EPTExcept me, I'm the best of them all so it doesn't happen to me.
I think I'm the only one that hasn't hydra-derped yet lol. Maybe Grey/iGrok haven't yet
/G
[T] MTG Mini Mafia II - Page 28
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
(DontFear)ThePoster
Guernsey584 Posts
Except me, I'm the best of them all so it doesn't happen to me. I think I'm the only one that hasn't hydra-derped yet lol. Maybe Grey/iGrok haven't yet /G | ||
|
(DontFear)ThePoster
Guernsey584 Posts
Come on post post post post, it may be the only time we can catch them like this! | ||
|
Clockwork Hydra
Uzbekistan442 Posts
On January 30 2013 08:23 (DontFear)ThePoster wrote: Anyways, this means we can do any shit we want without scum communicating with each other freely! Come on post post post post, it may be the only time we can catch them like this! Oh baby! ~This important post is brought to you ~by ~dandel | ||
|
(DontFear)ThePoster
Guernsey584 Posts
Topics of spam for other posters: Rockhydra, discuss. | ||
|
(DontFear)ThePoster
Guernsey584 Posts
Rock, hmm, yeah. Basically what we discussed in the QT. However (just for our dear observers and fellow townies), I don't see much scummy from Hope, and I don't know how to read zbets really. I entrust your read more than mine lol Hope's argument about 0/X creatures, hmm, kind of seems townie to me. Seemed too personal and "bad" for him to say that as scum. I mean, him being antagonistic against me right off the bat doesn't seem like a good scum strategy does it? Specially about something irrelevant like a policy regarding 0/X creatures Don't really know what to think of what zbest posted.....doesn't strike me as scummy nor townie. Although I guess in a "general sense" it's more townie than scummy I also agree with some stuff Hope posted in that "reads" post of his. To be honest Suck and Aperture seem more "bad" than Rock, and are far ahead them in the "who to kill" list. /G | ||
|
(DontFear)ThePoster
Guernsey584 Posts
We also need Stutters to finally "catch up" with the thread, and Cross to get here. /G | ||
|
Clockwork Hydra
Uzbekistan442 Posts
On January 30 2013 08:22 (DontFear)ThePoster wrote: Also considering Prome told me (and everybody) Stutters is this "useless" every time he's town, I am thus willing to "forgive" him and focus on Crossfire more, and also considering Xfire's "blunders" and contradictions and wishy-washy play so far I.e if I had 2 10/10 beasts I'd attack Cross right now and let Stutters be for another day. Please don't say this kind of stuff. Stutters: you are not getting a freebie from me. I don't give a shit about your meta. Start scumhunting or get zombied. | ||
|
(DontFear)ThePoster
Guernsey584 Posts
p | ||
|
(DontFear)ThePoster
Guernsey584 Posts
| ||
|
Stutters695
2610 Posts
On January 30 2013 07:42 (DontFear)ThePoster wrote: Also Stutters: This is kind of interesting, since every single post of yours since this one (except the one where I basically force you stuff out of you), has been about MtG speculation. What gives? I think I saw you post in LIX, so you shouldn't have much trouble posting here soon. I should have phrased that better. Theory crafting isn't good on its own but it is helpful early d1. It provides something to discuss. As the game goes on I expect less theory crafting except to what directly applies to actions that day. That said regarding mind aglow I'm neutral to today or tomorrow. Since the mafia creature is unlockable and we want yo attack whenever possible anyway as long as I don't get attacked for 11 from monsters that are dropped I'll live til tomorrow. It's definitely better for me today since I might pull something I can drop but in the grand scheme whatever gives us the most attack damage is what I'm backing. Regarding revealing deck arch types I agree with revealing. I've got a green ramp with bears and its probably one of the weaker decks due to my lack of vintage knowledge and picking cards. That said it does pack some power of it gets rolling but nowhere near as fearsome as zombies or something like that. I saw someone has lavamancers which means the more they mill through mind aglow means they can burn more, but I don't know the other decks well enough. Now regarding who I think is scum, I agree I think at least 1 hydra is scum. I know I'm not and currently nova feels town to me. Crossfire I'm somewhat suspicious of. He might not know MtG that well but of all of his posts nothing is an original thought except gonzaw is scummy for a post that once he explained it he agreed with (although less extreme). What concerns me about that is that he's advocating defending attacks as long as they're offensive also which is beneficial to scum much more than town from my view. I need to read over the hydras filters to get a feel for who is most likely scum out of them, but holistically I'd lean towards aperture currently. | ||
|
(DontFear)ThePoster
Guernsey584 Posts
Think of this as a normal D1, and that you HAVE to find scum before the 48 hours are up. Don't get complacent just because you don't have monsters to attack and shit and just want to "let the time fly" or something, like what happened last game (I think last game nobody found anybody suspicious at all until T2 lol). Anyways, Prome said he wouldn't oppose the "20 cards with Mind Glow" plan, and I'd support it with 2 mana as well. I think CW is town, and I don't mind him having some skeletons, specially since he can distribute damage with them, and I grant it they'll take town's input regarding it and that kind of shit. About Bin, he seems townie but like I said, they need to get into the scumhunting mood and be a little bit more active. Their plan seems pro-town, although I don't want them to like lie as scum and never use Voyager or some shit like that  However right now I don't see much to convince us Bin is lying about playing Voyager, so I support that as well. /G | ||
|
Stutters695
2610 Posts
On January 30 2013 08:37 Clockwork Hydra wrote: Please don't say this kind of stuff. Stutters: you are not getting a freebie from me. I don't give a shit about your meta. Start scumhunting or get zombied. Agreed with this actually. Why would you give me a free pass for a day? From your position I wouldn't consider me town yet. Why would you give me a free pass instead of questioning me to force more out of me. | ||
|
Stutters695
2610 Posts
| ||
|
(DontFear)ThePoster
Guernsey584 Posts
If I had to attack someone today it'd be Cross, not you. I don't think I said I'd give you a "free pass", rather that I'd "forgive" your lack of participation/shit as not being scummy enough to kill you. Thus I wanted more focus on Cross, who I do want to kill, or rather (to not be that extreme just yet), who I think is likely scum, at least ahead of your/Nova /G | ||
Aperture Science
United States151 Posts
On January 30 2013 07:59 (DontFear)ThePoster wrote: ApSci: I also want something from you guys, I have no idea who you think is scum or why. You will get that info in a bit. We have an opinion, but posting it is counterproductive at the moment. Yes, I can be obnoxious, arrogant, and hostile. These can be useful. I can also be fun, but you've got to be fun with me. To me, mafia is a game - if you aren't having fun while playing it you're doing it wrong. I'd rather have fun and lose than win by ruining the game for everyone. But if you ruin it for me, I'll do the same right back. I don't play like "Oh herp-dee-derp, let me tell everyone exactly what I feel like at all times." That just seems frivolous to me, and is the leading cause of why people like Gonzaw end up with 30-page filters. If I'm not sure about someone, I'm going to wait. Look at the best town players, they do the exact same thing. Foolishness, GGQ, Radfield - these guys don't talk 24/7. Besides, scumhunting takes content, and in the first 24hrs there is no content. Now that there is a bit (though not a ton), I can look back and actually form opinions. Those of you who've formed opinions already, congratulations! You're good at pulling things out of your ass. I'm willing to give this game a fresh start, and try to have fun. Final bit of MTG advice: Minds Aglow doesn't just affect whoever puts in mana. It makes EVERYONE draw those cards. Same with Collective Voyage. Whoever said "keep the players balanced" had the right idea. 20 Zombies isn't bad when everyone has them. They're bad when one player has them. This isn't a mayor game, lets not turn it into one. | ||
|
BinOnFire
Laos123 Posts
/Oats | ||
|
Aperture Science
United States151 Posts
Now you no longer have to worry about me in your attempts to plan out what everyone will play. | ||
|
Aperture Science
United States151 Posts
| ||
|
Aperture Science
United States151 Posts
.,-:;//;:=, | ||
|
Stutters695
2610 Posts
On January 30 2013 09:18 (DontFear)ThePoster wrote: Check the "i.e". If I had to attack someone today it'd be Cross, not you. I don't think I said I'd give you a "free pass", rather that I'd "forgive" your lack of participation/shit as not being scummy enough to kill you. Thus I wanted more focus on Cross, who I do want to kill, or rather (to not be that extreme just yet), who I think is likely scum, at least ahead of your/Nova /G Yeah, I got that. Makes sense but why not question me to try and force more out of me? Seems like you're content to kill Xfire then me rather than be proactive about it. That concerns me. | ||
| ||
