EPTIt means normally I know exactly what you're doing and what you're pursuing at any one moment in time. The BH/Oats thing just seems/seemed to be... hanging there.
World Heavyweight Championship mafia - Page 19
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
It means normally I know exactly what you're doing and what you're pursuing at any one moment in time. The BH/Oats thing just seems/seemed to be... hanging there. | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
I have now read the BH/Oats interaction for 2 times and i still don't know what to make out of it. Guess i know after one more time. | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
No comment to make on slOosh, Dirk, whoever? Oats is an interesting case. Him asking me if I'm scum seems out of place (I'm aware he asks people that all the time) because there was very little reason for him to do so at the time - evidently he agreed with me about Dirkzor and was willing to sheep me on the vote, and yet also asks me if I'm scum? How do those two things go together? | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
oats mostly flailing and trying to look real. he isn't. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
Any good points you may have had (I picked up on the slOosh townread thing) are kinda lost in between all the points that clearly aren't actually points. | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
| ||
|
Risen
United States7927 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On October 03 2013 05:41 Risen wrote: And so the cycle continues where I accuse someone of being scum and they're immune to lynch. In all seriousness, just listen to what I said without getting defensive about it. If I'm reading your case and I'm dismissing 80% of it as non-alignment indicative, then the 20% that remains gets hidden in between the mess that's the rest of it. Less than halfway into Day 1 there's going to be, at most, two or three succinct points why someone could be mafia. Not PBPing their entire filter. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
On October 03 2013 05:31 marvellosity wrote: Btw, Risen, your case on Clarity is riddled with confirmation bias. Any good points you may have had (I picked up on the slOosh townread thing) are kinda lost in between all the points that clearly aren't actually points. Can you explain this? As in, it's just something you noticed or it's something you found scummy? | ||
|
slOosh
3291 Posts
On October 03 2013 00:55 marvellosity wrote: It's twice you've mentioned this now without any furthe explanation. Makes marv a sad little whore. Fluffy initial vote, little follow up, unnaturally defensive posture (w/ respect to BH). Will be reading his new big post and giving subsequent thoughts. @HolyFlare I'm arguing against the notion that Dirkzor did the typical scum move of parking their vote on a place where it won't be noticed and is therefore scum. That's not true. I agree that he didn't read carefully and that he retracted his initial statement. He admits making a mistake. On October 02 2013 22:38 Dirkzor wrote: Maybe I didn't value that vote so highly. Maybe I did just want to stir up things to see what fell out. I read this differently, like, he wasn't sure either kind of thing. Not a sarcastic response. As for Oats, could you explain why his unvote is scummy? As for the meta thing, "I'm not too into meta" = "I'm not into reading into people's game history and doing all that jazz, which is what you were doing." If you have specific things about his post you can point out I'd be happy to address them without using meta. | ||
|
slOosh
3291 Posts
On October 03 2013 02:12 Clarity_nl wrote: His vote on HF had faulty reasoning. Once it gets asked of him to point out HF's "sheeping of BH and his lack of contributions" he backtracks, because he has to, as either alignment. I really would like you to specify what exactly gives you your townread. In your eyes, how would a scum HF react differently than how he has reacted? Or if you prefer, what is it he's done that you think he wouldn't do as scum? I think he is trying to give honestly address each question directed at him and that there is a general consistency throughout his postings / I can follow his thought process easily. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On October 03 2013 07:40 Clarity_nl wrote: Can you explain this? As in, it's just something you noticed or it's something you found scummy? It was weird, but i think your explanation for it was fine. | ||
|
slOosh
3291 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On October 03 2013 05:28 marvellosity wrote: BH, are you still set on this Oats thing? No comment to make on slOosh, Dirk, whoever? Oats is an interesting case. Him asking me if I'm scum seems out of place (I'm aware he asks people that all the time) because there was very little reason for him to do so at the time - evidently he agreed with me about Dirkzor and was willing to sheep me on the vote, and yet also asks me if I'm scum? How do those two things go together? Opinions on this, slOosh? | ||
|
slOosh
3291 Posts
On October 02 2013 23:59 Oatsmaster wrote: I think that marv is null, he hasnt shown much of anything either way. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
| ||
