|
This thread is for discussing recent bans. Don't discuss other topics here. Take it to website feedback if you disagree with a ban or want to raise an issue. Keep it civil.NOTE: For those of you who want to find the actual ABL thread where the bans are posted. Please look in here: https://tl.net/forum/closed-threads/ |
On December 16 2012 23:23 ELA wrote:Show nested quote +On December 16 2012 21:34 opterown wrote:
so what actually constitutes a "bad moderation" history? like how many times would you be warned/banned for you to be considered a bad/horrible poster? haha (T+P)/M = x x≪1000 = Bad T= Time on forums (days) P= Number of posts M= Moderations .... Sub 1000 posts are naturally just bad posters... just because
On December 17 2012 01:26 imallinson wrote:Show nested quote +On December 17 2012 01:12 Caihead wrote:You guys are such nubs. If you are going to make a formula, at least make it a partial differential equation where the user has to solve the answer. Hint: If you can't solve it, you are automatically a bad poster. Here's the equation: ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/QDKXW.png) L = period = current time - time of joining u(t,0) = 0, u(t,L) = total ban time u(0,x) = 0, u(L,x) = total posts Jump discontinuities in t at ban times. Solver fourier series. If bn > 4, you are a bad poster. Oh and lambda = total number of bans, mai bad. Who knew you needed a maths degree to be considered a good poster. A more sensible formula: (1 - X)(T+P) / (D/6 + W/12 + 0.5) T = days on tl P = number of posts D = days banned W = warnings (equal to 1/2 a day) X = perms threshold for being a good poster is above 1,000
Awwwww.... :-C
X-D
|
On December 17 2012 00:58 The_Templar wrote:edit@above post: I don't care, I love making formulas for no good reason  This is a little more accurate, I think.. W=Warnings B=Cumulative Ban Length (days) P=Posts D=Days on TL x= (P+D)/((B+W)^2+15) If x>5 you're a good poster. If you just joined you're automatically considered a bad poster 
(2811+747)/((4+4)^2+15) = 45
suddenly Im an exceptionally good poster 
|
Alright some more bans:
Zergrusher was just banned by monk..
That account was created on 2011-11-14 06:35:00 and had 504 posts.
Reason: I just warned you about this in the same thread.
You were given a second chance and aren't using it very well by pissing everyone off in this thread. Know when to stop or your second chance is over. Also, stop skipping lines in between single lines.
Your second chance is over. [/list]
anyone who can tell me why it ends in[/list]? is it a bit html. Or is it that mod notes are all in one big list? I am a bit confused.
Alright this is just confusing. what the hell is up with the quote tag?
|
On December 17 2012 03:09 JackDragon wrote:Alright some more bans: Show nested quote +Zergrusher was just banned by monk.. That account was created on 2011-11-14 06:35:00 and had 504 posts. Reason: I just warned you about this in the same thread. - You were given a second chance and aren't using it very well by pissing everyone off in this thread. Know when to stop or your second chance is over.
- Also, stop skipping lines in between single lines.
Your second chance is over.
anyone who can tell me why it ends in[/.list]? is it a bit html. Or is it that mod notes are all in one big list? I am a bit confused. Alright this is just confusing. what the hell is up with the quote tag?
|
you have two start quotes only one end quote. also two end lists and no start lists.
or ELA could do it faster and better.
|
United States8476 Posts
Most likely the idiot mod who did that manually typed in a quote and then mistyped /list instead of /quote.
|
Monk your name looks different...
|
Hey. You're red now Monk. What happened? Did you slay the Balrog?
|
Monk also has 5.6k, as opposed to the 2k posts when he first became a mod.
Methinks the mod forum is a spamfest.
|
Oh maybe he became head of the strategy forum?
|
Maybe he achieved enlightenment and will now disperse joy and happiness instead of pain.
|
responding to reports ups post count iirc.
|
Germany25658 Posts
It does indeed. I was wondering how I got a few hundred posts in a few weeks lol :D
|
On December 17 2012 03:15 Gene wrote:
you have two start quotes only one end quote. also two end lists and no start lists.
or ELA could do it faster and better.
Yeah I guess, but why did the list tag come at the end? And shouldn't at least one of the quote tags make a quote? This is so confusing.
|
On December 17 2012 03:51 JackDragon wrote:Show nested quote +On December 17 2012 03:15 Gene wrote:
you have two start quotes only one end quote. also two end lists and no start lists.
or ELA could do it faster and better. Yeah I guess, but why did the list tag come at the end? And shouldn't at least one of the quote tags make a quote? This is so confusing.
Replace the list-tag with a /quote and it works
|
On December 16 2012 23:23 ELA wrote:Show nested quote +On December 16 2012 21:34 opterown wrote:
so what actually constitutes a "bad moderation" history? like how many times would you be warned/banned for you to be considered a bad/horrible poster? haha (T+P)/M = x x≪1000 = Bad T= Time on forums (days) P= Number of posts M= Moderations .... Sub 1000 posts are naturally just bad posters... just because - Or maybe it's subjective and it varies from mod to mod
(3965+552)/10=452,6... What do I win?
|
United States8476 Posts
On December 17 2012 03:37 Praetorial wrote:
Monk also has 5.6k, as opposed to the 2k posts when he first became a mod.
Methinks the mod forum is a spamfest.
About 1200 of my posts were for responding to reports. Btw weird that you know how many posts I had before i became a banling.
|
On December 17 2012 04:43 monk. wrote:Show nested quote +On December 17 2012 03:37 Praetorial wrote:
Monk also has 5.6k, as opposed to the 2k posts when he first became a mod.
Methinks the mod forum is a spamfest. About 1200 of my posts were for responding to reports. Btw weird that you know how many posts I had before i became a banling.
Quick ban him for cyber stalker-ing.
|
On December 17 2012 04:43 monk. wrote:Show nested quote +On December 17 2012 03:37 Praetorial wrote:
Monk also has 5.6k, as opposed to the 2k posts when he first became a mod.
Methinks the mod forum is a spamfest. About 1200 of my posts were for responding to reports. Btw weird that you know how many posts I had before i became a banling.
So was I correct that your name is all special and red because you became head of strat forum?
|
On December 17 2012 04:43 monk. wrote:Show nested quote +On December 17 2012 03:37 Praetorial wrote:
Monk also has 5.6k, as opposed to the 2k posts when he first became a mod.
Methinks the mod forum is a spamfest. About 1200 of my posts were for responding to reports. Btw weird that you know how many posts I had before i became a banling.
Is there a statistics for the combined number of reports in the history of the reporting system? 1200 sounds like an awfull lot (and you are, afaik, not even the most active banling).
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
