|
On March 11 2013 08:14 yamato77 wrote:
Watch this.
Pro GF snipe right here.
so will i die already
|
+ Show Spoiler +On March 11 2013 08:06 cDgCorazon wrote:Show nested quote +On March 11 2013 07:07 Vivax wrote:On March 11 2013 06:57 cDgCorazon wrote:On March 11 2013 06:31 Vivax wrote:On March 11 2013 06:20 cDgCorazon wrote:On March 11 2013 06:04 VisceraEyes wrote:On March 11 2013 05:59 cDgCorazon wrote:
Hmmm...guess who has decided to lurk now that other targets are being hunted? Yamato and Acro...
##Vote: Yamato
Gonna start scumhunting? Does this not describe your play too? Did you not just delurk to call out Yam/Acro for something you yourself were guilty of? What do you think of the "other targets being hunted"? I think Strongandbig's argument is very good. It's very convincing, but we are still a long time away from the deadline. Other than that, I've just seen a lot of nonsense and posts that I cannot understand. I was the first one to start scum hunting, don't accuse me of not doing that... Also, it's a bit frustrating to try and scumhunt and then have 5 people complain that no one has scumhunted... [vivax] You think his argument is very good? His case is pretty big what exactly do you think is good about it or what parts do you think are good? If you think his argument is good why aren't you pushing Oats and say we're far away from deadline? [/vivax] I think he makes good points. If you're going to make me repeat what he is saying and then try to hammer me for it, it's not going to happen. I'm not pushing Oats because I am pushing my own read (Yamato). Just because SnB's case is good doesn't give us an excuse to sit around for 24+ hours and do nothing. I've already said why Yamato is scummy and now I'm voting for him. It's pretty simple. I don't think I said I wanted to hammer you it's just strange that you comment on someone's case as being very good without reacting to it by either voting for the guy in the case or putting it into relation with your own case. I don't understand why you are so afraid of me I just asked you something that made me curious  Why aren't you trying to persuade me about the yamato lynch then? You too Kurumi I only asked you to write in a way that is understandable I don't get why you react like that (also you failed to roleplay didn't I break the Chezinu role or something like that ?  ) I'm not afraid of you, it's just that I don't trust anyone right now, and I could see how scum Vivax would turn that around on me. I'll be coming out with a case a few hours before the deadline. It's too early now and I know that cases presented too early in the day just lose so much traction (My case on WB in NMM 37). Show nested quote +On March 11 2013 07:08 marvellosity wrote:On March 11 2013 06:47 Kurumi wrote:
oh I will repeat that
I AM A SCUM ROLE AND I AM TOWN ALIGNED AND I WANT TO DIE SO WE CAN AVOID THE POSSIBILITY OF ME BEING A MOLE
thanks so, if you're intent on being lynched, why don't you tell us what your role is? hi s&b. we're not lynching Oats today and to be honest I only barely skimmed your case. $10 says that what you said is probably valid, but it doesn't make Oats mafia. By far the most interesting result of the case is that Corazon agrees with it, despite having played with Oats before (more than once I think?). Corazon, why don't you tell me in your own words why you think Oats is mafia, why don't you tell me how Oats' play is different this game than in Hiro's game. thanks bish. Dude, this shitty logic is bad for your standards Marv. Why are you attacking me for having the same view as you? We literally just said the same thing (like the case but don't want to vote for it). You are saying that you are not going to vote because it does not make Oats mafia and I said I'd rather see Yamato lynched than Oats. What is the problem with that? The thing is, Oats' meta is not the main part of the case. BnS laid out many reasons as to why he thinks Oats is scum and I just made a comment that I liked his case and that it had a lot of valid points in it. Let me ask you this Marv: Would you rather I... Say "I agree with SnB" and just vote for Oats? or Say "I think it's a good case but I'm going to continue to scumhunt and push my top scum read" If you prefer #1 it would be such a glaring scumtell.
You refuse to comment on a case you like cause you are afraid of scum making a case on you for that?
Can you repeat what I just said cause I'm not sure if I can believe what you said.
|
On March 11 2013 08:25 Vivax wrote:+ Show Spoiler +On March 11 2013 08:06 cDgCorazon wrote:Show nested quote +On March 11 2013 07:07 Vivax wrote:On March 11 2013 06:57 cDgCorazon wrote:On March 11 2013 06:31 Vivax wrote:On March 11 2013 06:20 cDgCorazon wrote:On March 11 2013 06:04 VisceraEyes wrote:On March 11 2013 05:59 cDgCorazon wrote:
Hmmm...guess who has decided to lurk now that other targets are being hunted? Yamato and Acro...
##Vote: Yamato
Gonna start scumhunting? Does this not describe your play too? Did you not just delurk to call out Yam/Acro for something you yourself were guilty of? What do you think of the "other targets being hunted"? I think Strongandbig's argument is very good. It's very convincing, but we are still a long time away from the deadline. Other than that, I've just seen a lot of nonsense and posts that I cannot understand. I was the first one to start scum hunting, don't accuse me of not doing that... Also, it's a bit frustrating to try and scumhunt and then have 5 people complain that no one has scumhunted... [vivax] You think his argument is very good? His case is pretty big what exactly do you think is good about it or what parts do you think are good? If you think his argument is good why aren't you pushing Oats and say we're far away from deadline? [/vivax] I think he makes good points. If you're going to make me repeat what he is saying and then try to hammer me for it, it's not going to happen. I'm not pushing Oats because I am pushing my own read (Yamato). Just because SnB's case is good doesn't give us an excuse to sit around for 24+ hours and do nothing. I've already said why Yamato is scummy and now I'm voting for him. It's pretty simple. I don't think I said I wanted to hammer you it's just strange that you comment on someone's case as being very good without reacting to it by either voting for the guy in the case or putting it into relation with your own case. I don't understand why you are so afraid of me I just asked you something that made me curious Why aren't you trying to persuade me about the yamato lynch then? You too Kurumi I only asked you to write in a way that is understandable I don't get why you react like that (also you failed to roleplay didn't I break the Chezinu role or something like that ? ) I'm not afraid of you, it's just that I don't trust anyone right now, and I could see how scum Vivax would turn that around on me. I'll be coming out with a case a few hours before the deadline. It's too early now and I know that cases presented too early in the day just lose so much traction (My case on WB in NMM 37). Show nested quote +On March 11 2013 07:08 marvellosity wrote:On March 11 2013 06:47 Kurumi wrote:
oh I will repeat that
I AM A SCUM ROLE AND I AM TOWN ALIGNED AND I WANT TO DIE SO WE CAN AVOID THE POSSIBILITY OF ME BEING A MOLE
thanks so, if you're intent on being lynched, why don't you tell us what your role is? hi s&b. we're not lynching Oats today and to be honest I only barely skimmed your case. $10 says that what you said is probably valid, but it doesn't make Oats mafia. By far the most interesting result of the case is that Corazon agrees with it, despite having played with Oats before (more than once I think?). Corazon, why don't you tell me in your own words why you think Oats is mafia, why don't you tell me how Oats' play is different this game than in Hiro's game. thanks bish. Dude, this shitty logic is bad for your standards Marv. Why are you attacking me for having the same view as you? We literally just said the same thing (like the case but don't want to vote for it). You are saying that you are not going to vote because it does not make Oats mafia and I said I'd rather see Yamato lynched than Oats. What is the problem with that? The thing is, Oats' meta is not the main part of the case. BnS laid out many reasons as to why he thinks Oats is scum and I just made a comment that I liked his case and that it had a lot of valid points in it. Let me ask you this Marv: Would you rather I... Say "I agree with SnB" and just vote for Oats? or Say "I think it's a good case but I'm going to continue to scumhunt and push my top scum read" If you prefer #1 it would be such a glaring scumtell. You refuse to comment on a case you like cause you are afraid of scum making a case on you for that? Can you repeat what I just said cause I'm not sure if I can believe what you said.
I made a comment on this case. I said it was good and had valid points. It's just me being paranoid.
|
On March 11 2013 07:40 Promethelax wrote:Show nested quote +On March 11 2013 07:24 Kurumi wrote:On March 11 2013 07:23 Promethelax wrote:
My posts are not hard to figure out
though my rhymes are weak, my words still hold clout
Vivax, you most read closely my friend;
my thoughts have both goal and an end
you should see this as you are no lout.
Kurumi, if I may ask something of you:
why is it you shared so out of the blue?
You have had twenty four hours
why ask now to be devoured?
Why has your evil become so suddenly true? I just felt like not reading my role pm and doing fun stuff, but then realised that everyone doing their roleplaying will drown this game in the sea of nonsense. So tell me, how is it that big ole wbg called you a mole in the game so early? How could he know about your tunneling habits when you didn't know yourself if you were a snake or a rabbit? Does he have information to which the rest of us are not privy? Why is it that Foolish and Ver The two vets with whom most I wish to confer have vanished so fully are they both red bullies? I say that them we should bestir Bloodycobbler is a player renowned but his reads today leave my head going around and around. He says meta suggests scum between two lurky players but Foolish is not included with these two nay-sayers. Why BC, do you leave him? please expound. Kurumi, you jack of great trades, oh possible mole explain to me the whole of your role. How is it that one day you fight for town and the next you wish us all to drown? How is this colouric shit controlled?
phils alignment is always confirmed by day 2. Why waste time analyzing a player who obviously gives himself away.
|
2610 Posts
On March 11 2013 08:38 cDgCorazon wrote:Show nested quote +On March 11 2013 08:25 Vivax wrote:+ Show Spoiler +On March 11 2013 08:06 cDgCorazon wrote:Show nested quote +On March 11 2013 07:07 Vivax wrote:On March 11 2013 06:57 cDgCorazon wrote:On March 11 2013 06:31 Vivax wrote:On March 11 2013 06:20 cDgCorazon wrote:On March 11 2013 06:04 VisceraEyes wrote:On March 11 2013 05:59 cDgCorazon wrote:
Hmmm...guess who has decided to lurk now that other targets are being hunted? Yamato and Acro...
##Vote: Yamato
Gonna start scumhunting? Does this not describe your play too? Did you not just delurk to call out Yam/Acro for something you yourself were guilty of? What do you think of the "other targets being hunted"? I think Strongandbig's argument is very good. It's very convincing, but we are still a long time away from the deadline. Other than that, I've just seen a lot of nonsense and posts that I cannot understand. I was the first one to start scum hunting, don't accuse me of not doing that... Also, it's a bit frustrating to try and scumhunt and then have 5 people complain that no one has scumhunted... [vivax] You think his argument is very good? His case is pretty big what exactly do you think is good about it or what parts do you think are good? If you think his argument is good why aren't you pushing Oats and say we're far away from deadline? [/vivax] I think he makes good points. If you're going to make me repeat what he is saying and then try to hammer me for it, it's not going to happen. I'm not pushing Oats because I am pushing my own read (Yamato). Just because SnB's case is good doesn't give us an excuse to sit around for 24+ hours and do nothing. I've already said why Yamato is scummy and now I'm voting for him. It's pretty simple. I don't think I said I wanted to hammer you it's just strange that you comment on someone's case as being very good without reacting to it by either voting for the guy in the case or putting it into relation with your own case. I don't understand why you are so afraid of me I just asked you something that made me curious Why aren't you trying to persuade me about the yamato lynch then? You too Kurumi I only asked you to write in a way that is understandable I don't get why you react like that (also you failed to roleplay didn't I break the Chezinu role or something like that ? ) I'm not afraid of you, it's just that I don't trust anyone right now, and I could see how scum Vivax would turn that around on me. I'll be coming out with a case a few hours before the deadline. It's too early now and I know that cases presented too early in the day just lose so much traction (My case on WB in NMM 37). Show nested quote +On March 11 2013 07:08 marvellosity wrote:On March 11 2013 06:47 Kurumi wrote:
oh I will repeat that
I AM A SCUM ROLE AND I AM TOWN ALIGNED AND I WANT TO DIE SO WE CAN AVOID THE POSSIBILITY OF ME BEING A MOLE
thanks so, if you're intent on being lynched, why don't you tell us what your role is? hi s&b. we're not lynching Oats today and to be honest I only barely skimmed your case. $10 says that what you said is probably valid, but it doesn't make Oats mafia. By far the most interesting result of the case is that Corazon agrees with it, despite having played with Oats before (more than once I think?). Corazon, why don't you tell me in your own words why you think Oats is mafia, why don't you tell me how Oats' play is different this game than in Hiro's game. thanks bish. Dude, this shitty logic is bad for your standards Marv. Why are you attacking me for having the same view as you? We literally just said the same thing (like the case but don't want to vote for it). You are saying that you are not going to vote because it does not make Oats mafia and I said I'd rather see Yamato lynched than Oats. What is the problem with that? The thing is, Oats' meta is not the main part of the case. BnS laid out many reasons as to why he thinks Oats is scum and I just made a comment that I liked his case and that it had a lot of valid points in it. Let me ask you this Marv: Would you rather I... Say "I agree with SnB" and just vote for Oats? or Say "I think it's a good case but I'm going to continue to scumhunt and push my top scum read" If you prefer #1 it would be such a glaring scumtell. You refuse to comment on a case you like cause you are afraid of scum making a case on you for that? Can you repeat what I just said cause I'm not sure if I can believe what you said. I made a comment on this case. I said it was good and had valid points. It's just me being paranoid.
Scared to take a stance?
|
On March 11 2013 08:40 BloodyC0bbler wrote:Show nested quote +On March 11 2013 07:40 Promethelax wrote:On March 11 2013 07:24 Kurumi wrote:On March 11 2013 07:23 Promethelax wrote:
My posts are not hard to figure out
though my rhymes are weak, my words still hold clout
Vivax, you most read closely my friend;
my thoughts have both goal and an end
you should see this as you are no lout.
Kurumi, if I may ask something of you:
why is it you shared so out of the blue?
You have had twenty four hours
why ask now to be devoured?
Why has your evil become so suddenly true? I just felt like not reading my role pm and doing fun stuff, but then realised that everyone doing their roleplaying will drown this game in the sea of nonsense. So tell me, how is it that big ole wbg called you a mole in the game so early? How could he know about your tunneling habits when you didn't know yourself if you were a snake or a rabbit? Does he have information to which the rest of us are not privy? Why is it that Foolish and Ver The two vets with whom most I wish to confer have vanished so fully are they both red bullies? I say that them we should bestir Bloodycobbler is a player renowned but his reads today leave my head going around and around. He says meta suggests scum between two lurky players but Foolish is not included with these two nay-sayers. Why BC, do you leave him? please expound. Kurumi, you jack of great trades, oh possible mole explain to me the whole of your role. How is it that one day you fight for town and the next you wish us all to drown? How is this colouric shit controlled? phils alignment is always confirmed by day 2. Why waste time analyzing a player who obviously gives himself away.
phil is foolish? I say that to make this make sense, so I do.
so why is his meta only used on day two?
Ver and Sloosh you can call out right now
but to foolish extra time you allow.
So expand on the above, or I might lynch poor Foo'
|
##Unvote
##Vote Stutters695
Forget about kurumi. if he's confirmed town then there is no point in talking about him.
lynch the commentator. his filter is short so i will not bother even quoting. all he can do is ask meaningless questions and complain about how people treat him. he has no opinions on anything of value.
|
On March 11 2013 08:50 Promethelax wrote:Show nested quote +On March 11 2013 08:40 BloodyC0bbler wrote:On March 11 2013 07:40 Promethelax wrote:On March 11 2013 07:24 Kurumi wrote:On March 11 2013 07:23 Promethelax wrote:
My posts are not hard to figure out
though my rhymes are weak, my words still hold clout
Vivax, you most read closely my friend;
my thoughts have both goal and an end
you should see this as you are no lout.
Kurumi, if I may ask something of you:
why is it you shared so out of the blue?
You have had twenty four hours
why ask now to be devoured?
Why has your evil become so suddenly true? I just felt like not reading my role pm and doing fun stuff, but then realised that everyone doing their roleplaying will drown this game in the sea of nonsense. So tell me, how is it that big ole wbg called you a mole in the game so early? How could he know about your tunneling habits when you didn't know yourself if you were a snake or a rabbit? Does he have information to which the rest of us are not privy? Why is it that Foolish and Ver The two vets with whom most I wish to confer have vanished so fully are they both red bullies? I say that them we should bestir Bloodycobbler is a player renowned but his reads today leave my head going around and around. He says meta suggests scum between two lurky players but Foolish is not included with these two nay-sayers. Why BC, do you leave him? please expound. Kurumi, you jack of great trades, oh possible mole explain to me the whole of your role. How is it that one day you fight for town and the next you wish us all to drown? How is this colouric shit controlled? phils alignment is always confirmed by day 2. Why waste time analyzing a player who obviously gives himself away. phil is foolish? I say that to make this make sense, so I do. so why is his meta only used on day two? Ver and Sloosh you can call out right now but to foolish extra time you allow. So expand on the above, or I might lynch poor Foo'
This. If you have some reason for not allowing Ver the same benefit of the doubt I'd like to hear it.
|
There are some players you just don't lynch d1-d2.
Foolishness is one of them.
|
|
|
On March 11 2013 08:55 supersoft wrote:
There are some players you just don't lynch d1-d2.
Foolishness is one of them.
I can't say that I disagree
but surely my point you must see
surely Ver is in the same category
or has it been so long we forget his story?
He is TL's number one townie.
|
On March 11 2013 08:56 VisceraEyes wrote:
And Ver is not?
I envy the ease of your response
you can use as few words as you want.
I must write my five lines
even when all that is on my mind
is: my dear SS, you logic gaunt.
|
Just sucks cause Foolish decided to do it on his own - if you're doing the same and blaming a post-restriction, I have no sympathy. <3
|
On March 11 2013 08:53 VisceraEyes wrote:Show nested quote +On March 11 2013 08:50 Promethelax wrote:On March 11 2013 08:40 BloodyC0bbler wrote:On March 11 2013 07:40 Promethelax wrote:On March 11 2013 07:24 Kurumi wrote:On March 11 2013 07:23 Promethelax wrote:
My posts are not hard to figure out
though my rhymes are weak, my words still hold clout
Vivax, you most read closely my friend;
my thoughts have both goal and an end
you should see this as you are no lout.
Kurumi, if I may ask something of you:
why is it you shared so out of the blue?
You have had twenty four hours
why ask now to be devoured?
Why has your evil become so suddenly true? I just felt like not reading my role pm and doing fun stuff, but then realised that everyone doing their roleplaying will drown this game in the sea of nonsense. So tell me, how is it that big ole wbg called you a mole in the game so early? How could he know about your tunneling habits when you didn't know yourself if you were a snake or a rabbit? Does he have information to which the rest of us are not privy? Why is it that Foolish and Ver The two vets with whom most I wish to confer have vanished so fully are they both red bullies? I say that them we should bestir Bloodycobbler is a player renowned but his reads today leave my head going around and around. He says meta suggests scum between two lurky players but Foolish is not included with these two nay-sayers. Why BC, do you leave him? please expound. Kurumi, you jack of great trades, oh possible mole explain to me the whole of your role. How is it that one day you fight for town and the next you wish us all to drown? How is this colouric shit controlled? phils alignment is always confirmed by day 2. Why waste time analyzing a player who obviously gives himself away. phil is foolish? I say that to make this make sense, so I do. so why is his meta only used on day two? Ver and Sloosh you can call out right now but to foolish extra time you allow. So expand on the above, or I might lynch poor Foo' This. If you have some reason for not allowing Ver the same benefit of the doubt I'd like to hear it.
Easy. Ver is catchable day 1 based on meta. Foolishness is day 2. As such you go with the person you know.
Also for anyone saying don't lynch vets day 1, this game is almost entirely vets. Stop being dicktards. People who contribute in a meaningful and helpful way get to live, people who do dick all to help get sent to the gallows.
|
On March 11 2013 03:03 wherebugsgo wrote:
Perhaps you all know this old saying that I am about to invoke.
It is well known, but often bastardized. I will set this straight now.
Imagine we now live in a long past age. Our language is the language of the Sages. In this language of the wise, the ending "mi" roughly translates into "the little." It is a dimunitive title, used most commonly for the apprentice of a wizard. The evil ones are rough, but the sages are not. There is no aural difference, merely in our script. If we were to transliterate to the modern language of the flock, it would be the difference between the letters "f" and "ph," or "c" and "s" and "z," or, in our case, the difference between "C" and "K".
In the past, a member of The Great Ones was old Curu, also known as The Cunning. Curu had a duality and the propensity to delve into evil, but on the whole acted as one of the influential Sages of our past. In the language of the wise, Curu means "goose", although "Curumi" means "duck." Oddly enough, "Uruc" (ooroos) translates into "mouse", and "Uruk" (oorook) is "rat". When we add a dimunitive, with "soft" letters such as "c", a vowel is added. "Uruc" becomes "Urucimi". With "hard" letters, the end vowel must be moved to the front to facilitate the dimunitive. Thus, from "Uruk" we get "Kurumi."
I have thus discovered the true meaning behind the name of the impostor.
After all, the old saying is that, if it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, it is most definitely a rat.
This cracked me up.
|
gentlemen.the man stutters walks before you doing nothing while still posting. why do you ignore his facade and talk about players who haven't even shown up?
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
Announcement!
Kurumi as Wherebugsgo has been killed by Meapak_Ziphh!
You are wherebugsgo, Jack of all mafia trades! Unfortunately for you, you seem to have rolled town. Once per cycle, you must submit one of the following actions. You cannot select the same action twice. The following cycle you will receive a reward for your scummy ways based on your selection. 1) Frame target player to return the role and alignment of your choice. 2) Silence target player from posting in the thread for the first 24 hours of the day cycle. 3) Cover target player's alignment from being revealed during an alignment check or death through night hit. You cannot cover yourself. 4) Roleblock target player. 5) Pardon target player during the day cycle, negating all votes against that player. You cannot pardon yourself. You win with town. Hidden rewards:
1) Frame -> Role cop target player
2) Silence -> Mason target player for the first 24 hours
3) Cover -> Godfather
4) Roleblock -> Jail target player
5) Pardon -> Unlynchable for 1 cycle+ Show Spoiler +On March 22 2012 03:12 wherebugsgo wrote:Poll: Should I help town or scum?Me (11) 65% Town (4) 24% Scum (2) 12% 17 total votes Your vote: Should I help town or scum? (Vote): Town
(Vote): Scum
(Vote): Me
|
Also why the fuck isn't Mocsta more of a presence this game?
|
On March 11 2013 09:00 VisceraEyes wrote:
Just sucks cause Foolish decided to do it on his own - if you're doing the same and blaming a post-restriction, I have no sympathy. <3
No, I do it by choice
these lines are my voice;
the restriction is of my own making
I devised it myself: no faking
I must say poetry makes me rejoice.
BloodyC's response is a good one
he doesn't seem to be just having fun
his ideas are not mine
but I think they are fine
for now I have him as not-dumb
|
and modconfirmed player shot already rofl
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
