|
On November 17 2011 07:15 chaoser wrote:Show nested quote +On November 17 2011 07:14 Lemonwalrus wrote:On November 17 2011 07:00 GreYMisT wrote:On November 17 2011 06:39 Lemonwalrus wrote:On November 17 2011 06:32 risk.nuke wrote:
Okey, but isn't this exacly one of those situations where we connected two people and should not lynch both of them incase they are town.
##Vote Kenpachi That's why I only voted Lanaia, figure Lanaia flips scum, Kenpachi auto-lynch day 2, Lanaia flips town, then back to the drawing board. I felt that Lanaia was the best choice since she is either a scum or a town that used a powerful role in what I consider to be an untownly fashion, what is your reasoning for Kenpachi instead? Lemon, what do you think of risk's response? On November 17 2011 06:47 risk.nuke wrote:On November 17 2011 06:34 GreYMisT wrote:On November 17 2011 06:32 risk.nuke wrote:
Okey, but isn't this exacly one of those situations where we connected two people and should not lynch both of them incase they are town.
##Vote Kenpachi perhaps, but why choose to lynch kenpachi over the guy who anti-voted him? If kenpachi is green, then lanaia probably isn't scum. If kenpachi is red we got a scumkill even if that doesn't necessarily mean lanaia is his buddy. If lanai is green that means nothing for kenpachis alignment. If lanai is red then kenpachi is scum. I think we learn more from knowing kenpachis alignment. Im starting to agree with him a bit, but in my eyes neither kenpachi or lanaia is off the hook just yet. I don't agree with risk's assessment and no longer agree with my original assessment because I can't see any scum team doing something this risky (or dumb, depending on how you want to look at it) on day 1. However, since Kenpachi has now adopted the "lol town is bad I'm not going to try anymore" mentality he is either scum or a townie that is no longer playing to win. Either way I don't want him to still be here for day 2. ##Vote: KenpachiI know that Kenpachi is capable of a lot, but if he can't offer simple explanations for what he considers to be obvious things then what is the point? oh oh vote for me too! I fall under that category!
I've got a town read on you that I can't quite explain and am holding on to hope that you will stop being butt-hurt and start being useful in the near future, or that all of your play so far has been part of some grand plan that will help town in some way, so I'll hold my vote off of you for now. At least this way when you do get yourself lynched (which you seem to be doing quite efficiently) and flip green I'll be able to congratulate myself or something.
|
lol <3
I'd post a walrus shooting lasers but sadly that's not allowed
|
On November 17 2011 07:21 HarbingerOfDoom wrote:
I'm going to hold off voting on Lanaia for now. While double voting or anti-voting is certainly powerful for both scum and for town, it is a lot less useful for scum if it is prominently announced for all to see on the vote list. If Lanaia is town, presumably scum will eventually settle the issue. If Lanaia is scum, it will be hard for her to use her ability without blatantly giving things away later on. Also, unless she thought her anti-vote would be hidden, I find it hard to believe scum would be so brash on day 1.
That being said, I am going to vote for Drazerk. I said if he didn't give a good reason for his vote I'd be voting for him, and I intend to follow through on that. He seems to like trumpeting the fact that he has generally sucked as town, and overall I think his contributions have not exactly been helping to create a good town atmosphere. His repeated mentions of how much he has screwed up as town in the past combined with his plethora of 1 liners and votes with little reason behind them makes it seem like he is trying to play anti-town and get away with it because it's just his meta.
Vote: Drazerk
Now I'm going to reread the thread some and see if there is someone else I'd like to place a vote on as well.
HoD your vote is formated incorrectly, you forgot the ##.
yea Lemon thats the view I hold now, but im going to wait until lanaia gets back and can explain his behavior further before I decide wether or not to unvote him.
Also Drazek/Chaoser, I was Doctor Whooves in MLP mafia, and the only time i got a red check he died that night.
|
United Kingdom31255 Posts
On November 17 2011 07:27 GreYMisT wrote:Show nested quote +On November 17 2011 07:21 HarbingerOfDoom wrote:
I'm going to hold off voting on Lanaia for now. While double voting or anti-voting is certainly powerful for both scum and for town, it is a lot less useful for scum if it is prominently announced for all to see on the vote list. If Lanaia is town, presumably scum will eventually settle the issue. If Lanaia is scum, it will be hard for her to use her ability without blatantly giving things away later on. Also, unless she thought her anti-vote would be hidden, I find it hard to believe scum would be so brash on day 1.
That being said, I am going to vote for Drazerk. I said if he didn't give a good reason for his vote I'd be voting for him, and I intend to follow through on that. He seems to like trumpeting the fact that he has generally sucked as town, and overall I think his contributions have not exactly been helping to create a good town atmosphere. His repeated mentions of how much he has screwed up as town in the past combined with his plethora of 1 liners and votes with little reason behind them makes it seem like he is trying to play anti-town and get away with it because it's just his meta.
Vote: Drazerk
Now I'm going to reread the thread some and see if there is someone else I'd like to place a vote on as well. HoD your vote is formated incorrectly, you forgot the ##. yea Lemon thats the view I hold now, but im going to wait until lanaia gets back and can explain his behavior further before I decide wether or not to unvote him. Also Drazek/Chaoser, I was Doctor Whooves in MLP mafia, and the only time i got a red check he died that night.
It's not a contest!
|
On November 17 2011 07:27 GreYMisT wrote:Show nested quote +On November 17 2011 07:21 HarbingerOfDoom wrote:
I'm going to hold off voting on Lanaia for now. While double voting or anti-voting is certainly powerful for both scum and for town, it is a lot less useful for scum if it is prominently announced for all to see on the vote list. If Lanaia is town, presumably scum will eventually settle the issue. If Lanaia is scum, it will be hard for her to use her ability without blatantly giving things away later on. Also, unless she thought her anti-vote would be hidden, I find it hard to believe scum would be so brash on day 1.
That being said, I am going to vote for Drazerk. I said if he didn't give a good reason for his vote I'd be voting for him, and I intend to follow through on that. He seems to like trumpeting the fact that he has generally sucked as town, and overall I think his contributions have not exactly been helping to create a good town atmosphere. His repeated mentions of how much he has screwed up as town in the past combined with his plethora of 1 liners and votes with little reason behind them makes it seem like he is trying to play anti-town and get away with it because it's just his meta.
Vote: Drazerk
Now I'm going to reread the thread some and see if there is someone else I'd like to place a vote on as well. HoD your vote is formated incorrectly, you forgot the ##. yea Lemon thats the view I hold now, but im going to wait until lanaia gets back and can explain his behavior further before I decide wether or not to unvote him. Also Drazek/Chaoser, I was Doctor Whooves in MLP mafia, and the only time i got a red check he died that night.
Oh shit, totally didn't realize I forgot that part. Thanks for pointing that out.
##Vote: Drazerk
|
On November 17 2011 07:21 HarbingerOfDoom wrote:
I'm going to hold off voting on Lanaia for now. While double voting or anti-voting is certainly powerful for both scum and for town, it is a lot less useful for scum if it is prominently announced for all to see on the vote list. If Lanaia is town, presumably scum will eventually settle the issue. If Lanaia is scum, it will be hard for her to use her ability without blatantly giving things away later on. Also, unless she thought her anti-vote would be hidden, I find it hard to believe scum would be so brash on day 1.
That being said, I am going to vote for Drazerk. I said if he didn't give a good reason for his vote I'd be voting for him, and I intend to follow through on that. He seems to like trumpeting the fact that he has generally sucked as town, and overall I think his contributions have not exactly been helping to create a good town atmosphere. His repeated mentions of how much he has screwed up as town in the past combined with his plethora of 1 liners and votes with little reason behind them makes it seem like he is trying to play anti-town and get away with it because it's just his meta.
Vote: Drazerk
Now I'm going to reread the thread some and see if there is someone else I'd like to place a vote on as well.
You make a good point about lanaia. If she knew it would be public, it would be very weird that she did it as scum.
|
United Kingdom31255 Posts
On November 17 2011 07:30 HarbingerOfDoom wrote:Show nested quote +On November 17 2011 07:27 GreYMisT wrote:On November 17 2011 07:21 HarbingerOfDoom wrote:
I'm going to hold off voting on Lanaia for now. While double voting or anti-voting is certainly powerful for both scum and for town, it is a lot less useful for scum if it is prominently announced for all to see on the vote list. If Lanaia is town, presumably scum will eventually settle the issue. If Lanaia is scum, it will be hard for her to use her ability without blatantly giving things away later on. Also, unless she thought her anti-vote would be hidden, I find it hard to believe scum would be so brash on day 1.
That being said, I am going to vote for Drazerk. I said if he didn't give a good reason for his vote I'd be voting for him, and I intend to follow through on that. He seems to like trumpeting the fact that he has generally sucked as town, and overall I think his contributions have not exactly been helping to create a good town atmosphere. His repeated mentions of how much he has screwed up as town in the past combined with his plethora of 1 liners and votes with little reason behind them makes it seem like he is trying to play anti-town and get away with it because it's just his meta.
Vote: Drazerk
Now I'm going to reread the thread some and see if there is someone else I'd like to place a vote on as well. HoD your vote is formated incorrectly, you forgot the ##. yea Lemon thats the view I hold now, but im going to wait until lanaia gets back and can explain his behavior further before I decide wether or not to unvote him. Also Drazek/Chaoser, I was Doctor Whooves in MLP mafia, and the only time i got a red check he died that night. Oh shit, totally didn't realize I forgot that part. Thanks for pointing that out. ##Vote: Drazerk
♥♥♥
|
I don't have time to post much right now, but I've read the thread, and really don't like what went down between Lana, and Ken.
##Vote: Lanaia
##Vote: Kenpachi
I need to do a more in depth read of Chao before I vote him, because he is getting very close to over 50%.
|
On November 17 2011 07:32 hyshes wrote:Show nested quote +On November 17 2011 07:21 HarbingerOfDoom wrote:
I'm going to hold off voting on Lanaia for now. While double voting or anti-voting is certainly powerful for both scum and for town, it is a lot less useful for scum if it is prominently announced for all to see on the vote list. If Lanaia is town, presumably scum will eventually settle the issue. If Lanaia is scum, it will be hard for her to use her ability without blatantly giving things away later on. Also, unless she thought her anti-vote would be hidden, I find it hard to believe scum would be so brash on day 1.
That being said, I am going to vote for Drazerk. I said if he didn't give a good reason for his vote I'd be voting for him, and I intend to follow through on that. He seems to like trumpeting the fact that he has generally sucked as town, and overall I think his contributions have not exactly been helping to create a good town atmosphere. His repeated mentions of how much he has screwed up as town in the past combined with his plethora of 1 liners and votes with little reason behind them makes it seem like he is trying to play anti-town and get away with it because it's just his meta.
Vote: Drazerk
Now I'm going to reread the thread some and see if there is someone else I'd like to place a vote on as well. You make a good point about lanaia. If she knew it would be public, it would be very weird that she did it as scum.
Yeah but what would a scum say when specifically asked? No?
|
On November 17 2011 07:34 Cyber_Cheese wrote:Show nested quote +On November 17 2011 07:32 hyshes wrote:On November 17 2011 07:21 HarbingerOfDoom wrote:
I'm going to hold off voting on Lanaia for now. While double voting or anti-voting is certainly powerful for both scum and for town, it is a lot less useful for scum if it is prominently announced for all to see on the vote list. If Lanaia is town, presumably scum will eventually settle the issue. If Lanaia is scum, it will be hard for her to use her ability without blatantly giving things away later on. Also, unless she thought her anti-vote would be hidden, I find it hard to believe scum would be so brash on day 1.
That being said, I am going to vote for Drazerk. I said if he didn't give a good reason for his vote I'd be voting for him, and I intend to follow through on that. He seems to like trumpeting the fact that he has generally sucked as town, and overall I think his contributions have not exactly been helping to create a good town atmosphere. His repeated mentions of how much he has screwed up as town in the past combined with his plethora of 1 liners and votes with little reason behind them makes it seem like he is trying to play anti-town and get away with it because it's just his meta.
Vote: Drazerk
Now I'm going to reread the thread some and see if there is someone else I'd like to place a vote on as well. You make a good point about lanaia. If she knew it would be public, it would be very weird that she did it as scum. Yeah but what would a scum say when specifically asked? No?
Quoted the wrong post, someone asked if Lanaia knew about the anti-vote appearing.
|
United Kingdom31255 Posts
On November 17 2011 06:51 hyshes wrote:Show nested quote +On November 16 2011 21:37 Palmar wrote:
okay, prplhz, tyrran and chaoser I'll do. any reason why you didn't do tyrran?
By the way Palmar I would like to see this as well
|
On November 17 2011 07:34 Hiroruby wrote:
I don't have time to post much right now, but I've read the thread, and really don't like what went down between Lana, and Ken.
##Vote: Lanaia
##Vote: Kenpachi
I need to do a more in depth read of Chao before I vote him, because he is getting very close to over 50%.
With 26 alive, that means at any point in the day if someone reaches 14 that person is condemned to death no matter what.
Choaser is still a bit off from this amount, but we do need to wait until at least until the latter end of day1 before we add on any more votes.
|
United Kingdom31255 Posts
On November 17 2011 07:37 Cyber_Cheese wrote:Show nested quote +On November 17 2011 07:34 Cyber_Cheese wrote:On November 17 2011 07:32 hyshes wrote:On November 17 2011 07:21 HarbingerOfDoom wrote:
I'm going to hold off voting on Lanaia for now. While double voting or anti-voting is certainly powerful for both scum and for town, it is a lot less useful for scum if it is prominently announced for all to see on the vote list. If Lanaia is town, presumably scum will eventually settle the issue. If Lanaia is scum, it will be hard for her to use her ability without blatantly giving things away later on. Also, unless she thought her anti-vote would be hidden, I find it hard to believe scum would be so brash on day 1.
That being said, I am going to vote for Drazerk. I said if he didn't give a good reason for his vote I'd be voting for him, and I intend to follow through on that. He seems to like trumpeting the fact that he has generally sucked as town, and overall I think his contributions have not exactly been helping to create a good town atmosphere. His repeated mentions of how much he has screwed up as town in the past combined with his plethora of 1 liners and votes with little reason behind them makes it seem like he is trying to play anti-town and get away with it because it's just his meta.
Vote: Drazerk
Now I'm going to reread the thread some and see if there is someone else I'd like to place a vote on as well. You make a good point about lanaia. If she knew it would be public, it would be very weird that she did it as scum. Yeah but what would a scum say when specifically asked? No? Quoted the wrong post, someone asked if Lanaia knew about the anti-vote appearing.
/claims credit
|
On November 16 2011 05:21 Hiroruby wrote:Show nested quote +On November 16 2011 05:13 Drazerk wrote:##Vote: Sabin010
Bad vibes also this - On November 16 2011 00:22 Sabin010 wrote:
I have seen to many games where we lose our cop or doc first day and end up wasting our time as the mob picks us off. On November 16 2011 01:06 Sabin010 wrote:
This is my first game and im not sure of all the terms. I thought scum, mob, and mafia are the same. That appears to be a very blatant lie. Looking at it, I can really see nothing that can redeem this. LaL. ##Vote: Sabin010
On November 16 2011 05:21 Hiroruby wrote:
Does bolding matter when you vote? And I know not to Edit in if I do need to change.
On November 17 2011 03:45 Zona wrote:
Uh guys...check the 5th post. That's where votecounts will appear.
To clarify things: Votes within quotes are not counted. Votes not in bold are not counted. Right now votes in spoilers ARE counted - but that is NOT intended and will be changed so that they will not be counted. (It doesn't look like anyone has placed a vote in a spoiler so far.)
Votes with and without colons are both counted.
Since somebody kindly pointed out my mistake in voting, I'll return the favor :-P
Your vote didn't count, if you want it to count you will need to state it again and bold it.
|
On November 17 2011 07:38 GreYMisT wrote:Show nested quote +On November 17 2011 07:34 Hiroruby wrote:
I don't have time to post much right now, but I've read the thread, and really don't like what went down between Lana, and Ken.
##Vote: Lanaia
##Vote: Kenpachi
I need to do a more in depth read of Chao before I vote him, because he is getting very close to over 50%. With 26 alive, that means at any point in the day if someone reaches 14 that person is condemned to death no matter what. Choaser is still a bit off from this amount, but we do need to wait until at least until the latter end of day1 before we add on any more votes.
at any point? Wouldn't it be 14 by the end of the day-cycle(ie. 18-Nov 11:00 KST)?
|
On November 17 2011 07:44 Zephirdd wrote:Show nested quote +On November 17 2011 07:38 GreYMisT wrote:On November 17 2011 07:34 Hiroruby wrote:
I don't have time to post much right now, but I've read the thread, and really don't like what went down between Lana, and Ken.
##Vote: Lanaia
##Vote: Kenpachi
I need to do a more in depth read of Chao before I vote him, because he is getting very close to over 50%. With 26 alive, that means at any point in the day if someone reaches 14 that person is condemned to death no matter what. Choaser is still a bit off from this amount, but we do need to wait until at least until the latter end of day1 before we add on any more votes. at any point? Wouldn't it be 14 by the end of the day-cycle(ie. 18-Nov 11:00 KST)?
No.
This game uses a Majority Multi-Lynch system. During the day, any player may vote for as many other players as he or she wishes. If at any point during the day over half of players alive are voting for a particular player, that player will be condemned to the lynch and will die at the end of that day.
|
I think ZBot might be on the fritz, it didn't count my vote on Kenpachi, but it has counted HoB's vote on Drazerk which happened afterwards.
|
On November 17 2011 07:45 Lemonwalrus wrote:
I think ZBot might be on the fritz, it didn't count my vote on Kenpachi, but it has counted HoB's vote on Drazerk which happened afterwards.
I am looking into this right now.
|
On November 17 2011 07:47 ZBot wrote:Show nested quote +On November 17 2011 07:45 Lemonwalrus wrote:
I think ZBot might be on the fritz, it didn't count my vote on Kenpachi, but it has counted HoB's vote on Drazerk which happened afterwards. I am looking into this right now.
ITS SELF AWARE!
|
On November 15 2011 13:43 Hiroruby wrote:Show nested quote +On November 15 2011 12:55 LSB wrote:
come to think about it, that does seem like a nice icebreaker. So everyone! How about lets talk about how you think mafia should be played, the importance of blues, what should we do with lurkers, and what majority lynch means. Well, this is my first game so I'll give my elementary assessment of the afformentioned topics. <Fluff+Contradictions>
Specifically:
Playing Mafia: I think mafia lurking and lying are weak strategies. Following those guidelines you set will guarantee the mafia get a few free town lynches if they play smart and be active at the beginning as I'm pretty sure we will have some inactive townies.
Lurkers: should be killed, and that should be made clear right away. If you know you will die if you lurk, then you will not lurk unless you are mafia, and that should just get you killed.
Mafia will be pushing for lurkers to be lynched in the first few days. Lurkers should be killed!
On November 16 2011 05:21 Hiroruby wrote:Show nested quote +On November 16 2011 05:13 Drazerk wrote:##Vote: Sabin010
Bad vibes also this - On November 16 2011 00:22 Sabin010 wrote:
I have seen to many games where we lose our cop or doc first day and end up wasting our time as the mob picks us off. On November 16 2011 01:06 Sabin010 wrote:
This is my first game and im not sure of all the terms. I thought scum, mob, and mafia are the same. That appears to be a very blatant lie. Looking at it, I can really see nothing that can redeem this. LaL. ##Vote: Sabin010
Shitty reasoned vote for Sabin010? Doesn't post for 24 hours to explain or push for it.
On November 17 2011 07:34 Hiroruby wrote:
I don't have time to post much right now, but I've read the thread, and really don't like what went down between Lana, and Ken.
##Vote: Lanaia
##Vote: Kenpachi
I need to do a more in depth read of Chao before I vote him, because he is getting very close to over 50%.
Once again, doesn't explain his vote, saying it's due to "don't like what went down"
##vote: Hiroruby
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
