|
Interesting thought...
Perhaps Blizzard are aware of this chap hacking and are going to publicly deal with him upon arrival to the event.
It is not a criminal offence to break an EULA, but they can sue your ass. And what better way to corner a known hacker than by paying for him to walk up to the gallows and tie the noose himself.
I can envision it now... "And please welcome to the stage; Zack! And now lets talk to Zack for the pre match interview: here are your court orders, you're served, son". Epic moment in e-Sports history! Kid gets sued for millions because he hacked in a game! Pretty effective deterrent if you ask me!
|
On June 06 2012 17:01 goste wrote:
Interesting thought...
Perhaps Blizzard are aware of this chap hacking and are going to publicly deal with him upon arrival to the event.
It is not a criminal offence to break an EULA, but they can sue your ass. And what better way to corner a known hacker than by paying for him to walk up to the gallows and tie the noose himself.
I can envision it now... "And please welcome to the stage; Zack! And now lets talk to Zack for the pre match interview: here are your court orders, you're served, son". Epic moment in e-Sports history! Kid gets sued for millions because he hacked in a game! Pretty effective deterrent if you ask me!
... Cost of plane ticket and hotel <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< cost of attorneys retained by a major company
Nobody in their right mind would sink thousands into sueing a tween for violating the terms of service of their video game
... With the exception of the RIAA or MPAA of course ...
|
You guys should let VP faith play in this tournamnet instead of this hacka, he doesnt' need plane ticket just needs an entrance in
|
another obvious hacker, good job OP, it's nice to see people in the community going out of there way to catch and document these losers
|
On June 06 2012 17:10 mememolly wrote:
another obvious hacker, good job OP, it's nice to see people in the community going out of there way to catch and document these losers
Correction; an obvious hacker, not another.
This is the first time anyone has presented definitive proof to back up their accusations.
|
On June 06 2012 17:15 toiletCAT wrote:Show nested quote +On June 06 2012 17:10 mememolly wrote:
another obvious hacker, good job OP, it's nice to see people in the community going out of there way to catch and document these losers Correction; an obvious hacker, not another. This is the first time I've seen anyone present definitive proof to back up their accusations.
You haven't been reading SC2 general much lately have you ?
|
First Impa, then Spades, now Zack. Who will be our next victim?
|
On June 06 2012 17:17 Geiko wrote:Show nested quote +On June 06 2012 17:15 toiletCAT wrote:On June 06 2012 17:10 mememolly wrote:
another obvious hacker, good job OP, it's nice to see people in the community going out of there way to catch and document these losers Correction; an obvious hacker, not another. This is the first time I've seen anyone present definitive proof to back up their accusations. You haven't been reading SC2 general much lately have you ?
I was refering to the Spades episode, considering all the personal hate mememolly has going on lately. There was no proof to back up the accusations against Spades, the opening post includes definitive proof for the accusations against this particular user. There's a big difference, in case you haven't noticed.
|
On June 06 2012 17:17 Geiko wrote:Show nested quote +On June 06 2012 17:15 toiletCAT wrote:On June 06 2012 17:10 mememolly wrote:
another obvious hacker, good job OP, it's nice to see people in the community going out of there way to catch and document these losers Correction; an obvious hacker, not another. This is the first time I've seen anyone present definitive proof to back up their accusations. You haven't been reading SC2 general much lately have you ?
He's basically been trolling around with a new account since yesterday...
|
On June 06 2012 17:23 ZenithM wrote:Show nested quote +On June 06 2012 17:17 Geiko wrote:On June 06 2012 17:15 toiletCAT wrote:On June 06 2012 17:10 mememolly wrote:
another obvious hacker, good job OP, it's nice to see people in the community going out of there way to catch and document these losers Correction; an obvious hacker, not another. This is the first time I've seen anyone present definitive proof to back up their accusations. You haven't been reading SC2 general much lately have you ? He's basically been trolling around with a new account since yesterday...
New account? Trolling?
Please elaborate, I've been very serious about this topic and if you think I've been trolling, then there's something you deliberately misunderstand.
|
On June 06 2012 17:17 Adonminus wrote:
First Impa, then Spades, now Zack. Who will be our next victim?
Is victim really the right word to use?
|
On June 06 2012 17:25 terran0330 wrote:Show nested quote +On June 06 2012 17:17 Adonminus wrote:
First Impa, then Spades, now Zack. Who will be our next victim? Is victim really the right word to use?
We as fair players and spectators are the victims and especially the guy who is number 65 and didnt qualify for this event because of this hacker.
|
That's why you don't use the blizzard Ladder as a tool for invites. Proper Qualifier >> all.
|
On June 06 2012 17:25 toiletCAT wrote:Show nested quote +On June 06 2012 17:23 ZenithM wrote:On June 06 2012 17:17 Geiko wrote:On June 06 2012 17:15 toiletCAT wrote:On June 06 2012 17:10 mememolly wrote:
another obvious hacker, good job OP, it's nice to see people in the community going out of there way to catch and document these losers Correction; an obvious hacker, not another. This is the first time I've seen anyone present definitive proof to back up their accusations. You haven't been reading SC2 general much lately have you ? He's basically been trolling around with a new account since yesterday... New account? Trolling? Please elaborate, I've been very serious about this topic and if you think I've been trolling, then there's something you deliberately misunderstand.
Joined TL.net Wednesday, 6th of June 2012
=> "new account"
|
On June 06 2012 17:25 terran0330 wrote:Show nested quote +On June 06 2012 17:17 Adonminus wrote:
First Impa, then Spades, now Zack. Who will be our next victim? Is victim really the right word to use?
don't mind that guy, he was just yesterday braging in "season7 lock" thread how he's bored of having 1500pts and expects promotion to GM, and then somebody looked him up and turns out he's just another mid-masters player
so no wonder liar defends liars...
|
1001 YEARS KESPAJAIL22272 Posts
On June 06 2012 17:25 terran0330 wrote:Show nested quote +On June 06 2012 17:17 Adonminus wrote:
First Impa, then Spades, now Zack. Who will be our next victim? Is victim really the right word to use?
It actually is, because the word victim does not denote innocence, correctness, or faultlessness. A victim is "one that is acted on and usually adversely affected by a force or agent". So yes they are indeed victims of the esports mob. Whether they deserve or not is not included in his statement.
|
On June 06 2012 17:30 ZenithM wrote:Show nested quote +On June 06 2012 17:25 toiletCAT wrote:On June 06 2012 17:23 ZenithM wrote:On June 06 2012 17:17 Geiko wrote:On June 06 2012 17:15 toiletCAT wrote:On June 06 2012 17:10 mememolly wrote:
another obvious hacker, good job OP, it's nice to see people in the community going out of there way to catch and document these losers Correction; an obvious hacker, not another. This is the first time I've seen anyone present definitive proof to back up their accusations. You haven't been reading SC2 general much lately have you ? He's basically been trolling around with a new account since yesterday... New account? Trolling? Please elaborate, I've been very serious about this topic and if you think I've been trolling, then there's something you deliberately misunderstand. => "new account"
trolling around with a new accoun
It would seem that you are the one trolling.
Sorry, not going to waste my time on you, buddy.
|
On June 06 2012 17:17 Adonminus wrote:
First Impa, then Spades, now Zack. Who will be our next victim?
It's funny how you use the word victim. By your logic Osama Bin Laden, Joseph Fritzl and Adolf Hitler would also be "victims"?
I didn't watch any of the Spades, Impa or Zack replays and you can never be 100% sure of people hacking, but the opinions and reasoning of professional players and the behavior of Spades in Spades-case convinces me about hacking.
No love for hackers
|
On June 06 2012 17:34 Ogww wrote:Show nested quote +On June 06 2012 17:17 Adonminus wrote:
First Impa, then Spades, now Zack. Who will be our next victim? It's funny how you use the word victim. By your logic Osama Bin Laden, Joseph Fritzl and Adolf Hitler would also be "victims"? I didn't watch any of the Spades, Impa or Zack replays and you can never be 100% sure of people hacking, but the opinions and reasoning of professional players and the behavior of Spades in Spades-case convinces me about hacking. No love for hackers
Except from the tiny difference that there's proof for Zack's actions, there's no proof, as of yet, for Spades' actions, and I don't know about the episode with Impa.
|
Wow that just shows me that hackers can be very very very stupid.. lucky for us.
This dude desserve nothing than hate. And a lesson in pride and honor.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
