EPTOn May 27 2013 22:21 nunez wrote:
yeint has principles. good on him.
yeint has principles. good on him.
that's not having principles
The Automated Ban List - Page 1916
| Forum Index > TL Community |
This thread is for discussing recent bans. Don't discuss other topics here. Take it to website feedback if you disagree with a ban or want to raise an issue. Keep it civil. NOTE: For those of you who want to find the actual ABL thread where the bans are posted. Please look in here: https://tl.net/forum/closed-threads/ | ||
|
DeepElemBlues
United States5079 Posts
that's not having principles | ||
|
nooboon
2602 Posts
| ||
|
Iplaythings
Denmark9110 Posts
On May 27 2013 21:10 Nyovne wrote: That was just a terrible post and normally I´d warn or PM someone about it. Sadly enough he´s been racking ´em up ever since he joined TL and just refuses to improve his posting. The post in question was poor enough and as such it set me to scanning his recent post history. Obviously it was in line with what I came to expect from him so funtime was over. Fenrax had it comming for so long and it seems several mods just moderated posts in question and missed his history. As such he's been lucky to make it this far in the way he has. It's kind of a shame though, even if I know it's not allowable his banned posts are allways silly enough to make me smile Especially when he got banned for posting the "evil chart", shit was hillarious and him getting banned made it even better | ||
|
NicolBolas
United States1388 Posts
Sure it is. If you truly believe that a company is a bad actor, then you should not patronize them, nor should you patronize those supported by them. You may disagree that the company is bad, for whatever reasons you like. But you have to respect the fact that he believes it and, more importantly, is willing to stand by those beliefs by taking action. That's what principles are. It's not what you feel, it's what you do. | ||
|
DeepElemBlues
United States5079 Posts
On May 28 2013 00:17 NicolBolas wrote: Sure it is. If you truly believe that a company is a bad actor, then you should not patronize them, nor should you patronize those supported by them. You may disagree that the company is bad, for whatever reasons you like. But you have to respect the fact that he believes it and, more importantly, is willing to stand by those beliefs by taking action. That's what principles are. It's not what you feel, it's what you do. taking your ball and going home and then breaking your parents' new 60-inch flatscreen so they ground you forever because you don't like the kid down the block that just came outside to play is not a principle | ||
|
MasterOfPuppets
Romania6942 Posts
On May 27 2013 23:22 Purpose88 wrote: People who play these terrible Casualgames instead of SC2 are doing it because they are too bad for SC2 and not because they cannot affort 20$ for SC2... User was banned for this post. Is this NaEjeOn? Lol... | ||
JackDragon
525 Posts
On May 28 2013 00:24 DeepElemBlues wrote: taking your ball and going home and then breaking your parents' new 60-inch flatscreen so they ground you forever because you don't like the kid down the block that just came outside to play is not a principle That is a very bad analogy. What does the ball and flatscreen symbolize? For teamliquid it is barely noticeable if one guy leaves. Hardly the same as if he is taking his ball with him. And the grounding and flatscreen I guess is the ban request? Except for I am fairly certain that he could come back if he chance his mind, and no harm have been done to teamliquids mind or assets. A better analogy would be that you go home if the kid whom you don't like come down and play. It is nothing major in itself, you lose out on it (since you can't play), no one else really care. | ||
Nyovne
Netherlands19129 Posts
| ||
Firebolt145
Lalalaland34483 Posts
| ||
|
MasterOfPuppets
Romania6942 Posts
On May 28 2013 02:21 Firebolt145 wrote: Nyovne is sad you guys aren't talking more about his poems. Recently there has been an over-saturation of poetry-based content which has naturally led to a decline in interest. + Show Spoiler +  | ||
|
JackDragon
525 Posts
| ||
|
FetTerBender
Germany1393 Posts
On May 28 2013 02:30 JackDragon wrote: Sorry about that. Your poems are great. Even though I have no idea how to read them. Top left to bottom right. And always with a grain of salt ;-) | ||
|
TOCHMY
Sweden1692 Posts
B.I.G. was just temp banned for 2 weeks by Nyovne. That account was created on 2010-08-14 21:13:10 and had 2080 posts. Reason: The non-dutch mod warns you, the dutch one who can actually read it bans you. Making a comment along the lines of "She just wants a dick" in response to that post is unacceptable. In the context of your last banreason: Reason: I find your belief that rape is inevitable whenever men have power over women to be a disgusting abdication of responsibility and part of the systemic denial of the personal responsibility of the rapist in these cases. If you want to end rape in the military you hold rapists to account for their crimes rather than collectively writing off all men as uncontrollable animals. Concluding that women need to be treated differently for their own protection is bullshit, rape isn't a women's issue, it's an ongoing crime that is predominantly perpetrated by men. Your view is part of the wider institutionalised sexism which excuses rapists, blames women and writes men off as incapable of making moral decisions by themselves. And further posting on your part it becomes downright disgusting. Less dog manners, shape up. SNAP I bet he regrets that statement T_T | ||
|
Cokefreak
Finland8094 Posts
IshinShishi was just temp banned for 2 days by Plexa. That account was created on 2012-04-12 08:48:36 and had 3470 posts. Reason: Ban length decreased Turns out it doesn't actually take a week to sober up. | ||
|
nunez
Norway4003 Posts
On May 28 2013 04:56 Cokefreak wrote: Turns out it doesn't actually take a week to sober up. i think 2 days is a reasonable amount of time to sober up. usually the day after the day after i am still reduced. | ||
|
Targe
United Kingdom14103 Posts
Harrad was just banned by MoonBear. That account was created on 2010-10-04 04:58:13 and had 999 posts. Reason: You seem to be unable to make any good posts. So bye. God that was deserved. | ||
|
[UoN]Sentinel
United States11320 Posts
| ||
|
JackDragon
525 Posts
On May 28 2013 04:18 FetTerBender wrote: Top left to bottom right. And always with a grain of salt ;-) Oh that explains it, I thought "Sing that A O! Still A And A Shall Down" was a bit strange. Edit: then again, you never said that I should read them horizontally so technically I guess I could still read them right :p On another note. I don't remember this guy so much. But looking through his temp bans we find gems like On August 24 2012 03:58 Harrad wrote: a true faggot. enjoy your empty troll-life, you disgusting piece of shit. the person you just shat is superior in more ways than your underdeveloped wits can imagine. User was temp banned for this post. And On January 19 2012 19:47 Harrad wrote: your not terrible, your utter garbage and you will never be good at this game  User was temp banned for this post. I don't get why some people think they can get away with shit by just adding a smily. It doesn't make whatever you say less offensive. Both of them was completely uncalled for. | ||
|
AlternativeEgo
Sweden17309 Posts
| ||
|
Targe
United Kingdom14103 Posts
On May 28 2013 05:41 JackDragon wrote: Oh that explains it, I thought "Sing that A O! Still A And A Shall Down" was a bit strange. Edit: then again, you never said that I should read them horizontally so technically I guess I could still read them right :p On another note. I don't remember this guy so much. But looking through his temp bans we find gems like And I don't get why some people think they can get away with shit by just adding a smily. It doesn't make whatever you say less offensive. Both of them was completely uncalled for. The one he got banned for: On May 28 2013 05:09 Harrad wrote: You're scum User was banned for this post. on a blog  | ||
| ||
