|
This thread is for discussing recent bans. Don't discuss other topics here. Take it to website feedback if you disagree with a ban or want to raise an issue. Keep it civil.NOTE: For those of you who want to find the actual ABL thread where the bans are posted. Please look in here: https://tl.net/forum/closed-threads/ |
Kwark, you were wrong in one part.
You think you're special but tl won't remember you, I won't remember you,
|
On January 13 2013 15:05 sylverfyre wrote:Kwark, you were wrong in one part.
I was going to mention the same thing, but I wasn't sure if it was neversummer that KwarK was referring to, lol.
In any case, it will forever be here now on the ABL, for everyone to remember. 
|
United States42831 Posts
Perhaps not the kind of "special" he thought he was.
|
I voted for neversummer, because I was there for that amazing thread.
Memories....
|
United Kingdom3482 Posts
On January 13 2013 15:05 sylverfyre wrote:Kwark, you were wrong in one part.
He may be remembered but certainly not as he would wish to be.
|
France9034 Posts
Damn, that string of PMs makes me doubt about my vote..... This is just hilarious.
The part about spamming mails "until someone read them and take actions" is just WTF !
|
On January 13 2013 15:04 cLAN.Anax wrote:
Say what you like. I voted for neversummer. KwarK's early PM reveals were what ultimately swayed my choice.
Voted neversummer too because of the PM's released during the rounds. I think extremely Failsafe is hilarious and any of these two is a deserving champion.
|
lowreezy08 was just banned by EvilTeletubby.
That account was created on 2011-06-01 11:56:58 and had 142 posts.
Reason: Ok, we've had enough of you.
On January 13 2013 14:33 lowreezy08 wrote:Show nested quote +On January 13 2013 13:09 {CC}StealthBlue wrote:The problem being is that people who don't believe in global warming won't believe anything until it happens to them, anything the government or pro groups publish is just a push to change their daily lives etc. So watch and observe world the U.S. is going to be the prime example of what NOT to do. A federal committee has published a draft of the nation's third climate assessment report, a comprehensive analysis of the latest and best peer-reviewed science on the extent and impacts of global warming on the United States.
None of the body's findings are entirely new, but the report suggests that evidence is now stronger and clearer than ever that the climate is rapidly changing -- primarily as a result of human activities, including the copious burning of fossil fuels. Observed weather extremes are on the rise, and the possible connection between at least some of these events and human-induced climate change is also more strongly supported by the science.
The nation can expect increased impacts on everything from crops to fresh water supplies, and better and broader national plans for adaptation are needed, the assessment noted.
The draft report, which was prepared by the so-called National Climate Assessment Development Advisory Committee and written and amassed by a group of 240 scientists, will be subject to a three-month period of review and public comment.
"Climate change presents a major challenge for society," the committee's leadership said in a letter addressed to the American people. "This report and the sustained assessment process that is being developed represent steps forward in advancing our understanding of that challenge and its far-reaching implications for our nation and the world."
In an emailed statement, Gene Karpinski, the president of the League of Conservation Voters, said the report confirms what many Americans already know. "Hurricane Sandy and the historic droughts, floods and heat waves happening across the country aren't a fluke, but the result of a climate warming much faster than previously thought," he said. "If we put off action on climate change, the costs of addressing its impacts will only rise and this extreme weather will be just the beginning. This report should serve as a wake-up call that it's time to act." Source You act as if climate change is something new that "HUMANS HAVE NEVER EXPERIENCED BEFORE!" I'm sorry, but if you go back 100's of years of climates being charted, you can see the variation, everyone wants to blame it on humans burning fossil fuel. I'm sorry, but the sun is getting hotter, could that possibly make the earth warmer! The moon drifts further away from the earth, could that make the earth warmer! There are literally a 100 things that could contribute to global warming, but what is the single one that could fill our pockets? Oh wait, humans.
On January 13 2013 14:54 lowreezy08 wrote:Show nested quote +On January 13 2013 14:45 Alex1Sun wrote:On January 13 2013 14:33 lowreezy08 wrote:On January 13 2013 13:09 {CC}StealthBlue wrote:The problem being is that people who don't believe in global warming won't believe anything until it happens to them, anything the government or pro groups publish is just a push to change their daily lives etc. So watch and observe world the U.S. is going to be the prime example of what NOT to do. A federal committee has published a draft of the nation's third climate assessment report, a comprehensive analysis of the latest and best peer-reviewed science on the extent and impacts of global warming on the United States.
None of the body's findings are entirely new, but the report suggests that evidence is now stronger and clearer than ever that the climate is rapidly changing -- primarily as a result of human activities, including the copious burning of fossil fuels. Observed weather extremes are on the rise, and the possible connection between at least some of these events and human-induced climate change is also more strongly supported by the science.
The nation can expect increased impacts on everything from crops to fresh water supplies, and better and broader national plans for adaptation are needed, the assessment noted.
The draft report, which was prepared by the so-called National Climate Assessment Development Advisory Committee and written and amassed by a group of 240 scientists, will be subject to a three-month period of review and public comment.
"Climate change presents a major challenge for society," the committee's leadership said in a letter addressed to the American people. "This report and the sustained assessment process that is being developed represent steps forward in advancing our understanding of that challenge and its far-reaching implications for our nation and the world."
In an emailed statement, Gene Karpinski, the president of the League of Conservation Voters, said the report confirms what many Americans already know. "Hurricane Sandy and the historic droughts, floods and heat waves happening across the country aren't a fluke, but the result of a climate warming much faster than previously thought," he said. "If we put off action on climate change, the costs of addressing its impacts will only rise and this extreme weather will be just the beginning. This report should serve as a wake-up call that it's time to act." Source You act as if climate change is something new that "HUMANS HAVE NEVER EXPERIENCED BEFORE!" I'm sorry, but if you go back 100's of years of climates being charted, you can see the variation, everyone wants to blame it on humans burning fossil fuel. I'm sorry, but the sun is getting hotter, could that possibly make the earth warmer! The moon drifts further away from the earth, could that make the earth warmer! There are literally a 100 things that could contribute to global warming, but what is the single one that could fill our pockets? Oh wait, humans. Listen, child, go back to school and learn. And an advice for when you grow up: don't openly declare things you don't have a clue about. Child? I am probably old enough to be your father, but very logical and thoughtful rebuttal moron. I did go to school, and they try their dearest to make you believe in global warming, basically accepting it as FACT, just like the evolution theory. I want you to do something, imagine the earth, imagine how huge it is, ok now 2/3rds of it is water, the other 3rd is land, inside that land you get a VERY SMALL percentage of fossil fuels available, now think if we burn that VERY SMALL percentage, you think that it will cause global warming, when you have volcanoes emitting more carbon than fossil fuels alone? If yes, you are very close minded. (this is idiot proof) User was banned for this post.
I kind of wish we would ban everyone that didn't believe in global warming. The thread makes my head hurt sometimes. ~.~
|
I only wish we would ban anyone that argues like this:
imagine the earth, imagine how huge it is, ok now 2/3rds of it is water, the other 3rd is land, inside that land you get a VERY SMALL percentage of fossil fuels available, now think if we burn that VERY SMALL percentage, you think that it will cause global warming, when you have volcanoes emitting more carbon than fossil fuels alone? If yes, you are very close minded. (this is idiot proof)
|
On January 14 2013 02:06 Blisse wrote:Show nested quote +lowreezy08 was just banned by EvilTeletubby.
That account was created on 2011-06-01 11:56:58 and had 142 posts.
Reason: Ok, we've had enough of you.
Show nested quote +On January 13 2013 14:33 lowreezy08 wrote:On January 13 2013 13:09 {CC}StealthBlue wrote:The problem being is that people who don't believe in global warming won't believe anything until it happens to them, anything the government or pro groups publish is just a push to change their daily lives etc. So watch and observe world the U.S. is going to be the prime example of what NOT to do. A federal committee has published a draft of the nation's third climate assessment report, a comprehensive analysis of the latest and best peer-reviewed science on the extent and impacts of global warming on the United States.
None of the body's findings are entirely new, but the report suggests that evidence is now stronger and clearer than ever that the climate is rapidly changing -- primarily as a result of human activities, including the copious burning of fossil fuels. Observed weather extremes are on the rise, and the possible connection between at least some of these events and human-induced climate change is also more strongly supported by the science.
The nation can expect increased impacts on everything from crops to fresh water supplies, and better and broader national plans for adaptation are needed, the assessment noted.
The draft report, which was prepared by the so-called National Climate Assessment Development Advisory Committee and written and amassed by a group of 240 scientists, will be subject to a three-month period of review and public comment.
"Climate change presents a major challenge for society," the committee's leadership said in a letter addressed to the American people. "This report and the sustained assessment process that is being developed represent steps forward in advancing our understanding of that challenge and its far-reaching implications for our nation and the world."
In an emailed statement, Gene Karpinski, the president of the League of Conservation Voters, said the report confirms what many Americans already know. "Hurricane Sandy and the historic droughts, floods and heat waves happening across the country aren't a fluke, but the result of a climate warming much faster than previously thought," he said. "If we put off action on climate change, the costs of addressing its impacts will only rise and this extreme weather will be just the beginning. This report should serve as a wake-up call that it's time to act." Source You act as if climate change is something new that "HUMANS HAVE NEVER EXPERIENCED BEFORE!" I'm sorry, but if you go back 100's of years of climates being charted, you can see the variation, everyone wants to blame it on humans burning fossil fuel. I'm sorry, but the sun is getting hotter, could that possibly make the earth warmer! The moon drifts further away from the earth, could that make the earth warmer! There are literally a 100 things that could contribute to global warming, but what is the single one that could fill our pockets? Oh wait, humans. Show nested quote +On January 13 2013 14:54 lowreezy08 wrote:On January 13 2013 14:45 Alex1Sun wrote:On January 13 2013 14:33 lowreezy08 wrote:On January 13 2013 13:09 {CC}StealthBlue wrote:The problem being is that people who don't believe in global warming won't believe anything until it happens to them, anything the government or pro groups publish is just a push to change their daily lives etc. So watch and observe world the U.S. is going to be the prime example of what NOT to do. A federal committee has published a draft of the nation's third climate assessment report, a comprehensive analysis of the latest and best peer-reviewed science on the extent and impacts of global warming on the United States.
None of the body's findings are entirely new, but the report suggests that evidence is now stronger and clearer than ever that the climate is rapidly changing -- primarily as a result of human activities, including the copious burning of fossil fuels. Observed weather extremes are on the rise, and the possible connection between at least some of these events and human-induced climate change is also more strongly supported by the science.
The nation can expect increased impacts on everything from crops to fresh water supplies, and better and broader national plans for adaptation are needed, the assessment noted.
The draft report, which was prepared by the so-called National Climate Assessment Development Advisory Committee and written and amassed by a group of 240 scientists, will be subject to a three-month period of review and public comment.
"Climate change presents a major challenge for society," the committee's leadership said in a letter addressed to the American people. "This report and the sustained assessment process that is being developed represent steps forward in advancing our understanding of that challenge and its far-reaching implications for our nation and the world."
In an emailed statement, Gene Karpinski, the president of the League of Conservation Voters, said the report confirms what many Americans already know. "Hurricane Sandy and the historic droughts, floods and heat waves happening across the country aren't a fluke, but the result of a climate warming much faster than previously thought," he said. "If we put off action on climate change, the costs of addressing its impacts will only rise and this extreme weather will be just the beginning. This report should serve as a wake-up call that it's time to act." Source You act as if climate change is something new that "HUMANS HAVE NEVER EXPERIENCED BEFORE!" I'm sorry, but if you go back 100's of years of climates being charted, you can see the variation, everyone wants to blame it on humans burning fossil fuel. I'm sorry, but the sun is getting hotter, could that possibly make the earth warmer! The moon drifts further away from the earth, could that make the earth warmer! There are literally a 100 things that could contribute to global warming, but what is the single one that could fill our pockets? Oh wait, humans. Listen, child, go back to school and learn. And an advice for when you grow up: don't openly declare things you don't have a clue about. Child? I am probably old enough to be your father, but very logical and thoughtful rebuttal moron. I did go to school, and they try their dearest to make you believe in global warming, basically accepting it as FACT, just like the evolution theory. I want you to do something, imagine the earth, imagine how huge it is, ok now 2/3rds of it is water, the other 3rd is land, inside that land you get a VERY SMALL percentage of fossil fuels available, now think if we burn that VERY SMALL percentage, you think that it will cause global warming, when you have volcanoes emitting more carbon than fossil fuels alone? If yes, you are very close minded. (this is idiot proof) User was banned for this post. I kind of wish we would ban everyone that didn't believe in global warming. The thread makes my head hurt sometimes. ~.~
On the bright side, if you start up your own forum you WILL be able to ban everyone who doesn't agree with your opinion on a somewhat controversial topic. Especially when tons of propaganda influence the public opinion (note I said influence instead of educate) on the issue at hand.
I'll be honest with you here. I did not do dozens of hours of research on the topic nor have I read dozens of published articles and theses. I'm not going to pull some random bullshit statistics or quotes from my ass either. But from what I have come to understand, some of what this guy says is correct. Yes, Earth has been through various climate changes (not just to a hotter temperature but also the Ice Ages) throughout its history, both before human society came to be and even before man as a species appeared. And, should we not find a stable and accurate way to control weather to our will, similar events would occur in the future as well. Does industrial activity as well as the sum of personal uses of fossil fuel contribute to this phenomenon we are experiencing here, of global warming? Yes. Is the phenomenon accelerating? Yes. Is it really as bad as many people would bet their lives on? Not really.
Can we do something about this issue? Most likely yes. However it's not that cost efficient right now, and as you should be well aware, large corporations manipulate things for their own interest i.e. profit. The massive propaganda against nuclear power does not help a single bit either, but nor do the hipsters who blindly "go green".
As with many controversial topics, you will find a lot of people whose opinions are unknowingly shaped by propaganda, in other words the opinion that the media has pushed for the people to believe, and you will also find a lot of people who do not buy any of it, but refuse to do research and end up going in the other extreme. However, the truth is somewhere in the middle.
Do let me know that I'm wrong and you (Blisse) would love to ban me though. ^.-
EDIT 2: Actually do that through PM, I've probably posted enough off-topics in the ABL. lol
EDIT:
On January 14 2013 02:09 Cokefreak wrote:I only wish we would ban anyone that argues like this: Show nested quote +imagine the earth, imagine how huge it is, ok now 2/3rds of it is water, the other 3rd is land, inside that land you get a VERY SMALL percentage of fossil fuels available, now think if we burn that VERY SMALL percentage, you think that it will cause global warming, when you have volcanoes emitting more carbon than fossil fuels alone? If yes, you are very close minded. (this is idiot proof)
His argument was pretty silly but it did make some fair points and to dismiss all of it entirely would be just as stupid as him dismissing global warming entirely.
|
United States5162 Posts
Why did you need to post that here? Keep that in the general forum.
|
United States42831 Posts
Imagine all the possible combinations of letters. Obviously you can't, there are limitless as I didn't say that letters can't be reused. In his case he only used an infinitesimal fraction of the total possible letters, do you really think that he could have possibly made his point with just those?
|
On January 14 2013 02:36 Myles wrote:
Why did you need to post that here? Keep that in the general forum.
My bad, I try to stay out of those kinds of topics usually so as to not get pissed. ^^
![[image loading]](http://puu.sh/1NgfO)
Not sure how this guy hadn't been noticed before but it's ok, I have a report button and I don't afraid of anything. ^^
|
Lalalaland34492 Posts
I'm pretty sure I've heard Kwark make that rant at me except for 'numbers' instead of 'letters'.
|
Perhaps not the kind of "special" he thought he was.
Short bus special then?
|
|
|
|
|
So long as we are calling out future ban suspects, I'm going to lay a vote for yeastiality. The last 2 posts I read:
On January 14 2013 04:15 yeastiality wrote:Show nested quote +On January 13 2013 17:37 viletomato wrote:
M-theory as in the 11dimensional string theory? What's that got to do with smart technology around us? I don't see the connection there... dude be careful he just watched the discovery channel for the first time.. the possibility of a theory. oh man we're sunk. what does this even mean? Show nested quote +On January 13 2013 17:21 Bahku wrote:The other possibility is that we may just merge with our technology, philosophy: deus ex edition (there are many other possibilities in the scenario you're describing. actual philosophers/scientists/sociologists study them, and you won't find those people on teamliquid) Show nested quote +On January 13 2013 17:21 Bahku wrote:What are your thoughts? Do you think people will continue to live normal lives, even when there is nothing left to be accomplished by humans? Or can you think of another solution to this problem? I don't think there is such a problem. Everything you described is hypothetical and based entirely on "cool science facts" that people spout off on TV and in magazines to seem like they understand science. "Technological singularity", "string theory", "growth of computing power" - these are all things you can hear humanities majors talk about on Discovery all day, but the reality is they don't have a clue. Science isn't about saying buzzwords and referencing 50 year old science fiction concepts. Show nested quote +On January 13 2013 17:45 Bahku wrote:
I don't need a source because I didn't make a single claim in the OP. I'm obviously talking about a hypothetical (but likely) version of the future.
On January 14 2013 04:05 yeastiality wrote:Show nested quote +On January 14 2013 03:36 wo1fwood wrote:
OK, I'm just going to say it, fuck esports. I'm really beginning to dislike what people use that word for these days. No dude see this is where you're wrong.. We don't need to have good gameplay, connectivity between regions of the world, or good future direction for the game. All we need is endless fake hype, dr pepper pregame shows and announcements about someone joining/leaving a team every 12 hours. If you don't want to contribute to that and let the game itself languish, you're literally hitler. Welcome to teamliquid.
|
On January 14 2013 04:25 liberal wrote:So long as we are calling out future ban suspects, I'm going to lay a vote for yeastiality. The last 2 posts I read: Show nested quote +On January 14 2013 04:15 yeastiality wrote:On January 13 2013 17:37 viletomato wrote:
M-theory as in the 11dimensional string theory? What's that got to do with smart technology around us? I don't see the connection there... dude be careful he just watched the discovery channel for the first time.. On January 13 2013 17:21 Bahku wrote:the possibility of m-theory, the possibility of a theory. oh man we're sunk. On January 13 2013 17:21 Bahku wrote:humans could reach maximum technology what does this even mean? On January 13 2013 17:21 Bahku wrote:The other possibility is that we may just merge with our technology, philosophy: deus ex edition (there are many other possibilities in the scenario you're describing. actual philosophers/scientists/sociologists study them, and you won't find those people on teamliquid) On January 13 2013 17:21 Bahku wrote:What are your thoughts? Do you think people will continue to live normal lives, even when there is nothing left to be accomplished by humans? Or can you think of another solution to this problem? I don't think there is such a problem. Everything you described is hypothetical and based entirely on "cool science facts" that people spout off on TV and in magazines to seem like they understand science. "Technological singularity", "string theory", "growth of computing power" - these are all things you can hear humanities majors talk about on Discovery all day, but the reality is they don't have a clue. Science isn't about saying buzzwords and referencing 50 year old science fiction concepts. On January 13 2013 17:45 Bahku wrote:
I don't need a source because I didn't make a single claim in the OP. I'm obviously talking about a hypothetical (but likely) version of the future. Show nested quote +On January 14 2013 04:05 yeastiality wrote:On January 14 2013 03:36 wo1fwood wrote:
OK, I'm just going to say it, fuck esports. I'm really beginning to dislike what people use that word for these days. No dude see this is where you're wrong.. We don't need to have good gameplay, connectivity between regions of the world, or good future direction for the game. All we need is endless fake hype, dr pepper pregame shows and announcements about someone joining/leaving a team every 12 hours. If you don't want to contribute to that and let the game itself languish, you're literally hitler. Welcome to teamliquid.
His first post I found a bit ironic in that he accused the other guy of spouting random science babble without having a clue what it means, but he himself did not elaborate on the topic either.
The second post though was evidently facetious and quite representative of the bullshit that naive people such as the OP tried to push in that thread.
Also this is not the place to report people. :/
Goddamnit he got double drive-by'd. 
|
I guess it's fair game now
yeastiality was just temp banned for 30 days by EvilTeletubby.
That account was created on 2011-04-17 13:52:08 and had 353 posts.
Reason: After carefully reviewing your posting and moderation history, you're being issued a 30 day ban.
Reason being aggressive, condescending posting that you've been warned about multiple times before. There is nothing constructive or even tangible in your recent posts that I looked through. You add nothing of value.
Fix it when you come back or we'll remove you permanently.
It is rare to spot a ban suspect in two different forums at the same time. He was a little... aggressive in his posting.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
