EPTThe Automated Ban List - Page 832
| Forum Index > TL Community |
This thread is for discussing recent bans. Don't discuss other topics here. Take it to website feedback if you disagree with a ban or want to raise an issue. Keep it civil. NOTE: For those of you who want to find the actual ABL thread where the bans are posted. Please look in here: https://tl.net/forum/closed-threads/ | ||
|
Deleted User 137586
7859 Posts
| ||
|
Kamais Ookin
Canada591 Posts
On February 23 2012 05:11 motbob wrote: This is proof that Cartin didn't do anything wrong. Admins on TL can ban mods here EZ but he wasn't banned. Why? Because "fuck you" can be legit. To the guys on the previous page quoting me, I respect your guy's opinion but I'm still convinced that there's nothing wrong with this. Let me just say that multiple mods read ZeroCartin's post but declined to take action. When I read his post, I was unaware he was staff. | ||
|
dAPhREAk
Nauru12397 Posts
On February 23 2012 05:23 Kamais Ookin wrote: This is proof that Cartin didn't do anything wrong. Admins on TL can ban mods here EZ but he wasn't banned. Why? Because "fuck you" can be legit. To the guys on the previous page quoting me, I respect your guy's opinion but I'm still convinced that there's nothing wrong with this. speaking only for myself, I just don't see legitimate discussion coming from people insulting each other at the outset of their post. sure, "fuck you" can be used appropriately (mostly between friends and in a comedic sense), but random forum posters (especially ones that are arguing) will not be able to use it in a productive manner (in my opinion). however, the mods looked at his post, decided it wasn't actionable (including at least one who didn't know he was staff), and i am fine with that explanation. i don't agree and i have seen similar posts banned or warned, but the mods decide, not me. | ||
|
turdburgler
England6749 Posts
On February 23 2012 05:23 Kamais Ookin wrote: This is proof that Cartin didn't do anything wrong. Admins on TL can ban mods here EZ but he wasn't banned. Why? Because "fuck you" can be legit. To the guys on the previous page quoting me, I respect your guy's opinion but I'm still convinced that there's nothing wrong with this. people are banned for being 'negative' but fuck you is ok? | ||
motbob
United States12546 Posts
On February 23 2012 05:35 turdburgler wrote: people are banned for being 'negative' but fuck you is ok? If you would like to point out a double standard in my moderating, please PM me. I'd be happy to explain my actions. This thread is getting off-topic. Try to keep the subject on people who have been banned, not on TL moderation in general. | ||
|
Pusekatten
Norway234 Posts
| ||
|
turdburgler
England6749 Posts
| ||
|
TheToast
United States4808 Posts
edit: Clarity_nl was just temp banned for 2 days by motbob. That account was created on 2011-11-08 06:05:36 and had 108 posts. Reason: Shouldn't have derailed the thread. A bit of advice: don't troll SkyR in Tech Support. Like 90% of those "8k posts" are him using his free time to help people with their PC issues. He's also pretty smart. | ||
|
VirgilSC2
United States6151 Posts
I just saw a user get banned for this post, and it raises a question that I've been wondering for quite a while. Why is it OK to gender discriminate positively, but to question that ban-worthy? I, personally, think some of the female discrimination in SC2 is fairly silly. For example, at MLG Providence; x6.Ailuj got a main-stage featured match against LosirA because: She was the most attractive female competing If I've overstepped any boundaries with this post, please let me know, but I feel it's a legitimate thing to question. | ||
|
Chocolate
United States2350 Posts
| ||
|
TheToast
United States4808 Posts
On February 23 2012 10:17 Chocolate wrote: I feel the same. I heartily dislike this "discrimination" that grants women these different tournaments for cash prizes and also gives them more attention, which in turn leads to money. I see nothing wrong with that post, and I would definitely say the same thing if he wasn't already banned for it. It's bannable for the same reason balance whining is bannable; because no one wants to hear you whine. If you really have a problem with it make a thread in website feedback. | ||
|
CeriseCherries
6170 Posts
| ||
|
Slardar
Canada7593 Posts
| ||
Manifesto7
Osaka27156 Posts
Having that opinion is not bannable, but forwarding like that is just being a jerk. | ||
|
dAPhREAk
Nauru12397 Posts
On February 23 2012 10:33 CeriseCherries wrote: meh I guess its a bit of affirmative action? if you dont give females an advantage to get exposure, then they will take a long time to develop to the point where exposure can be earned, and by that point, it may have become too discouraging. additionally, you add other female progamers who potentially will earn their spot females dont need any help to get additional exposure in video games. how many viewers do megumibear, julia and aphrodite get compared to much better players? signing females is a smart move by teams because they drastically increase their exposure. signing a female player who is moderately good is like a gold mine for a team. i guarantee that if a female makes it into code s, she will likely be the most popular player--like idra level popular. | ||
|
DeepElemBlues
United States5079 Posts
2. women should be encouraged to get into esports and contribute, and one way to do that is to showcase female players at tournaments when possible, even if they are "not good" or something silly like that. 3. a more physically attractive woman will gather more attention from other women as well, not just men. its not a sexual thing (most of the time), its an unconscious admiration thing. the same reason why you see QBs and running backs on commercials 99% of the time instead of offensive linemen. unless it's a chunky soup or hungry man commercial, and even then you're more likely to see tom brady than matt light. 4. did i mention that sex sells? females dont need any help to get additional exposure in video games. i would disagree, in an area where 99.9% (HYPERBOLE!) of the players and the fans are still men, women participating should be encouraged and to some degree showcased. | ||
|
dAPhREAk
Nauru12397 Posts
jinixxx123 was just banned by Waxangel. That account was created on 2010-06-19 15:29:50 and had 537 posts. Reason: martyring :D | ||
|
Probulous
Australia3894 Posts
| ||
|
dAPhREAk
Nauru12397 Posts
On February 23 2012 05:23 Kamais Ookin wrote: This is proof that Cartin didn't do anything wrong. Admins on TL can ban mods here EZ but he wasn't banned. Why? Because "fuck you" can be legit. To the guys on the previous page quoting me, I respect your guy's opinion but I'm still convinced that there's nothing wrong with this. i just wanted to point out the irony in this post.... because the timing was impeccable... On February 23 2012 10:56 R3demption wrote: Fuck you. User was temp banned for this post. | ||
|
Synwave
United States2803 Posts
On February 23 2012 13:38 dAPhREAk wrote: i just wanted to point out the irony in this post.... because the timing was impeccable... He can be redeemed!! ...well maybe. | ||
| ||
