|
This thread is for discussing recent bans. Don't discuss other topics here. Take it to website feedback if you disagree with a ban or want to raise an issue. Keep it civil.NOTE: For those of you who want to find the actual ABL thread where the bans are posted. Please look in here: https://tl.net/forum/closed-threads/ |
|
|
On February 01 2013 06:20 derpface wrote:Show nested quote +On February 01 2013 06:18 Cokefreak wrote:
You should get banned again for intentionally trying to get banned. Reported. Schadenfreude
Fixed. 
(EDIT: Gah. I can't spell German.... >_< )
|
On February 01 2013 07:28 Emzeeshady wrote:Show nested quote +On February 01 2013 07:05 p4NDemik wrote:On February 01 2013 06:18 Emzeeshady wrote:I am awfully confused. This whole month I have been experimenting where the line was between an acceptable post, a warn and a ban. I have made quite a lot of posts trying to see what would get me banned but all I got were warnings. When I finally got banned though it was for a post where I wasn't trying to :/. I guess I don't understand the moderation at all  I'm not sure why you would make posts with the expressed purpose of testing moderation policies. That seems like a rather banal usage of your precious time considering you can get the same data by just posting normally. I follow this thread and answer questions like this when they arise, but sometimes I don't understand why anyone would want to spend so much time solely to observe and test our moderation policies. It's a bit odd. The entire nature of this thread can be quite odd at times I suppose but hey, its your time to waste. Anyways, I'll give you my interpretation of your moderation history in the interest of you posting because you have something your really want to say, rather than toeing the line just for the hell of it. + Show Spoiler [Warning #1] +Show nested quote +On December 04 2012 05:36 Scholera wrote:On December 04 2012 02:50 b0rt_ wrote:On December 04 2012 02:43 Scholera wrote:On December 04 2012 02:20 The KY wrote:
Remember when zerg was the weakest race and you couldn't go five minutes without hearing some Z threaten to switch to terran?
Not saying they're OP now, just being wistful. No, I don't remember when Zerg was nearly as bad as Terran is now... I remember Fruitdealer winning a GSL and IdrA winnings MLGs, etc, but not 3 foreign zergs in a ro32 of a tournament and not making top 13. lets hear how you'd improve foreign terrans to protoss and zerg level without making korean terrans godlike Revert latest patches. back to 50/50 You are an idiot Terran foreigners will still suck Korean Terrans will still dominate You first warning back in December was for a blatant insult and player bashing. It was your first offense, thus a warning. + Show Spoiler [Warning #2] +Show nested quote +On December 10 2012 10:01 Dodgin wrote:
This game really shouldn't have been close, we should be halfway through game 4 by now. Lol how much time do you spend on this site making stupid posts? Second warning, same thing, insults and flaming. This is still a relatively minor offense and mods don't like to ban for something so petty. + Show Spoiler [Ban #1] +On December 10 2012 09:32 Emzeeshady wrote:Show nested quote +On December 10 2012 09:28 Schelim wrote:
this was such a nice example of the state of this matchup. Polt kills all the tech, plays 10x better than sortof and... barely wins!!! amazing times with the new patch folks.
the commentary also is second to none. you are so full of shit User was temp banned for this post. First ban as you continue to insult other posters. Barring some kind of selective memory loss you should have a crystal clear idea that this type of infraction is not acceptable. + Show Spoiler [Warning #3] +Habs Habs
Habs
Habs
Habs Habs
Habs
Habs
Habs Habs Habs This is an example of a post that is truly stupid. In the warning it is pointed out that the mod had already told you to cut it out. Again, this is your encounter with moderation concerning an issue. You should understand posts like this that say nothing and just take up space are not acceptable. A number of your other posts that required mod action are 1-liners that just have no purpose other than insulting another poster, stating your general apathy ("where is the I don't give a shit poll?"), or your expectations of seeing more bans coming from the mods. I could go on but it seems clear to me that the breakdown in communication is not on our side here. Those first three moderations were not part of the experiment. Just me posting and not knowing that this site is not like battle net forums and you can't act like an asshole for no reason. Also I didn't take a long time making bad posts. I just threw a few here and there. Anyway I made a post summarizing as you guys requested http://www.teamliquid.net/blogs/viewblog.php?topic_id=396382
"At first, I shitposted by accident, then I started shitposting intentionally to see how far I could go before getting banned. Why did I get banned "
lol ban of the week month right here
|
On February 01 2013 07:28 Emzeeshady wrote:Show nested quote +On February 01 2013 07:05 p4NDemik wrote:On February 01 2013 06:18 Emzeeshady wrote:I am awfully confused. This whole month I have been experimenting where the line was between an acceptable post, a warn and a ban. I have made quite a lot of posts trying to see what would get me banned but all I got were warnings. When I finally got banned though it was for a post where I wasn't trying to :/. I guess I don't understand the moderation at all I'm not sure why you would make posts with the expressed purpose of testing moderation policies. That seems like a rather banal usage of your precious time considering you can get the same data by just posting normally. I follow this thread and answer questions like this when they arise, but sometimes I don't understand why anyone would want to spend so much time solely to observe and test our moderation policies. It's a bit odd. The entire nature of this thread can be quite odd at times I suppose but hey, its your time to waste. Anyways, I'll give you my interpretation of your moderation history in the interest of you posting because you have something your really want to say, rather than toeing the line just for the hell of it. + Show Spoiler [Warning #1] +Show nested quote +On December 04 2012 05:36 Scholera wrote:On December 04 2012 02:50 b0rt_ wrote:On December 04 2012 02:43 Scholera wrote:On December 04 2012 02:20 The KY wrote:
Remember when zerg was the weakest race and you couldn't go five minutes without hearing some Z threaten to switch to terran?
Not saying they're OP now, just being wistful. No, I don't remember when Zerg was nearly as bad as Terran is now... I remember Fruitdealer winning a GSL and IdrA winnings MLGs, etc, but not 3 foreign zergs in a ro32 of a tournament and not making top 13. lets hear how you'd improve foreign terrans to protoss and zerg level without making korean terrans godlike Revert latest patches. back to 50/50 You are an idiot Terran foreigners will still suck Korean Terrans will still dominate You first warning back in December was for a blatant insult and player bashing. It was your first offense, thus a warning. + Show Spoiler [Warning #2] +Show nested quote +On December 10 2012 10:01 Dodgin wrote:
This game really shouldn't have been close, we should be halfway through game 4 by now. Lol how much time do you spend on this site making stupid posts? Second warning, same thing, insults and flaming. This is still a relatively minor offense and mods don't like to ban for something so petty. + Show Spoiler [Ban #1] +On December 10 2012 09:32 Emzeeshady wrote:Show nested quote +On December 10 2012 09:28 Schelim wrote:
this was such a nice example of the state of this matchup. Polt kills all the tech, plays 10x better than sortof and... barely wins!!! amazing times with the new patch folks.
the commentary also is second to none. you are so full of shit User was temp banned for this post. First ban as you continue to insult other posters. Barring some kind of selective memory loss you should have a crystal clear idea that this type of infraction is not acceptable. + Show Spoiler [Warning #3] +Habs Habs
Habs
Habs
Habs Habs
Habs
Habs
Habs Habs Habs This is an example of a post that is truly stupid. In the warning it is pointed out that the mod had already told you to cut it out. Again, this is your encounter with moderation concerning an issue. You should understand posts like this that say nothing and just take up space are not acceptable. A number of your other posts that required mod action are 1-liners that just have no purpose other than insulting another poster, stating your general apathy ("where is the I don't give a shit poll?"), or your expectations of seeing more bans coming from the mods. I could go on but it seems clear to me that the breakdown in communication is not on our side here. Those first three moderations were not part of the experiment. Just me posting and not knowing that this site is not like battle net forums and you can't act like an asshole for no reason. Also I didn't take a long time making bad posts. I just threw a few here and there. Anyway I made a post summarizing as you guys requested http://www.teamliquid.net/blogs/viewblog.php?topic_id=396382
I skimmed the thread you made and I can't help but feel like there's a control that's missing in your experiment - do you know for a fact that all of these posts you felt may have deserved a warning or ban but didn't receive any were reported/seen by a mod?
I don't really get the point of the whole thing either it usually seems pretty obvious especially since you read this thread what results in some sort of moderation - anything less than a two week ban is practically a warning anyway just to shape up posting.
|
|
|
On February 01 2013 15:04 Emzeeshady wrote:Show nested quote +On February 01 2013 14:29 HeavenResign wrote:On February 01 2013 07:28 Emzeeshady wrote:On February 01 2013 07:05 p4NDemik wrote:On February 01 2013 06:18 Emzeeshady wrote:I am awfully confused. This whole month I have been experimenting where the line was between an acceptable post, a warn and a ban. I have made quite a lot of posts trying to see what would get me banned but all I got were warnings. When I finally got banned though it was for a post where I wasn't trying to :/. I guess I don't understand the moderation at all I'm not sure why you would make posts with the expressed purpose of testing moderation policies. That seems like a rather banal usage of your precious time considering you can get the same data by just posting normally. I follow this thread and answer questions like this when they arise, but sometimes I don't understand why anyone would want to spend so much time solely to observe and test our moderation policies. It's a bit odd. The entire nature of this thread can be quite odd at times I suppose but hey, its your time to waste. Anyways, I'll give you my interpretation of your moderation history in the interest of you posting because you have something your really want to say, rather than toeing the line just for the hell of it. + Show Spoiler [Warning #1] +Show nested quote +On December 04 2012 05:36 Scholera wrote:On December 04 2012 02:50 b0rt_ wrote:On December 04 2012 02:43 Scholera wrote:On December 04 2012 02:20 The KY wrote:
Remember when zerg was the weakest race and you couldn't go five minutes without hearing some Z threaten to switch to terran?
Not saying they're OP now, just being wistful. No, I don't remember when Zerg was nearly as bad as Terran is now... I remember Fruitdealer winning a GSL and IdrA winnings MLGs, etc, but not 3 foreign zergs in a ro32 of a tournament and not making top 13. lets hear how you'd improve foreign terrans to protoss and zerg level without making korean terrans godlike Revert latest patches. back to 50/50 You are an idiot Terran foreigners will still suck Korean Terrans will still dominate You first warning back in December was for a blatant insult and player bashing. It was your first offense, thus a warning. + Show Spoiler [Warning #2] +Show nested quote +On December 10 2012 10:01 Dodgin wrote:
This game really shouldn't have been close, we should be halfway through game 4 by now. Lol how much time do you spend on this site making stupid posts? Second warning, same thing, insults and flaming. This is still a relatively minor offense and mods don't like to ban for something so petty. + Show Spoiler [Ban #1] +On December 10 2012 09:32 Emzeeshady wrote:Show nested quote +On December 10 2012 09:28 Schelim wrote:
this was such a nice example of the state of this matchup. Polt kills all the tech, plays 10x better than sortof and... barely wins!!! amazing times with the new patch folks.
the commentary also is second to none. you are so full of shit User was temp banned for this post. First ban as you continue to insult other posters. Barring some kind of selective memory loss you should have a crystal clear idea that this type of infraction is not acceptable. + Show Spoiler [Warning #3] +Habs Habs
Habs
Habs
Habs Habs
Habs
Habs
Habs Habs Habs This is an example of a post that is truly stupid. In the warning it is pointed out that the mod had already told you to cut it out. Again, this is your encounter with moderation concerning an issue. You should understand posts like this that say nothing and just take up space are not acceptable. A number of your other posts that required mod action are 1-liners that just have no purpose other than insulting another poster, stating your general apathy ("where is the I don't give a shit poll?"), or your expectations of seeing more bans coming from the mods. I could go on but it seems clear to me that the breakdown in communication is not on our side here. Those first three moderations were not part of the experiment. Just me posting and not knowing that this site is not like battle net forums and you can't act like an asshole for no reason. Also I didn't take a long time making bad posts. I just threw a few here and there. Anyway I made a post summarizing as you guys requested http://www.teamliquid.net/blogs/viewblog.php?topic_id=396382 I skimmed the thread you made and I can't help but feel like there's a control that's missing in your experiment - do you know for a fact that all of these posts you felt may have deserved a warning or ban but didn't receive any were reported/seen by a mod? I don't really get the point of the whole thing either it usually seems pretty obvious especially since you read this thread what results in some sort of moderation - anything less than a two week ban is practically a warning anyway just to shape up posting. It was mostly just for fun
maybe your posting is so bad that what you think is bad is good?
|
On February 01 2013 07:28 Emzeeshady wrote:Show nested quote +On February 01 2013 07:05 p4NDemik wrote:On February 01 2013 06:18 Emzeeshady wrote:I am awfully confused. This whole month I have been experimenting where the line was between an acceptable post, a warn and a ban. I have made quite a lot of posts trying to see what would get me banned but all I got were warnings. When I finally got banned though it was for a post where I wasn't trying to :/. I guess I don't understand the moderation at all I'm not sure why you would make posts with the expressed purpose of testing moderation policies. That seems like a rather banal usage of your precious time considering you can get the same data by just posting normally. I follow this thread and answer questions like this when they arise, but sometimes I don't understand why anyone would want to spend so much time solely to observe and test our moderation policies. It's a bit odd. The entire nature of this thread can be quite odd at times I suppose but hey, its your time to waste. Anyways, I'll give you my interpretation of your moderation history in the interest of you posting because you have something your really want to say, rather than toeing the line just for the hell of it. + Show Spoiler [Warning #1] +Show nested quote +On December 04 2012 05:36 Scholera wrote:On December 04 2012 02:50 b0rt_ wrote:On December 04 2012 02:43 Scholera wrote:On December 04 2012 02:20 The KY wrote:
Remember when zerg was the weakest race and you couldn't go five minutes without hearing some Z threaten to switch to terran?
Not saying they're OP now, just being wistful. No, I don't remember when Zerg was nearly as bad as Terran is now... I remember Fruitdealer winning a GSL and IdrA winnings MLGs, etc, but not 3 foreign zergs in a ro32 of a tournament and not making top 13. lets hear how you'd improve foreign terrans to protoss and zerg level without making korean terrans godlike Revert latest patches. back to 50/50 You are an idiot Terran foreigners will still suck Korean Terrans will still dominate You first warning back in December was for a blatant insult and player bashing. It was your first offense, thus a warning. + Show Spoiler [Warning #2] +Show nested quote +On December 10 2012 10:01 Dodgin wrote:
This game really shouldn't have been close, we should be halfway through game 4 by now. Lol how much time do you spend on this site making stupid posts? Second warning, same thing, insults and flaming. This is still a relatively minor offense and mods don't like to ban for something so petty. + Show Spoiler [Ban #1] +On December 10 2012 09:32 Emzeeshady wrote:Show nested quote +On December 10 2012 09:28 Schelim wrote:
this was such a nice example of the state of this matchup. Polt kills all the tech, plays 10x better than sortof and... barely wins!!! amazing times with the new patch folks.
the commentary also is second to none. you are so full of shit User was temp banned for this post. First ban as you continue to insult other posters. Barring some kind of selective memory loss you should have a crystal clear idea that this type of infraction is not acceptable. + Show Spoiler [Warning #3] +Habs Habs
Habs
Habs
Habs Habs
Habs
Habs
Habs Habs Habs This is an example of a post that is truly stupid. In the warning it is pointed out that the mod had already told you to cut it out. Again, this is your encounter with moderation concerning an issue. You should understand posts like this that say nothing and just take up space are not acceptable. A number of your other posts that required mod action are 1-liners that just have no purpose other than insulting another poster, stating your general apathy ("where is the I don't give a shit poll?"), or your expectations of seeing more bans coming from the mods. I could go on but it seems clear to me that the breakdown in communication is not on our side here. Those first three moderations were not part of the experiment. Just me posting and not knowing that this site is not like battle net forums and you can't act like an asshole for no reason. Also I didn't take a long time making bad posts. I just threw a few here and there. Anyway I made a post summarizing as you guys requested http://www.teamliquid.net/blogs/viewblog.php?topic_id=396382
See thats the problem with the internet. People assume you can be a asshole just because. People don't start by being not-assholes as the generel rule of social interwebs interactions....
|
decado90 was just banned by Harem.
That account was created on 2012-12-07 08:47:13 and had 480 posts.
Reason: consistently terrible poster and pbu
This didn't surprise me one bit, he was a real debbie downer in todays LR, I wonder how many of his posts were reported...
|
Korea (South)1389 Posts
On February 01 2013 23:18 Cokefreak wrote:Show nested quote +decado90 was just banned by Harem.
That account was created on 2012-12-07 08:47:13 and had 480 posts.
Reason: consistently terrible poster and pbu This didn't surprise me one bit, he was a real debbie downer in todays LR, I wonder how many of his posts were reported...
Ouch.. I vaguely remember that dude. Wasnt he real diehard flash fanboy? Or jaedong it was... Looks like he kept on with his aggressive posts
|
Can I just point out Kadaver is the nicest person around and you should always be bloody amazing to him <3
|
On February 02 2013 01:22 kollin wrote:
Can I just point out Kadaver is the nicest person around and you should always be bloody amazing to him <3
How long a ban did he blackmail you with to make you say that?
You can pm me, he'll never know.
|
|
|
Hahahaha! Our glorious fan-favorite banling is an imposter who rules with an iron fist shrouded by an open hand? X-D
Kadaver, you devilish Machiavellian, you.
|
On February 02 2013 01:59 Rollin wrote:Show nested quote +On February 02 2013 01:22 kollin wrote:
Can I just point out Kadaver is the nicest person around and you should always be bloody amazing to him <3 How long a ban did he blackmail you with to make you say that? You can pm me, he'll never know.
It's hard to be certain, what Kadaver says will be a 2 day... might be.... much.......... longer...............
|
sigh, spoilers in the ABL......
|
Germany25649 Posts
Kollin is telling lies
|
Teehee 
|
your Country52797 Posts
On February 02 2013 03:02 KadaverBB wrote:Kollin is telling lies
I think he's hyping up the next part of his saga of myles. Just guessing
|
I was expecting so many more bans for Stephano's debut in the GSL. Even Wax was expecting the live report thread to earn a lot of bans, early on he said this,
On February 01 2013 18:01 Waxangel wrote:
may the greatest ban-bait thread of 2013 commence
And yet the ABL has been fairly quiet.
On February 02 2013 03:02 KadaverBB wrote:Kollin is telling lies
So kollin was lying when he said;
On February 02 2013 01:22 kollin wrote:
Can I just point out Kadaver is the nicest person around and you should always be bloody amazing to him <3 
|
I am a two faced trickster
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
