|
This thread is for discussing recent bans. Don't discuss other topics here. Take it to website feedback if you disagree with a ban or want to raise an issue. Keep it civil.NOTE: For those of you who want to find the actual ABL thread where the bans are posted. Please look in here: https://tl.net/forum/closed-threads/ |
Fenrax was just temp banned for 90 days by Nyovne.
That account was created on 2010-01-04 09:57:33 and had 5018 posts.
Reason: 32 priors, going for #7 this year alone. Self explanatory.
I gotta say, his "pity me, I can't post chops/gifs like staff/writers" spiel in the WCS EU LR was annoying as shit.
|
Seeker
Where dat snitch at?36920 Posts
On May 27 2013 15:47 farvacola wrote:Show nested quote +Fenrax was just temp banned for 90 days by Nyovne.
That account was created on 2010-01-04 09:57:33 and had 5018 posts.
Reason: 32 priors, going for #7 this year alone. Self explanatory.
I gotta say, his "pity me, I can't post chops/gifs like staff/writers" spiel in the WCA EU LR was annoying as shit. What was Fenrax banned for?
|
Germany25649 Posts
|
ALLEYCAT BLUES49496 Posts
On May 27 2013 17:49 KadaverBB wrote: Making a penis joke -.-
thats hard man.
|
Seeker
Where dat snitch at?36920 Posts
On May 27 2013 17:49 KadaverBB wrote: Making a penis joke -.- Source?
|
Germany25649 Posts
|
I might be missing some context but wow Fenrax, that seems really harsh at face value.
|
Bit harsh to perma ban Benjamin99, I liked that guy, his insane but mostly good spirited fanboyism always made me smile
|
On May 27 2013 17:51 BLinD-RawR wrote:thats hard man.
haha holy crap 90 days for that post. don't think he expected that.
|
On May 27 2013 15:22 TL.net Bot wrote: hehewangbing was just banned by Nyovne.
That account was created on 2013-05-27 15:08:19 and had 3 posts.
Reason: We, accustomed to rage exiles from delight live coiled in shells of judgement until bans leave their high holy temple and come into our threads to liberate us into order.
Bans arrive and in their train come ecstasies old memories of pleasure ancient histories of flame. Yet if we are bold, bans strikes away the chains of fear from our souls.
We are weaned from our timidity In the flush of a ban's light we dare be brave And suddenly we see that bans costs all we are and will ever be. Yet it is only bans which set us free.
|
On May 27 2013 19:30 qotsager wrote:Show nested quote +On May 27 2013 17:51 BLinD-RawR wrote:On May 27 2013 17:49 KadaverBB wrote: Making a penis joke -.- thats hard man. haha holy crap 90 days for that post. don't think he expected that. Eh, he has a HORRIBLE history (I've seen his name pop up in this thread more than once and I haven't been a member of TL for too long).
Nyvone is rolling.
malaan was just temp banned for 2 days by Nyovne.
That account was created on 2010-09-27 10:24:26 and had 340 posts.
Reason: Don't go into a proper and respectable topic and start calling everyone that participates in it an idiot. On that note, you look like you could use a pair of proper shoes yourself.
On May 25 2013 16:24 malaan wrote: I hate to chime in with this truth - but if you spend like $50+ on any item of clothing you are an idiot.
All you are doing is walking around advert for some corporation... User was temp banned for this post.
|
Netherlands19129 Posts
That was just a terrible post and normally I´d warn or PM someone about it. Sadly enough he´s been racking ´em up ever since he joined TL and just refuses to improve his posting. The post in question was poor enough and as such it set me to scanning his recent post history. Obviously it was in line with what I came to expect from him so funtime was over. Fenrax had it comming for so long and it seems several mods just moderated posts in question and missed his history. As such he's been lucky to make it this far in the way he has.
|
On May 27 2013 21:18 TL.net Bot wrote: Morlock was just banned by Nyovne.
That account was created on 2013-05-06 03:44:18 and had 68 posts.
Reason: Comes straight off a one week ban with 5 priors, all for balance whining, and goes straight into yet another huge balance rant with some martyrsauce to boot which is an autobannable offense itself. You had your chance, then about four second chances and you still keep going. If you can't take a hint, you take the hammer.
For the occasion:
Sing hey! for the bans at close of day That wash the balance whines away! A loon is he that will not sing: O! A Banning Spree is anoble thing!
Still round the corner there may wait A new account with a clean slate, And though I oft have passed them by, A day will come at last when I Shall take the PBU's that run Down with a ban, and perhaps a pun.
|
yeint was just banned by KadaverBB.
That account was created on 2011-05-30 18:53:25 and had 2328 posts.
Reason: By request
Permaban my account please. I will not patronize a site that accepts a sponsorship from John Schnatter.
Indirect death by pizza
|
On May 27 2013 21:44 AlternativeEgo wrote:Show nested quote +yeint was just banned by KadaverBB.
That account was created on 2011-05-30 18:53:25 and had 2328 posts.
Reason: By request Show nested quote +Permaban my account please. I will not patronize a site that accepts a sponsorship from John Schnatter. Indirect death by pizza I heard a rumor that soon Liquid players will be rocking the PJ as a tag just like EG. Liquid'HerOPJ XD
|
On May 27 2013 21:44 AlternativeEgo wrote:Show nested quote +yeint was just banned by KadaverBB.
That account was created on 2011-05-30 18:53:25 and had 2328 posts.
Reason: By request Show nested quote +Permaban my account please. I will not patronize a site that accepts a sponsorship from John Schnatter. Indirect death by pizza Haha and there are so many things wrong with that logic it's hilarious.
|
yeint has principles. good on him.
|
On May 27 2013 22:13 AgentW wrote:Show nested quote +On May 27 2013 21:44 AlternativeEgo wrote:yeint was just banned by KadaverBB.
That account was created on 2011-05-30 18:53:25 and had 2328 posts.
Reason: By request Permaban my account please. I will not patronize a site that accepts a sponsorship from John Schnatter. Indirect death by pizza Haha and there are so many things wrong with that logic it's hilarious.
Well in theory, if a large enough proportion of the users boycotted Teamliquid because of the actions a particular sponsor, that would pressure Teamliquid into not taking sponsorship from that particular company, and starve the company of advertising. Voting with your cash/esports dollars/eyeballs is a perfectly reasonable way to pressure companies into not doing things you dislike.
This guy's protest won't be particularly effective, because he's not put enough effort into organizing a boycott but I don't think he's being illogical to the point of hilarity.
|
On May 27 2013 22:31 Aim Here wrote:Show nested quote +On May 27 2013 22:13 AgentW wrote:On May 27 2013 21:44 AlternativeEgo wrote:yeint was just banned by KadaverBB.
That account was created on 2011-05-30 18:53:25 and had 2328 posts.
Reason: By request Permaban my account please. I will not patronize a site that accepts a sponsorship from John Schnatter. Indirect death by pizza Haha and there are so many things wrong with that logic it's hilarious. Well in theory, if a large enough proportion of the users boycotted Teamliquid because of the actions a particular sponsor, that would pressure Teamliquid into not taking sponsorship from that particular company, and starve the company of advertising. Voting with your cash/esports dollars/eyeballs is a perfectly reasonable way to pressure companies into not doing things you dislike. This guy's protest won't be particularly effective, because he's not put enough effort into organizing a boycott but I don't think he's being illogical to the point of hilarity. Ignoring my disagreement on his position on Papa John, the major point I was hinting at was TL =/= TL.net, so this protest will go completely unnoticed. Now, if people don't buy the pizza, then he'd be on to something, but Papa John's won't care if people just stop visiting TL.net.
|
525 Posts
The sponsorship was for TL.net as well as their SC2 team and Dota 2 team though, so they should care. That is if it was in a larger scale, not one or two of course.
|
|
|
|