|
This thread is for discussing recent bans. Don't discuss other topics here. Take it to website feedback if you disagree with a ban or want to raise an issue. Keep it civil.NOTE: For those of you who want to find the actual ABL thread where the bans are posted. Please look in here: https://tl.net/forum/closed-threads/ |
Seeker
Where dat snitch at?36921 Posts
On February 27 2018 04:50 BigFan wrote:Show nested quote +On February 27 2018 00:35 Seeker wrote: BigFan just pretends to know what is going on. It gets everyone riled up and asking him to share his knowledge. He just feeds off of that. except my friend, you are quite wrong! I was indeed in the know about what went down! Also, you calling me a leech?  You are what you eat.
|
ALLEYCAT BLUES49497 Posts
On February 27 2018 05:15 Seeker wrote:Show nested quote +On February 27 2018 04:50 BigFan wrote:On February 27 2018 00:35 Seeker wrote: BigFan just pretends to know what is going on. It gets everyone riled up and asking him to share his knowledge. He just feeds off of that. except my friend, you are quite wrong! I was indeed in the know about what went down! Also, you calling me a leech?  You are what you eat.
I really hope this was your 30k.
I wish I had a milestone post to deliver a burn on BigFan.
424 was just banned by Olli.
That account was created on 2018-02-27 18:33:12 and had 1 posts.
Reason: Advertising. SPAM even!
Heavens to Murgatroyd
also an actual Mani ban in 2018
Twinkle Toes was just temp banned for 30 days by Manifesto7.
That account was created on 2012-05-15 01:29:00 and had 2529 posts.
Reason: You've been asked not to insult others. You continued to do so.
|
On February 27 2018 17:40 Manifesto7 wrote: Whoops, I didn't click on his second page of mod notes otherwise it would have been a perm ban. Whatever, Twinkle Toes don't post in this thread again. Thanks. Also this.
|
Where is the actual automated ban list thread? I cant find it lol.
|
United Kingdom13775 Posts
|
Seeker
Where dat snitch at?36921 Posts
Was that thread always closed? I can't remember.
|
TLADT24920 Posts
On February 28 2018 03:20 Seeker wrote:Was that thread always closed? I can't remember. yes it was!
|
Are fidget spinners a bannable offense?
|
your Country52797 Posts
|
|
xD(D
xM(Z was just temp banned for 1 week by Seeker.
That account was created on 2006-11-22 01:34:49 and had 4549 posts.
Reason: What in the world...? Please don't post like that from now on.
+ Show Spoiler +On February 27 2018 20:08 xM(Z wrote:dude, you're not getting the context. US is/was to large for its own good for a while so they did what greed dictated and split in two(see the W vs E Roman empire as example here): a part of the world(from US's influence sphere) is republican controlled(jewish leaning+US military) and the other democrat controlled(arab leaning+US espionage services). that being the context and J.O. being a liberal poster child, gives you the following: the clip was a propaganda piece designed to 'help' Democrat's allies across the pond. and @the dudes with a free market fetish: do realize that humans are a commodity. in a self regulating free market(no regulatory state) not only that there will be nothing from stopping humans from killing each others to increase their own value, but also it'll be ... desired. + Show Spoiler +BigJ here will want some state involvement which will have him lose the 'libertarian' argument and Nyx will go for the hippie route with humans+empathy/innate collaboration inclinations etc which will lose him the 'free' argument. that makes them both not only wrong but also fronting the same argument, one that starts with/relies on some form of pre-existing moral/ethical value, either innate or acquired, to support it.
PS:their argument in a nutshell: humans will be regulated but everything else will not. yay for freedom! and yay for libertarianism!. Edit: in case it still hasn't clicked for you - what the natives are doing right now, in countries with immigration/immigrants issues, is trying to uphold their monetary value but get denied because ... <reasons>. User was temp banned for this post.
|
xmz and Baskerville have merged into one being, it would seem.
|
your Country52797 Posts
On February 28 2018 05:23 farvacola wrote: xmz and Baskerville have merged into one being, it would seem. No, I can usually understand what baskerville is saying.
|
On February 27 2018 20:08 xM(Z wrote: dude, you're not getting the context. US is/was to large for its own good for a while so they did what greed dictated and split in two
The US did split in two at one point. Those were some crazy times.
|
The 11th commandment: don't post stuff that is too complicated for Seeker to understand.
|
On February 28 2018 05:16 Sent. wrote:xD(D Show nested quote +xM(Z was just temp banned for 1 week by Seeker.
That account was created on 2006-11-22 01:34:49 and had 4549 posts.
Reason: What in the world...? Please don't post like that from now on. + Show Spoiler +On February 27 2018 20:08 xM(Z wrote:dude, you're not getting the context. US is/was to large for its own good for a while so they did what greed dictated and split in two(see the W vs E Roman empire as example here): a part of the world(from US's influence sphere) is republican controlled(jewish leaning+US military) and the other democrat controlled(arab leaning+US espionage services). that being the context and J.O. being a liberal poster child, gives you the following: the clip was a propaganda piece designed to 'help' Democrat's allies across the pond. and @the dudes with a free market fetish: do realize that humans are a commodity. in a self regulating free market(no regulatory state) not only that there will be nothing from stopping humans from killing each others to increase their own value, but also it'll be ... desired. + Show Spoiler +BigJ here will want some state involvement which will have him lose the 'libertarian' argument and Nyx will go for the hippie route with humans+empathy/innate collaboration inclinations etc which will lose him the 'free' argument. that makes them both not only wrong but also fronting the same argument, one that starts with/relies on some form of pre-existing moral/ethical value, either innate or acquired, to support it.
PS:their argument in a nutshell: humans will be regulated but everything else will not. yay for freedom! and yay for libertarianism!. Edit: in case it still hasn't clicked for you - what the natives are doing right now, in countries with immigration/immigrants issues, is trying to uphold their monetary value but get denied because ... <reasons>. User was temp banned for this post. amazing, I now have to check out other posts from xM(Z
|
On February 28 2018 18:31 opisska wrote: The 11th commandment: don't post stuff that is too complicated for Seeker to understand.
To be honest his message was quite clear, especially compared to some of his other posts.
|
United States97274 Posts
On February 28 2018 18:31 opisska wrote: The 11th commandment: don't post stuff that is too complicated for Seeker to understand. you just killed the whole forum
User was warned for this post.
|
On February 28 2018 20:18 Penev wrote:Show nested quote +On February 28 2018 05:16 Sent. wrote:xD(D xM(Z was just temp banned for 1 week by Seeker.
That account was created on 2006-11-22 01:34:49 and had 4549 posts.
Reason: What in the world...? Please don't post like that from now on. + Show Spoiler +On February 27 2018 20:08 xM(Z wrote:dude, you're not getting the context. US is/was to large for its own good for a while so they did what greed dictated and split in two(see the W vs E Roman empire as example here): a part of the world(from US's influence sphere) is republican controlled(jewish leaning+US military) and the other democrat controlled(arab leaning+US espionage services). that being the context and J.O. being a liberal poster child, gives you the following: the clip was a propaganda piece designed to 'help' Democrat's allies across the pond. and @the dudes with a free market fetish: do realize that humans are a commodity. in a self regulating free market(no regulatory state) not only that there will be nothing from stopping humans from killing each others to increase their own value, but also it'll be ... desired. + Show Spoiler +BigJ here will want some state involvement which will have him lose the 'libertarian' argument and Nyx will go for the hippie route with humans+empathy/innate collaboration inclinations etc which will lose him the 'free' argument. that makes them both not only wrong but also fronting the same argument, one that starts with/relies on some form of pre-existing moral/ethical value, either innate or acquired, to support it.
PS:their argument in a nutshell: humans will be regulated but everything else will not. yay for freedom! and yay for libertarianism!. Edit: in case it still hasn't clicked for you - what the natives are doing right now, in countries with immigration/immigrants issues, is trying to uphold their monetary value but get denied because ... <reasons>. User was temp banned for this post. amazing, I now have to check out other posts from xM(Z
Why would you that to yourself? Were you naughty?
|
Moderating a politics subforum on a gaming site must be pretty baffling to be honest, but it must be nice to see the rest of the website/community free from it!
On March 01 2018 04:03 opisska wrote:Show nested quote +On February 28 2018 20:18 Penev wrote:On February 28 2018 05:16 Sent. wrote:xD(D xM(Z was just temp banned for 1 week by Seeker.
That account was created on 2006-11-22 01:34:49 and had 4549 posts.
Reason: What in the world...? Please don't post like that from now on. + Show Spoiler +On February 27 2018 20:08 xM(Z wrote:dude, you're not getting the context. US is/was to large for its own good for a while so they did what greed dictated and split in two(see the W vs E Roman empire as example here): a part of the world(from US's influence sphere) is republican controlled(jewish leaning+US military) and the other democrat controlled(arab leaning+US espionage services). that being the context and J.O. being a liberal poster child, gives you the following: the clip was a propaganda piece designed to 'help' Democrat's allies across the pond. and @the dudes with a free market fetish: do realize that humans are a commodity. in a self regulating free market(no regulatory state) not only that there will be nothing from stopping humans from killing each others to increase their own value, but also it'll be ... desired. + Show Spoiler +BigJ here will want some state involvement which will have him lose the 'libertarian' argument and Nyx will go for the hippie route with humans+empathy/innate collaboration inclinations etc which will lose him the 'free' argument. that makes them both not only wrong but also fronting the same argument, one that starts with/relies on some form of pre-existing moral/ethical value, either innate or acquired, to support it.
PS:their argument in a nutshell: humans will be regulated but everything else will not. yay for freedom! and yay for libertarianism!. Edit: in case it still hasn't clicked for you - what the natives are doing right now, in countries with immigration/immigrants issues, is trying to uphold their monetary value but get denied because ... <reasons>. User was temp banned for this post. amazing, I now have to check out other posts from xM(Z Why would you that to yourself? Were you naughty? He probably just enjoys being punished...
|
|
|
|