| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Blazinghand
United States25558 Posts
On May 07 2012 13:51 Nova_Terra wrote: Because you're kenpachi isnt an excuse. And if you dont die today, im just gonna start defending myself with Because im Nova_Terra. That's basically what you're doing already... | ||
|
Kenpachi
United States9908 Posts
On May 07 2012 13:49 PaqMan wrote: You've been busy, but you're obviously keeping up with the thread since you quickly responded to my halfassed case against you. So basically your excuse is, "im not going to play because i dont want too, even tho i signed up. and anyone who votes me for not playing/contributing/doing anything is obv. scum." if ive been following the thread, i would have responded to NT's vote on me. i didnt notice that until after i voted you | ||
|
Nova_Terra
Switzerland1190 Posts
On May 07 2012 13:51 Blazinghand wrote: You're trying to hide and I called you out. Seems pretty obvious... rofl, i mean how im called out and i cant/am not trying to(your thoughts) remedy the situation and instead ask for a pass by this does not make sense from a scum point of view | ||
|
Nova_Terra
Switzerland1190 Posts
On May 07 2012 13:52 Blazinghand wrote: That's basically what you're doing already... no | ||
|
PaqMan
United States1475 Posts
On May 07 2012 13:51 Nova_Terra wrote: Because you're kenpachi isnt an excuse. And if you dont die today, im just gonna start defending myself with Because im Nova_Terra. That's the worst thing you could do. If you REALLY want to prove your town then stop letting a couple votes freak you out. it makes it look like you have something to hide. Make good fos, analysis', and cases against people and pressure the people who you think are scum. Quit spending so much time defending yourself. Make a good defense that addresses all the points against you and move on. goodnight ppl. | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25558 Posts
On May 07 2012 13:53 Nova_Terra wrote: rofl, i mean how im called out and i cant/am not trying to(your thoughts) remedy the situation and instead ask for a pass by this does not make sense from a scum point of view Yeah it does! You realize your actions are indefensible so you make some dirty, dirty appeal to IRL and asking for a pass. I'm not a teacher, I don't give out hall passes, you gotta earn them yourself by being useful. And you're not. ##unvote ##vote: Nova_Terra | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25558 Posts
| ||
|
PaqMan
United States1475 Posts
On May 07 2012 13:53 Kenpachi wrote: if ive been following the thread, i would have responded to NT's vote on me. i didnt notice that until after i voted you And you "coincidentally" check the thread right after I make my case. Yeah, I don't buy it. You're actively lurking and unless one of the hosts confirm that you're looking for a replacement I don't buy that either. | ||
|
Kenpachi
United States9908 Posts
On May 07 2012 13:57 PaqMan wrote: And you "coincidentally" check the thread right after I make my case. Yeah, I don't buy it. You're actively lurking and unless one of the hosts confirm that you're looking for a replacement I don't buy that either. yes. | ||
|
Kenpachi
United States9908 Posts
| ||
|
PaqMan
United States1475 Posts
On May 07 2012 14:00 Kenpachi wrote: if you dont believe it, doesnt matter. you're scum as far as i can tell What were you so busy with | ||
|
DoYouHas
United States1140 Posts
I suppose I should start with far and away the scummiest of blubbdavid's posts and then tack on all the extras after to seal the deal. On May 07 2012 04:27 blubbdavid wrote: 1. Somethingawesome, still think I am not scum? 2. How about you lynch me, or are you too cautious because it could reveal your whole scumplan? I need action, not words. 3. You are buddying up with layabout instead of scumhunting. Cast your vote on the one you think is the most scummy player. You say that I know layabout's alignment (mind reading), BUT: Is my concern illegitimate? You are circling around the actual matter: Why did layabout push BM so hard? Come on, tell me. 4. Furthermore: BM was a lurker, and yes, a lynch on him wouldn't have been out-of-normal, but the intensity with which layabout has pushed BM surprised me. And I have been pushing on lay since I saw that he wanted to policy lynch BM although he vowed not to policy lynch. about Palm: Seems like the first option was true. grush: I may have sheeped on this vote, I admit but I didn't sheep with the vote of layabout I want to see some action of you, SA. 1. This is awkwardly phrased considering SA had just said that he thinks blubb is scum. 2. Daring SA to try and lynch you? Where is this coming from? For someone who has played the "my bad, don't hold it against me" card as well as a "I give up" defense this is extremely out of character and scummy. Not only that, he states his read that SA is scum because SA doesn't want to vote for him yet which immediately makes his next statement absurd. 3. This is the part that really got me wanting to lynch blubb. Let us think about this ridiculous scenario that blubb has put forth between SA and layabout. Supposedly at this point blubb believes both SA and layabout to be scum, or at the very least highly suspicious. So in what world does it make sense that one scum(SA) is going to 'buddy' ANOTHER SCUM(laya), another scum who just happens to be under a fair bit of scrutiny atm. Even forgetting the scrutiny part it doesn't make sense. In blubb's attempt to defend against SA's claim that blubb seemed to know people's roles he slips again and gives us this buddying scenario. The only way that it can possibly make sense is if blubb KNOWS that layabout is town. 4. Didn't sheep the vote of layabout, true, but then there is this: On May 05 2012 06:49 blubbdavid wrote: For someone who has been fixated on attacking others (mainly layabout) for pushing a BM lynch you were awful ready to jump on the train to secure the lynch. Ok thx. So I won't switch to BM. Part 2 On May 05 2012 02:54 blubbdavid wrote: I am also willing to lynch BM if there's no majority on grush. But: What even more important is than lynching scum D1is obtaining information. A BM lynch wouldn't us give much info, assuming he is scum. I still want to see panda's take on grush before I set my vote in stone. And lol, there's no way BM is going to be modkilled. Seriously, obtaining information is more important than lynching scum D1 according to blubb. This is the reasoning he uses to say that BM was a bad lynch. This is just so incredibly wrong from a town POV. Lynch a lurker scum d1 you get all the info of the people fighting/pushing the lynch + the chance to get rid of a scum power + YOU JUST KILLED SCUM, CMON. On May 06 2012 19:50 blubbdavid wrote: I see, Blazinghand is switching cases so it looks like he doesn't sheep l10f. Well, jdup has made a good post regarding layabout's behaviour It took scum by surprise that Kat was modkilled. blubb quotes JW's good post on laya's behavior and then does what? Reinforce a point(s) he liked? no. Expand or provide further analysis? no. What we get is this statement, "It took scum by surprise that Kat was modkilled." What purpose does this serve? This statement isn't, "I also think it took scum by surprise that Kat was modkilled." or "If it took scum by surprise that Kat was modkilled then...". I think that the lack of relevance paired with the certainty on something that shouldn't have been able to go past speculation makes this likely to be a scumslip. Part 3 Inconsistencies and WIFOM: On May 04 2012 19:31 blubbdavid wrote: I have no read on Nova, he is pretty neutral atm. And I will stop tunneling grush for the time being, maybe he will come up with something useful. Still, I would be interested in papapanda's opinion. And katina, do some scumhunting. What is your opinion on grush? blubb calls out Katina which normally would mean that blubb would have taken note of Katina's past posts as well as be waiting for a response to this call out. Then we get this: On May 05 2012 05:36 blubbdavid wrote: ^yeah, everyone will probably jump a wagon. and layabout, you seem to be very very defensive, considering the fact that you only have 2 votes on you. I have to look into katina yet. This is after I made my case and slOosh had switched his vote. A consistent blubb would already have been up to date on Katina and this comment would have been either been accepting, refuting, or critiquing my case instead of playing at being ignorant. WIFOM: On May 05 2012 05:55 blubbdavid wrote: I have a suspicion: What if BM is scum, but doesn't want to play/ doesn't have time, so he sacrifices himself for the other scum? There are a few more examples of each I could pull for this section, but I feel like I would just be diluting my argument. TLDR: blubbdavid is scum, scumming scum ##Vote: blubbdavid | ||
|
Kenpachi
United States9908 Posts
would you like an intricate schedule of what i did over the past few days? | ||
|
Kenpachi
United States9908 Posts
| ||
|
Kenpachi
United States9908 Posts
| ||
|
Kenpachi
United States9908 Posts
is that enough reason fool? | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25558 Posts
| ||
|
Kenpachi
United States9908 Posts
| ||
|
Kenpachi
United States9908 Posts
| ||
|
Kenpachi
United States9908 Posts
| ||
| ||
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Calm Dota 2 5046Sea  2869Bisu  2159Jaedong 1393firebathero 628Hyuk 515Stork 338Leta 332EffOrt 304actioN 280[ Show more ] Counter-Strike Other Games Organizations Counter-Strike Other Games StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War |
|
CranKy Ducklings
WardiTV Team League
Replay Cast
CranKy Ducklings
WardiTV Team League
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
BSL
n0maD vs perroflaco
TerrOr vs ZZZero
MadiNho vs WolFix
DragOn vs LancerX
Sparkling Tuna Cup
WardiTV Team League
OSC
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
