|
On January 03 2013 07:38 Toadesstern wrote:besides that, hopeless looks like a nice 2nd target. Show nested quote +On January 03 2013 07:12 Hopeless1der wrote:On January 03 2013 07:04 Lazermonkey wrote:
So, anyone feel like policy lynching grush just for the lulz? He is going to troll the game 24/7 no matter what alignment he gets... I will have nothing to do with a policy lynch on any specific player. If a player warrants such treatment, they shouldn't be allowed to play in the first place. You may not like grush's playstyle, but I don't find it entirely devoid of reason or thinking. 1)I am willing to go after lurkers, but that's about as far as I am concerned with policy.2) @wbg voters: dafuq? 1) Who cares and why are you telling us that? You could as well just get in here, yell "YALLA YALLA NO POLICY LYNCH OMFG NOOBS" and it would be way better than that. Why do you feel the need to tell us that you're fine with lynching a lurker although you apparently don't want to, at all? At least that's what I'm getting at here. 2) Srsly?
1)
I am not fine with lynching at random.
I am not fine with lynching alphabetically
I am not fine with lynching by forum post count
I am not fine with lynching by thread post count
I am fine with lynching lurkers
2) Piss off
|
This just in, palmar most likely town.
More in a few hours when I get home.
|
|
|
On January 03 2013 07:42 Hopeless1der wrote:Show nested quote +On January 03 2013 07:38 Toadesstern wrote:besides that, hopeless looks like a nice 2nd target. On January 03 2013 07:12 Hopeless1der wrote:On January 03 2013 07:04 Lazermonkey wrote:
So, anyone feel like policy lynching grush just for the lulz? He is going to troll the game 24/7 no matter what alignment he gets... I will have nothing to do with a policy lynch on any specific player. If a player warrants such treatment, they shouldn't be allowed to play in the first place. You may not like grush's playstyle, but I don't find it entirely devoid of reason or thinking. 1)I am willing to go after lurkers, but that's about as far as I am concerned with policy.2) @wbg voters: dafuq? 1) Who cares and why are you telling us that? You could as well just get in here, yell "YALLA YALLA NO POLICY LYNCH OMFG NOOBS" and it would be way better than that. Why do you feel the need to tell us that you're fine with lynching a lurker although you apparently don't want to, at all? At least that's what I'm getting at here. 2) Srsly? 1) I am not fine with lynching at random. I am not fine with lynching alphabetically I am not fine with lynching by forum post count I am not fine with lynching by thread post count I am fine with lynching lurkers 2) Piss off
I'm actually fine with every single method you proposed.
|
On January 03 2013 07:43 grush57 wrote:
do a video palmar!
Nah, I read my role pm, it'll be too hard to fake that I'm town on camera.
|
On January 03 2013 07:42 Hopeless1der wrote:Show nested quote +On January 03 2013 07:38 Toadesstern wrote:besides that, hopeless looks like a nice 2nd target. On January 03 2013 07:12 Hopeless1der wrote:On January 03 2013 07:04 Lazermonkey wrote:
So, anyone feel like policy lynching grush just for the lulz? He is going to troll the game 24/7 no matter what alignment he gets... I will have nothing to do with a policy lynch on any specific player. If a player warrants such treatment, they shouldn't be allowed to play in the first place. You may not like grush's playstyle, but I don't find it entirely devoid of reason or thinking. 1)I am willing to go after lurkers, but that's about as far as I am concerned with policy.2) @wbg voters: dafuq? 1) Who cares and why are you telling us that? You could as well just get in here, yell "YALLA YALLA NO POLICY LYNCH OMFG NOOBS" and it would be way better than that. Why do you feel the need to tell us that you're fine with lynching a lurker although you apparently don't want to, at all? At least that's what I'm getting at here. 2) Srsly? 1) I am not fine with lynching at random. I am not fine with lynching alphabetically I am not fine with lynching by forum post count I am not fine with lynching by thread post count I am fine with lynching lurkers 2) Piss off
well yeah, the question was why you feel the need to tell us that. If you wanted to tell us that you don't want to policy lynch you could have just said "I don't want to policy lynch (and you're a terrible person to suggest that)". Instead you said you'd be fine with lynching lurkers and I'm just doubting your motives here.
No need to get mad at me.
|
United States2624 Posts
I am not fine with lynching by thread post count
I am fine with lynching lurkers
lol
|
I made my piece on what 'policy' I would entertain and that was it. My motives aren't suspicious until I ignore lurkers, but you're already lining up a day 2 lynch on me? I may not need to get mad at you, but I feel completely justified, especially in light of the fact that the reasons for voting bugs are terrible, but clearly I'm the retard who doesn't "get it".
|
|
|
On January 03 2013 07:47 HiroPro wrote:Show nested quote +I am not fine with lynching by thread post count
I am fine with lynching lurkers lol
I meant by highest post count there...meh
|
On January 03 2013 07:48 Hopeless1der wrote:
I made my piece on what 'policy' I would entertain and that was it. My motives aren't suspicious until I ignore lurkers, but you're already lining up a day 2 lynch on me? I may not need to get mad at you, but I feel completely justified, especially in light of the fact that the reasons for voting bugs are terrible, but clearly I'm the retard who doesn't "get it".
Bitch please, just let it go.
Kick back, have a drink, lynch a bug.
|
On January 03 2013 07:47 HiroPro wrote:Show nested quote +I am not fine with lynching by thread post count
I am fine with lynching lurkers lol TBH I think there is a significant diference in these two.
Some players post a little but at least provides their thought process and what not.
Some players post a little but doesn't.
Some players just want to watch the world burn...
I'm quite sure that it is the second type of player he wants to lynch.
|
On January 03 2013 07:49 Palmar wrote:Show nested quote +On January 03 2013 07:48 Hopeless1der wrote:
I made my piece on what 'policy' I would entertain and that was it. My motives aren't suspicious until I ignore lurkers, but you're already lining up a day 2 lynch on me? I may not need to get mad at you, but I feel completely justified, especially in light of the fact that the reasons for voting bugs are terrible, but clearly I'm the retard who doesn't "get it". Bitch please, just let it go. Kick back, have a drink, lynch a bug.
 Yes sir...
still, not really seeing a good reason to lynch bugs yet.
|
On January 03 2013 07:48 Palmar wrote:
nice catch
On January 03 2013 07:50 Lazermonkey wrote:Show nested quote +On January 03 2013 07:47 HiroPro wrote:I am not fine with lynching by thread post count
I am fine with lynching lurkers lol TBH I think there is a significant diference in these two. Some players post a little but at least provides their thought process and what not. Some players post a little but doesn't. Some players just want to watch the world burn... I'm quite sure that it is the second type of player he wants to lynch.
do you agree on monkey or do you still think it's a catch?
|
Monkey is annoying with all his shitty logic. Hiro knows whats up
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
hey supersoft, how do you feel about killing Palmar today?
|
On January 03 2013 07:55 marvellosity wrote:
hey supersoft, how do you feel about killing Palmar today?
On January 03 2013 07:43 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:
This just in, palmar most likely town.
I'd prefer to lynch MZ.
|
i would like that ongoing game to be over so i could lynch palmar.
|
United States2624 Posts
marvel. i'm thinking about killing hopeless, monkey, and supersoft. which one would you not?
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
MZ just silly. Palmar trolling and disruptive and it's boring.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
