|
This thread is for discussing recent bans. Don't discuss other topics here. Take it to website feedback if you disagree with a ban or want to raise an issue. Keep it civil.NOTE: For those of you who want to find the actual ABL thread where the bans are posted. Please look in here: https://tl.net/forum/closed-threads/ |
On April 03 2016 02:06 OtherWorld wrote:Show nested quote +SK.Testie was just temp banned for 30 days by Teoita. That account was created on 2007-01-11 19:04:17 and had 9612 posts. Reason: That crack-addicted mother gave birth to these delinquents. And the city decided to pay them to not commit crime instead of giving them a well deserved bullet to the brain.
Yeah this is really not ok, especially with your posting history, especially after you were just banned for your bad posting in the general forum. Take a month off to think about it. Testie with an unnecessary excessive comment. Kinda surprised he suddenly went to such lengths. Like the Dead Kennedys' once sang, "Kill, Kill, Kill, Kill, Kill the Poor."
|
On April 03 2016 02:06 OtherWorld wrote:Show nested quote +SK.Testie was just temp banned for 30 days by Teoita. That account was created on 2007-01-11 19:04:17 and had 9612 posts. Reason: That crack-addicted mother gave birth to these delinquents. And the city decided to pay them to not commit crime instead of giving them a well deserved bullet to the brain.
Yeah this is really not ok, especially with your posting history, especially after you were just banned for your bad posting in the general forum. Take a month off to think about it. Testie with an unnecessary excessive comment. Kinda surprised he suddenly went to such lengths. Yet another post I skipped over reporting, because while reprehensible, in the context of the thread it was sparkIng discussion rather than anger.
Not enough advertising happening to keep the mods occupied?
|
On April 03 2016 02:20 Acrofales wrote:Show nested quote +On April 03 2016 02:06 OtherWorld wrote:SK.Testie was just temp banned for 30 days by Teoita. That account was created on 2007-01-11 19:04:17 and had 9612 posts. Reason: That crack-addicted mother gave birth to these delinquents. And the city decided to pay them to not commit crime instead of giving them a well deserved bullet to the brain.
Yeah this is really not ok, especially with your posting history, especially after you were just banned for your bad posting in the general forum. Take a month off to think about it. Testie with an unnecessary excessive comment. Kinda surprised he suddenly went to such lengths. Yet another post I skipped over reporting, because while reprehensible, in the context of the thread it was sparkIng discussion rather than anger.
Yeah I think his recent shitty post history played a part in that, as opposed to it being just a one-off odd out-of-context comment.
|
Italy12246 Posts
On April 03 2016 02:30 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:Show nested quote +On April 03 2016 02:20 Acrofales wrote:On April 03 2016 02:06 OtherWorld wrote:SK.Testie was just temp banned for 30 days by Teoita. That account was created on 2007-01-11 19:04:17 and had 9612 posts. Reason: That crack-addicted mother gave birth to these delinquents. And the city decided to pay them to not commit crime instead of giving them a well deserved bullet to the brain.
Yeah this is really not ok, especially with your posting history, especially after you were just banned for your bad posting in the general forum. Take a month off to think about it. Testie with an unnecessary excessive comment. Kinda surprised he suddenly went to such lengths. Yet another post I skipped over reporting, because while reprehensible, in the context of the thread it was sparkIng discussion rather than anger. Yeah I think his recent shitty post history played a part in that, as opposed to it being just a one-off odd out-of-context comment.
Yep
|
On April 03 2016 02:07 Falling wrote:Show nested quote +On April 03 2016 01:41 farvacola wrote: Intolerance of PUA attitudes needn't be political. And I think in regards to PUA, social conservatives and social liberals would have a fair amount of common ground, because really opposition to it relies less on politics and more on 'once burned, twice shy' or perhaps 'many times burned...' Because every PUA that got banned, was banned for consistent creepy posts (some of the worst being the fellow that filmed girls without their knowledge, and then uploaded said videos without their permission.) Not only that, but the conversation consistently moves to 'what is and is not rape' which is ugly water to tread every day. It's an experience based aversion to a topic that brings out the creepiest sort of conversations and attitudes. I'm not sure that PUA is a bannable offense in the way that martyring= auto ban, but rather we've pretty much removed any location for people to talk about PUA... so I guess banned in a sense. We don't feel the need to house those sorts of discussions here anymore. It's a nightmare to moderate and it sucks to have a super thread always on the 'frontpage' that is consistently creepy, arguing about rape, and combined with weird psychobabble discussions analyzing women like computer programs who lack agency. This makes a lot of sense. It's not the subject, but the sociopaths that talk about it.
|
On April 03 2016 02:36 Jealous wrote:Show nested quote +On April 03 2016 02:07 Falling wrote:On April 03 2016 01:41 farvacola wrote: Intolerance of PUA attitudes needn't be political. And I think in regards to PUA, social conservatives and social liberals would have a fair amount of common ground, because really opposition to it relies less on politics and more on 'once burned, twice shy' or perhaps 'many times burned...' Because every PUA that got banned, was banned for consistent creepy posts (some of the worst being the fellow that filmed girls without their knowledge, and then uploaded said videos without their permission.) Not only that, but the conversation consistently moves to 'what is and is not rape' which is ugly water to tread every day. It's an experience based aversion to a topic that brings out the creepiest sort of conversations and attitudes. I'm not sure that PUA is a bannable offense in the way that martyring= auto ban, but rather we've pretty much removed any location for people to talk about PUA... so I guess banned in a sense. We don't feel the need to house those sorts of discussions here anymore. It's a nightmare to moderate and it sucks to have a super thread always on the 'frontpage' that is consistently creepy, arguing about rape, and combined with weird psychobabble discussions analyzing women like computer programs who lack agency. This makes a lot of sense. It's not the subject, but the sociopaths that talk about it. It's like religious debating. There's no real way to contain it to reasonable discussion. There's some grains of truth in the PUA movement since there's a set of general male behaviors and a set of general female behaviors, and understanding the psychology of both can improve your chances at hooking up or getting into a relationship. The flip side is when people take these guidelines, attempt to turn them into an exact science, and then, since a lot of people who look into PUA haven't had much luck before and hence turn to PUA as an alternative, their insecurity comes out when talking to others on, say, a dating thread on the internet.
|
United States43278 Posts
Testie's been posting like that for a while but in that post he decided he wouldn't even bother with the dog whistles and just full out say what he means.
|
On April 03 2016 02:20 Acrofales wrote:Show nested quote +On April 03 2016 02:06 OtherWorld wrote:SK.Testie was just temp banned for 30 days by Teoita. That account was created on 2007-01-11 19:04:17 and had 9612 posts. Reason: That crack-addicted mother gave birth to these delinquents. And the city decided to pay them to not commit crime instead of giving them a well deserved bullet to the brain.
Yeah this is really not ok, especially with your posting history, especially after you were just banned for your bad posting in the general forum. Take a month off to think about it. Testie with an unnecessary excessive comment. Kinda surprised he suddenly went to such lengths. Yet another post I skipped over reporting, because while reprehensible, in the context of the thread it was sparkIng discussion rather than anger. Not enough advertising happening to keep the mods occupied? Hmm I dunno, even in context saying that shooting "delinquents" (which can mean anything, really) is well-deserved sounds kinda out of the boundaries of acceptability
|
On April 03 2016 02:31 Teoita wrote:Show nested quote +On April 03 2016 02:30 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:On April 03 2016 02:20 Acrofales wrote:On April 03 2016 02:06 OtherWorld wrote:SK.Testie was just temp banned for 30 days by Teoita. That account was created on 2007-01-11 19:04:17 and had 9612 posts. Reason: That crack-addicted mother gave birth to these delinquents. And the city decided to pay them to not commit crime instead of giving them a well deserved bullet to the brain.
Yeah this is really not ok, especially with your posting history, especially after you were just banned for your bad posting in the general forum. Take a month off to think about it. Testie with an unnecessary excessive comment. Kinda surprised he suddenly went to such lengths. Yet another post I skipped over reporting, because while reprehensible, in the context of the thread it was sparkIng discussion rather than anger. Yeah I think his recent shitty post history played a part in that, as opposed to it being just a one-off odd out-of-context comment. Yep
Okay, that makes sense. Don't get me wrong. I'm happy he's taking a forced break 
|
As soon as I read that Testie comment, I rolled my eyes and went to read news at the BBC, kinda like the old grandpa rolling his eyes and going for a smoke.
|
On April 01 2016 07:28 flipstar wrote:Show nested quote +On April 01 2016 06:44 BingbingBOPOMOFO wrote: Criminals are the worst. I'm glad Teamliquid and it's community isn't backing these criminal heinous acts. I think I say with confidence we would be better if these idiots were not part of community at all, and they should never be welcomed back into our gracious hands. Savior, you too.
Also, what is with their punishment? What's the point of having a judicial system if they don't even get punished for their crimes. They stole money, and lots of it, and they just hit with petty fines? Give them 10 to 15 years so they smarten up instead of just letting them go into the wild after a year where they'll do even more damage..
American spotted, most likely republican. User was warned for this post Testie alt? 
|
On April 03 2016 07:00 Otolia wrote: Look at these monkeys chanting USA. How many of them will die in the next war the USA will wage ? Will they chant then ?
User was temp banned for this post.
|
lol, the many awesome French posters on this site make me forget that dudes like Otolia exist. Dude needs to stop eating the pretzels.
|
I always say theres a time and a proper way to discuss US foreign policy. a counterstrike thread is never the right place
|
On April 03 2016 07:10 Karis Vas Ryaar wrote: I always say theres a time and a proper way to discuss US foreign policy. a counterstrike thread is never the right place All enemies have been banned, counter-terrorists win.
|
On April 03 2016 08:01 apes wrote: simples playing zookeeper this game, just rounding up the monkeys
User was temp banned for this post.
|
I'm surprised this game isn't creating more bans. Maybe the mods are just too busy crying and the bans will come later.
|
American nationalism too stronk
|
the one i posted was from 2 housr ago btw
|
On April 03 2016 07:06 Karis Vas Ryaar wrote:Show nested quote +On April 03 2016 07:00 Otolia wrote: Look at these monkeys chanting USA. How many of them will die in the next war the USA will wage ? Will they chant then ?
User was temp banned for this post.
On March 02 2016 22:51 Otolia wrote: Meanwhile France best nation ! lol
|
|
|
|
|
|