The Sum of All Fears Mafia - Page 17
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
johnnywup
United States3858 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
How about you tell me WHY it's shit rather than just ignoring what I say and ignoring the evidence? "I don't like meta" Oh really? That's not what you said in C9++ where we SMOKED THE FUCK OUT OF SCUM TOGETHER. I'm pissed off because you fooled me into thinking you're town, but your actions in the last 15 minutes have shown me that you're actually, in fact, the last scum. /facepalm You broke my heart jdub. </3 | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
EchelonTee
United States5239 Posts
On March 28 2012 07:49 johnnywup wrote: I personally don't see anything wrong with C_C's posting. However I think that EchelonTree is super suspicious. Sides with me until the moment I vote. Admittedly the argument that BH posted to change his mind was a strong one. But what makes me wonder if ET is scum is... First of all, my argument was strong at the time. He was acting scummy, in my opinion. But he defended himself well. So my argument fell apart. Which is fine. no your arguement wasn't strong. this post didn't make any sense. i could detail to you exactly why it doesn't, but you're going to have to do some thinking sometime. On March 28 2012 07:49 johnnywup wrote: But the thing is, previously you said which ties into you saying I'm more scummy because BH defended himself well and my argument fell apart. what? you didn't actually state anything by bringing up this quote. in this post, and in your atk on BH, you draw several quotes but don't actually use them to prove anything. my english professor would fail you. On March 28 2012 07:49 johnnywup wrote: You made the same argument as me, that BH's posts were nonsensical. But after "rereading my posts after finding BHs argument to be strong" you found my argument was weak. This doesn't make me scummy, unless it makes you scummy as well, since you had the same opinion. Admittedly, BH's argument was pretty good and I don't fault you for unvoting. Arguments fall apart. Mine did. So why does that make me scum? Why so hypocritical? ##vote: EchelonTee once again, you take one of my quotes and completely ignore what i said. you still haven't provided a single actual reason why i'm "super suspicious". whatever. I had the same STANCE as you (blazinghand a scummy fck) but my ARGUMENT was constructed definitely. as in it made sense while yours, upon further investigation, feels fabricated and false. don't link myself and you; you're scummy not because of your bad arguement. it's because your reasoning for voting BH is fake. just look at this. does anyone srsly think this is a good reason to vote someone? it reminds me of when TKHawkins tried to bandwagon me in surprisingly normal VII. Get your vote off me, you're not starting a wagon on me today. VE, the fact that you think mr.wup is onto something here makes me very worried about your sanity. looking over current cases now. off hand i'm between gonzaw and C_C. don't like froggy/mr. wup either but they're not for today's lynch | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
Bluelightz
Indonesia2463 Posts
##Unvote ##Vote: Cyber_Cheese EchelonTee looks townie, he has substance unlike say, cccalf? | ||
johnnywup
United States3858 Posts
| ||
EchelonTee
United States5239 Posts
| ||
Bluelightz
Indonesia2463 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
On March 27 2012 16:00 VisceraEyes wrote: Anyway... If anyone is interested in lynching scum, perhaps I could interest you in a hot juicy Cyber_Cheese. The important part of this post is the flag. At first I thought that Cyber_Cheese was idiotically claiming his nationality. But after rereading his play in L and seeing his posting so far, I'm finding this less and less likely. If C_C were town, I feel like he wouldn't have included any kind of clue that would hint at giving scum information, as most of the first posts by other players so far have done. It just makes more sense to try and keep scum in the dark. Taking this into account, this post looks terrible, and here's why: in the initial post, he had made an underhanded accusation of me trying to hide some sort of underlying guilt by a show of bravado or something, and when I called him out on it rather than continue that line of thinking any further he responds as he should have in the first place and comments on the content in my post. Which begs the question: why did he attack me in the first place? What was the point? I'd been one of the few to actually post in the game so far, what's the point of raising suspicion of someone if you're not even going to respond back when asked? My vote is going on Cyber_Cheese and if you're town, I'd go my early interactions with him and tell me what you think. ##Vote: Cyber_Cheese This was my initial case, which was strong enough as it was. Indications from C_C's first two posts:
Ever since then, he's only strengthened my case: go look at his case on Bluelightz, it's laughably bad. I responded to every point and all he had to say to that was "Awww, he's defending him". He's not interested in finding scum with us, and he's doing a piss-poor job of pretending to be interested in helping us. And then, there's meta. So whatever the hell you're talking about "not seeing a connection to being scum", keep it. Push your ET train and we'll see what happens with it. I'm gonna vote for C_C because he's scum and he's gonna fucking die today. If you stand in my way, you'll have to explain your reluctance after he flips scum. I'm fully prepared to explain my enthusiasm if he flips town. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
##Vote: Cyber_Cheese | ||
johnnywup
United States3858 Posts
On March 28 2012 08:28 EchelonTee wrote: i'm not really sure how to respond to this because it doesn't make sense no your arguement wasn't strong. this post didn't make any sense. i could detail to you exactly why it doesn't, but you're going to have to do some thinking sometime. I really don't see why the argument was that bad. I dunno what to say, sorry? I don't know. I don't understand how it's so vastly different. what? you didn't actually state anything by bringing up this quote. in this post, and in your atk on BH, you draw several quotes but don't actually use them to prove anything. my english professor would fail you. Yeah I'm pretty bad at that lol. I tried to draw them all together at the end but I guess it didn't go well :/ once again, you take one of my quotes and completely ignore what i said. you still haven't provided a single actual reason why i'm "super suspicious". whatever. I had the same STANCE as you (blazinghand a scummy fck) but my ARGUMENT was constructed definitely. as in it made sense while yours, upon further investigation, feels fabricated and false. How? I really don't see the difference. And I was asking the question why I become more scummy since you had a similar argument (I really don't see the difference on how my argument more scummy). don't link myself and you; you're scummy not because of your bad arguement. it's because your reasoning for voting BH is fake. just look at this. does anyone srsly think this is a good reason to vote someone? it reminds me of when TKHawkins tried to bandwagon me in surprisingly normal VII. Get your vote off me, you're not starting a wagon on me today. I've mentioned before that I voted based on the reasons I had posted prior to that post, and that was only an additional point..alone it would be a bad reason to vote for someone, yes. --- I don't think you're scum VE so I'll just trust you. I don't think I'm being unreasonable, having an opinion and all. My argument against ET wasn't very strong, but it was something. I couldn't link why you thought he was scum until you explained it to me, so thanks for that. Your argument is better now that I see what you mean. I don't suppose many people think I'm town right now, and I don't think that me submitting to lynching C_C will really change much, but I'll do what I can to clear my name. ##unvote EchelonTee ##vote Cyber_Cheese + Show Spoiler + note to self: don't try and be helpful because my arguments are terrible and have me look like scum in both of the games I've played. | ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
On March 28 2012 08:38 VisceraEyes wrote: This was my initial case, which was strong enough as it was. Indications from C_C's first two posts:
Ever since then, he's only strengthened my case: go look at his case on Bluelightz, it's laughably bad. I responded to every point and all he had to say to that was "Awww, he's defending him". He's not interested in finding scum with us, and he's doing a piss-poor job of pretending to be interested in helping us. Yeah? | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
@jdub Dude, it's fine - just try and think in terms of 'why' rather than 'what'. Actions are important, but the motivations are what separate town from scum. | ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
##Vote Johnnywup Blatently defending me to that extent. Not many townies would have logically done it, but scum will know I flip town and end up looking good afterwards. He's my best read. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
johnnywup
United States3858 Posts
| ||
Bluelightz
Indonesia2463 Posts
My Mind was being destroyed | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
Ooooooh I sing of joyous tidiiiiings when we lynch Cheeeeeeese... | ||
| ||