EPTDoctoring with Borders - Page 21
| Forum Index > TL Community |
|
virpi
Germany3599 Posts
| ||
520
United States2822 Posts
On November 01 2013 23:43 TheBloodyDwarf wrote: This is very bad change. I like much more that one game has one blocks. Is there way how I can use old? Under Settings, go to "revert to per-game sidebar blocks." | ||
|
JimmiC
Canada22817 Posts
| ||
|
TheBloodyDwarf
Finland7524 Posts
On November 02 2013 00:10 scintilliaSD wrote: Under Settings, go to "revert to per-game sidebar blocks." Well didnt help to that. I meant forums. I press forum and then I get news blabla but then starts tournaments, then general. I want that it is like it used to be. sc2 general, then tournaments, then stategy. Next to each other. Not like now tournaments (sc2,dota,lol) then general (sc2,dota,lol) | ||
|
Liquid`Nazgul
22427 Posts
On November 02 2013 00:55 TheBloodyDwarf wrote: Well didnt help to that. I meant forums. I press forum and then I get news blabla but then starts tournaments, then general. I want that it is like it used to be. sc2 general, then tournaments, then stategy. Next to each other. Not like now tournaments (sc2,dota,lol) then general (sc2,dota,lol) The forum index could use a bit of a cleanup but can't you just use http://i.imgur.com/rPbizp8.png? | ||
|
TheBloodyDwarf
Finland7524 Posts
On November 02 2013 01:48 Liquid`Nazgul wrote: The forum index could use a bit of a cleanup but can't you just use http://i.imgur.com/rPbizp8.png? I can't go to sc2 forums with my phone with one click...If I want to go sc2 forums I need to press forum, then zoom, move my phone screen (if I miss zoom) and then press sc2 forum... its much faster just to press forum than sc2 forum  | ||
|
Liquid`Nazgul
22427 Posts
On November 02 2013 01:52 TheBloodyDwarf wrote: I can't go to sc2 forums with my phone with one click...If I want to go sc2 forums I need to press forum, then zoom, move my phone screen (if I miss zoom) and then press sc2 forum... its much faster just to press forum than sc2 forum How about when you revert to the per-game blocks and then just 1-click the header http://i.imgur.com/p8JRZEn.png | ||
|
Liquid`Nazgul
22427 Posts
| ||
|
XaCez
Sweden6991 Posts
| ||
|
Grettin
42416 Posts
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/t2nkKz5.jpg) Any way to keep the other one hidden and the one you want to be shown, not hidden? Right now they aren't 'separate'. ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/tRKV07t.jpg) | ||
|
KrazyTrumpet
United States2520 Posts
On November 01 2013 23:58 virpi wrote: well, I'm using a 19" 4:3 monitor and the change is absolutely terrible for me. the site is waaaay to broad now. If I zoom out to see everything, it naturally becomes unreadable. And no, I will not buy a widescreen monitor. Have fun being stuck in the 90s I guess? Even mobile devices are widescreen now, dude. 4:3 displays are the minority now. | ||
|
Sanguinarius
United States3427 Posts
| ||
|
ffadicted
United States3545 Posts
Also, The new light bars around the posts are pretty awful and just general bad website design for a forum. You need to highlight more the individual posts, it just looks plain bad now. The font and header colors for the sidebar on the left also look horrific-ly bad. They need some sort of gradient or SOMETHING, they just look awful and definitely worse than before. Understandable changes with the sidebar block organization, but I'm assuming more core fans won't like it and reverse back, so it's nice you kept that ability. I like the new lengths and love the greyed out stream #s and other additional info On November 01 2013 23:58 virpi wrote: well, I'm using a 19" 4:3 monitor and the change is absolutely terrible for me. the site is waaaay to broad now. If I zoom out to see everything, it naturally becomes unreadable. And no, I will not buy a widescreen monitor. Honestly this is your problem. You are the 1%. It's the same thing I tell ppl with 4:3 TVs when their movies and TV shows get cut off: move along with the times. | ||
|
Araneae
Norway100 Posts
Please take a screenshot showing your site settings page as well as the filters top right. Found the problem, the BW part in the filter top right was not checked, thought that was just for the news on the frontpage. Works now^^ | ||
|
autechr3
United States58 Posts
| ||
|
LittLeD
Sweden7973 Posts
| ||
|
Kotreb
Croatia1392 Posts
gj though, i bet it took some effort. | ||
|
teapoted
United Kingdom24425 Posts
On November 02 2013 02:52 KrazyTrumpet wrote: 4:3 monitors are still prevalent in many countries. And to be honest 4:3 is the superior way to view the 'vast' majority of websites over 16 : 9 as human reading doesn't really take advantage of the extra width naturally and thus most websites are still built vertically, like a page. And 4:3 is closer to a page than 16 : 9. If 16 : 9 made sense for browsing the internet there would be more webpages like the windows 8 home screen, the one that's really annoying with it's horizontal scrolling. I have many screens new and old and my favorite to browser the internet is a 4:3 monitor from like 2005.Have fun being stuck in the 90s I guess? Even mobile devices are widescreen now, dude. 4:3 displays are the minority now. Either way, it doesn't matter if it's only 1%. An update shouldn't make your site less accessible unless it's at the will of some revolutionary feature. And they could at least (without making the whole site responsive) fit it into 960px with some queries that only make the sidebars and header more narrow. And either way the issue isn't 4:3, it's a low screen resolution, which will happen to people on small laptops or netbooks as well, are those people stuck in the 90s? On November 02 2013 02:58 ffadicted wrote: I hope you're not a web developer.Honestly this is your problem. You are the 1%. It's the same thing I tell ppl with 4:3 TVs when their movies and TV shows get cut off: move along with the times. | ||
|
ratty
New Zealand275 Posts
| ||
|
FueledUpAndReadyToGo
Netherlands30548 Posts
On November 02 2013 07:30 teapoted wrote: Either way, it doesn't matter if it's only 1%. An update shouldn't make your site less accessible unless it's at the will of some revolutionary feature. And they could at least (without making the whole site responsive) fit it into 960px with some queries that only make the sidebars and header more narrow. And either way the issue isn't 4:3, it's a low screen resolution, which will happen to people on small laptops or netbooks as well, are those people stuck in the 90s? Netbooks are not meant to be full computers. They were crappy when they came out and are even more crappier now. You have to side scroll a bit, but hey you get good battery life and a small packaging for cheap. The site is only like 1200 pixels wide. The 1024x768 times are a really long time ago. No reason to handicap the website for that. | ||
| ||
