EPTThe Automated Ban List - Page 1571
| Forum Index > TL Community |
This thread is for discussing recent bans. Don't discuss other topics here. Take it to website feedback if you disagree with a ban or want to raise an issue. Keep it civil. NOTE: For those of you who want to find the actual ABL thread where the bans are posted. Please look in here: https://tl.net/forum/closed-threads/ | ||
motbob
United States12546 Posts
| ||
|
Bibbit
Canada5377 Posts
| ||
|
CyDe
United States1010 Posts
| ||
|
frogrubdown
1266 Posts
Xpace was just banned by EvilTeletubby. That account was created on 2011-03-15 22:22:48 and had 1656 posts. Reason: On December 16 2012 15:29 Xpace wrote: There are trolls in every stream chat, especially when it's unrestricted, not modded or isn't subs only. But really, + Show Spoiler + KOREANS GET TEH FUCK OUT OF THIS STREAM. WE ARE SENDING ANDERS BREVIK TO SOLVE KOREAN GOOK PROBLEM. THIS IS NOW A USA-ONLY CHAT. What the fuck is wrong with you?!? Whoa, I'm pretty sure this dude was just quoting and criticizing one of the many instances of racism on the Korean SPL chat. I don't think he was endorsing or producing the spoilered material. That place got taken over by English speaking trolls/racists the second the English stream went down. edit: On December 16 2012 15:34 Bibbit wrote: Poor Xpace, I think he just quoted something from the stream chat to point out how messed up it is there. I guess you're better off leaving that jazz off TL altogether, quote or not! Prudentially perhaps, but there's no way that post would be given a perm if interpreted the way I think it was intended. I think ETT thought that Xpace was saying that Koreans were stream trolls before launching a racist screed against them, rather than criticizing stream trolls who were producing said screeds against Koreans. | ||
|
Bibbit
Canada5377 Posts
| ||
|
EvilTeletubby
Baltimore, USA22259 Posts
On December 16 2012 15:34 frogrubdown wrote: I think ETT thought that Xpace was saying that Koreans were stream trolls before launching a racist screed against them, rather than criticizing stream trolls who were producing said screeds against Koreans. Yeah, pretty much this. I realized it right AFTER I hit the ban button. It's a stupid thing to post regardless, and he has an abysmal posting history, but I wouldn't perm based on that alone. Working to get it reversed. | ||
|
frogrubdown
1266 Posts
On December 16 2012 15:41 EvilTeletubby wrote: Yeah, pretty much this. I realized it right AFTER I hit the ban button. It's a stupid thing to post regardless, and he has an abysmal posting history, but I wouldn't perm based on that alone. Working to get it reversed. Fair enough. | ||
|
nam nam
Sweden4672 Posts
On December 16 2012 15:09 CyDe wrote: + Show Spoiler + On December 15 2012 19:24 MasterOfPuppets wrote: When someone who does so much for esports and gaming in general is met with such stupendous amounts of idiocy from some of the people in the same community, I think he has the right to be a *little* bit entitled and tell them off. -_- He doesn't just "tell them off," and get "a *little* bit entitled;" he becomes this utter asshole who thinks he can get away with saying anything to anyone. And the sad thing is that he does a lot of the time. I really couldn't care less if he _coined_ the term eSports, there are plenty of other people who contributed just as much and more than him without being so condescending and rude. On December 16 2012 05:52 MasterOfPuppets wrote: And people have the audacity to call TB entitled when retards like that guy (MarkK) plague this community... I don't think it's a particularly audacious statement to call someone who is so blatantly entitled, "entitled." It's not even like insulting at this point, he kind of flaunts it, and he and his fans say things like you did just there; he has "the right." I don't think anyone has the right to say what he says, regardless of their fame and regardless of whoever else might be acting like a retard or a prick or whatever on the rest of the internet. If it was anybody else, people would have nothing to do with someone so impertinent. I don't really see how anything he has done in the past justifies how he acts now. He is so arrogant, and so quick to retaliate, even to people who claim to be fans of his. I'm just not one to turn my eye away from that. He needs to learn some goddamn manners, if you become as famous as he did I think it's more important to learn how to deal with people that bother you rather than react like a five year old on angel dust at the slightest suggestion of anything but idolization. He hates people that idolize as well, fyi. | ||
opterown
Australia54784 Posts
| ||
|
The_Templar
your Country52798 Posts
On December 16 2012 21:34 opterown wrote: so what actually constitutes a "bad moderation" history? like how many times would you be warned/banned for you to be considered a bad/horrible post? haha You can never be considered a bad post, just a collection of them. I think it depends on the time between the moderations For an actual number, I would say more than 2-3 bans per year would be pretty bad. | ||
|
KwarK
United States44171 Posts
On December 16 2012 22:21 The_Templar wrote: You can never be considered a bad post, just a collection of them. I think it depends on the time between the moderations For an actual number, I would say more than 2-3 bans per year would be pretty bad. Some people have way, way more than that. There are a load of people on their second page (20+) of history. | ||
|
ELA
Denmark4608 Posts
On December 16 2012 21:34 opterown wrote: so what actually constitutes a "bad moderation" history? like how many times would you be warned/banned for you to be considered a bad/horrible poster? haha (T+P)/M = x x≪1000 = Bad T= Time on forums (days) P= Number of posts M= Moderations .... Sub 1000 posts are naturally just bad posters... just because - Or maybe it's subjective and it varies from mod to mod  | ||
|
The_Templar
your Country52798 Posts
On December 16 2012 23:23 ELA wrote: (T+P)/M = x x≪1000 = Bad T= Time on forums (days) P= Number of posts M= Moderations .... Sub 1000 posts are naturally just bad posters... just because - Or maybe it's subjective and it varies from mod to mod 4 warnings = 4 moderations. (695 + 3074) /4 = 3769/4=942.25. Cool, I'm a bad poster! | ||
|
Caihead
Canada8550 Posts
On December 16 2012 23:34 The_Templar wrote: 4 warnings = 4 moderations. (695 + 3074) /4 = 3769/4=942.25. Cool, I'm a bad poster! I know who I'm banning if I get to top the FPL group now! | ||
|
solidbebe
Netherlands4921 Posts
(747 + 2811) /6 = 593,1 Wow Im a horrible poster....  | ||
|
Dirkzor
Denmark1944 Posts
I'm not that strong in math anymore so I can't remember what happens when you divide by zero? 0 happens? (Days are estimated...) | ||
|
Caihead
Canada8550 Posts
| ||
|
Rollin
Australia1552 Posts
On December 16 2012 23:23 ELA wrote: (T+P)/M = x x≪1000 = Bad T= Time on forums (days) P= Number of posts M= Moderations .... Sub 1000 posts are naturally just bad posters... just because - Or maybe it's subjective and it varies from mod to mod For the lazy, you can use posts per day (R) and posts for T: T = P/R I get 745(1 + 1/1.18)/1 = 1376. Yay, I'm not a bad poster! | ||
|
ELA
Denmark4608 Posts
My three war wounds: (All warnings) 1. For posting a picture of a walrus in a thread completely not relevant to walruses 2. For calling a guy who said, that legality of nudity in public should be determined world wide by what was acceptable on an american beach, an idiot. 3. For going mental on a guy who kept talking about doping in a thread about Tour de France | ||
|
TheAmazombie
United States3714 Posts
On December 16 2012 23:23 ELA wrote: (T+P)/M = x x≪1000 = Bad T= Time on forums (days) P= Number of posts M= Moderations .... Sub 1000 posts are naturally just bad posters... just because - Or maybe it's subjective and it varies from mod to mod Well, let's play this game... M is a bit weird...I am counting the one temp and one warning, but not the ban for the ABL 1000 page celebration...so 2. T=836 P=3359 M=2 (836+3359)/2 = 2097.5. Woot woot! | ||
| ||
