|
This thread is for discussing recent bans. Don't discuss other topics here. Take it to website feedback if you disagree with a ban or want to raise an issue. Keep it civil.NOTE: For those of you who want to find the actual ABL thread where the bans are posted. Please look in here: https://tl.net/forum/closed-threads/ |
On May 07 2013 04:48 nooboon wrote:Show nested quote + Ubiquitousdichotomy was just temp banned for 2 weeks by MoonBear.
That account was created on 2013-01-08 03:08:17 and had 119 posts.
Reason: Under the Oxford Dictionary of Not Posting Like Shit I looked up the definition of your post.
It said temp ban. Said banned post from the dating luck thread: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=273445¤tpage=143#2858+ Show Spoiler + UR DAMN 2 HE11 0LD MAMA SAYZ G0 2 BED A11 FUK1N READY U L0SE L0 L1FE DAMN 2 HE11 CR1TTER, SHAK1N DA DAMN 2 0LD AZZ W0NT GETT U ANNY WARE BUTT HERPEZ D1SEASE ANN U N0 TH1Z 2 BEE VERY DAMN 2 HE11 TRUE, GUEZZ U W0NT TAK 0UR W0RD UPP 4 1T C0Z U D0NT N0 US D0 U, G1V 1T SUM FDAMN T1ME AFTER U HAV UR 0WN VERY F1RST DAMN 2 HE11 D1SEASE U JUS M1GHT WAK UUP, C0Z UR B0B0 JUS M1GHT BEE B00RNN DED, BUTT WEE CANT TE11 U A DAMN TH1NGG, U G0TTA WA1K DA DAMN R.0.A.D. A11 BUY UR DAMN SE1F U ST1NK1N F0U1 F001<< I tried decipher what was written: + Show Spoiler + Your damn to hell. Old mama says go to dead all fucking ready. You lose low(?) life. Damn hell critter, shaking that damn to old ass won't get you anywhere but herpes disease. And you no this 2 be very damn to hell true, guess u won't take our word up four it cause you don't no us do you, give it sum damn time after you have your own very first. Damn to hell disease you just might wake up cause your bobo (baby?) just might be born dead, but we cant tell you a damn thing, you gotta walk the damn road. All buy your damn self you stinking foul fool. This is one of those things that is more effort to type than it would ever be worth. As a person who makes poor, text based jokes on a rather frequent basis I should know.
|
sagansagan was just temp banned for 2 days by KadaverBB.
That account was created on 2013-03-29 06:03:58 and had 8 posts.
Reason: Read the mod note please, no book spoilers.
I felt the heat on this one, as I almost fell victim to the offense myself. Props to Zandar for lookin out
|
|
Seeker
Where dat snitch at?36920 Posts
On May 07 2013 07:34 jeerlessdogmas wrote:Show nested quote +On May 07 2013 04:48 nooboon wrote: Ubiquitousdichotomy was just temp banned for 2 weeks by MoonBear.
That account was created on 2013-01-08 03:08:17 and had 119 posts.
Reason: Under the Oxford Dictionary of Not Posting Like Shit I looked up the definition of your post.
It said temp ban. Said banned post from the dating luck thread: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=273445¤tpage=143#2858+ Show Spoiler + UR DAMN 2 HE11 0LD MAMA SAYZ G0 2 BED A11 FUK1N READY U L0SE L0 L1FE DAMN 2 HE11 CR1TTER, SHAK1N DA DAMN 2 0LD AZZ W0NT GETT U ANNY WARE BUTT HERPEZ D1SEASE ANN U N0 TH1Z 2 BEE VERY DAMN 2 HE11 TRUE, GUEZZ U W0NT TAK 0UR W0RD UPP 4 1T C0Z U D0NT N0 US D0 U, G1V 1T SUM FDAMN T1ME AFTER U HAV UR 0WN VERY F1RST DAMN 2 HE11 D1SEASE U JUS M1GHT WAK UUP, C0Z UR B0B0 JUS M1GHT BEE B00RNN DED, BUTT WEE CANT TE11 U A DAMN TH1NGG, U G0TTA WA1K DA DAMN R.0.A.D. A11 BUY UR DAMN SE1F U ST1NK1N F0U1 F001<< I tried decipher what was written: + Show Spoiler + Your damn to hell. Old mama says go to dead all fucking ready. You lose low(?) life. Damn hell critter, shaking that damn to old ass won't get you anywhere but herpes disease. And you know this to be very damn to hell true, guess you won't take our word up for it cause you don't know us do you? Give it some damn time after you have your own very first. Damn to hell disease you just might wake up cause your bobo (baby?) just might be born dead, but we cant tell you a damn thing, you gotta walk the damn road. All buy your damn self you stinking foul fool. Fairly close translation. Fortunately, I happen to have a degree in 1337, that's "leetspeak" to the layman, from Oxford University no less. Here is my translation: + Show Spoiler +Your damn-to-hell old mama says go to bed all-fucking-ready. You lose, low life damn-to-hell critter. Shaking the damn-too-old ass won't get you anywhere but herpes disease, and you know this to be very damn-to-hell true. Guess you won't take our word up for it because you don't know us do you? Give it some damn time after you have your own very first damn-to-hell disease, you just might wake up, because your baby just might be born dead, but we can't tell you a damn thing, you gotta walk the damn road all by your damn self, you stinking foul fool. User is waiting to be unbanned for this post because Myles fucked up. isn't this jdseemoreglass?
|
United States5162 Posts
No, but I guess my mistake was just easy to make. Of course, the coincidence that he's a low post user posting in the ABL with a name that is slightly similar to jd's might be no coincidence at all, or maybe it is.
|
On May 07 2013 08:03 Myles wrote: No, but I guess my mistake was just easy to make. Of course, the coincidence that he's a low post user posting in the ABL with a name that is slightly similar to jd's might be no coincidence at all, or maybe it is.
Am I missing some heavy irony here? The name isn't just slightly similar to jd's; it's an anagram. Is there seriously debate about who it is?
|
Both names look very similar at a cursory glance. Fooled me for a sec too.
|
On May 07 2013 08:16 frogrubdown wrote:Show nested quote +On May 07 2013 08:03 Myles wrote: No, but I guess my mistake was just easy to make. Of course, the coincidence that he's a low post user posting in the ABL with a name that is slightly similar to jd's might be no coincidence at all, or maybe it is. Am I missing some heavy irony here? The name isn't just slightly similar to jd's; it's an anagram. Is there seriously debate about who it is? not a full anagramm tho, e and s are missing. still pretty strange
|
United States5162 Posts
On May 07 2013 08:16 frogrubdown wrote:Show nested quote +On May 07 2013 08:03 Myles wrote: No, but I guess my mistake was just easy to make. Of course, the coincidence that he's a low post user posting in the ABL with a name that is slightly similar to jd's might be no coincidence at all, or maybe it is. Am I missing some heavy irony here? The name isn't just slightly similar to jd's; it's an anagram. Is there seriously debate about who it is? Their other posts seemed ok, so the higher ups can make that decision.
|
On May 07 2013 08:26 Paljas wrote:Show nested quote +On May 07 2013 08:16 frogrubdown wrote:On May 07 2013 08:03 Myles wrote: No, but I guess my mistake was just easy to make. Of course, the coincidence that he's a low post user posting in the ABL with a name that is slightly similar to jd's might be no coincidence at all, or maybe it is. Am I missing some heavy irony here? The name isn't just slightly similar to jd's; it's an anagram. Is there seriously debate about who it is? not a full anagramm tho, e and s are missing. still pretty strange
How so? Two 'e's in 'see' and one in 'more' to match the two in 'jeer' and one in 'less'. One 's' in 'see' and two in 'glass' to match the two in 'less' and the one in 'dogmas'. Three a piece in both cases.
edit:
On May 07 2013 08:27 Myles wrote:Show nested quote +On May 07 2013 08:16 frogrubdown wrote:On May 07 2013 08:03 Myles wrote: No, but I guess my mistake was just easy to make. Of course, the coincidence that he's a low post user posting in the ABL with a name that is slightly similar to jd's might be no coincidence at all, or maybe it is. Am I missing some heavy irony here? The name isn't just slightly similar to jd's; it's an anagram. Is there seriously debate about who it is? Their other posts seemed ok, so the higher ups can make that decision.
Sure, they weren't inflammatory, but they also weren't the posts of someone new to the site. The odds of an anagram happening by chance are pretty abysmal...
edit2:
On May 07 2013 08:33 cLAN.Anax wrote:Show nested quote +On May 07 2013 08:31 frogrubdown wrote:On May 07 2013 08:26 Paljas wrote:On May 07 2013 08:16 frogrubdown wrote:On May 07 2013 08:03 Myles wrote: No, but I guess my mistake was just easy to make. Of course, the coincidence that he's a low post user posting in the ABL with a name that is slightly similar to jd's might be no coincidence at all, or maybe it is. Am I missing some heavy irony here? The name isn't just slightly similar to jd's; it's an anagram. Is there seriously debate about who it is? not a full anagramm tho, e and s are missing. still pretty strange How so? Two 'e's in 'see' and one in 'more' to match the two in 'jeer' and one in 'less'. One 's' in 'see' and two in 'glass' to match the two in 'less' and the one in 'dogmas'. Three a piece in both cases. edit: On May 07 2013 08:27 Myles wrote:On May 07 2013 08:16 frogrubdown wrote:On May 07 2013 08:03 Myles wrote: No, but I guess my mistake was just easy to make. Of course, the coincidence that he's a low post user posting in the ABL with a name that is slightly similar to jd's might be no coincidence at all, or maybe it is. Am I missing some heavy irony here? The name isn't just slightly similar to jd's; it's an anagram. Is there seriously debate about who it is? Their other posts seemed ok, so the higher ups can make that decision. Sure, they weren't inflammatory, but they also weren't the posts of someone new to the site. The odds of an anagram happening by chance are pretty abysmal... Either he's getting a lot cleverer, or we're reading way too much into this.
He was never an idiot; he just has a persecution complex and enough narcissism to sink a ship. Anagrams are right up his alley.
|
On May 07 2013 08:31 frogrubdown wrote:Show nested quote +On May 07 2013 08:26 Paljas wrote:On May 07 2013 08:16 frogrubdown wrote:On May 07 2013 08:03 Myles wrote: No, but I guess my mistake was just easy to make. Of course, the coincidence that he's a low post user posting in the ABL with a name that is slightly similar to jd's might be no coincidence at all, or maybe it is. Am I missing some heavy irony here? The name isn't just slightly similar to jd's; it's an anagram. Is there seriously debate about who it is? not a full anagramm tho, e and s are missing. still pretty strange How so? Two 'e's in 'see' and one in 'more' to match the two in 'jeer' and one in 'less'. One 's' in 'see' and two in 'glass' to match the two in 'less' and the one in 'dogmas'. Three a piece in both cases. edit: Show nested quote +On May 07 2013 08:27 Myles wrote:On May 07 2013 08:16 frogrubdown wrote:On May 07 2013 08:03 Myles wrote: No, but I guess my mistake was just easy to make. Of course, the coincidence that he's a low post user posting in the ABL with a name that is slightly similar to jd's might be no coincidence at all, or maybe it is. Am I missing some heavy irony here? The name isn't just slightly similar to jd's; it's an anagram. Is there seriously debate about who it is? Their other posts seemed ok, so the higher ups can make that decision. Sure, they weren't inflammatory, but they also weren't the posts of someone new to the site. The odds of an anagram happening by chance are pretty abysmal...
Either he's getting a lot cleverer, or we're reading way too much into this.
|
On May 07 2013 08:31 frogrubdown wrote:Show nested quote +On May 07 2013 08:26 Paljas wrote:On May 07 2013 08:16 frogrubdown wrote:On May 07 2013 08:03 Myles wrote: No, but I guess my mistake was just easy to make. Of course, the coincidence that he's a low post user posting in the ABL with a name that is slightly similar to jd's might be no coincidence at all, or maybe it is. Am I missing some heavy irony here? The name isn't just slightly similar to jd's; it's an anagram. Is there seriously debate about who it is? not a full anagramm tho, e and s are missing. still pretty strange How so? Two 'e's in 'see' and one in 'more' to match the two in 'jeer' and one in 'less'. One 's' in 'see' and two in 'glass' to match the two in 'less' and the one in 'dogmas'. Three a piece in both cases. yeah, I am stupid, thought his name was jdseemoreglasses
|
Clearly, Myles needs to get like KwarK and start banning without remorse
|
your Country52797 Posts
anagrams are not that hard guys
On May 07 2013 08:38 farvacola wrote:Clearly, Myles needs to get like KwarK and start banning without remorse data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/41f32/41f32ccbf9c308e87a90fa896d4fd874e9b79ee6" alt="" We already have KadaverBB.
|
opterown
Australia54784 Posts
On May 07 2013 01:50 TotalBiscuit wrote:Show nested quote +On May 06 2013 19:24 opterown wrote: i don't want to get into another argument, suffice to say tb is not exactly a model poster and has never been But what he doesn't do is call people dicks and then act all surprised when they respond negatively. This is alllll on you bro. You got punished within the rules and as far as I'm concerned the matter is settled now. i requested a ban to walk away, i did not get punished one bit thanks. i walked away since i know how things often get out of hand with you (i'm sure you're well aware), and i did not want things to get out of hand and further ruin people's days.
furthermore, i have a much better moderation history than you do, and you get away with a lot of things due to being a community member. there was this blog post recently...? (and yes, i know you are trying to work on that, so props to you)
but yeah, matter is settled if you want to say it is, i hold no beef against you as a person, just your comment. glhf otherwise
|
Aeroplaneoverthesea was just temp banned for 2 weeks by MoonBear.
That account was created on 2012-04-26 05:34:32 and had 1669 posts.
Reason: You haven't learnt how to avoid LR threads despite a massive moderation history about it and being told to watch you posting.
You get one more chance.
People on the internet in general and LR threads in particular need to learn that people tend to have short memories. This guy was really getting on my nerves in the WCS AM thread constantly defending why his lame joke was actually funny, although I'm not sure if it was something else that got him banned. But ya, my point being he should have just walked away and tried again later =p.
Edit: turns out he was banned for flaming during that exchange: which I really should have quoted to begin with =p
On May 07 2013 09:45 Aeroplaneoverthesea wrote:Show nested quote +On May 07 2013 09:42 Toosneaky wrote:On May 07 2013 09:40 Aeroplaneoverthesea wrote:On May 07 2013 09:38 Toosneaky wrote:On May 07 2013 09:37 Aeroplaneoverthesea wrote:On May 07 2013 09:36 Bagi wrote:On May 07 2013 09:34 Aeroplaneoverthesea wrote: I have a feeling that HelloKitty comes from a Warcraft 3 background. Yeah just like Thorzain and Hasuobs who are the most passive players in the scene. It's a joke, you can un-clench anytime. Yeah, bagi just proved your joke wasn't funny. Awwww are you butt hurt too? Don't worry kid, you'll develop a sense of humour one day. lol what. I said he just proved your joke doesn't make sense or wasn't funny. I'm sure jokes have to have both to be a good joke. Since your sense of humor is so good, please explain that joke then. Okay, for the slow people in the cheap seats. Back in the early days of Sc2 people from a Warcraft 3 background didn't 'get' macro play for a little so they would build a bunch of units on one base for ages and then attack on 50-80 supply. They especially loved either hero style units like Thors or Collosus or heavily microable units like Blink stalkers. This was something the Brood War players found pretty funny for a while until Wc3 players figured out that Sc2 was not Warcraft IV.
|
Northern Ireland23785 Posts
He's annoying as fuck for continually insulting foreigners, even the good ones
|
On May 07 2013 09:44 opterown wrote:Show nested quote +On May 07 2013 01:50 TotalBiscuit wrote:On May 06 2013 19:24 opterown wrote: i don't want to get into another argument, suffice to say tb is not exactly a model poster and has never been But what he doesn't do is call people dicks and then act all surprised when they respond negatively. This is alllll on you bro. You got punished within the rules and as far as I'm concerned the matter is settled now. i requested a ban to walk away, i did not get punished one bit thanks. i walked away since i know how things often get out of hand with you (i'm sure you're well aware), and i did not want things to get out of hand and further ruin people's days. furthermore, i have a much better moderation history than you do, and you get away with a lot of things due to being a community member. there was this blog post recently...? (and yes, i know you are trying to work on that, so props to you) but yeah, matter is settled if you want to say it is, i hold no beef against you as a person, just your comment. glhf otherwise i find it ironic you seem to be blaming him for things getting out of control, but you asked for a ban because you couldnt control yourself.
|
opterown
Australia54784 Posts
i can control myself, the ban was just to make 100% sure of that
|
On May 07 2013 10:09 opterown wrote: i can control myself, the ban was just to make 100% sure of that im sure tb says the same thing.
|
|
|
|