|
I won't have time to read zare's filter carefully enough before the deadline, so in case I die tonight I would like to say this:
Lynch Spaghetticus.
Either he or zare or both of them are scum. This is simple logical deduction from the actions and votes of day 2. Again for the cheap seats: scum would not have split their vote 3 ways and if you think that scum bussed Mocsta it means I am scum.
Spag bandwagoned Trotske at the end of day 2, this alone is reason enough for a lynch. He has not provided an explanation for this action, nor had he delivered on his promise to start "taking names".
Simply put, while I'm still on the fence about zare there is simply zero town motivation for Spag's actions.
|
On January 18 2013 06:11 Sn0_Man wrote: Lots more sense but I'm still pretty sure you are wrong.
Lets say JSL and Mocsta were scum. A) who is #3? B) Why would JSL not vote to save himself day 1 (I guess moc promises to save him in scum QT?) and save mocsta day 2? (Admittedly a smurf *may* be suicidal but that seems weird).
Wait, so you think JSL is scum or not?
Because your post makes it look like you think he's not, and zare also thinks he's not, so... where's the disagreement?
|
On January 18 2013 05:53 Trotske wrote:Show nested quote +On January 18 2013 05:19 zarepath wrote: Sorry, what did you mean to say, then? I'm confused now. What I Was trying to say was that your townie claim on JSL is not as solid as your posts seems to make clear you think it is. Your reasoning is that he could have voted me and saving his scum mate, but by doing so when I showed up townie the biggest case that was around was on mocsta after I was lynched aka he is next in line of fire even more so since he was pushing for my mislynch. So by hammering me JSL not only would kill mocsta next lynch in the process but would also be under more scrutiny form hammering me. I am not trying to say he is scum just that he is not a confirmed townie like your post said. does that make more sense than my other post?
By saving Mocsta and lynching you, all they do is create suspicion around them, they don't guarantee a lynch especially since they go into day 3 with a 3-vote power against 5.
Speculation time:
yesterday you die, then I get NK. OE is modkilled, maybe replaced, but maybe not. Oh. Suddenly scum are 3 against 4 which means barring a unanimous scumlynch, they win. I think casting suspicions on themselves is a pretty decent tradeoff for winning the game.
|
I'm about to start my commute home and then dinner/family time, so I might not be around for the end of N2.
So if these are my last words: I think Spag is extremely suspicious. Look at all of his interactions with Mocsta (from both filters), and ask how they resonate. Then look at how he voted, and how he explained his vote. Also look at how Mocsta talked about Bringaniga (Spag's predecessor) on Day 1.
I look forward to how the role claim goes. I'll try to post right before the deadline. (I've been able to check in a little before the deadline most days.)
|
On January 18 2013 06:42 zarepath wrote: I'm about to start my commute home and then dinner/family time, so I might not be around for the end of N2.
So if these are my last words: I think Spag is extremely suspicious. Look at all of his interactions with Mocsta (from both filters), and ask how they resonate. Then look at how he voted, and how he explained his vote. Also look at how Mocsta talked about Bringaniga (Spag's predecessor) on Day 1.
I look forward to how the role claim goes. I'll try to post right before the deadline. (I've been able to check in a little before the deadline most days.)
Noted. Spag has seemed the most suspicious to me after Jacob. I just haven't had the time yet to really read through his entire filter yet. So I'm not actually sure why I have this feeling.
|
About 2 hours until the Day 3 post. As previously mentioned,
I want a full roleclaim and explanation from everybody immediately before the Day 3 post (or shortly after if necessary, but before lets you share info if you get NK'd)
I'm willing to throw mine out right now cuz its simple: I'm VT.
@ Any JK: Feel free to save Me/Acid @ Any RB: I'll let you know later who I think is scum. Acid's FoS on Spag seems correct but he may offload the KP.
|
Day 3![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/cKbc0.png)
What is this, a monty python sketch?
+ Show Spoiler [flips] +Sn0_Man, as French Pea #1 the Vanilla Townie is dead!
OmniEulogy, as French Pea #2 the Vanilla Townie has been modkilled!
No more replacements from this point onwards. Flavor is just flavor. You have 48 hours left to vote! Deadline is at 00:00 GMT (+00:00). Votes that are not in the correct format will not be counted. Everyone is required to vote.
|
:LURK:
OEF:
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/034fe/034fe82eb3422466c3f0d4789a7fc0144d3dcdea" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/087ad/087ad8e0676bd8571de1b2ef0c8ac708fe067ce9" alt="" hehe
|
|
|
|
|
##Vote Spaghetticus
Still has not answered satisfactorily for his vote switch.
|
R.I.P. Sn0_Man
Just so we're clear, Sn0's death doesn't mean anyone gets a free pass re: roleclaiming and explanations.
I'll start, since I have the most powerful role with the best power of them all:
+ Show Spoiler +
I would like to see all of your claims before making a case.
@Zebezt: You need to get off your tunneling of Laguerta and make a case against JSL if you insist on going that route for today's lynch. I also want to hear an explanation of why you didn't consolidate with town on Mocsta when it was clear a JSL lynch wasn't going to happen.
In that regard, until you step up...
##Vote: Zebezt
|
|
Oh shoot, I forgot to post my whole last will.
Too late now.
GGWP all. GO TOWN GO
|
Vt
"Lynch Spaghetticus.
Either he or zare or both of them are scum. This is simple logical deduction from the actions and votes of day 2. Again for the cheap seats: scum would not have split their vote 3 ways and if you think that scum bussed Mocsta it means I am scum."
So why the vote on Zebezt?
|
Also yes Spag is full of empty promises and isn't posting as much as usual (heard someone say that) I thought his reason for his last minute vote was down to "waking up to control the lynch" but why did you pick those two? Did you think they were both scummy? We need to work out if it makes sense that those two were his targets.
For example does both of them being scum make sense? Will look into this, however acid reminded me that I didn't have time to look at Zarapath.
His night filter is mainly rb analysis, day 2 action analysis, and theorys on how many people would be left. although, he did have one or two good posts on who we should be looking at so as long as a follow though happens and he uses this information to good use I am not so bothered. It's just every single one of these is perfect scum content because it is so easy to be correct and right. While they are things that need to be discussed it's concerning at the moment.
|
ebwop: acid reminded me indirectly that I forgot to finish my look at Zarapath.
Also something about acid that popped up. You constantly mentioned that you didn't vote for someone you made a case on. Now either you are town being open or scum trying to appear to be open knowing someone will realise that eventually. Just if I recall correctly you mentioned it more than once. Could be trying for town cred?
|
|
|
|