The Automated Ban List - Page 3051
Forum Index > TL Community |
This thread is for discussing recent bans. Don't discuss other topics here. Take it to website feedback if you disagree with a ban or want to raise an issue. Keep it civil. NOTE: For those of you who want to find the actual ABL thread where the bans are posted. Please look in here: https://tl.net/forum/closed-threads/ | ||
JimmiC
Canada22817 Posts
| ||
Alejandrisha
United States6565 Posts
| ||
Jealous
10096 Posts
On March 17 2019 04:20 Alejandrisha wrote: jealous memed too hard I knew that if I used words I would have gotten in more trouble. However, this an opportunity to discuss the rules surrounding memes and image macros. Neither were image macros as there was no text on them. Neither are really memes because memes are, to my understanding, popular images with a sort of culture behind them. This was a photo of a Brood War coach, and a gif of one. People post photos of players all the time. I feel that my punishment was unjust, especially since I got the warning and the ban back to back and after both posts had been made. Then Seeker didn't answer my PMs. This is a great injustice. Fight with me on this! | ||
Alejandrisha
United States6565 Posts
edit: it devolved into bs. i thought it should have been closed a while ago but i guess we're seeing how it plays out edit2: as egregious i think this is, i have to say i am impressed by the ability of the majority to suspend judgment. though it is not hard to sit on a fence | ||
Ej_
47656 Posts
| ||
Simberto
Germany11313 Posts
| ||
brickrd
United States4894 Posts
On March 17 2019 18:12 Ej_ wrote: do people actually think that you can dispute with TL's moderation on any ground? person with exclusively hostile attitude scoffs at concept of different attitudes leading to different results | ||
Jealous
10096 Posts
On March 17 2019 23:00 Simberto wrote: It seems to sometimes work. I have seen perms being reduced to smaller bans, and bans completely retracted in some cases. Thus, there seem to be situations where the moderation decisions can be changed by good arguments. I have had civil and engaging conversations with Seeker before, most of which went nowhere. EDIT: Moataz has returned, and as a first order of business, bumped a thread of his which has seen no activity in over 2 months to say "You're welcome." I fear he is not long for this world. | ||
![]()
Seeker
![]()
Where dat snitch at?36920 Posts
On March 18 2019 01:42 Jealous wrote: I have had civil and engaging conversations with Seeker before, most of which went nowhere. EDIT: Moataz has returned, and as a first order of business, bumped a thread of his which has seen no activity in over 2 months to say "You're welcome." I fear he is not long for this world. lol... Moataz is back? Oh boy... I smell a perm coming ![]() | ||
JimmiC
Canada22817 Posts
| ||
Ej_
47656 Posts
On March 18 2019 00:47 brickrd wrote: person with exclusively hostile attitude scoffs at concept of different attitudes leading to different results Thanks for your classic condescending tone, but I never actually disputed any mod decisions myself, save for a 2 week ban for a picture another user received, and when people other than me were also promptly ignored in their attempts to pledge for shortening the ban. | ||
Luolis
Finland7084 Posts
On March 18 2019 17:01 Ej_ wrote: Thanks for your classic condescending tone, but I never actually disputed any mod decisions myself, save for a 2 week ban for a picture another user received, and when people other than me were also promptly ignored in their attempts to pledge for shortening the ban. I recognize myself from this post :D | ||
Dangermousecatdog
United Kingdom7084 Posts
On March 18 2019 01:42 Jealous wrote: I have had civil and engaging conversations with Seeker before, most of which went nowhere. EDIT: Moataz has returned, and as a first order of business, bumped a thread of his which has seen no activity in over 2 months to say "You're welcome." I fear he is not long for this world. It's odd, but not really a problem yet, unless he starts bumping every other thread. | ||
Ben...
Canada3485 Posts
xDaunt was just temp banned for 30 days by Seeker. That account was created on 2010-03-05 03:09:59 and had 16895 posts. Reason: I think TL needs a break from you. And just so you know, you're really skating on thin ice right now... There was a good while where there was good discussion in the US politics thread. Since xDaunt's return to that thread it had degenerated completely into xDaunt versus the world. The thread has been better the last couple weeks. | ||
Danglars
United States12133 Posts
On March 20 2019 12:10 Ben... wrote: Just here to voice my appreciation for this one: There was a good while where there was good discussion in the US politics thread. Since xDaunt's return to that thread it had degenerated completely into xDaunt versus the world. The thread has been better the last couple weeks. Not to put a damper on your bloodlust, but he was back to posting and unbanned almost immediately. With an apology, but no explanation for the mistake. | ||
DeepElemBlues
United States5079 Posts
On March 20 2019 12:10 Ben... wrote: Just here to voice my appreciation for this one: There was a good while where there was good discussion in the US politics thread. Since xDaunt's return to that thread it had degenerated completely into xDaunt versus the world. The thread has been better the last couple weeks. Surely there are PMs and Facebook groups to get a daily dose of echo chamber | ||
Ben...
Canada3485 Posts
On March 20 2019 12:41 DeepElemBlues wrote: There are Republican-supporting people that post in meaningful ways in that thread and help bring insight into how things look from the conservative side and put care into their posts.Surely there are PMs and Facebook groups to get a daily dose of echo chamber Having somebody who never tried to understand the other side's perspective and derailed the thread with topics that were either one degree of separation from conspiracy theories or were from incredibly sketchy news sources was harming the thread a lot. | ||
DeepElemBlues
United States5079 Posts
On March 21 2019 00:55 Ben... wrote: There are Republican-supporting people that post in meaningful ways in that thread and help bring insight into how things look from the conservative side and put care into their posts. Having somebody who never tried to understand the other side's perspective and derailed the thread with topics that were either one degree of separation from conspiracy theories or were from incredibly sketchy news sources was harming the thread a lot. Yeah your post here is a consequence of the insane rules for that thread lol, all this attacking people over allegedly sketchy news sources or alleged conspiracy theorizing or allegedly not trying to understand the other side's perspective. that's all just ad hominem nonsense legitimized by the insane formal and informal rules Not just attacking them but saying things would be better if they were banned Geez Louise | ||
Danglars
United States12133 Posts
On March 21 2019 03:17 DeepElemBlues wrote: Yeah your post here is a consequence of the insane rules for that thread lol, all this attacking people over allegedly sketchy news sources or alleged conspiracy theorizing or allegedly not trying to understand the other side's perspective. that's all just ad hominem nonsense legitimized by the insane formal and informal rules Not just attacking them but saying things would be better if they were banned Geez Louise Does this explanation of the rules overlap on why you stopped posting at regular intervals a few years ago? | ||
deacon.frost
Czech Republic12128 Posts
Don't use red text please. Why can we use the red color then? ![]() ![]() Anyway, gotcha, will stop it and use only green for JAGW (I'll also stop responding to that thread because of obvious reasons) Edit> While this is not a ban I don't think this should be taken into feedback or something, this is just me being curious and I believe this is the best thread to ask the question | ||
| ||