|
This thread is for discussing recent bans. Don't discuss other topics here. Take it to website feedback if you disagree with a ban or want to raise an issue. Keep it civil.NOTE: For those of you who want to find the actual ABL thread where the bans are posted. Please look in here: https://tl.net/forum/closed-threads/ |
On April 30 2016 12:39 Cascade wrote:Show nested quote +On April 30 2016 08:06 Cricketer12 wrote:
I would like to retract my previous statement now T_T Luckily you formulated it as a question, not a statement, so you are clear.  The high ones on my subscribe list, that haven't been mentioned: Diablo 3 discussion: 2.2M scarlett fanclub: 1.5M sc2 balance discussion: 2M awesome/cconfusing BM: 2.4M GM hacking thread: 2.2M Didn't expect the BM thread to come up that high, and I thought the stupid questions thread would be higher, it's only 0.6M. it's interesting how they mostly have a similar views/posts ratio, and I think the differences says something about the thread. Diablo 3 discussion: 103 scarlett fanclub: 129 sc2 balance discussion: 80 SFW that makes you laugh: 1896 awesome/cconfusing BM: 319 GM hacking thread: 211 ABL: 81 In general it seems like smaller communities promote more posts per view. people are less shy to spout out nonsense. Also threads prone to intense discussion seem to have that effect. Other threads are more for reading than posting, such as the hacking thread, BM thread and ofc makes you laugh, where it is even enforced, which makes the ratio shoot up super high.
I knew it was you posting this before even looking at your name :p
|
your Country52797 Posts
On April 30 2016 12:39 Cascade wrote:Show nested quote +On April 30 2016 08:06 Cricketer12 wrote:
I would like to retract my previous statement now T_T Luckily you formulated it as a question, not a statement, so you are clear. The high ones on my subscribe list, that haven't been mentioned: Diablo 3 discussion: 2.2M scarlett fanclub: 1.5M sc2 balance discussion: 2M awesome/cconfusing BM: 2.4M GM hacking thread: 2.2M Didn't expect the BM thread to come up that high, and I thought the stupid questions thread would be higher, it's only 0.6M. it's interesting how they mostly have a similar views/posts ratio, and I think the differences says something about the thread. Diablo 3 discussion: 103 scarlett fanclub: 129 sc2 balance discussion: 80 SFW that makes you laugh: 1896 awesome/cconfusing BM: 319 GM hacking thread: 211 ABL: 81 In general it seems like smaller communities promote more posts per view. people are less shy to spout out nonsense. Also threads prone to intense discussion seem to have that effect. Other threads are more for reading than posting, such as the hacking thread, BM thread and ofc makes you laugh, where it is even enforced, which makes the ratio shoot up super high.
I have a theory that a perfectly balanced and infinitely lengthy discussion would have a views/posts ratio of exactly 100. Anything higher than that has more lurkers, anything below that is abnormally active.
|
On May 01 2016 04:28 oGoZenob wrote:Show nested quote +On April 30 2016 12:39 Cascade wrote:On April 30 2016 08:06 Cricketer12 wrote:
I would like to retract my previous statement now T_T Luckily you formulated it as a question, not a statement, so you are clear. The high ones on my subscribe list, that haven't been mentioned: Diablo 3 discussion: 2.2M scarlett fanclub: 1.5M sc2 balance discussion: 2M awesome/cconfusing BM: 2.4M GM hacking thread: 2.2M Didn't expect the BM thread to come up that high, and I thought the stupid questions thread would be higher, it's only 0.6M. it's interesting how they mostly have a similar views/posts ratio, and I think the differences says something about the thread. Diablo 3 discussion: 103 scarlett fanclub: 129 sc2 balance discussion: 80 SFW that makes you laugh: 1896 awesome/cconfusing BM: 319 GM hacking thread: 211 ABL: 81 In general it seems like smaller communities promote more posts per view. people are less shy to spout out nonsense. Also threads prone to intense discussion seem to have that effect. Other threads are more for reading than posting, such as the hacking thread, BM thread and ofc makes you laugh, where it is even enforced, which makes the ratio shoot up super high. I knew it was you posting this before even looking at your name :p
From my subscribe list, or from the overanalysis? >_>
|
your Country52797 Posts
On May 01 2016 10:38 Cascade wrote:Show nested quote +On May 01 2016 04:28 oGoZenob wrote:On April 30 2016 12:39 Cascade wrote:On April 30 2016 08:06 Cricketer12 wrote:
I would like to retract my previous statement now T_T Luckily you formulated it as a question, not a statement, so you are clear. The high ones on my subscribe list, that haven't been mentioned: Diablo 3 discussion: 2.2M scarlett fanclub: 1.5M sc2 balance discussion: 2M awesome/cconfusing BM: 2.4M GM hacking thread: 2.2M Didn't expect the BM thread to come up that high, and I thought the stupid questions thread would be higher, it's only 0.6M. it's interesting how they mostly have a similar views/posts ratio, and I think the differences says something about the thread. Diablo 3 discussion: 103 scarlett fanclub: 129 sc2 balance discussion: 80 SFW that makes you laugh: 1896 awesome/cconfusing BM: 319 GM hacking thread: 211 ABL: 81 In general it seems like smaller communities promote more posts per view. people are less shy to spout out nonsense. Also threads prone to intense discussion seem to have that effect. Other threads are more for reading than posting, such as the hacking thread, BM thread and ofc makes you laugh, where it is even enforced, which makes the ratio shoot up super high. I knew it was you posting this before even looking at your name :p From my subscribe list, or from the overanalysis? >_>
Probably the analysis. I'm subscribed to all of those threads.
|
On May 01 2016 10:40 The_Templar wrote:Show nested quote +On May 01 2016 10:38 Cascade wrote:On May 01 2016 04:28 oGoZenob wrote:On April 30 2016 12:39 Cascade wrote:On April 30 2016 08:06 Cricketer12 wrote:
I would like to retract my previous statement now T_T Luckily you formulated it as a question, not a statement, so you are clear. The high ones on my subscribe list, that haven't been mentioned: Diablo 3 discussion: 2.2M scarlett fanclub: 1.5M sc2 balance discussion: 2M awesome/cconfusing BM: 2.4M GM hacking thread: 2.2M Didn't expect the BM thread to come up that high, and I thought the stupid questions thread would be higher, it's only 0.6M. it's interesting how they mostly have a similar views/posts ratio, and I think the differences says something about the thread. Diablo 3 discussion: 103 scarlett fanclub: 129 sc2 balance discussion: 80 SFW that makes you laugh: 1896 awesome/cconfusing BM: 319 GM hacking thread: 211 ABL: 81 In general it seems like smaller communities promote more posts per view. people are less shy to spout out nonsense. Also threads prone to intense discussion seem to have that effect. Other threads are more for reading than posting, such as the hacking thread, BM thread and ofc makes you laugh, where it is even enforced, which makes the ratio shoot up super high. I knew it was you posting this before even looking at your name :p From my subscribe list, or from the overanalysis? >_> Probably the analysis. I'm subscribed to all of those threads.
Yea thats how I interpreted Zenob's post...
|
On May 01 2016 10:40 The_Templar wrote:Show nested quote +On May 01 2016 10:38 Cascade wrote:On May 01 2016 04:28 oGoZenob wrote:On April 30 2016 12:39 Cascade wrote:On April 30 2016 08:06 Cricketer12 wrote:
I would like to retract my previous statement now T_T Luckily you formulated it as a question, not a statement, so you are clear. The high ones on my subscribe list, that haven't been mentioned: Diablo 3 discussion: 2.2M scarlett fanclub: 1.5M sc2 balance discussion: 2M awesome/cconfusing BM: 2.4M GM hacking thread: 2.2M Didn't expect the BM thread to come up that high, and I thought the stupid questions thread would be higher, it's only 0.6M. it's interesting how they mostly have a similar views/posts ratio, and I think the differences says something about the thread. Diablo 3 discussion: 103 scarlett fanclub: 129 sc2 balance discussion: 80 SFW that makes you laugh: 1896 awesome/cconfusing BM: 319 GM hacking thread: 211 ABL: 81 In general it seems like smaller communities promote more posts per view. people are less shy to spout out nonsense. Also threads prone to intense discussion seem to have that effect. Other threads are more for reading than posting, such as the hacking thread, BM thread and ofc makes you laugh, where it is even enforced, which makes the ratio shoot up super high. I knew it was you posting this before even looking at your name :p From my subscribe list, or from the overanalysis? >_> Probably the analysis. I'm subscribed to all of those threads.
Are subscribed threads useful? I've never used that feature before, and wasn't even aware that the "My Quoted Posts" tab was a thing.
|
United Kingdom13775 Posts
Yeah, it's a nice way to keep track of threads you generally post often in.
|
On May 01 2016 11:43 ZigguratOfUr wrote:Show nested quote +On May 01 2016 10:40 The_Templar wrote:On May 01 2016 10:38 Cascade wrote:On May 01 2016 04:28 oGoZenob wrote:On April 30 2016 12:39 Cascade wrote:On April 30 2016 08:06 Cricketer12 wrote:
I would like to retract my previous statement now T_T Luckily you formulated it as a question, not a statement, so you are clear. The high ones on my subscribe list, that haven't been mentioned: Diablo 3 discussion: 2.2M scarlett fanclub: 1.5M sc2 balance discussion: 2M awesome/cconfusing BM: 2.4M GM hacking thread: 2.2M Didn't expect the BM thread to come up that high, and I thought the stupid questions thread would be higher, it's only 0.6M. it's interesting how they mostly have a similar views/posts ratio, and I think the differences says something about the thread. Diablo 3 discussion: 103 scarlett fanclub: 129 sc2 balance discussion: 80 SFW that makes you laugh: 1896 awesome/cconfusing BM: 319 GM hacking thread: 211 ABL: 81 In general it seems like smaller communities promote more posts per view. people are less shy to spout out nonsense. Also threads prone to intense discussion seem to have that effect. Other threads are more for reading than posting, such as the hacking thread, BM thread and ofc makes you laugh, where it is even enforced, which makes the ratio shoot up super high. I knew it was you posting this before even looking at your name :p From my subscribe list, or from the overanalysis? >_> Probably the analysis. I'm subscribed to all of those threads. Are subscribed threads useful? I've never used that feature before, and wasn't even aware that the "My Quoted Posts" tab was a thing.
Personally its the only thing I use unless Im looking for a LR or blog
|
On May 01 2016 10:38 Cascade wrote:Show nested quote +On May 01 2016 04:28 oGoZenob wrote:On April 30 2016 12:39 Cascade wrote:On April 30 2016 08:06 Cricketer12 wrote:
I would like to retract my previous statement now T_T Luckily you formulated it as a question, not a statement, so you are clear. The high ones on my subscribe list, that haven't been mentioned: Diablo 3 discussion: 2.2M scarlett fanclub: 1.5M sc2 balance discussion: 2M awesome/cconfusing BM: 2.4M GM hacking thread: 2.2M Didn't expect the BM thread to come up that high, and I thought the stupid questions thread would be higher, it's only 0.6M. it's interesting how they mostly have a similar views/posts ratio, and I think the differences says something about the thread. Diablo 3 discussion: 103 scarlett fanclub: 129 sc2 balance discussion: 80 SFW that makes you laugh: 1896 awesome/cconfusing BM: 319 GM hacking thread: 211 ABL: 81 In general it seems like smaller communities promote more posts per view. people are less shy to spout out nonsense. Also threads prone to intense discussion seem to have that effect. Other threads are more for reading than posting, such as the hacking thread, BM thread and ofc makes you laugh, where it is even enforced, which makes the ratio shoot up super high. I knew it was you posting this before even looking at your name :p From my subscribe list, or from the overanalysis? >_>
because you share my love of numbers and overanalysis =)
|
On May 01 2016 17:03 oGoZenob wrote:Show nested quote +On May 01 2016 10:38 Cascade wrote:On May 01 2016 04:28 oGoZenob wrote:On April 30 2016 12:39 Cascade wrote:On April 30 2016 08:06 Cricketer12 wrote:
I would like to retract my previous statement now T_T Luckily you formulated it as a question, not a statement, so you are clear. The high ones on my subscribe list, that haven't been mentioned: Diablo 3 discussion: 2.2M scarlett fanclub: 1.5M sc2 balance discussion: 2M awesome/cconfusing BM: 2.4M GM hacking thread: 2.2M Didn't expect the BM thread to come up that high, and I thought the stupid questions thread would be higher, it's only 0.6M. it's interesting how they mostly have a similar views/posts ratio, and I think the differences says something about the thread. Diablo 3 discussion: 103 scarlett fanclub: 129 sc2 balance discussion: 80 SFW that makes you laugh: 1896 awesome/cconfusing BM: 319 GM hacking thread: 211 ABL: 81 In general it seems like smaller communities promote more posts per view. people are less shy to spout out nonsense. Also threads prone to intense discussion seem to have that effect. Other threads are more for reading than posting, such as the hacking thread, BM thread and ofc makes you laugh, where it is even enforced, which makes the ratio shoot up super high. I knew it was you posting this before even looking at your name :p From my subscribe list, or from the overanalysis? >_> because you share my love of numbers and overanalysis =)
<3 overanalysis <3
|
What a frutiful LR today. DonDomingo had it coming from his first posts - and honestly everytime I see someone with so little posts finding their way straight to the LR with that much of a hate, I can't help but wonder.
Then a random match fixing accuser in all caps is just the icing on the cake.
|
On May 01 2016 20:25 opisska wrote:
What a frutiful LR today. DonDomingo had it coming from his first posts - and honestly everytime I see someone with so little posts finding their way straight to the LR with that much of a hate, I can't help but wonder.
Then a random match fixing accuser in all caps is just the icing on the cake.
In both cases I honestly can't tell if they actually believe what they say or if they're just trying hard to get attention :/
|
On May 01 2016 20:35 Silvana wrote:Show nested quote +On May 01 2016 20:25 opisska wrote:
What a frutiful LR today. DonDomingo had it coming from his first posts - and honestly everytime I see someone with so little posts finding their way straight to the LR with that much of a hate, I can't help but wonder.
Then a random match fixing accuser in all caps is just the icing on the cake. In both cases I honestly can't tell if they actually believe what they say or if they're just trying hard to get attention :/
From a brief look at their posting histories, DonDomingo actually seems like a reasonable fan of the game who just had a bad day today, while the matchfixing guy is a walking embodiement of negativity - he even declared that he is done with SC2 after the Life thing, then probably got frustrated that nobody seemed to be hit by this terrbile loss for the scene and all of his previous 40 posts were in vain.
|
On May 01 2016 19:44 OzhMa wrote:
rofl TL i got warned because I posted a link to a petition? thanks for allowing free speech.
"TL is not your personal army. We do not allow people to post petitions like this.
Thanks in advance for your cooperation,
Seeker
(Do not reply to this message. No one will receive it.)"
and this was the message i received how pathetic! My personal army? As you can see the huge majority of the community feels the same as I do and we need to get something done. the diablo 3 community united and got rid of a horrible designer, so why shouldnt we?
User was temp banned for this post.
Ahh, the good old free speech argument.
|
Like two people agreed with him. 'The vast majority'. Lol.
|
The ABL is littered with the remains of populist heroes!
|
On May 01 2016 18:10 Poopi wrote:
Such fair matchup haha
you only need 5mn if you want to
User was temp banned for this post.
|
On May 02 2016 02:03 Karis Vas Ryaar wrote:Show nested quote +On May 01 2016 18:10 Poopi wrote:
Such fair matchup haha
you only need 5mn if you want to
User was temp banned for this post.
No idea what that even means
|
On May 02 2016 02:36 Cricketer12 wrote:Show nested quote +On May 02 2016 02:03 Karis Vas Ryaar wrote:On May 01 2016 18:10 Poopi wrote:
Such fair matchup haha
you only need 5mn if you want to
User was temp banned for this post. No idea what that even means
The meaning is pretty clear to me?
|
On May 02 2016 02:36 Cricketer12 wrote:Show nested quote +On May 02 2016 02:03 Karis Vas Ryaar wrote:On May 01 2016 18:10 Poopi wrote:
Such fair matchup haha
you only need 5mn if you want to
User was temp banned for this post. No idea what that even means
I would assume that was in reference to Zest vs TY game 2 in GSL today.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
