EPTWCS Winter RO32 concludes, RO16 groups drawn - Page 3
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
Kafka777
361 Posts
| ||
|
tilhorizon
Germany191 Posts
| ||
|
HolydaKing
21254 Posts
| ||
|
tilhorizon
Germany191 Posts
On February 12 2019 08:03 Kafka777 wrote: Obviously seeding is wrong for the draw. It should be based on 2018 rankings. That should give Serral, Showtime, Heromarine and Lambo a group each. Then Uthermal should be with Lambo, Reynor with Heromarine, Elazer with Showtime and Serral with Mana. The rest shoul;d be a random draw. But i think they tried to make sure there are less Protosses in next round as Serral and Elazer have the best chance of eliminating any Protoss. and they wanted at least 1 Terran to advance. this | ||
Nakajin
Canada8991 Posts
On February 12 2019 08:03 Kafka777 wrote: Obviously seeding is wrong for the draw. It should be based on 2018 rankings. That should give Serral, Showtime, Heromarine and Lambo a group each. Then Uthermal should be with Lambo, Reynor with Heromarine, Elazer with Showtime and Serral with Mana. The rest shoul;d be a random draw. But i think they tried to make sure there are less Protosses in next round as Serral and Elazer have the best chance of eliminating any Protoss. and they wanted at least 1 Terran to advance. Heromarine wouldn't have a group he ended up second, also pretty sure they didin't fix it to have less protoss... I feel like it's base on Montreal result somehow, or maybe just "gut's feelling"? The ranking would go Serral-Reynor-Showtime-Lambo-Uthermal-Elazer-Mana-Gungfu which seems to logical to be totally random but stranger thing have happen especially since the NA groups are random (At least I hope so because if not someone is trolling us lol) | ||
|
tilhorizon
Germany191 Posts
On February 12 2019 08:48 Nakajin wrote: Heromarine wouldn't have a group he ended up second, also pretty sure they didin't fix it to have less protoss... I feel like it's base on Montreal result somehow, or maybe just "gut's feelling"? The ranking would go Serral-Reynor-Showtime-Lambo-Uthermal-Elazer-Mana-Gungfu which seems to logical to be totally random but stranger thing have happen especially since the NA groups are random (At least I hope so because if not someone is trolling us lol) no you are wrong you talkabout only WCS Montreal we talk about WCS Standng 2018  2018 StarCraft II World Championship Series/Standings | ||
|
Kafka777
361 Posts
On February 12 2019 08:03 Kafka777 wrote: Obviously seeding is wrong for the draw. It should be based on 2018 rankings. That should give Serral, Showtime, Heromarine and Lambo a group each. Then Uthermal should be with Lambo, Reynor with Heromarine, Elazer with Showtime and Serral with Mana. The rest shoul;d be a random draw. But i think they tried to make sure there are less Protosses in next round as Serral and Elazer have the best chance of eliminating any Protoss. and they wanted at least 1 Terran to advance. Heromarine wouldn't have a group he ended up second, also pretty sure they didin't fix it to have less protoss... I feel like it's base on Montreal result somehow, or maybe just "gut's feelling"? The ranking would go Serral-Reynor-Showtime-Lambo-Uthermal-Elazer-Mana-Gungfu which seems to logical to be totally random but stranger thing have happen especially since the NA groups are random (At least I hope so because if not someone is trolling us lol) Yes, I missed the fact that Heromarine was 2nd. But that would give Serral with Gungfu, Showtime with Mana, Lambo with Elazer and Raynor with Uthermal. | ||
|
parrotpitaya
Germany37 Posts
| ||
|
Nakajin
Canada8991 Posts
On February 12 2019 08:50 tilhorizon wrote: no you are wrong you talkabout only WCS Montreal we talk about WCS Standng 2018 2018 StarCraft II World Championship Series/StandingsI know but it would explain why Reynor is ahead of Uthermal. Reynor-Serral-Lambo-Showtime(tied with UT) are the 4 best european of WCS Montreal. | ||
|
Kafka777
361 Posts
I know but it would explain why Reynor is ahead of Uthermal. Reynor-Serral-Lambo-Showtime(tied with UT) are the 4 best european of WCS Montreal. It would make absolutely no sense to take WCS Montreal as basis for seeding, unless one would liuke to manipulate something. | ||
Waxangel
United States33699 Posts
According to the rulebook it looks like 2018 standings stop being used for seeding beginning the RO16, although they were used in qualifiers and in the RO32. The Round of 16 group stage will consist of the 16 players who advanced from the Round of 32. These players will be seeded into four groups of four players each. • Players who advanced from their group first will be assigned a 1-seed • Players who advanced from their group second will be assigned a 2-seed • Each Round of 16 group will have two 1-seeds and two 2-seeds • Players who were in the same group in the round of 32 may not be placed in the same Round of 16 group | ||
|
Deleted User 3420
24492 Posts
On February 12 2019 10:06 Waxangel wrote: WCS Winter Rules According to the rulebook it looks like 2018 standings stop being used for seeding beginning the RO16, although they were used in qualifiers and in the RO32. I feel like this is missing something... so is it random? Are they just placing them however they want within those rules? | ||
|
Nakajin
Canada8991 Posts
On February 12 2019 10:19 travis wrote: I feel like this is missing something... so is it random? Are they just placing them however they want within those rules? I mean we should not rule out the chance that it's random, NA group really do look random. | ||
|
Kafka777
361 Posts
According to the rulebook it looks like 2018 standings stop being used for seeding beginning the RO16, although they were used in qualifiers and in the RO32 It doesn\t look random at all. But there is a little problem balance wise currently, We can fix it a bit by staging groups. Like AI Serral and Elazer are faster than other players. Hateme, with all due respect, will not advance. | ||
|
xelnaga_empire
627 Posts
 | ||
|
Drake
Germany6146 Posts
what a **** drawing xD and eu the only 2 terrans in 1 group i shit myself xD | ||
|
Drake
Germany6146 Posts
On February 12 2019 14:08 xelnaga_empire wrote: Only 2 Terran out of 16 players for WCS EU so tell me who is a good european terran ? the race isnt just that famous in eu on top level so there are very few top tier terrans the sad thing is that they are both in the same group. ps: if heromarine still plays this awefull build hes gonna lose ... i dare a terran to cry for balance until they stop playing the WORST BUILD POSSIBLE every damn tvp xD | ||
|
lechatnoir
392 Posts
| ||
|
dysenterymd
1250 Posts
| ||
|
Charoisaur
Germany16089 Posts
On February 12 2019 17:06 Drake wrote: so tell me who is a good european terran ? the race isnt just that famous in eu on top level so there are very few top tier terrans the sad thing is that they are both in the same group. ps: if heromarine still plays this awefull build hes gonna lose ... i dare a terran to cry for balance until they stop playing the WORST BUILD POSSIBLE every damn tvp xD Tell them what a proper build is with your gm game knowledge. Foreign terrans really should take coaching lessons from you | ||
| ||
