EPTTL Mafia XLVII - Page 52
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
wherebugsgo
Japan10647 Posts
| ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
|
Hassybaby
United Kingdom10823 Posts
| ||
|
sandroba
Canada4998 Posts
| ||
|
wherebugsgo
Japan10647 Posts
| ||
|
sandroba
Canada4998 Posts
| ||
|
sandroba
Canada4998 Posts
| ||
|
wherebugsgo
Japan10647 Posts
My current suspicions have already been listed, but I will be adding to them soon. I have some more ideas, I just need to sleep on them and give them some time. As of now it's like 5:15 so staying up longer will probably not be a good idea. Please everyone, read this post: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=285690¤tpage=49#962 Tell me if you agree with it, and if you do, please provide scum reads. Even if you don't agree with it, please provide scum reads. If you don't agree with it, tell me why and outline what makes the plan bad. If you have ways of improving the idea, go ahead and post them. Until tomorrow, good night everyone! | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22634 Posts
On November 25 2011 22:13 sandroba wrote: Your 10 best scum reads day1 in a 80 player game composed with mostly new people before any clues or any hits/flips/shit to really get a grasp of the situation. Cool. How can someone who consistently finds scum on day 1 be this opposed to the notion of scumhunting on day 1? | ||
|
Hassybaby
United Kingdom10823 Posts
| ||
|
IMABUNNEH
United Kingdom1062 Posts
Faction 1 is Palmar, WBG, and their supporters. Faction 2 is Sandro, prplzpzl, and their supporters. Although my current vote is on Palmar, I don't like how he and WBG interact with each other. For a day 1 they're already interacting together as a team. There's only one team at the moment. I'm watching you. | ||
|
sandroba
Canada4998 Posts
On November 25 2011 22:21 Palmar wrote: How can someone who consistently finds scum on day 1 be this opposed to the notion of scumhunting on day 1? Where do I say I'm opposed to it? Quote me on that one. I'm saying that 10 scum reads day 1 is as unreliable as you can get. Do you dissagree? Do you think this plan is optimal? | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22634 Posts
On November 25 2011 22:05 syllogism wrote: All your plan does is basically waste 2 complete days worth of DT checks and potentially vig shots as well, because the only way those people will flip is if we lynch/vig them. And no, a "great majority" of them won't know their sanity based on two flips when their checks were announced beforehand. Am I wrong in saying that no matter what happens, the DT needs a flip or two to confirm his sanity? Yes, we're risking framers, but with increasing the size of the list, that chance will be diminished. The benefits of the plan is threefold: a) We offer our DTs sensible checks on night one, based on analysis b) We offer our DTs targets that have a higher chance than average of dying, due to the plan c) We create very focused discussion on several specific targets. Remember, no one is getting put on the list unless someone in town creates an analysis on that player. Current candidates for the DT list: Player: youngminii Accuser: Palmar Analysis: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=12442782 Vetos: None | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22634 Posts
On November 25 2011 22:29 sandroba wrote: Where do I say I'm opposed to it? Quote me on that one. I'm saying that 10 scum reads day 1 is as unreliable as you can get. Do you dissagree? Do you think this plan is optimal? What's the alternative? I think the plan gives us focus, I think it allows us to force people to play optimally. | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22634 Posts
Current candidates for the DT list: Player: youngminii Accuser: Palmar Analysis: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=12442782 Vetos: None | ||
|
Erandorr
2283 Posts
I will post something longer in a short while | ||
|
Erandorr
2283 Posts
| ||
|
IMABUNNEH
United Kingdom1062 Posts
On November 25 2011 00:55 Jackal58 wrote: Palmar, Decon, BC, Sandroba - Question Who did you receive your role PM from? Why has nobody said anything more about this? | ||
|
Benjef
United Kingdom6921 Posts
I am very supportive of WBG plan on the top of page 49 and seeing as Palmer's is extremely active and supporting WBG plan, my vote is currently leading that way. I personally believe that Palmer has the experience and activity to lead us very well the only thing I worry about is his success rate of being a mafia that was pointed out way back at the start but no one else has called him out on that in a while and he seems very unscummy atm so meh. Gonna be more active now reading the past 25 pages in one sitting was obviously a pleasent experience.... Palmer for Mayor! | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22634 Posts
On November 25 2011 23:02 IMABUNNEH wrote: Why has nobody said anything more about this? Because while the intentions are good, Jackal is trying to abuse out of game mechanics. That's cheating. | ||
| ||
