EPTI spose you have said that Praise does not require justification in the same way as criticism, although in terms of contribution to a discussion they both seem like 2 sides of a rather dull coin.
The Automated Ban List - Page 178
| Forum Index > TL Community |
This thread is for discussing recent bans. Don't discuss other topics here. Take it to website feedback if you disagree with a ban or want to raise an issue. Keep it civil. NOTE: For those of you who want to find the actual ABL thread where the bans are posted. Please look in here: https://tl.net/forum/closed-threads/ | ||
|
XeliN
United Kingdom1755 Posts
I spose you have said that Praise does not require justification in the same way as criticism, although in terms of contribution to a discussion they both seem like 2 sides of a rather dull coin. | ||
Chill
Calgary25991 Posts
On November 10 2010 09:23 XeliN wrote: Using that analogy Chill "I like Pizza" reiterated constantly seems just as irritating. I spose you have said that Praise does not require justification in the same way as criticism, although in terms of contribution to a discussion they both seem like 2 sides of a rather dull coin. I think it's common sense.  | ||
|
semantics
10040 Posts
| ||
|
Moa
United States790 Posts
On November 10 2010 08:51 Chill wrote: Imagine you're trying to have a conversation about delicious food with a group of people. Now imagine the conversation keeps progressing, with people adding in dashes here and there to take the conversation in different directions. Now imagine one guy keeps saying "I don't like pizza" over and over for the entirety of the 10 minute conversation. Do you knock him out? It's great that you don't like pizza, but you don't need to tell us about it. Keep that to yourself if it adds nothing to the discussion. That is not the strongest analogy because the guy only said "I don't like pizza" once. For ten minutes it would make me want to hurt him, but just to bluntly say that you don't like pizza (or don't believe iNcontrol has what it takes to win in the GSL) is not obnoxious or particularly offensive. As for having to support your criticisms I agree, but I agree on the level of a minor warning instead of a temp. ban. That said it is your website. Even though I do enjoy that the forum is highly moderated because it keeps most of the obnoxious parts of communicating on the internet out sometimes a ban may not be deserved. | ||
|
Gummy
United States2180 Posts
Chill, you are my hero! I wake up in the morning wishing I could be you, but then I realize I am not you and my day is but bleak sorrow. | ||
|
Aquafresh
United States824 Posts
On November 10 2010 01:28 XeliN wrote: I'm also suprised about some of the people banned for stating the opinion that Incontrol does not have a chance to qualify. I've seen people state far more laughable opinions than this with respect to common sense. I'd understand slightly more if the guy wrote it asif it was a fact (although people have a tendancy of stating their opinions as facts) but he even went to the trouble to say "I think". Here's the thing though. There are like 10 whole pages of people discussing whether inc has a chance to qualify or not with people making points on either side. Then this guy pops in and says "No chance" without addressing anything that has been said before. I mean what the fuck? Why would you even do that? What purpose does it serve? On November 10 2010 08:51 Chill wrote: Imagine you're trying to have a conversation about delicious food with a group of people. Now imagine the conversation keeps progressing, with people adding in dashes here and there to take the conversation in different directions. Now imagine one guy keeps saying "I don't like pizza" over and over for the entirety of the 10 minute conversation. Do you knock him out? It's great that you don't like pizza, but you don't need to tell us about it. Keep that to yourself if it adds nothing to the discussion. It's like Donnie from the Big Lebowski saying "I am the Walrus" over and over again after he heard Lenin's name come up in Walter and The Dude's conversation. | ||
|
emperorchampion
Canada9496 Posts
What a piece of shit thread this turned into. Really makes me want to run out and join the thriving online CoD community so I can interact with people like you. Bans: Raeleigh was just temp banned for 1 week by Manifesto7. That account was created on 2010-09-23 08:04:15 and had 177 posts. Reason: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=167853 pretty fucking embarrassing to get banned because of a thread like that. If you are going to get banned, at least make it worthwhile. RyuChus was just temp banned for 1 week by Manifesto7. That account was created on 2010-08-04 05:23:33 and had 220 posts. Reason: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=167853 pretty fucking embarrassing to get banned because of a thread like that. If you are going to get banned, at least make it worthwhile. theinvisiblePLER was just temp banned for 1 week by Manifesto7. That account was created on 2010-10-13 10:01:57 and had 85 posts. Reason: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=167853 pretty fucking embarrassing to get banned because of a thread like that. If you are going to get banned, at least make it worthwhile. ahahaha | ||
|
semantics
10040 Posts
Is mani endorsing martyrdom? | ||
|
Redmark
Canada2129 Posts
On November 10 2010 13:45 semantics wrote: If you are going to get banned, at least make it worthwhile. Is mani endorsing martyrdom? yes, he will fulfill the wishes of martyrs with even greater fervor | ||
|
Ryalnos
United States1946 Posts
On November 08 2010 19:21 KinosJourney2 wrote: Hahahahahaha, that subforum sure as hell is looking promising. ROFL Rofl. I cracked up for about 5 minutes reading that. | ||
|
StorrZerg
United States13919 Posts
| ||
|
KinosJourney2
Sweden1811 Posts
Raeleigh was just temp banned for 1 week by Manifesto7. That account was created on 2010-09-23 08:04:15 and had 177 posts. Reason: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=167853 pretty fucking embarrassing to get banned because of a thread like that. If you are going to get banned, at least make it worthwhile. Wow, what a d-bag. Should have permabanned him IMO, typical cocky console gamer. Something tells me he won't last another 100 posts  Also, the recent warnings in the LoL thread had me choke on laughter in the middle of class :D | ||
|
Licmyobelisk
Philippines3682 Posts
On November 10 2010 18:42 KinosJourney2 wrote: Wow, what a d-bag. Should have permabanned him IMO, typical cocky console gamer. Something tells me he won't last another 100 posts Also, the recent warnings in the LoL thread had me choke on laughter in the middle of class :D she's actually a girl, or is she? | ||
|
Archas
United States6531 Posts
Yeah, she is. She was a lot more mannered in other topics she posted in... Why can't we all just get along? =( | ||
|
Megaliskuu
United States5123 Posts
On November 10 2010 13:45 semantics wrote: If you are going to get banned, at least make it worthwhile. Is mani endorsing martyrdom? Getting banned is never worthwhile  , unsless you are Coagulation and taking Teamliquid hostage. | ||
|
Deleted User 3420
24492 Posts
DorF was just temp banned for 2 days by Manifesto7. That account was created on 2009-07-10 01:28:33 and had 362 posts. Reason: "EDIT: I bet most of the people buying the books are catholic preists , OH SNAP " I'll snap your neck if you try to derail another thread with baiting like this. what an absolutely ridiculous ban. like that's possibly going to derail the thread. it's a small, somewhat stupid joke, that has been said a million times and isn't possibly going to derail the thread. I think you banned him because you didn't like his opinions/how he expressed himself | ||
|
Raelcun
United States3747 Posts
but I disagree the thread was about free speech and he was going off about catholic priests and I"m too busy giggling at the Manlyfesto snapping some tiny idiot's neck. | ||
|
Randomaccount#77123
United States5003 Posts
| ||
Manifesto7
Osaka27156 Posts
On November 11 2010 08:03 travis wrote: what an absolutely ridiculous ban. like that's possibly going to derail the thread. it's a small, somewhat stupid joke, that has been said a million times and isn't possibly going to derail the thread. I think you banned him because you didn't like his opinions/how he expressed himself It is a stupid joke, you are correct. Don't make stupid jokes and you won't get banned. The fact is travis is that he has been warned about flamebaiting in the past and continues to do it. Sorry if my humour doesn't stoop low enough for your tastes. | ||
|
FiWiFaKi
Canada9859 Posts
I myself think that's good, teamliquid is supposed to be a community of people who share similiar views, which is a love for Starcraft and maturity. Just like if you have a friend in a circle of friends. If he's weird and has very weird views for your taste, like you play football and he thinks sports are a waste of time... It isn't hard for him to get kicked out of your circle. And I like how TL works that way. Afterall, the admins are like the leaders and we gotta play by their rules. Just want to add that the automated ban list is my fav thread on TL! | ||
| ||
