|
This thread is for discussing recent bans. Don't discuss other topics here. Take it to website feedback if you disagree with a ban or want to raise an issue. Keep it civil.NOTE: For those of you who want to find the actual ABL thread where the bans are posted. Please look in here: https://tl.net/forum/closed-threads/ |
Canada16217 Posts
On January 15 2015 13:55 Plexa wrote:We really need to upgrade from the red text data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44632/446320620b2797481b98f0248bf47d03f83e2600" alt="" the red text was just something I started doing a long time ago and it kinda stuck. We should definitely make it more difficult to imitate... rainbow text!
|
Seeker
Where dat snitch at?36920 Posts
On January 16 2015 08:34 NovemberstOrm wrote:Show nested quote +On January 15 2015 13:55 Plexa wrote:We really need to upgrade from the red text data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44632/446320620b2797481b98f0248bf47d03f83e2600" alt="" the red text was just something I started doing a long time ago and it kinda stuck. We should definitely make it more difficult to imitate... rainbow text! Oo;;
User was warned for this post
Like this?
|
Canada8157 Posts
|
On January 16 2015 08:56 Seeker wrote:Show nested quote +On January 16 2015 08:34 NovemberstOrm wrote:On January 15 2015 13:55 Plexa wrote:We really need to upgrade from the red text data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44632/446320620b2797481b98f0248bf47d03f83e2600" alt="" the red text was just something I started doing a long time ago and it kinda stuck. We should definitely make it more difficult to imitate... rainbow text! Oo;; User was warned for this postLike this? That looks like it should be in an early eighties VW.
|
|
United Kingdom13775 Posts
There should be flying monkeys on any page with at least 1 ban on it.
|
your Country52797 Posts
On January 16 2015 10:47 LegalLord wrote: There should be flying monkeys on any page with at least 1 ban on it. That would probably draw unnecessary attention
|
On January 16 2015 10:47 LegalLord wrote: There should be flying monkeys on any page with at least 1 ban on it.
But then people could fake mod text as long as someone else has already been banned. The solution is to increase the number of monkeys for each ban, and have the name of culprit written on them.
|
On January 16 2015 09:04 Jer99 wrote: red background
With a nuke in it
|
Canada8157 Posts
On January 16 2015 22:13 FFW_Rude wrote:With a nuke in it
"DENIED" German security council
|
|
A TL elephant in a black suit and glasses might be a cool thing.
Or a dead
|
when i read the ban reason, i thought this guy may have made a legitimate point, but was a stupid martyr. wtf. why so conciliatory in the ban reason for such a shitty post?
RevTiberius was just temp banned for 2 days by lichter.
That account was created on 2011-07-06 10:40:51 and had 272 posts.
Reason: Martyring is instantly bannable regardless of content, sorry
On January 18 2015 16:44 RevTiberius wrote: I'll probably get a ban for this (which I gladly accept), but after working in the corporate sector for about 10 years, my opinion about Naniwa is this:
He's a passive-aggressive piece of shit, and in ANY other "professional" environment, he'd been fired many times over a LONG time ago... Employers DO NOT tolerate unprofessional behavior, and rightly so!
Naniwa is a stupid kid who has much to learn, not just about SC2
User was temp banned for this post.
|
I'm still avoiding mod actions but I feel like I'm close to the edge. Naniwa is a sick bait though.
|
On January 19 2015 03:06 pigmanbear wrote:Show nested quote +On January 19 2015 03:02 Starecat wrote: He is an idiot and Protoss player this combo is worse than Hitler. Hitler, no skill all-inner. User was temp banned for this post.
Best. 2K. Ever.
|
On January 19 2015 03:27 dAPhREAk wrote:when i read the ban reason, i thought this guy may have made a legitimate point, but was a stupid martyr. wtf. why so conciliatory in the ban reason for such a shitty post? Show nested quote +RevTiberius was just temp banned for 2 days by lichter.
That account was created on 2011-07-06 10:40:51 and had 272 posts.
Reason: Martyring is instantly bannable regardless of content, sorry Show nested quote +On January 18 2015 16:44 RevTiberius wrote: I'll probably get a ban for this (which I gladly accept), but after working in the corporate sector for about 10 years, my opinion about Naniwa is this:
He's a passive-aggressive piece of shit, and in ANY other "professional" environment, he'd been fired many times over a LONG time ago... Employers DO NOT tolerate unprofessional behavior, and rightly so!
Naniwa is a stupid kid who has much to learn, not just about SC2
User was temp banned for this post. Hmm while his post is poorly expressed and very insulting and would have probably resulted in a ban even without the martyring, his point can be seen as valid. Or maybe lichter banned him without even reading the post, explaining the ban reason d:
|
On January 19 2015 04:46 OtherWorld wrote:Show nested quote +On January 19 2015 03:27 dAPhREAk wrote:when i read the ban reason, i thought this guy may have made a legitimate point, but was a stupid martyr. wtf. why so conciliatory in the ban reason for such a shitty post? RevTiberius was just temp banned for 2 days by lichter.
That account was created on 2011-07-06 10:40:51 and had 272 posts.
Reason: Martyring is instantly bannable regardless of content, sorry On January 18 2015 16:44 RevTiberius wrote: I'll probably get a ban for this (which I gladly accept), but after working in the corporate sector for about 10 years, my opinion about Naniwa is this:
He's a passive-aggressive piece of shit, and in ANY other "professional" environment, he'd been fired many times over a LONG time ago... Employers DO NOT tolerate unprofessional behavior, and rightly so!
Naniwa is a stupid kid who has much to learn, not just about SC2
User was temp banned for this post. Hmm while his post is poorly expressed and very insulting and would have probably resulted in a ban even without the martyring, his point can be seen as valid. Or maybe lichter banned him without even reading the post, explaining the ban reason d: not really. professional athletes get away with a lot of shit, including criminal activity. comparing to him with an office worker is idiotic.
|
|
Thats why you dont do drugs
|
On January 19 2015 11:03 Skynx wrote:Thats why you dont do drugs
But I like drugs. They never made me think I was a Hive Queen though
|
|
|
|