|
On January 03 2013 07:04 Lazermonkey wrote:
So, anyone feel like policy lynching grush just for the lulz? He is going to troll the game 24/7 no matter what alignment he gets...
I will have nothing to do with a policy lynch on any specific player. If a player warrants such treatment, they shouldn't be allowed to play in the first place. You may not like grush's playstyle, but I don't find it entirely devoid of reason or thinking.
I am willing to go after lurkers, but that's about as far as I am concerned with policy.
@wbg voters: dafuq?
|
On January 03 2013 07:11 supersoft wrote:Show nested quote +On January 03 2013 07:10 Lazermonkey wrote:On January 03 2013 07:09 grush57 wrote:On January 03 2013 07:04 Lazermonkey wrote:
So, anyone feel like policy lynching grush just for the lulz? He is going to troll the game 24/7 no matter what alignment he gets... You're going to regret that :D I hope I will. Please show me your A-game this time grush! You're in for a wbg lynch? I'd rather lynch grush : (.
|
On January 03 2013 07:11 grush57 wrote:Show nested quote +On January 03 2013 07:11 Lazermonkey wrote:On January 03 2013 07:10 kushm4sta wrote:On January 03 2013 07:05 Lazermonkey wrote:
I'm OK with killing kush as well! i never even seen you before how do you automatically want to kill me? I've read some games that you've played. What games have you read of me? :D I played with you. Some newbie game (XX? something along thoose lines at least.)like half a year ago. You fake claimed DT as vanilla...
|
really kush? he calls you a troll so you ninja omgus lazer?
|
11589 Posts
On January 03 2013 07:12 Hopeless1der wrote:Show nested quote +On January 03 2013 07:04 Lazermonkey wrote:
So, anyone feel like policy lynching grush just for the lulz? He is going to troll the game 24/7 no matter what alignment he gets... I will have nothing to do with a policy lynch on any specific player. If a player warrants such treatment, they shouldn't be allowed to play in the first place. You may not like grush's playstyle, but I don't find it entirely devoid of reason or thinking. I am willing to go after lurkers, but that's about as far as I am concerned with policy. @wbg voters: dafuq?
Hopeless, Why so serious?
|
On January 03 2013 07:14 Lazermonkey wrote:Show nested quote +On January 03 2013 07:11 grush57 wrote:On January 03 2013 07:11 Lazermonkey wrote:On January 03 2013 07:10 kushm4sta wrote:On January 03 2013 07:05 Lazermonkey wrote:
I'm OK with killing kush as well! i never even seen you before how do you automatically want to kill me? I've read some games that you've played. What games have you read of me? :D I played with you. Some newbie game (XX? something along thoose lines at least.)like half a year ago. You fake claimed DT as vanilla...
Yea and that caused us the scum to slip and win the game.
Gj using a 6 month old game. Read current ones?
|
On January 03 2013 07:14 yamato77 wrote:Show nested quote +On January 03 2013 07:12 Hopeless1der wrote:On January 03 2013 07:04 Lazermonkey wrote:
So, anyone feel like policy lynching grush just for the lulz? He is going to troll the game 24/7 no matter what alignment he gets... I will have nothing to do with a policy lynch on any specific player. If a player warrants such treatment, they shouldn't be allowed to play in the first place. You may not like grush's playstyle, but I don't find it entirely devoid of reason or thinking. I am willing to go after lurkers, but that's about as far as I am concerned with policy. @wbg voters: dafuq? Hopeless, Why so serious?
How long do you want the start of the game to be trivial nonsense? The sooner we get started the better, no? Yamato, why does bugs have 2 votes already?
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On January 03 2013 07:17 Hopeless1der wrote:Show nested quote +On January 03 2013 07:14 yamato77 wrote:On January 03 2013 07:12 Hopeless1der wrote:On January 03 2013 07:04 Lazermonkey wrote:
So, anyone feel like policy lynching grush just for the lulz? He is going to troll the game 24/7 no matter what alignment he gets... I will have nothing to do with a policy lynch on any specific player. If a player warrants such treatment, they shouldn't be allowed to play in the first place. You may not like grush's playstyle, but I don't find it entirely devoid of reason or thinking. I am willing to go after lurkers, but that's about as far as I am concerned with policy. @wbg voters: dafuq? Hopeless, Why so serious? How long do you want the start of the game to be trivial nonsense? The sooner we get started the better, no? Yamato, why does bugs have 2 votes already?
longer than this 
|
11589 Posts
On January 03 2013 07:17 Hopeless1der wrote:Show nested quote +On January 03 2013 07:14 yamato77 wrote:On January 03 2013 07:12 Hopeless1der wrote:On January 03 2013 07:04 Lazermonkey wrote:
So, anyone feel like policy lynching grush just for the lulz? He is going to troll the game 24/7 no matter what alignment he gets... I will have nothing to do with a policy lynch on any specific player. If a player warrants such treatment, they shouldn't be allowed to play in the first place. You may not like grush's playstyle, but I don't find it entirely devoid of reason or thinking. I am willing to go after lurkers, but that's about as far as I am concerned with policy. @wbg voters: dafuq? Hopeless, Why so serious? How long do you want the start of the game to be trivial nonsense? The sooner we get started the better, no? Yamato, why does bugs have 2 votes already?
Because Toad and Palmar want to troll the shit out of Bugs like they always do.
It doesn't seem meaningful to me.
|
On January 03 2013 07:15 grush57 wrote:Show nested quote +On January 03 2013 07:14 Lazermonkey wrote:On January 03 2013 07:11 grush57 wrote:On January 03 2013 07:11 Lazermonkey wrote:On January 03 2013 07:10 kushm4sta wrote:On January 03 2013 07:05 Lazermonkey wrote:
I'm OK with killing kush as well! i never even seen you before how do you automatically want to kill me? I've read some games that you've played. What games have you read of me? :D I played with you. Some newbie game (XX? something along thoose lines at least.)like half a year ago. You fake claimed DT as vanilla... Yea and that caused us the scum to slip and win the game. Gj using a 6 month old game. Read current ones? Well, if scum wouldn't have fake claimed why might as well have lost the game so it was a crazy gamble from your side.
Yhea, I think it was Hero mini mafia. I also played with you in Mad men mafia(although to be fair that was some time ago as well). I wasn't really impressed by your play in either of these games.
|
No one is trolling anyone I believe deep in my soul that Palmar and Toad both would love nothing more than to lynch Bugs today.
|
On January 03 2013 07:18 yamato77 wrote:Show nested quote +On January 03 2013 07:17 Hopeless1der wrote:On January 03 2013 07:14 yamato77 wrote:On January 03 2013 07:12 Hopeless1der wrote:On January 03 2013 07:04 Lazermonkey wrote:
So, anyone feel like policy lynching grush just for the lulz? He is going to troll the game 24/7 no matter what alignment he gets... I will have nothing to do with a policy lynch on any specific player. If a player warrants such treatment, they shouldn't be allowed to play in the first place. You may not like grush's playstyle, but I don't find it entirely devoid of reason or thinking. I am willing to go after lurkers, but that's about as far as I am concerned with policy. @wbg voters: dafuq? Hopeless, Why so serious? How long do you want the start of the game to be trivial nonsense? The sooner we get started the better, no? Yamato, why does bugs have 2 votes already? Because Toad and Palmar want to troll the shit out of Bugs like they always do. It doesn't seem meaningful to me.
I'm not trolling. I'm sincerely suggesting we policy lynch Bugs to start the game off.
1) It'd be fucking hilarious
2) He's wrong as town
3) He's good as scum
|
11589 Posts
On January 03 2013 07:20 Palmar wrote:Show nested quote +On January 03 2013 07:18 yamato77 wrote:On January 03 2013 07:17 Hopeless1der wrote:On January 03 2013 07:14 yamato77 wrote:On January 03 2013 07:12 Hopeless1der wrote:On January 03 2013 07:04 Lazermonkey wrote:
So, anyone feel like policy lynching grush just for the lulz? He is going to troll the game 24/7 no matter what alignment he gets... I will have nothing to do with a policy lynch on any specific player. If a player warrants such treatment, they shouldn't be allowed to play in the first place. You may not like grush's playstyle, but I don't find it entirely devoid of reason or thinking. I am willing to go after lurkers, but that's about as far as I am concerned with policy. @wbg voters: dafuq? Hopeless, Why so serious? How long do you want the start of the game to be trivial nonsense? The sooner we get started the better, no? Yamato, why does bugs have 2 votes already? Because Toad and Palmar want to troll the shit out of Bugs like they always do. It doesn't seem meaningful to me. I'm not trolling. I'm sincerely suggesting we policy lynch Bugs to start the game off. 1) It'd be fucking hilarious 2) He's wrong as town 3) He's good as scum
So you're following my suggestion from our last game with our Buggy friend, eh?
I almost think it's a good idea.
|
|
|
On January 03 2013 07:20 Palmar wrote:Show nested quote +On January 03 2013 07:18 yamato77 wrote:On January 03 2013 07:17 Hopeless1der wrote:On January 03 2013 07:14 yamato77 wrote:On January 03 2013 07:12 Hopeless1der wrote:On January 03 2013 07:04 Lazermonkey wrote:
So, anyone feel like policy lynching grush just for the lulz? He is going to troll the game 24/7 no matter what alignment he gets... I will have nothing to do with a policy lynch on any specific player. If a player warrants such treatment, they shouldn't be allowed to play in the first place. You may not like grush's playstyle, but I don't find it entirely devoid of reason or thinking. I am willing to go after lurkers, but that's about as far as I am concerned with policy. @wbg voters: dafuq? Hopeless, Why so serious? How long do you want the start of the game to be trivial nonsense? The sooner we get started the better, no? Yamato, why does bugs have 2 votes already? Because Toad and Palmar want to troll the shit out of Bugs like they always do. It doesn't seem meaningful to me. I'm not trolling. I'm sincerely suggesting we policy lynch Bugs to start the game off. 1) It'd be fucking hilarious 2) He's wrong as town 3) He's good as scum Last game I played scum and bugs played town. He opposed the D1 misslynch and nailed the whole scum team D2. I was happy that town decided to misslynch him that day instead of listening to him. I'm guessing you are trolling but in case aren't: bugs is one of the best town players in this game. Foh Sho.
|
##Vote: wherebugsgo
This is the kind of policy I can get behind.
|
On January 03 2013 07:24 Lazermonkey wrote:Show nested quote +On January 03 2013 07:20 Palmar wrote:On January 03 2013 07:18 yamato77 wrote:On January 03 2013 07:17 Hopeless1der wrote:On January 03 2013 07:14 yamato77 wrote:On January 03 2013 07:12 Hopeless1der wrote:On January 03 2013 07:04 Lazermonkey wrote:
So, anyone feel like policy lynching grush just for the lulz? He is going to troll the game 24/7 no matter what alignment he gets... I will have nothing to do with a policy lynch on any specific player. If a player warrants such treatment, they shouldn't be allowed to play in the first place. You may not like grush's playstyle, but I don't find it entirely devoid of reason or thinking. I am willing to go after lurkers, but that's about as far as I am concerned with policy. @wbg voters: dafuq? Hopeless, Why so serious? How long do you want the start of the game to be trivial nonsense? The sooner we get started the better, no? Yamato, why does bugs have 2 votes already? Because Toad and Palmar want to troll the shit out of Bugs like they always do. It doesn't seem meaningful to me. I'm not trolling. I'm sincerely suggesting we policy lynch Bugs to start the game off. 1) It'd be fucking hilarious 2) He's wrong as town 3) He's good as scum Last game I played scum and bugs played town. He opposed the D1 misslynch and nailed the whole scum team D2. I was happy that town decided to misslynch him that day instead of listening to him. I'm guessing you are trolling but in case aren't: bugs is one of the best town players in this game. Foh Sho.
A DEAD CLOCK IS RIGHT TWICE A DAY.
Come on people, let's lynch that bugs guy
|
I was under the impression that Bugs was trash as town is this not the case?!
|
I may be miss informed then. But he DID rape us in Paranoia, that is a fact.
|
we all know it's not going to happen.
"2) He's wrong as town" he's not + therefor he tends to die early as town.
you got a point with 3). If he's alive d4++ and he hasnt townslipped we seriously have to discuss this topic again.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
