EPTDon't Get Fined - WCS 2014 Handbook - Page 12
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
Muffloe
Sweden6061 Posts
| ||
|
scypio
Poland2127 Posts
fun -40% | ||
|
Ana_
Finland453 Posts
| ||
|
DekkuM
United States149 Posts
On December 20 2013 23:04 Waxangel wrote: H. Software Exploitation – Any intentional use of any bugs or exploits in the game may result in a forfeit of the match and disqualification from the tournament. Bugs and exploits will be determined at the discretion of Blizzard Entertainment. I feel like this should be at the discretion of the tournament organizer. Aside from that I'm cool with the rest. | ||
|
MonkeyBot
United States125 Posts
On December 21 2013 01:06 Greendotz wrote: I've seen that pic of Naniwa so many times but still to this day have no idea what's going on in it :/ Seconded. I have a guess on what's going on but not sure. Can someone enlighten this noob? [This noob referring to myself, not Greendotz] | ||
|
TRaFFiC
Canada1448 Posts
| ||
|
Orcasgt24
Canada3238 Posts
On December 21 2013 04:01 TRaFFiC wrote: The no chat thing seems totally out of the blue. When has chat ever been a problem? That's what everyone wants to see. Chat! But seeing as blizz is clueless on making battlenet more social.... I didn't watch a single WCG game that had more then GL, HF, GG, WP. Thats all they every write anyways. | ||
|
PardonYou
United States1360 Posts
On December 21 2013 04:01 TRaFFiC wrote: The no chat thing seems totally out of the blue. When has chat ever been a problem? That's what everyone wants to see. Chat! But seeing as blizz is clueless on making battlenet more social.... Because during a WCS game I care about social and not the playing. | ||
|
Fusilero
United Kingdom50293 Posts
On December 21 2013 04:03 Orcasgt24 wrote: I didn't watch a single WCG game that had more then GL, HF, GG, WP. Thats all they every write anyways. "I CAN'T BELIEVE I'M PLAYING SO RISKY AGAINST THE WORST PLAYER IN THE WORLD" I also choose to raise my pitchforks over this, blizzard taking MUH FREEDOMS | ||
|
Squat
Sweden7978 Posts
On December 21 2013 04:05 Fusilero wrote: "I CAN'T BELIEVE I'M PLAYING SO RISKY AGAINST THE WORST PLAYER IN THE WORLD" I'm still partial to "IMBA IMBA IMBA IMBA" It will live forever in my heart. I seem to recall Nani having a pretty amusing reaction to having his colossi abducted by TLO in a basetrade situation. If someone knows where that game can be seen I shall be eternally grateful. | ||
|
TRaFFiC
Canada1448 Posts
On December 21 2013 04:03 Spektor wrote: Because during a WCS game I care about social and not the playing. When Nerchio loses to Protoss, I want to see his true rage. I want to see him write a paragraph about how the guy should be ashamed to use the imba race. Not just gg. Whether you agree with it or not, this is what gives huge viewer numbers. People love passionate players, not robots. | ||
Shellshock
United States97277 Posts
On December 21 2013 03:57 MonkeyBot wrote: Seconded. I have a guess on what's going on but not sure. Can someone enlighten this noob? [This noob referring to myself, not Greendotz] I think it was right after he lost to Leenock in the DreamHack finals because that's DH boss Robert Ohlen. I could be wrong | ||
|
Fusilero
United Kingdom50293 Posts
On December 21 2013 04:08 TRaFFiC wrote: When Nerchio loses to Protoss, I want to see his true rage. I want to see him write a paragraph about how the guy should be ashamed to use the imba race. Not just gg. Whether you agree with it or not, this is what gives huge viewer numbers. People love passionate players, not robots. To be fair nerchio does a pretty good job letting out the balance whine in the LR anyway  | ||
Zealously
East Gorteau22261 Posts
On December 21 2013 04:08 TRaFFiC wrote: When Nerchio loses to Protoss, I want to see his true rage. I want to see him write a paragraph about how the guy should be ashamed to use the imba race. Not just gg. Whether you agree with it or not, this is what gives huge viewer numbers. People love passionate players, not robots. As evidenced by the Blizzcon grand finals, for example. Without all the BM in that match, it wouldn't even have broken 100k viewers. | ||
|
Boucot
France15997 Posts
On December 21 2013 03:57 MonkeyBot wrote: Seconded. I have a guess on what's going on but not sure. Can someone enlighten this noob? [This noob referring to myself, not Greendotz] It was just after his defeat in DH Stockholm finals against Leenock. | ||
|
Squat
Sweden7978 Posts
On December 21 2013 04:10 Zealously wrote: As evidenced by the Blizzcon grand finals, for example. Without all the BM in that match, it wouldn't even have broken 100k viewers. But if that had been Nerchio raging after every game it would have been 200k, guaranteed. Maybe have an emote system like in WoW. Nerchio spits on you. | ||
|
Schelim
Austria11528 Posts
| ||
|
AlternativeEgo
Sweden17309 Posts
On December 21 2013 03:57 MonkeyBot wrote: Seconded. I have a guess on what's going on but not sure. Can someone enlighten this noob? [This noob referring to myself, not Greendotz] It's just the boss of Dreamhack giving homeboy Naniwa some comfort. I think it's from DH Stockholm when he got second place but I'm not sure. Edit: And while and thought about it Shell fired away, ofc | ||
|
Karis Vas Ryaar
United States4396 Posts
| ||
|
Zealously
East Gorteau22261 Posts
On December 21 2013 04:13 Schelim wrote: if you look at these rules and really think about the WCS tournaments of 2013, you'll realize that hardly anything will change. in fact, it will probably be MORE fun because now Naniwa will not only say something stupid, he will also get fined for it and then say something stupid about how the rules are stupid because he got fined for saying something stupid. i welcome the replay thing, i don't think watching a replay helps much in MOST cases anyways, and the amount of downtime in most sc2 tournaments has been ridiculous to the point where i have often just stopped watching in the middle of a tournament. The replay rule was, according to Adebisi (stated in this thread) already a thing in WCS this year, so it's not actually something new. | ||
| ||
