• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 18:55
CEST 00:55
KST 07:55
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Season 1 - Final Week6[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall12HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0
Community News
Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed5Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll2Team TLMC #5 - Submission extension2Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation17$25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced7
StarCraft 2
General
Team TLMC #5 - Submission extension Who will win EWC 2025? Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings Esports World Cup 2025 - Final Player Roster
Tourneys
RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event $5,100+ SEL Season 2 Championship (SC: Evo) WardiTV Mondays Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome
Brood War
General
Flash Announces (and Retracts) Hiatus From ASL Starcraft in widescreen BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ BW General Discussion A cwal.gg Extension - Easily keep track of anyone
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues CSL Xiamen International Invitational [BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China 2025 ACS Season 2 Qualifier
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project The PlayStation 5
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Summer Games Done Quick 2025! Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 2024 - 2025 Football Thread NBA General Discussion NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Men Take Risks, Women Win Ga…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 527 users

Faster Is Not Better (12 worker start)

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
1 2 3 4 5 6 Next All
geokilla
Profile Joined May 2011
Canada8230 Posts
January 24 2020 00:32 GMT
#1
https://terrancraft.com/2020/01/23/faster-is-not-better-the-effects-of-increasing-starting-worker-count/

This is a fantastic article on why the 12 worker start is not necessarily a good change for the game. Everyone should read it and share what you think about the 12 worker start compared to the previous 6. Some highlights:

*Shortened early game
*Resource ratio at the start
*Faster worker saturation
*Lower opportunity cost of strategic decisions
*Less discriminating early game choices
*Shallower strategic interactions
yubo56
Profile Joined May 2014
687 Posts
January 24 2020 00:36 GMT
#2
I'm somewhat surprised this is gaining traction again after 3+ years in the game. Not that we shouldn't change it, if it's bad, but there have seemingly been far fewer complaints about it until very recently.

I agree with the article, and TL's own "ode to 6 pool" or whatever, I just think it's interesting that both Harstem and terrancraft have brought this up recently
Jung Yoon Jong fighting, even after retirement! Feel better soon.
InfCereal
Profile Joined December 2011
Canada1759 Posts
January 24 2020 01:15 GMT
#3
On January 24 2020 09:36 yubo56 wrote:
I'm somewhat surprised this is gaining traction again after 3+ years in the game. Not that we shouldn't change it, if it's bad, but there have seemingly been far fewer complaints about it until very recently.

I agree with the article, and TL's own "ode to 6 pool" or whatever, I just think it's interesting that both Harstem and terrancraft have brought this up recently


Beasty as well mentioned it recently.
Cereal
brickrd
Profile Blog Joined March 2014
United States4894 Posts
Last Edited: 2020-01-24 01:24:06
January 24 2020 01:18 GMT
#4
it's just people getting tired of the game and hallucinating that fiddling with the worker start will make the overall experience better

these same people would just find something else to bitch about if you gave them 6 worker start. same old blah blah blah from people who dislike the game because they never went pro but can't just give it up and play something else

what passes for "analysis" on this community is just someone writing 5000 words where they repeatedly restate an opinion. people will listen to anything if it makes them feel like they have special knowledge. that's why the terrible, useless "welcome to zparcraft" thread lasted for like 2 years
TL+ Member
BonitiilloO
Profile Joined June 2013
Dominican Republic614 Posts
January 24 2020 01:45 GMT
#5
i have to say 12 workers work fine for me since it takes less time for you to play more games, but i kinda agree with reducing the amount probably 8workers? there are few things SC2 needs to address to make the game great again,
1-reduce workers
2-stop the meta shifting (it doesn't belong to games like SC2 where u need to develop a path and learn by the book your strategies)
3-stop trying to make all the units useful, BW had few units that were there for some purpose but they were not actually use other some specific scenarios.
4-bring back Terrain advantage like in BW and the miss hit we had before
5-units should stack less or be less like in a burble.
How may help u?
freelifeffs
Profile Joined April 2018
97 Posts
January 24 2020 01:59 GMT
#6
12 workers is much, much, much better. god the early game was so painful to play but especially to watch in hots. nothing really happening for minutes besides making workers and the first 3 buildings (except for the occasional cheese).
Waxangel
Profile Blog Joined September 2002
United States33356 Posts
January 24 2020 06:05 GMT
#7
On January 24 2020 10:18 brickrd wrote:
it's just people getting tired of the game and hallucinating that fiddling with the worker start will make the overall experience better

these same people would just find something else to bitch about if you gave them 6 worker start. same old blah blah blah from people who dislike the game because they never went pro but can't just give it up and play something else

what passes for "analysis" on this community is just someone writing 5000 words where they repeatedly restate an opinion. people will listen to anything if it makes them feel like they have special knowledge. that's why the terrible, useless "welcome to zparcraft" thread lasted for like 2 years


...But essentially you just said "MY opinion is that YOUR opinion is wrong" while providing no elaboration or direct refutation of his points. Even if you think the guy's reasoning is flawed and repetitive, at least he made an attempt to explain it

Anyhow, just to expand on my response to Max on Twitter—I'm not really concerned about the 'objective' increase or decline in strategic depth due to 12 worker start. But I do think that from the viewpoint of a fan watching the game, pro-level SC2 feels more uniform and less diverse. Like, even a fairly casual fan in WoL could count the number of bases a player had and deduce how they game would play out. Also, it eas easier for them get a simple understanding of a player's traits (e.g. 'PuMa likes to all-in in PvT so he goes for 1-base 1/1/1. Mvp likes to macro so he goes for a fast command center.'). What's the present day difference between TY and Maru in playstyle? I'm sure Terran pros could elaborate in exquisite detail, but I think the rest of us would struggle to make even a generalization.

Anyway, I still think it's just a matter of individual taste. While I kinda thought it was awesome that PuMa bulldozed Protoss players with a one-base all-in, I'm sure lots of other people thought that kind of 'variety' fucking sucked.
AdministratorHey HP can you redo everything youve ever done because i have a small complaint?
JimmyJRaynor
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
Canada16692 Posts
Last Edited: 2020-01-24 06:41:44
January 24 2020 06:30 GMT
#8
To me the higher worker count with faster saturating bases moves SC2 to being closer to the C&C style of "fast and fluid" game play.
On January 24 2020 09:32 geokilla wrote:
https://terrancraft.com/2020/01/23/faster-is-not-better-the-effects-of-increasing-starting-worker-count/

This is a fantastic article on why the 12 worker start is not necessarily a good change for the game. Everyone should read it and share what you think about the 12 worker start compared to the previous 6. Some highlights:

*Shortened early game
*Resource ratio at the start
*Faster worker saturation
*Lower opportunity cost of strategic decisions
*Less discriminating early game choices
*Shallower strategic interactions

I think AlphaStar has exposed SOME of this. AlphaStar wins on macro so much. AlphaStar elects to spend more time on macro than most GM players. However, AlphaStar has also demonstrated that there are some very interesting early game choices and early game aggression tactics that humans have chosen to ignore or they were just not innovative enough to create themselves.
On January 24 2020 15:05 Waxangel wrote:
Anyway, I still think it's just a matter of individual taste. While I kinda thought it was awesome that PuMa bulldozed Protoss players with a one-base all-in, I'm sure lots of other people thought that kind of 'variety' fucking sucked.

Naniwa occasionally competed in low level tournaments. The only way it was worth his time was to 4 gate everyone. LOL. I watched him 4-gate his way to a $1000 tournament win in a record low amount of time.

It was a pride swallowing siege for many of his decorated europian opponents. Sentry, Stalker, Zealot is all he needed ... who needs all these other stupid units?

Here is Blizzard spending years trying to build "Chess 2.0" and Naniwa turned it into Checkers.
Ray Kassar To David Crane : "you're no more important to Atari than the factory workers assembling the cartridges"
Shuffleblade
Profile Joined February 2012
Sweden1903 Posts
January 24 2020 09:54 GMT
#9
This is a very complicated topic and i seriously Believe there is no "right" or "wrong" here merely different opinions. What I mean is that the things the article repeatedly mentions as bad effects are only bad in his or her opinion, they are not objectively bad.

Personally I like that the change sped up the game and that it in general got rid of a lot of turtle styles however there are parts i dislike as well. Specifically when I read the part in the piece about mineral vs gas income I felt that maybe the game could have been improved further by tweaking the gas income, making it possible for workers to either mine more gas or for more workers to mine gas from one geyser effectively. While zerg pretty much keeps their options open after the 6-12 worker change terran specifically get hampered in their possible builds. Because you start with so many workers and the gas mining is limited you can use the gas you can mine to be aggresive/harassing and still afford getting eco and maybe even tech. Investing more into aggression and harassment is innefficient because the units you need are limited by gas meaning you get minerals over to expand. I'm not great at builds but what I am trying to say is that it feels like there are few viable build paths and the game state usually ends up in a similar state.

Sure a mid game were players need multiple bases that therefore are weak to harassment or attacks sounds hectic and fun both for Viewers and players but what we get is many games that look similar. Also because you are so spread out a slight missposition can lose you a game. Terran doomdrop, protoss WP, zerg nydus not to mention dedicated pushes. You need to be able to defend all the Heavy hitting attacks that can hit your main base (vulnerable underbelly) while also being able to defend stright up attacks on your third or fourth.

This is also why I feel scouting in some ways are more important now because since you are more spread out it is more important for you to know exactly were you opponents army are. Scouting is at least as important as Before the difference is that the scouting you need to do is a need that is more constant, where is your army and where are you going. Tech scouting was easier because you didn't need to do it as often and the repercusions of a mistake while big was hitting you later
Maru, Bomber, TY, Dear, Classic, DeParture and Rogue!
Ziggy
Profile Blog Joined June 2013
South Korea2105 Posts
January 24 2020 10:01 GMT
#10
Imagine thinking Blizzard care enough to introduce meta-breaking changes to SC2


Nonetheless, a good takeaway for future RTS games
WriterDefeating a sandwich only makes it tastier. @imjustziggy
INWRifle
Profile Joined January 2020
5 Posts
January 24 2020 10:07 GMT
#11
I feel like we're forgetting something important here - reducing the amount of workers will increase a game's length by a minute or two.

This means that tournaments have to plan for tournament days to go on for about an hour or more-ish, there will be more cheeses and early-game shenanigans, or there'll be less matches played.
Anoss
Profile Joined July 2012
21 Posts
Last Edited: 2020-01-24 11:41:45
January 24 2020 10:56 GMT
#12
Hi (grabbing popcorn)

3 years ago, i was explaining the same thing. I start to did some new tournament with 6 harversters instead of 12, to show people that it was much better (6 start), then i created "Powered" who was a 6 start with a new balance and some new units. And i remember, everybody here was laughing.. sadly.

3 years later, we can see easily that was a bad idea, and even with some good paper like this, there is still some people who are thinking it's a matter of taste (hi Waxangel) which is not. This is math that's all

And this was all the problem with TL since the beginning , you can write the best explanation ever, if you are not "some one in TL", your idea will be dodge, like Wax is doing now "this a matter of taste" even if you are writing 30 pages on the subject to explain each part of the idea.

My popcorn is empty, i have to go, good work terrancraft.com, you are totally right, but don't expect to be fully understand, a lot of people here are in bad faith just to keep the head up, sadly. They will never say you are right, cause if you are right, that's means they were wrong from the start, impossible to imagine for all these people who think themselves so intelligent
Agh
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
United States935 Posts
January 24 2020 11:37 GMT
#13
Worker change won't solve the root of what the article wants it to. It's one of those 'think you do, but you don't' things.


The better direction would be to look at what makes the game fun to play and less frustrating, like fight and engagement times. Nothing like Spending over 10 minutes and having a game be decided in less than 5 seconds.




On January 24 2020 15:05 Waxangel wrote:
Anyway, I still think it's just a matter of individual taste. While I kinda thought it was awesome that PuMa bulldozed Protoss players with a one-base all-in, I'm sure lots of other people thought that kind of 'variety' fucking sucked.


I still have distinct memories playing David Kim on my 2nd account. We're both random and whenever I got T against his P I told him "you know what's coming" and It always ended the same. I don't fault players like MMA and Puma for playing the way they did but looking back on everything the state of the game was atrocious. I just see that on the same level as 3 range queens vs 5 range hellions, not to mention og roaches, etc.






Those types of fundamental shortcomings in overall game design compounded and ended up shaping the product we have today. I always found it amusing that when players voiced what was simply un-fun or frustrating to deal with while playing the issues brought up were almost unanimous. Even better when some were both not only being on the receiving end of X, but also while executing it.

Rather than directly axing or addressing those scenarios the effort was always made to band-aid adjust around it, sometimes looking to a completely unrelated unit to address a forced design issue.


Main offenders (just an example 2 from each race [not necessarily current iterations]) Window mines & Liberators, Disruptors & Tempests, Swarm Hosts & Brood lords. Obviously list could go on to include past states of Adepts, Infestors, etc - but to circle back to the point would the game have lost anything if these units were omitted? And to go deeper than that if the unit is introduced to address something, why not look towards the issue rather than trying to build around it?





Didn't want to go off on too much of a tangent but the issue is entirely bigger than a simple worker adjustment.
I may appear to be an emotionless sarcastic pos, but just like an onion when you pull off more and more layers you find the exact same thing everytime and you start crying
Drfilip
Profile Joined March 2013
Sweden590 Posts
January 24 2020 12:08 GMT
#14
I have two things to mention. And for all of you who feel the need to separate objectivity from subjectivity: there is almost no objectivity that will affect the opinions of people here, we need to argue strengths vs weaknesses and consider that our own tastes are not necessarily the same as that of others.
1:
On January 24 2020 18:54 Shuffleblade wrote:
[...]
Sure a mid game were players need multiple bases that therefore are weak to harassment or attacks sounds hectic and fun both for Viewers and players but what we get is many games that look similar. Also because you are so spread out a slight missposition can lose you a game. Terran doomdrop, protoss WP, zerg nydus not to mention dedicated pushes. You need to be able to defend all the Heavy hitting attacks that can hit your main base (vulnerable underbelly) while also being able to defend stright up attacks on your third or fourth.

This is also why I feel scouting in some ways are more important now because since you are more spread out it is more important for you to know exactly were you opponents army are. Scouting is at least as important as Before the difference is that the scouting you need to do is a need that is more constant, where is your army and where are you going. Tech scouting was easier because you didn't need to do it as often and the repercusions of a mistake while big was hitting you later

The end of HotS had almost only macro games and 6 worker start. The meta was shifting away from the early aggression.
(T)TaeJa was a great player, beating almost everyone outside of the Korean borders. In the second season of 2014 WCS America, (P)Pigbaby beat TaeJa 3-0 with a crowd chanting "observer". I think that Pigbaby's unusually thorough scouting was what beat TaeJa so easily.
This implies that scouting has been important for quite some time. It might be a shifting meta that makes it even more important in a greater degree than the game's inherent steering into macro games.

2:
On January 24 2020 19:56 Anoss wrote:
Hi (grabbing popcorn)

3 years ago, i was explaining the same thing. I start to did some new tournament with 6 harversters instead of 12, to show people that it was much better, then i created Powered (6 workers start too). Everybody here was laughing.. sadly.

3 years later, there is still some people who are thinking it's a matter of taste (hi Waxangel !) which is not. 12 start was just stupid, and it's so funny now i'm out of this business to see influent people like Wax who still trying to dodge the global idea. So let's write it again : You are wrong Wax and it's ok.

and this is all the problem with TL since many years, you can write the best explanation, if you are not "some one in TL", your idea will be dodge, like Wax is doing now "this a matter of taste". No this is math. If you don't get it, that's mean you are not thinking enough and if you don't want think enough and understand the problem, don't speak then.

My popcorn is empty, time to go, good work terrancraft.com, you are totally right, but don't expect to be fully understand, a lot of people here are are in bad faith just to keep the head up

I have read your threads with 6 worker start and 9 worker start. I do not agree with your assessment. The game allows for some more variety of early aggression, true, but that is at the cost of other things.
At the end of HotS, the early aggression was an alternative to macro which was seldom used in professional matches. Macro games dominated the meta. Nowadays, the early aggression is often proxy. My experience finds small difference between HotS aggression and LotV proxy. HotS had more all-ins, but that's about it.
The biggest downside of having fewer workers is the game duration. Fewer workers gives longer games. This is important for several reasons:
1. As a player, I have time for fewer games whenever I play. I like playing more games instead of longer games.
2. The extra time is in the early game, the part which is the most static of all the games parts. This leads to:
2a. As a player, if you like the early game best you will have more fun. Everybody else will like the game a bit less.
2b. As a professional player, you will spend more time with the part of the game that you already know best. This will hamper your overall skill development as you'll need even more time to practice.
Overall, this leads to longer games where the extra time is uninteresting and the professionals will not be as good as playing the game. More "boring" stuff and worse players is not good for spectators.

I also have a question to Anoss. What is this "math" that you mentioned? Care to explain?
Random Platinum EU
deacon.frost
Profile Joined February 2013
Czech Republic12129 Posts
January 24 2020 12:13 GMT
#15
On January 24 2020 18:54 Shuffleblade wrote:
This is a very complicated topic and i seriously Believe there is no "right" or "wrong" here merely different opinions. What I mean is that the things the article repeatedly mentions as bad effects are only bad in his or her opinion, they are not objectively bad.

+ Show Spoiler +
Personally I like that the change sped up the game and that it in general got rid of a lot of turtle styles however there are parts i dislike as well. Specifically when I read the part in the piece about mineral vs gas income I felt that maybe the game could have been improved further by tweaking the gas income, making it possible for workers to either mine more gas or for more workers to mine gas from one geyser effectively. While zerg pretty much keeps their options open after the 6-12 worker change terran specifically get hampered in their possible builds. Because you start with so many workers and the gas mining is limited you can use the gas you can mine to be aggresive/harassing and still afford getting eco and maybe even tech. Investing more into aggression and harassment is innefficient because the units you need are limited by gas meaning you get minerals over to expand. I'm not great at builds but what I am trying to say is that it feels like there are few viable build paths and the game state usually ends up in a similar state.

Sure a mid game were players need multiple bases that therefore are weak to harassment or attacks sounds hectic and fun both for Viewers and players but what we get is many games that look similar. Also because you are so spread out a slight missposition can lose you a game. Terran doomdrop, protoss WP, zerg nydus not to mention dedicated pushes. You need to be able to defend all the Heavy hitting attacks that can hit your main base (vulnerable underbelly) while also being able to defend stright up attacks on your third or fourth.

This is also why I feel scouting in some ways are more important now because since you are more spread out it is more important for you to know exactly were you opponents army are. Scouting is at least as important as Before the difference is that the scouting you need to do is a need that is more constant, where is your army and where are you going. Tech scouting was easier because you didn't need to do it as often and the repercusions of a mistake while big was hitting you late
r

It all comes down to the question if we(as the SC2 community) value more strategy or mechanics.

For years I've seen "bigger APM means better player" logic everywhere, praising mechanics and lowering strategic choices impact(BTW this means less BO losses!). So I think that this is what Blizzard saw and why they updated to the 12 worker start why making the game less strategic. Which was IMO demonstrated the best by the early PvP state of kamikaze balls/blink state which moved me from the SC2 for almost a year(yeah, the first 2 games were exciting, then it got boring).

I am more on the strategy side of the crowd that's why I play less and watch less(it's not just the "other" reasons I'm not gonna mention here). I was against it in the beta, I was against it at the launch and I am against 12 workers even now. It's not like the 12 worker start removed the off topic banter at the start(it did, for a while)
I imagine France should be able to take this unless Lilbow is busy practicing for Starcraft III. | KadaverBB is my fairy ban mother.
Vision_
Profile Joined September 2018
861 Posts
Last Edited: 2020-01-24 13:08:47
January 24 2020 12:38 GMT
#16
I couldn t think my previous "9 workers videos" worked so much...

**Silence**

PS : adding three workers : 3 x 12 = 36 seconds, with a big tournament (and overlaps between games), you can maybe multiply by 30.. or maybe 50.. so ? it s only about 20 minutes in a day ?? (and i m quite cautious).. In fact without a legit analysis it s difficult to conclude if LoTV is faster (like most of LoTV games plays with maximum workers - go 70 workers)

Blizzard wants to make game faster, but it might have done a different result..

This thread should be renamed to : "Less Quality is faster" - Isn t it ?

WombaT
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Northern Ireland25078 Posts
January 24 2020 12:39 GMT
#17
To my taste there is both truth here and it also misses the mark in some ways too.

I think there is strategic homogenisation to a degree yes. The early game is more stable in general.

The tech paths are less distinct as you pick them up faster, so yeah I agree there.

On the other hand the strategic variety side is overstated somewhat as I think it overestimates how much was actually scoutable.

My memory is of a lot of blind rock/paper/scissors scenarios in the early game that were really frustrating to both play and watch. The old 1/1/1 you’d arrive at a depot wall and have to blindly decide if it was coming or not, and prepare accordingly and for a period people would fake out. It only really died when Protoss figured 1 gate expands and the maps got better. Or proxy oracle builds where Terrans had to blindly throw down turrets, or die, or be behind if the Protoss wasn’t doing that if they did prepare for it. PvP has had its rock/paper/scissor periods on robo/twilight/stargate too.

Having those extra workers and your tech coming up quicker does homogenise things, but it does eliminate more of the ‘I picked the wrong tech I lose’ early game scenarios too.

So I think the article makes good points and makes them well, I think it does underestimate the information component in making sound strategic choices and how that actually played out in previous iterations.

Plus, in general strategic homogeneity will occur eventually in any RTS that has been played professionally for a decade, people will eventually figure out the optimal ways of playing.

'You'll always be the cuddly marsupial of my heart, despite the inherent flaws of your ancestry' - Squat
Drfilip
Profile Joined March 2013
Sweden590 Posts
January 24 2020 12:57 GMT
#18
On January 24 2020 21:39 Wombat_NI wrote:
To my taste there is both truth here and it also misses the mark in some ways too.

I think there is strategic homogenisation to a degree yes. The early game is more stable in general.

The tech paths are less distinct as you pick them up faster, so yeah I agree there.

On the other hand the strategic variety side is overstated somewhat as I think it overestimates how much was actually scoutable.

My memory is of a lot of blind rock/paper/scissors scenarios in the early game that were really frustrating to both play and watch. The old 1/1/1 you’d arrive at a depot wall and have to blindly decide if it was coming or not, and prepare accordingly and for a period people would fake out. It only really died when Protoss figured 1 gate expands and the maps got better. Or proxy oracle builds where Terrans had to blindly throw down turrets, or die, or be behind if the Protoss wasn’t doing that if they did prepare for it. PvP has had its rock/paper/scissor periods on robo/twilight/stargate too.

Having those extra workers and your tech coming up quicker does homogenise things, but it does eliminate more of the ‘I picked the wrong tech I lose’ early game scenarios too.

So I think the article makes good points and makes them well, I think it does underestimate the information component in making sound strategic choices and how that actually played out in previous iterations.

Plus, in general strategic homogeneity will occur eventually in any RTS that has been played professionally for a decade, people will eventually figure out the optimal ways of playing.


The "bag of protoss bullshit" is no longer a term used in every single thread about a game that included a protoss. The frustration on build order losses was very big in the community. There were more than 10 people complaining in a discussion of 15 people.

The build order losses was not even something I considered anyomore. I needed this article to be reminded of them. They were especially bad in the case of TvP. Roughly speaking there were 4 outcomes:
a) Oracle and oracle defense -> terran survived and protoss plays from behind
b) Oracle and no defense -> terran either dead or soon to be dead
c) Oracle defense and no oracle -> terran plays from behind
d) No oracle, no defense -> terran a bit ahead

This time of SC2 was not very fun to watch TvP in. The other match ups were great, though.
Random Platinum EU
Cyro
Profile Blog Joined June 2011
United Kingdom20285 Posts
January 24 2020 17:22 GMT
#19
I liked 6 workers better than 12. 8-9 might be even better.
"oh my god my overclock... I got a single WHEA error on the 23rd hour, 9 minutes" -Belial88
Jan1997
Profile Blog Joined April 2013
Norway671 Posts
Last Edited: 2020-01-24 17:47:08
January 24 2020 17:46 GMT
#20
6 workers offered a slower paste type of game. Which I really liked. I suppose there was also more variations you could put in the early game back then.
Do something today that your future self will be thankful for.
1 2 3 4 5 6 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 1h 5m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Nathanias 151
UpATreeSC 117
Livibee 108
JuggernautJason79
StarCraft: Brood War
Larva 398
firebathero 238
Artosis 63
Dota 2
syndereN736
monkeys_forever333
NeuroSwarm90
League of Legends
Grubby4565
Counter-Strike
fl0m1459
Foxcn365
Super Smash Bros
PPMD92
Liquid`Ken44
hungrybox18
Heroes of the Storm
Trikslyr88
Other Games
summit1g12006
shahzam991
C9.Mang0168
Maynarde97
Mew2King53
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick4876
BasetradeTV28
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 16 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• davetesta10
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• blackmanpl 39
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• masondota22552
League of Legends
• Doublelift3750
Counter-Strike
• Shiphtur260
Other Games
• imaqtpie2162
Upcoming Events
Replay Cast
1h 5m
Replay Cast
11h 5m
WardiTV European League
17h 5m
ShoWTimE vs sebesdes
Percival vs NightPhoenix
Shameless vs Nicoract
Krystianer vs Scarlett
ByuN vs uThermal
Harstem vs HeRoMaRinE
PiGosaur Monday
1d 1h
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
1d 17h
Replay Cast
2 days
The PondCast
2 days
Replay Cast
3 days
Epic.LAN
3 days
CranKy Ducklings
4 days
[ Show More ]
Epic.LAN
4 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
4 days
Bonyth vs Sziky
Dewalt vs Hawk
Hawk vs QiaoGege
Sziky vs Dewalt
Mihu vs Bonyth
Zhanhun vs QiaoGege
QiaoGege vs Fengzi
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5 days
Online Event
5 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
5 days
Bonyth vs Zhanhun
Dewalt vs Mihu
Hawk vs Sziky
Sziky vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs Hawk
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs Bonyth
Liquipedia Results

Completed

2025 ACS Season 2: Qualifier
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
Championship of Russia 2025
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters

Upcoming

CSL Xiamen Invitational
CSL Xiamen Invitational: ShowMatche
2025 ACS Season 2
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
K-Championship
RSL Revival: Season 2
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
Underdog Cup #2
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.