lurker... and he's scum He states JX is scum. THEN WHY IS HE KEEPING HIS OPTIONS OPEN LIKE THIS? Town Thrawn would want to push this JX lynch into the ground, not be ready to jump off the wagon at the last minute to lynch a lurker. Thrawn's general posting in context of the thread seems very opportunistic. The way he jumps on JX's vote post of Mr.Z is just that, scum trying to find easy things to tackle people on. I have no clue, if town, why he's willing to lynch a lurker right now if he's set on JX being scum. ##Vote: Thrawn On December 17 2012 02:51 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:On December 17 2012 02:50 kushm4sta wrote: we really need a vote count... We only have 3 hours left... people should not be discussing anything but the lynch. Who are teh viable lynches at this point? Is anyone adverse to lynching a lurker? Yes we need a vote count. I want to lynch Thrawn but I don't think anyone is biting atm... Who'd you have in mind for lurkers? On December 17 2012 02:52 JieXian wrote:
read my filter please, I'm still waiting for his reply On December 17 2012 02:57 Mr. Cheesecake wrote: JX, that post wasn't even directed towards / had anything to do with you. So you posted your long wall of text case against thrawn for shits and giggles? I get it Jx, you're really paranoid. If I could lynch thrawn I would. But apparently everyone wants you dead, and I can see why. WHY ARENT YOU LYNCHING THRAWN NOW THEN? BECAUSE NOBODY ELSE WANTS TO BRO, WHAT U WANT FROM ME. If anyone else wants to vote thrawn, please do so. Ok join me #Vote thrawn2122
Mrcc care to explain all that?
Makes a case on thrawn -> drops it -> I push it -> claims he's not talking to me -> said he'd lynch thrawn -> calls him a random ass person
HELLO?
|
On December 18 2012 00:47 JieXian wrote:Show nested quote +On December 17 2012 05:45 Mr. Cheesecake wrote: If I could lynch thrawn I would. But apparently everyone wants you dead, and I can see why. Show nested quote +On December 17 2012 06:02 JieXian wrote:On December 17 2012 05:58 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:On December 17 2012 05:58 JieXian wrote:On December 17 2012 05:54 Mr. Cheesecake wrote: Lol JX, what reason do you have to vote thrawn? Also, didn't you think I was scum? Why would you agree with me. You seriously should have read my filter wth I'm trying to swing the vote away from morbid shit And onto any other random ass person? Rofl. well you did post a case against the random ass person Show nested quote +On December 17 2012 05:53 JieXian wrote:On December 17 2012 05:45 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:On December 17 2012 05:42 JieXian wrote:shit it was about the acoltye = townie not a scumslip thing morbid is a bad idea I'm down for a mrcc lynch On December 17 2012 03:54 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:On December 17 2012 03:49 JieXian wrote:On December 17 2012 01:22 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:Hey guys, shenanigans here being sorted out. I'm down for a Thrawn lynch, he's a sheeping scummy dude right meow. Thrawn is an Opportunist + Show Spoiler +On December 15 2012 11:11 thrawn2112 wrote:ok ##Vote DjodrefShow nested quote +On December 15 2012 10:26 Djodref wrote: Other than that, I would like everybody to give a little hindsight of their game experience, especially newbies, if there are some.
what kind of information are you looking for? Sheep on Djodref vote, hardcore. No explanation, just does it. Also, the question he asks is self-explanatory. On December 15 2012 12:13 thrawn2112 wrote: I didn't th9nk hapa's case was super good but dp's reaction to it seems insane Slightly discredits Hapa's case, and takes the opportunity to acknowledge that DP looks scummy after an OMGUS vote (duh). He then unvotes to keep his options open. When Hapa makes his more fortified case, he suddenly believes it's some god-given scumhunting then votes for DP. Wait, What's this?On December 15 2012 12:17 thrawn2112 wrote: dp I don't think it's fair to accuse djo based on setup speculation meta because of 2 reasons
1. start of the game and everyone is lurking 2. this game doesn't have standard mechanics
Didn't Thrawn V OTE for Djo based on this exact thing? He was being obsessed with blue roles / witchhunter and Thrawn sheeped the vote, supposedly because of this. Now he thinks it's not fair to accuse him? On December 16 2012 10:17 thrawn2112 wrote: oh sniped on the random lurker vote lol, sounds fun
##unvote ##Vote: Mr Cheesecake
pie is better and all you mo-fos need to start posting
Sheeps onto lurker vote opportunity. Underlined = scummiest shit ever townies like cheesecake over pie. On December 16 2012 11:38 thrawn2112 wrote: ok here's what I probably mean about kush...
you mention his terrible ideas... yes the things he's said he'll do this game have been crazy, but that's his meta right? this game however, it seems like they are intentionally dumb. scum kush says crazier things than town kush.
he said he's not going to lynch me no matter what... is that a joke? an actual plan? the problem is I couldn't really tell.... it's so different from town oriented thinking I don't know what to make of it. the only reason I have to suspect that town kush could possibly have said that is because he's lynched me over and over for the same reasons and I keep flipping town. PROBABLY mean? What? How do you probably mean something...? Town mean things genuinely, scum try to emulate they are meaning something. The rest of this post is garbage--he comes to no read on Kush at all, just flip-flops between the possibility of town kush not wanting to lynch him and the alternative scum motivation. Above all, Thrawn doesn't seem to care who is lynched:On December 15 2012 11:52 thrawn2112 wrote: this conversation between the few of us is getting very tiresome
i'll lynch lurkers
LURKERS
i will happily lynch you Okay so he wants to lynch a lurker. By all means, a viable strategy considering the circumstance. But he also wants to lynch Djo, JX, DP... I'm confused. I don't see strong scum reads from him other than on JX due to obvious scumslips. He is sheeping a ton and doesn't seem too caring of who he wants to get lynched. Just look at this flip-floppiness between lurker lynching and lynching his top scumread.On December 16 2012 20:05 thrawn2112 wrote: I suggest all town people be around during the lynch if (when?) we decide to lynch a rando lurker Maybe we could lynch a lurker! That sounds like a good idea! On December 16 2012 20:41 thrawn2112 wrote: i still really really like it But I still really really like a JX lynch! On December 16 2012 20:42 thrawn2112 wrote: but who knows, perhaps some lurker will die instead But maybe we could lynch a lurker! I'm all for that! Why is Thrawn so indecisive?On December 16 2012 14:04 thrawn2112 wrote:Show nested quote +On December 16 2012 01:06 JieXian wrote: I was out the whole day man relax. You guys didn't understand my post.
I found what Dp and hapa was saying to be weird BUT I changed my mind as I kept on reading the thread (notice how those 2 points were quite early on)
no this is a lie Show nested quote +On December 15 2012 14:47 JieXian wrote:Hi and sorry I'm late, I'm at +8GMT and I didn't wake up as early as DarthPunk At first I was really confused (scummy read) about hapa's mindless babbling about 13-3, which ISN'T RELEVANT to anything at all because you can't change anything except stir the discussion towards the wrong direction. but i think he's town because xLater I got a stronger read from DP from his ridiculous "pressuring" above all for a point that's completely moot. but now i think he's town because xDjo why did you vote for Mr Zentor But above all there's Mr Zentor's relative non-chalance to everything seems to trump everything else as doesn't seem to give a damn to anything as townies are well on their way to lynching one another ##Vote MrZentor the red parts are what I just now added to the 2nd post that would make the 1st post true. I bolded "but above all" because that implies you still hold your suspicions about hapa/dp. J scum-slipped hard, he lied about the scumslip, he's a lurker... and he's scum He states JX is scum. THEN WHY IS HE KEEPING HIS OPTIONS OPEN LIKE THIS? Town Thrawn would want to push this JX lynch into the ground, not be ready to jump off the wagon at the last minute to lynch a lurker. Thrawn's general posting in context of the thread seems very opportunistic. The way he jumps on JX's vote post of Mr.Z is just that, scum trying to find easy things to tackle people on. I have no clue, if town, why he's willing to lynch a lurker right now if he's set on JX being scum. ##Vote: Thrawn On December 17 2012 02:51 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:On December 17 2012 02:50 kushm4sta wrote: we really need a vote count... We only have 3 hours left... people should not be discussing anything but the lynch. Who are teh viable lynches at this point? Is anyone adverse to lynching a lurker? Yes we need a vote count. I want to lynch Thrawn but I don't think anyone is biting atm... Who'd you have in mind for lurkers? On December 17 2012 02:52 JieXian wrote:
read my filter please, I'm still waiting for his reply On December 17 2012 02:57 Mr. Cheesecake wrote: JX, that post wasn't even directed towards / had anything to do with you. So you posted your long wall of text case against thrawn for shits and giggles? I get it Jx, you're really paranoid. If I could lynch thrawn I would. But apparently everyone wants you dead, and I can see why. WHY ARENT YOU LYNCHING THRAWN NOW THEN? BECAUSE NOBODY ELSE WANTS TO BRO, WHAT U WANT FROM ME. If anyone else wants to vote thrawn, please do so. Ok join me #Vote thrawn2122 Mrcc care to explain all that? Makes a case on thrawn -> drops it -> I push it -> claims he's not talking to me -> said he'd lynch thrawn -> calls him a random ass person HELLO?
I made a case on thrawn. I dropped it because nobody else wanted to lynch him. Getting 6 other votes onto him would have been impossible. You "push it".. that's one vote. I get my vote off Morb and risk a no-lynch. I want to lynch somebody and not nobody.
I called him a random ass person because you have no reason to vote him, I do.
|
On December 18 2012 00:46 Djodref wrote: @ JX
How much are you familiar with Hapa play ?
"Town Hapa can't possibly screw up his logic that badly"
What logic are you talking about ? I told you that the fact that you are consistent doesn't make you town.
Town players don't know about any other players alignment. So it's natural for them to change their minds Because they have no fucking idea who is who...
read my case and don't base your judgement on your philosophy on consistency
town hapa was tunneling on hopeless on d1 while jingle and I were dying to swing the vote onto someone else
you people have been voting based on 1 thing
jx - scumslip morbid - scumslip eywa - scumslip
read the dam case
|
@Djo
Not a fan of meta cases, never have been.
His play looks scummy to me, and I don't think you can deny that. He didn't look like he cared who was going to get lynched mid-day and totally forgot he thought I was scum.
|
On December 17 2012 22:29 Eywa- wrote:Show nested quote +On December 17 2012 22:27 Hapahauli wrote:On December 17 2012 22:24 Eywa- wrote: Hmmm... Since most people seem to think hapa and cheeseboard are town, why don't we meet in the middle and kill djodref.. Who, if you two are both innocent has a very high probability of being scum. Backing down all of a sudden are we? Putting it on the back burner... It'll come back if I'm still alive tomorrow or if enough people agree today (which seems unlikely).
On December 18 2012 00:06 Eywa- wrote:Show nested quote +On December 17 2012 23:57 Mr. Cheesecake wrote: Eywa,
Please, for God's sake if you're actually town, stop being an inconsiderate, blind, confirmation-biased asshole. If town, you're not playing to your win condition. You're just flailing your arms around like a complete buffoon.
Seriously. Make a decent case on Hapa or myself or Djo --- Convince people if you really don't want to be lynched today. If you're scum, keep doing what you're doing. The goal is not to not be lynched, the goal is to catch the scum. So I will be making a case on you guys, however, I'm not releasing it for at least another 24 hours.
Admits he might die.
Doesn't want to give case until tomorrow.
???
|
On December 18 2012 00:50 Mr. Cheesecake wrote: @Djo
Not a fan of meta cases, never have been.
His play looks scummy to me, and I don't think you can deny that. He didn't look like he cared who was going to get lynched mid-day and totally forgot he thought I was scum.
Yeah, me neither, but you should read this game. At least you can read thrawn's filter. It's not like it's going to take you a long time data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44632/446320620b2797481b98f0248bf47d03f83e2600" alt="" Could you do this at least and tell me what you make out of it ?
For me, the fact that he found Jx scumslip is showing that he is reading the thread carefully.
|
|
curious who you're suspect of djo, DYH perhaps?
|
On December 18 2012 00:48 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:Show nested quote +On December 18 2012 00:47 JieXian wrote:On December 17 2012 05:45 Mr. Cheesecake wrote: If I could lynch thrawn I would. But apparently everyone wants you dead, and I can see why. On December 17 2012 06:02 JieXian wrote:On December 17 2012 05:58 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:On December 17 2012 05:58 JieXian wrote:On December 17 2012 05:54 Mr. Cheesecake wrote: Lol JX, what reason do you have to vote thrawn? Also, didn't you think I was scum? Why would you agree with me. You seriously should have read my filter wth I'm trying to swing the vote away from morbid shit And onto any other random ass person? Rofl. well you did post a case against the random ass person On December 17 2012 05:53 JieXian wrote:On December 17 2012 05:45 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:On December 17 2012 05:42 JieXian wrote:shit it was about the acoltye = townie not a scumslip thing morbid is a bad idea I'm down for a mrcc lynch On December 17 2012 03:54 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:On December 17 2012 03:49 JieXian wrote:On December 17 2012 01:22 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:Hey guys, shenanigans here being sorted out. I'm down for a Thrawn lynch, he's a sheeping scummy dude right meow. Thrawn is an Opportunist + Show Spoiler +On December 15 2012 11:11 thrawn2112 wrote:ok ##Vote DjodrefShow nested quote +On December 15 2012 10:26 Djodref wrote: Other than that, I would like everybody to give a little hindsight of their game experience, especially newbies, if there are some.
what kind of information are you looking for? Sheep on Djodref vote, hardcore. No explanation, just does it. Also, the question he asks is self-explanatory. On December 15 2012 12:13 thrawn2112 wrote: I didn't th9nk hapa's case was super good but dp's reaction to it seems insane Slightly discredits Hapa's case, and takes the opportunity to acknowledge that DP looks scummy after an OMGUS vote (duh). He then unvotes to keep his options open. When Hapa makes his more fortified case, he suddenly believes it's some god-given scumhunting then votes for DP. Wait, What's this?On December 15 2012 12:17 thrawn2112 wrote: dp I don't think it's fair to accuse djo based on setup speculation meta because of 2 reasons
1. start of the game and everyone is lurking 2. this game doesn't have standard mechanics
Didn't Thrawn V OTE for Djo based on this exact thing? He was being obsessed with blue roles / witchhunter and Thrawn sheeped the vote, supposedly because of this. Now he thinks it's not fair to accuse him? On December 16 2012 10:17 thrawn2112 wrote: oh sniped on the random lurker vote lol, sounds fun
##unvote ##Vote: Mr Cheesecake
pie is better and all you mo-fos need to start posting
Sheeps onto lurker vote opportunity. Underlined = scummiest shit ever townies like cheesecake over pie. On December 16 2012 11:38 thrawn2112 wrote: ok here's what I probably mean about kush...
you mention his terrible ideas... yes the things he's said he'll do this game have been crazy, but that's his meta right? this game however, it seems like they are intentionally dumb. scum kush says crazier things than town kush.
he said he's not going to lynch me no matter what... is that a joke? an actual plan? the problem is I couldn't really tell.... it's so different from town oriented thinking I don't know what to make of it. the only reason I have to suspect that town kush could possibly have said that is because he's lynched me over and over for the same reasons and I keep flipping town. PROBABLY mean? What? How do you probably mean something...? Town mean things genuinely, scum try to emulate they are meaning something. The rest of this post is garbage--he comes to no read on Kush at all, just flip-flops between the possibility of town kush not wanting to lynch him and the alternative scum motivation. Above all, Thrawn doesn't seem to care who is lynched:On December 15 2012 11:52 thrawn2112 wrote: this conversation between the few of us is getting very tiresome
i'll lynch lurkers
LURKERS
i will happily lynch you Okay so he wants to lynch a lurker. By all means, a viable strategy considering the circumstance. But he also wants to lynch Djo, JX, DP... I'm confused. I don't see strong scum reads from him other than on JX due to obvious scumslips. He is sheeping a ton and doesn't seem too caring of who he wants to get lynched. Just look at this flip-floppiness between lurker lynching and lynching his top scumread.On December 16 2012 20:05 thrawn2112 wrote: I suggest all town people be around during the lynch if (when?) we decide to lynch a rando lurker Maybe we could lynch a lurker! That sounds like a good idea! On December 16 2012 20:41 thrawn2112 wrote: i still really really like it But I still really really like a JX lynch! On December 16 2012 20:42 thrawn2112 wrote: but who knows, perhaps some lurker will die instead But maybe we could lynch a lurker! I'm all for that! Why is Thrawn so indecisive?On December 16 2012 14:04 thrawn2112 wrote:Show nested quote +On December 16 2012 01:06 JieXian wrote: I was out the whole day man relax. You guys didn't understand my post.
I found what Dp and hapa was saying to be weird BUT I changed my mind as I kept on reading the thread (notice how those 2 points were quite early on)
no this is a lie Show nested quote +On December 15 2012 14:47 JieXian wrote:Hi and sorry I'm late, I'm at +8GMT and I didn't wake up as early as DarthPunk At first I was really confused (scummy read) about hapa's mindless babbling about 13-3, which ISN'T RELEVANT to anything at all because you can't change anything except stir the discussion towards the wrong direction. but i think he's town because xLater I got a stronger read from DP from his ridiculous "pressuring" above all for a point that's completely moot. but now i think he's town because xDjo why did you vote for Mr Zentor But above all there's Mr Zentor's relative non-chalance to everything seems to trump everything else as doesn't seem to give a damn to anything as townies are well on their way to lynching one another ##Vote MrZentor the red parts are what I just now added to the 2nd post that would make the 1st post true. I bolded "but above all" because that implies you still hold your suspicions about hapa/dp. J scum-slipped hard, he lied about the scumslip, he's a lurker... and he's scum He states JX is scum. THEN WHY IS HE KEEPING HIS OPTIONS OPEN LIKE THIS? Town Thrawn would want to push this JX lynch into the ground, not be ready to jump off the wagon at the last minute to lynch a lurker. Thrawn's general posting in context of the thread seems very opportunistic. The way he jumps on JX's vote post of Mr.Z is just that, scum trying to find easy things to tackle people on. I have no clue, if town, why he's willing to lynch a lurker right now if he's set on JX being scum. ##Vote: Thrawn On December 17 2012 02:51 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:On December 17 2012 02:50 kushm4sta wrote: we really need a vote count... We only have 3 hours left... people should not be discussing anything but the lynch. Who are teh viable lynches at this point? Is anyone adverse to lynching a lurker? Yes we need a vote count. I want to lynch Thrawn but I don't think anyone is biting atm... Who'd you have in mind for lurkers? On December 17 2012 02:52 JieXian wrote:
read my filter please, I'm still waiting for his reply On December 17 2012 02:57 Mr. Cheesecake wrote: JX, that post wasn't even directed towards / had anything to do with you. So you posted your long wall of text case against thrawn for shits and giggles? I get it Jx, you're really paranoid. If I could lynch thrawn I would. But apparently everyone wants you dead, and I can see why. WHY ARENT YOU LYNCHING THRAWN NOW THEN? BECAUSE NOBODY ELSE WANTS TO BRO, WHAT U WANT FROM ME. If anyone else wants to vote thrawn, please do so. Ok join me #Vote thrawn2122 Mrcc care to explain all that? Makes a case on thrawn -> drops it -> I push it -> claims he's not talking to me -> said he'd lynch thrawn -> calls him a random ass person HELLO? I made a case on thrawn. I dropped it because nobody else wanted to lynch him. Getting 6 other votes onto him would have been impossible. You "push it".. that's one vote. I get my vote off Morb and risk a no-lynch. I want to lynch somebody and not nobody. I called him a random ass person because you have no reason to vote him, I do.
let's look at your justifications on your vote for morbid
On December 17 2012 02:58 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:Show nested quote +On December 17 2012 02:58 kushm4sta wrote: cheesey baby, will you lurker lynch with me? morbidus sound good? Ill think about it honey.
On December 17 2012 04:46 Mr. Cheesecake wrote: Fuck it, may as well...
##Unvote ##Vote Morbidius
L O fucking L
Here are my reasons to vote for thrawn
On December 16 2012 23:53 JieXian wrote:Show nested quote +On December 16 2012 20:47 thrawn2112 wrote:On December 16 2012 20:45 JieXian wrote:On December 16 2012 20:40 thrawn2112 wrote: frustrating, uncooperative, etc Your inference is based on the assumption/information that he's townie lol you should have just called it a scum slip if that's what you're trying to implymy read on zentor is still null. hahaha :D just probing man but now that you've mentioned it I can imagine the mafia QT to be you asking him to post something and being all frustrated because he's so uncooperativeReading through your filter I can see NOT ONE single post of you asking him to "participate". I see one from drazak. All you did was say you had a null vote and attack me and kush who were directing attention towards him.
On December 17 2012 02:52 JieXian wrote:Show nested quote +On December 17 2012 02:51 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:On December 17 2012 02:50 kushm4sta wrote: we really need a vote count... We only have 3 hours left... people should not be discussing anything but the lynch. Who are teh viable lynches at this point? Is anyone adverse to lynching a lurker? Yes we need a vote count. I want to lynch Thrawn but I don't think anyone is biting atm... Who'd you have in mind for lurkers? read my filter please, I'm still waiting for his reply
On December 17 2012 02:54 JieXian wrote:I'll do it for you Show nested quote +On December 16 2012 23:53 JieXian wrote:On December 16 2012 20:47 thrawn2112 wrote:On December 16 2012 20:45 JieXian wrote:On December 16 2012 20:40 thrawn2112 wrote: frustrating, uncooperative, etc Your inference is based on the assumption/information that he's townie lol you should have just called it a scum slip if that's what you're trying to imply my read on zentor is still null. hahaha :D just probing man but now that you've mentioned it I can imagine the mafia QT to be you asking him to post something and being all frustrated because he's so uncooperative Reading through your filter I can see NOT ONE single post of you asking him to "participate". I see one from drazak. All you did was say you had a null vote and attack me and kush who were directing attention towards him. and hapa, I've changed my mind about providing reads on those 3 people and I think I shouldn't post read on them for now. For now the burning question is: What the hell are you contradicting yourself that badly? I made the most controversial post here and instantly got 4-5 votes on me. You yourself thought my reads were terrible
Do you know what happened after you posted the case on thrawn?
you chatted with eywa against going for hapa
On December 17 2012 02:03 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:Show nested quote +On December 17 2012 02:00 Eywa- wrote:On December 17 2012 01:53 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:On December 17 2012 01:44 Eywa- wrote:On December 17 2012 01:34 Mr. Cheesecake wrote: Care to elaborate? Just read up, he's hopped onto about 4-5 different people for no other reason than it seemed to be a good idea based on one previous post or because someone said it was a good idea. Why don't you make a case, then, if it's scummy behavior? Because people who play are meant to read the thread, I made the point of "why", if you read you'll understand the justification. Whether or not you agree is up to you. Town want to convince others that their top scumread is actually scum. Presenting a case with justification does that. Parking your vote on Hapa and telling people to go searching on their own isn't going to convince people.
On December 17 2012 02:51 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:Show nested quote +On December 17 2012 02:50 kushm4sta wrote: we really need a vote count... We only have 3 hours left... people should not be discussing anything but the lynch. Who are teh viable lynches at this point? Is anyone adverse to lynching a lurker? Yes we need a vote count. I want to lynch Thrawn but I don't think anyone is biting atm... Who'd you have in mind for lurkers?
and GAVE UP
No one influential came in to discredit you yet -- neither hapa nor DP. And you shove away the only person who agreed with you = me
|
|
|
|