| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
slOosh
3291 Posts
On October 02 2013 23:19 Oatsmaster wrote: Cause its hard to see tiny little Vote FOR DUDES.  Marv you scum? To which I respond, how seriously do you take this post? Like you said he calls everyone scum all the time. I don't think most of them are earnest. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On October 03 2013 08:14 marvellosity wrote: do you normally ask someone if they're mafia when you're sheeping their case? even oats doesn't do this normally. | ||
|
slOosh
3291 Posts
In any case I have to S&S for about an hour. :S | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
I wish more stuff happened. Bedtime now though | ||
|
iamperfection
United States9647 Posts
Perfect count Oatsmaster (2) - Blazinghand, Holyflare, Holyflare (1) - Dirkzor (3) - marvellosity, Clarity_nl, Oatsmaster Clairty_nl (1) - Risen With 9 alive it takes 5 to lynch. Currently no one is set to be lynched. If you see a mistake please notify us. You have to vote you may not abstain( you can vote for no lynch by ##vote No lynch). just over 23 hours remain. | ||
|
slOosh
3291 Posts
On October 03 2013 08:26 marvellosity wrote: alrighty. ty for your input ^^ expecting that Risen shizzle from you though :> There's nothing too compelling in the case on Clarity. There's a potentially good point in how clarity retracted his townread of me, but given clarity's explanation and the fact that he actually draws attention to it is a plus for him. He threw out his big case, and then just sits on it. There's no trying to convince people he is right, or even bring some attention to it, then he goes into sulking mode (immune to lynch? really?) without either trying to boil down his case into succinct points, or moving on to other stuff cause maybe he is wrong and it is a good time to regroup. Seems like pretense of contribution to me. Your current evaluation of Risen? Also clarity, I can see you angling for my lynch or something. Anything you want to ask me directly? | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
| ||
|
slOosh
3291 Posts
| ||
|
slOosh
3291 Posts
The following quotes contain wiffle-waffle: Agree / Disagree? On October 03 2013 03:01 Clarity_nl wrote: I think that's just blazinghand being blazinghand. He likes numbers and theorycrafting so despite having a scumread on oats he considers possibilities where he's town and justifies the lynch in that case. That's my interpretation anyway. He has contributed quite a bit, I don't have a solid read on him but I think he's a poor lynch today. I'd like to hear more about your thoughts on oats, and please comment on dirk as well. On October 03 2013 03:02 Clarity_nl wrote: Like, it's not improbable for him to be scum doing all this rng business but I can't tell. He's clearly putting effort in and that's cool. | ||
|
slOosh
3291 Posts
##Vote: Clarity_nl | ||
|
Risen
United States7927 Posts
| ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
| ||
|
slOosh
3291 Posts
On October 03 2013 12:50 Risen wrote: I would like more people's thoughts on my case on Clarity and Clarity's response. I think it would be good if you distill it down to like, 2 or 3 quotes and explain how it is indicative of him being scum. That way it forces clarity to respond to the heart of the points and clears stuff up so other people can more easily lend their opinions. | ||
|
slOosh
3291 Posts
On October 03 2013 12:55 Blazinghand wrote: he's been on my dick. just finished ocelot barbery, time to look at clarity dirk and sloosh Do you two have such a history of such being upons? | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
On October 03 2013 13:31 slOosh wrote: Do you two have such a history of such being upons? ok i must be having a brain fart because I really don't understand this question. what is "such being upons" and who is "you two" | ||
|
slOosh
3291 Posts
On October 03 2013 13:33 Blazinghand wrote: ok i must be having a brain fart because I really don't understand this question. what is "such being upons" and who is "you two" You and clarity. Does he have a history of "beeing on your dick"? | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
Sloosh, the whole process of voting and unvoting with Dirkzor is really scummy because who votes and then unvotes whithin like 3-4 posts going, OH SHIT I DIDNT READ IT PROPERLY, HES TOTALLY NOT SCUM. Also his atittude towards marv and clarity was weird, kinda like he treated them as confirmed town. | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
On October 03 2013 13:47 slOosh wrote: You and clarity. Does he have a history of "beeing on your dick"? not that I recall, but people love being on my dick. | ||
|
Dirkzor
Denmark1944 Posts
On October 03 2013 09:58 slOosh wrote: There's nothing too compelling in the case on Clarity. There's a potentially good point in how clarity retracted his townread of me, but given clarity's explanation and the fact that he actually draws attention to it is a plus for him. He threw out his big case, and then just sits on it. There's no trying to convince people he is right, or even bring some attention to it, then he goes into sulking mode (immune to lynch? really?) without either trying to boil down his case into succinct points, or moving on to other stuff cause maybe he is wrong and it is a good time to regroup. Seems like pretense of contribution to me. Your current evaluation of Risen? Also clarity, I can see you angling for my lynch or something. Anything you want to ask me directly? On October 03 2013 12:18 slOosh wrote: Booorinngg The following quotes contain wiffle-waffle: Agree / Disagree? On October 03 2013 12:20 slOosh wrote: I feel good about this one. ##Vote: Clarity_nl Wat? Explain how you went from "Nothing to compelling" to then add some wiffle-waffle and suddenly you feel good about it? | ||
| ||
|
|
Sparkling Tuna Cup
Afreeca Starleague
Monday Night Weeklies
GSL
OSC
PiGosaur Cup
Kung Fu Cup
Replay Cast
The PondCast
IntoTheTV X SOOP
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
