|
This thread is for discussing recent bans. Don't discuss other topics here. Take it to website feedback if you disagree with a ban or want to raise an issue. Keep it civil.NOTE: For those of you who want to find the actual ABL thread where the bans are posted. Please look in here: https://tl.net/forum/closed-threads/ |
On November 03 2020 07:29 WombaT wrote:Show nested quote +On November 03 2020 04:57 FlaShFTW wrote:Danglars was just temp banned for 1 week by Seeker.
That account was created on 2010-08-17 14:36:18 and had 11854 posts.
Reason: Danglars, I'm sorry but I think that you need to take a break from the USPMT. I agree with other people talking about how you refuse to argue in good faith. You can't seem to ever admit the other side is right regardless of how much evidence gets provided to you. It's been an ongoing pattern for a while now, and at some point, we have to step in and say that enough is enough. Madlads actually banned him. I didn't know being a stubborn person was actually ban worthy tbh. You can still argue in good faith whilst being extremely stubborn about your own particular beliefs.
Not if you get banned
|
Northern Ireland23784 Posts
On November 03 2020 08:46 Sent. wrote:Show nested quote +On November 03 2020 07:29 WombaT wrote:On November 03 2020 04:57 FlaShFTW wrote:Danglars was just temp banned for 1 week by Seeker.
That account was created on 2010-08-17 14:36:18 and had 11854 posts.
Reason: Danglars, I'm sorry but I think that you need to take a break from the USPMT. I agree with other people talking about how you refuse to argue in good faith. You can't seem to ever admit the other side is right regardless of how much evidence gets provided to you. It's been an ongoing pattern for a while now, and at some point, we have to step in and say that enough is enough. Madlads actually banned him. I didn't know being a stubborn person was actually ban worthy tbh. You can still argue in good faith whilst being extremely stubborn about your own particular beliefs. Not if you get banned data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/41f32/41f32ccbf9c308e87a90fa896d4fd874e9b79ee6" alt="" A mere temporary setback
|
On November 03 2020 08:49 WombaT wrote:Show nested quote +On November 03 2020 08:46 Sent. wrote:On November 03 2020 07:29 WombaT wrote:On November 03 2020 04:57 FlaShFTW wrote:Danglars was just temp banned for 1 week by Seeker.
That account was created on 2010-08-17 14:36:18 and had 11854 posts.
Reason: Danglars, I'm sorry but I think that you need to take a break from the USPMT. I agree with other people talking about how you refuse to argue in good faith. You can't seem to ever admit the other side is right regardless of how much evidence gets provided to you. It's been an ongoing pattern for a while now, and at some point, we have to step in and say that enough is enough. Madlads actually banned him. I didn't know being a stubborn person was actually ban worthy tbh. You can still argue in good faith whilst being extremely stubborn about your own particular beliefs. Not if you get banned data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/41f32/41f32ccbf9c308e87a90fa896d4fd874e9b79ee6" alt="" A mere temporary setback Are you..... Evil the Cat?
|
Northern Ireland23784 Posts
On November 03 2020 08:52 Jockmcplop wrote:Show nested quote +On November 03 2020 08:49 WombaT wrote:On November 03 2020 08:46 Sent. wrote:On November 03 2020 07:29 WombaT wrote:On November 03 2020 04:57 FlaShFTW wrote:Danglars was just temp banned for 1 week by Seeker.
That account was created on 2010-08-17 14:36:18 and had 11854 posts.
Reason: Danglars, I'm sorry but I think that you need to take a break from the USPMT. I agree with other people talking about how you refuse to argue in good faith. You can't seem to ever admit the other side is right regardless of how much evidence gets provided to you. It's been an ongoing pattern for a while now, and at some point, we have to step in and say that enough is enough. Madlads actually banned him. I didn't know being a stubborn person was actually ban worthy tbh. You can still argue in good faith whilst being extremely stubborn about your own particular beliefs. Not if you get banned data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/41f32/41f32ccbf9c308e87a90fa896d4fd874e9b79ee6" alt="" A mere temporary setback Are you..... Evil the Cat? I wish, sounds a cool thing to be.
|
On November 03 2020 09:27 WombaT wrote:Show nested quote +On November 03 2020 08:52 Jockmcplop wrote:On November 03 2020 08:49 WombaT wrote:On November 03 2020 08:46 Sent. wrote:On November 03 2020 07:29 WombaT wrote:On November 03 2020 04:57 FlaShFTW wrote:Danglars was just temp banned for 1 week by Seeker.
That account was created on 2010-08-17 14:36:18 and had 11854 posts.
Reason: Danglars, I'm sorry but I think that you need to take a break from the USPMT. I agree with other people talking about how you refuse to argue in good faith. You can't seem to ever admit the other side is right regardless of how much evidence gets provided to you. It's been an ongoing pattern for a while now, and at some point, we have to step in and say that enough is enough. Madlads actually banned him. I didn't know being a stubborn person was actually ban worthy tbh. You can still argue in good faith whilst being extremely stubborn about your own particular beliefs. Not if you get banned data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/41f32/41f32ccbf9c308e87a90fa896d4fd874e9b79ee6" alt="" A mere temporary setback Are you..... Evil the Cat? I wish, sounds a cool thing to be. I haven't thought about Earthworm Jim in probably 20 years, but somehow the phrase 'a temporary setback' bought it all flooding back.
|
Northern Ireland23784 Posts
On November 03 2020 09:31 Jockmcplop wrote:Show nested quote +On November 03 2020 09:27 WombaT wrote:On November 03 2020 08:52 Jockmcplop wrote:On November 03 2020 08:49 WombaT wrote:On November 03 2020 08:46 Sent. wrote:On November 03 2020 07:29 WombaT wrote:On November 03 2020 04:57 FlaShFTW wrote:Danglars was just temp banned for 1 week by Seeker.
That account was created on 2010-08-17 14:36:18 and had 11854 posts.
Reason: Danglars, I'm sorry but I think that you need to take a break from the USPMT. I agree with other people talking about how you refuse to argue in good faith. You can't seem to ever admit the other side is right regardless of how much evidence gets provided to you. It's been an ongoing pattern for a while now, and at some point, we have to step in and say that enough is enough. Madlads actually banned him. I didn't know being a stubborn person was actually ban worthy tbh. You can still argue in good faith whilst being extremely stubborn about your own particular beliefs. Not if you get banned data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/41f32/41f32ccbf9c308e87a90fa896d4fd874e9b79ee6" alt="" A mere temporary setback Are you..... Evil the Cat? I wish, sounds a cool thing to be. I haven't thought about Earthworm Jim in probably 20 years, but somehow the phrase 'a temporary setback' bought it all flooding back. I actually played for the first time recently at my weekly games night with my best friend.
Absolutely not a game to play 4/5 beers in, absolutely kicked my arse. Quality game though, artwork and overall vibe has a ton of character
|
|
Northern Ireland23784 Posts
On November 03 2020 09:51 JimmiC wrote:Old games are so much harder. The lives and lack of save points make it way harder. A game like Rayman legends is so much easier than Mario 1 because you can retry a part over and over. Kids now days have no idea how easy they have it! I’ll just force mine to play the Contra pack on Switch with me. Both me and my 7 year old and me and my buddy drunk had broadly similarly disastrous results with that!
I’ve played harder games than Earthworm Jim to be fair, it just controls quite distinctively or something? Some jumps or using your worm head as a grappling hook are like weirdly fiddly. Great game though, I’ll look forward to getting reacquainted, ideally sober next time.
Vaguely back on topic feels unfortunate Danglars is banned for the election carnage afoot.
|
6399mikh was just banned by BLinD-RawR.
That account was created on 2020-11-03 18:00:29 and had 10 posts.
Reason: Its fairly clear that you're not here for our community because you make no effort to learn how to participate in it.
I hope he finds the answer to his question of "Where is Hunter?" somewhere. Kinda reminds me the npc from Red Dead Redemption 2 that you can bump into who is desperately looking for his friend Gavin.
|
BLinD-RawR is Hunter Biden, confirmed
|
ALLEYCAT BLUES49496 Posts
On November 03 2020 20:54 farvacola wrote: BLinD-RawR is Hunter Biden, confirmed
dad don't out me here.
|
I would love to know where that 6399mikh account was posting from. Is it something that mods can reveal or is it confidential? It was clearly a troll / propaganda account with no knowledge of TL.
|
Wegandi was just temp banned for 2 days by JBright.
That account was created on 2011-03-12 14:09:12 and had 2370 posts.
Reason: Please provide source for unban. That was savage.
Though I know from experience it's easy to get emotional and let your posting quality slip quite a bit during those nail bitting elections. I hope both him and Danglar come back in good spirit.
|
|
United States10026 Posts
On November 06 2020 19:03 Biff The Understudy wrote:Show nested quote +Wegandi was just temp banned for 2 days by JBright.
That account was created on 2011-03-12 14:09:12 and had 2370 posts.
Reason: Please provide source for unban. That was savage. Though I know from experience it's easy to get emotional and let your posting quality slip quite a bit during those nail bitting elections. I hope both him and Danglar come back in good spirit. lmfaooooo this description is fucking gold.
|
Yeah I hope Danglars returns tomorrow and gives us an update on his view of what's happening right now. Honestly disappointed you banned him right before election day/week.
|
United States10026 Posts
On November 08 2020 19:29 Laurens wrote: Yeah I hope Danglars returns tomorrow and gives us an update on his view of what's happening right now. Honestly disappointed you banned him right before election day/week. Not gonna lie, the way that Wegandi was posting in the Election Day thread, there was a chance that Danglars might've followed a similar path and gotten himself banned anyways.
Wegandi should be unbanned by now, or just a few hours from unban. Will be interesting to see their takes on everything tomorrow when both are off the block.
|
My god, such a massive Sc2 hater AlovelyUsername was. Who was the man behind the mask?
|
Hyrule18969 Posts
Some guy who's already been permed multiple times because he doesn't seem to understand how TL works
|
|
|
|
|