• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 21:53
CET 02:53
KST 10:53
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL22] Finals Preview: Sweet Victory!9[ASL22] Ro4 Preview: Mirror Mirror6[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: Within Reach5[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: In A Tizzy11[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Holy Diver5
Community News
Evil Geniuses - shutting down14ISSL (IntoTheTV x SOOP SC2 League): Premier5Weekly Cups (October 12-18): 5.0.17 era begins1[$1250] International ShieldBattery League74Weekly Cups (October 5-11): Farewell to 5.0.167
StarCraft 2
General
How do you feel about the mass reverts in the 5.0.17 PTR? REPORT: StarCraft 2: Remastered In Development Team Liquid Map Contest #22: Results and Winners No more SC2 streamers on team liquid? Evil Geniuses - shutting down
Tourneys
ScienceCraft (October 24-25) - Live Event Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament RSL goes to London! 2026 Offline Finals Nov 21-22 ISSL (IntoTheTV x SOOP SC2 League): Premier WORTEX Challenger Series — Open SC2 LAN in Budapes
Strategy
[H] ZvP Mid-Late Game: Stalkers Collossi HT
Custom Maps
[G] How to playtest arcade maps [A] Nemrods 1/4 players [M] (2) Sweltering Sands
External Content
Mutation # 549 Endless Sparkles The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 548 Shining Bright Mutation # 547 Temple Of Terror
Brood War
General
Oceanic Brood War - Join and chat! Bot on ladder BW General Discussion Recent recommended BW games Sagi.gg Launcher Released
Tourneys
[$1250] International ShieldBattery League [ASL22] Grand Finals [BSL23] RO24 Group C Small VOD Thread 2.0
Strategy
Cliff Jump Revisited (1 in a 1000 strategy) 50,000-Word Terran Builds Memo 2026-10-22 Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Mobile Legends: Bang Bang Armies of Exigo - YesYes? General RTS Discussion Thread
Dota 2
Dota 2 Champions League Season 3 Begins April 25!
League of Legends
[TL LoL EUW IHs] Teemo shall perish
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
Reynor Fan Club The Flash Fan Club Serral Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece
Sports
Football (Soccer) Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
Recent Gifted Posts
Blogs
Innovate or Game Over?
TrAiDoS
ShieldBattery on Mac
Kraekkling
[ASL22] Ro4 Day1 Ticket Giv…
bITt.mAN
Can Bots Beat Pros?? Starcr…
namkraft
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 7694 users

Program to resume games from replays - Page 10

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 8 9 10 11 12 39 Next All
elt
Profile Joined July 2010
Thailand1092 Posts
April 13 2012 10:21 GMT
#181
On April 13 2012 19:12 Exempt. wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 13 2012 19:09 DigitalDevil wrote:
On April 13 2012 18:53 Exempt. wrote:
On April 13 2012 15:11 DigitalDevil wrote:
On April 13 2012 15:06 hegeo wrote:
On April 13 2012 15:04 DigitalDevil wrote:
One programmer can do this within such a short span of time and Blizz can't implement something decent for who knows how long?


I'm wondering - did they ever say they couldn't? I don't think so.

Who cares if they ever said they could or couldn't? The fact that it's not implemented speaks for itself, and if it is technically this easy to implement, then there is unlikely to be good justification to not have it implemented. Blizz is either lazy or incompetent.


it's not incompetence. Stop being ignorant. Go learn some basics of computer science so you have some common sense on the issue or don't post.

Did you completely miss the posts I made further in the thread?


What, did you contradict yourself later? If so my mistake for calling you out, otherwise it doesn't matter. It's a highly silly viewpoint to think blizzard couldn't write code to do the same thing if they wanted to.

Anyways on a side note I'm not detracting from the OP, like I said earlier it's impressive that he wrote it.

Pathetic that there can't be a thread without fucking blizzard bashing.


I use to hold back from Blizzard bashing, but in this case a little is called for. If they had written the game in a way that made this hard/impossible to implement then sure. What the guy proves is that it's possible in the framework of the game to do it.

The bashing comes from the fact that compared to LoL, DotA2 (I don't know about HoN) a disconnected player means a pause until the other player can reconnect, not a massive black stain against the finals of a major tournament which induces a couple of hundred pages of ranting, hate, bashing, ambiguity and throws the legitimacy of a result in doubt.
(Under Construction)
Exempt.
Profile Joined May 2011
United States470 Posts
April 13 2012 10:23 GMT
#182
On April 13 2012 19:15 kayrice wrote:
Show nested quote +
I dunno


Answer I was expecting. Maybe you should stop trying to have a logical discussion considering you have no viewpoint?


Seems someones jealous that they spent 10 years in school and lack any talent in the actual field.

You obviously have zero experience with applying your knowledge. So your viewpoint is worthless. Sad when a typical graduate has such unsound rationality, but I guess it's expected to have an influx of those individuals in an ever growing field.

Obviously if blizzard wrote the code it would only take them a few days in writing the same thing. They would continue to spend 10x+ that amount of time making sure it's perfect, because anything else would be under their standard. Your lack of understanding of this basic concept in programming tells me your degree is fallacious in nature.
DigitalDevil
Profile Joined October 2011
219 Posts
April 13 2012 10:25 GMT
#183
On April 13 2012 19:12 Exempt. wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 13 2012 19:09 DigitalDevil wrote:
On April 13 2012 18:53 Exempt. wrote:
On April 13 2012 15:11 DigitalDevil wrote:
On April 13 2012 15:06 hegeo wrote:
On April 13 2012 15:04 DigitalDevil wrote:
One programmer can do this within such a short span of time and Blizz can't implement something decent for who knows how long?


I'm wondering - did they ever say they couldn't? I don't think so.

Who cares if they ever said they could or couldn't? The fact that it's not implemented speaks for itself, and if it is technically this easy to implement, then there is unlikely to be good justification to not have it implemented. Blizz is either lazy or incompetent.


it's not incompetence. Stop being ignorant. Go learn some basics of computer science so you have some common sense on the issue or don't post.

Did you completely miss the posts I made further in the thread?


What, did you contradict yourself later? If so my mistake for calling you out, otherwise it doesn't matter. It's a highly silly viewpoint to think blizzard couldn't write code to do the same thing if they wanted to.

Anyways on a side note I'm not detracting from the OP, like I said earlier it's impressive that he wrote it.

Pathetic that there can't be a thread without fucking blizzard bashing.

Are you trying to troll? If anything, my later posts contradict your initial claim. And I clearly said Blizzard is either lazy or incompetent. They can be skillfully competent and lazy for all I know. What I do know is that someone created a proof of concept clearly showing how simple and feasible it is. On the other hand, convince me that Blizzard's decision making is perfect and all knowing.
Switchy
Profile Joined June 2011
343 Posts
April 13 2012 10:29 GMT
#184
On April 13 2012 19:25 DigitalDevil wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 13 2012 19:12 Exempt. wrote:
On April 13 2012 19:09 DigitalDevil wrote:
On April 13 2012 18:53 Exempt. wrote:
On April 13 2012 15:11 DigitalDevil wrote:
On April 13 2012 15:06 hegeo wrote:
On April 13 2012 15:04 DigitalDevil wrote:
One programmer can do this within such a short span of time and Blizz can't implement something decent for who knows how long?


I'm wondering - did they ever say they couldn't? I don't think so.

Who cares if they ever said they could or couldn't? The fact that it's not implemented speaks for itself, and if it is technically this easy to implement, then there is unlikely to be good justification to not have it implemented. Blizz is either lazy or incompetent.


it's not incompetence. Stop being ignorant. Go learn some basics of computer science so you have some common sense on the issue or don't post.

Did you completely miss the posts I made further in the thread?


What, did you contradict yourself later? If so my mistake for calling you out, otherwise it doesn't matter. It's a highly silly viewpoint to think blizzard couldn't write code to do the same thing if they wanted to.

Anyways on a side note I'm not detracting from the OP, like I said earlier it's impressive that he wrote it.

Pathetic that there can't be a thread without fucking blizzard bashing.

Are you trying to troll? If anything, my later posts contradict your initial claim. And I clearly said Blizzard is either lazy or incompetent. They can be skillfully competent and lazy for all I know. What I do know is that someone created a proof of concept clearly showing how simple and feasible it is. On the other hand, convince me that Blizzard's decision making is perfect and all knowing.



There are some other options, maybe they just chose not to include this feature. Maybe this feature is on the bottom of their priorities. When developing software its not exactly easy to deal with all requirements and keep everyone happy.
Exempt.
Profile Joined May 2011
United States470 Posts
April 13 2012 10:29 GMT
#185
On April 13 2012 19:25 DigitalDevil wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 13 2012 19:12 Exempt. wrote:
On April 13 2012 19:09 DigitalDevil wrote:
On April 13 2012 18:53 Exempt. wrote:
On April 13 2012 15:11 DigitalDevil wrote:
On April 13 2012 15:06 hegeo wrote:
On April 13 2012 15:04 DigitalDevil wrote:
One programmer can do this within such a short span of time and Blizz can't implement something decent for who knows how long?


I'm wondering - did they ever say they couldn't? I don't think so.

Who cares if they ever said they could or couldn't? The fact that it's not implemented speaks for itself, and if it is technically this easy to implement, then there is unlikely to be good justification to not have it implemented. Blizz is either lazy or incompetent.


it's not incompetence. Stop being ignorant. Go learn some basics of computer science so you have some common sense on the issue or don't post.

Did you completely miss the posts I made further in the thread?


What, did you contradict yourself later? If so my mistake for calling you out, otherwise it doesn't matter. It's a highly silly viewpoint to think blizzard couldn't write code to do the same thing if they wanted to.

Anyways on a side note I'm not detracting from the OP, like I said earlier it's impressive that he wrote it.

Pathetic that there can't be a thread without fucking blizzard bashing.

Are you trying to troll? If anything, my later posts contradict your initial claim. And I clearly said Blizzard is either lazy or incompetent. They can be skillfully competent and lazy for all I know. What I do know is that someone created a proof of concept clearly showing how simple and feasible it is. On the other hand, convince me that Blizzard's decision making is perfect and all knowing.


Here's blizzard's decision making buddy: Make money.

They do that by making HOTS and Blizzard Dota. Not from implementing random features. Should be pretty straightforward.
kayrice
Profile Joined April 2012
United States17 Posts
April 13 2012 10:29 GMT
#186
Seems someones jealous that they spent 10 years in school and lack any talent in the actual field.


You don't notice that you've slowly given up any logical position and incrementally translated into attacking me personally? I would be offended if it wasn't so transparent.

You obviously have zero experience with applying your knowledge. So your viewpoint is worthless. Sad when a typical graduate has such unsound rationality, but I guess it's expected to have an influx of those individuals in an ever growing field.


Nice. You don't even know what field I'm in, and assume I have never applied my knowledge in this unknown field. You haven't backed anything up or held a rational opinion at all - you just say your right and others are wrong and then bash them.

Obviously if blizzard wrote the code it would only take them a few days in writing the same thing


Exhibited by them implementing it within the last 2 years of the game...
This sentence you are reading is false
DigitalDevil
Profile Joined October 2011
219 Posts
April 13 2012 10:31 GMT
#187
On April 13 2012 19:29 Switchy wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 13 2012 19:25 DigitalDevil wrote:
On April 13 2012 19:12 Exempt. wrote:
On April 13 2012 19:09 DigitalDevil wrote:
On April 13 2012 18:53 Exempt. wrote:
On April 13 2012 15:11 DigitalDevil wrote:
On April 13 2012 15:06 hegeo wrote:
On April 13 2012 15:04 DigitalDevil wrote:
One programmer can do this within such a short span of time and Blizz can't implement something decent for who knows how long?


I'm wondering - did they ever say they couldn't? I don't think so.

Who cares if they ever said they could or couldn't? The fact that it's not implemented speaks for itself, and if it is technically this easy to implement, then there is unlikely to be good justification to not have it implemented. Blizz is either lazy or incompetent.


it's not incompetence. Stop being ignorant. Go learn some basics of computer science so you have some common sense on the issue or don't post.

Did you completely miss the posts I made further in the thread?


What, did you contradict yourself later? If so my mistake for calling you out, otherwise it doesn't matter. It's a highly silly viewpoint to think blizzard couldn't write code to do the same thing if they wanted to.

Anyways on a side note I'm not detracting from the OP, like I said earlier it's impressive that he wrote it.

Pathetic that there can't be a thread without fucking blizzard bashing.

Are you trying to troll? If anything, my later posts contradict your initial claim. And I clearly said Blizzard is either lazy or incompetent. They can be skillfully competent and lazy for all I know. What I do know is that someone created a proof of concept clearly showing how simple and feasible it is. On the other hand, convince me that Blizzard's decision making is perfect and all knowing.



There are some other options, maybe they just chose not to include this feature. Maybe this feature is on the bottom of their priorities. When developing software its not exactly easy to deal with all requirements and keep everyone happy.

Hence why I also implied in a previous post that incompetence can be extended to decision making.
AysiktiriX
Profile Joined June 2011
358 Posts
April 13 2012 10:31 GMT
#188
Dare I say, someone needs to be "exempted" from this thread, before it goes even more offtopic, thanks to his trolling?
Roflhaxx
Profile Joined April 2010
Korea (South)1244 Posts
April 13 2012 10:32 GMT
#189
On April 13 2012 19:13 Exempt. wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 13 2012 19:11 kayrice wrote:
you really think blizzard is too incompetent to write this?


Judging by the high demand and lack of implementation with the abundance of resources, what would you classify it as other than incompetence?


I dunno Mr. Master's degree, enlighten a poor undergraduate CS student such as myself since you seem to know so much more than one of the largest gaming companies.

You are obviously either looking for a fight or just..I dont even know to be honest, you'd need a doctor to look at you at least. What he is saying is that it is incompetent of them to implement this. NOT that they are not ABLE to! How hard is that to understand?
A game where the first thing you do is scout with a “worker”. Does that make any sense? Who scouts with a “worker”? That’s like sending out the janitor to perform recon, what general would do that? Retarded game.
TheAmazombie
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
United States3714 Posts
April 13 2012 10:33 GMT
#190
Hey, weren't we talking about this tool and what it does and/or how it works? While I am not trying it, I am excited for the possibilities of it. Anyone found any bugs or issues as of yet?
We think too much and feel too little. More than machinery, we need humanity. More than cleverness, we need kindness and gentleness. Without these qualities, life will be violent and all will be lost. -Charlie Chaplin
bgx
Profile Joined August 2010
Poland6595 Posts
April 13 2012 10:35 GMT
#191
On April 13 2012 19:29 Exempt. wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 13 2012 19:25 DigitalDevil wrote:
On April 13 2012 19:12 Exempt. wrote:
On April 13 2012 19:09 DigitalDevil wrote:
On April 13 2012 18:53 Exempt. wrote:
On April 13 2012 15:11 DigitalDevil wrote:
On April 13 2012 15:06 hegeo wrote:
On April 13 2012 15:04 DigitalDevil wrote:
One programmer can do this within such a short span of time and Blizz can't implement something decent for who knows how long?


I'm wondering - did they ever say they couldn't? I don't think so.

Who cares if they ever said they could or couldn't? The fact that it's not implemented speaks for itself, and if it is technically this easy to implement, then there is unlikely to be good justification to not have it implemented. Blizz is either lazy or incompetent.


it's not incompetence. Stop being ignorant. Go learn some basics of computer science so you have some common sense on the issue or don't post.

Did you completely miss the posts I made further in the thread?


What, did you contradict yourself later? If so my mistake for calling you out, otherwise it doesn't matter. It's a highly silly viewpoint to think blizzard couldn't write code to do the same thing if they wanted to.

Anyways on a side note I'm not detracting from the OP, like I said earlier it's impressive that he wrote it.

Pathetic that there can't be a thread without fucking blizzard bashing.

Are you trying to troll? If anything, my later posts contradict your initial claim. And I clearly said Blizzard is either lazy or incompetent. They can be skillfully competent and lazy for all I know. What I do know is that someone created a proof of concept clearly showing how simple and feasible it is. On the other hand, convince me that Blizzard's decision making is perfect and all knowing.


Here's blizzard's decision making buddy: Make money.

They do that by making HOTS and Blizzard Dota. Not from implementing random features. Should be pretty straightforward.

So call them greedy but not incompetent and settle it ok? Useless discussion.
Stork[gm]
Gingerninja
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
United Kingdom1339 Posts
April 13 2012 10:35 GMT
#192
On April 13 2012 19:01 maartendq wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 13 2012 14:34 Gorkon wrote:
Using an unauthorized program would probably incur a Bnet ban, so I'll just wait until Blizzard creates their own similar feature. Good idea, though. Sins of a Solar Empire has a feature that lets you resume multi-player games, and it works quite well. I'm sure Blizzard is working on it.

Even Age of Empires had a save function for multiplayer games.. It's nothing new really.


Holy shit.. yes it did! Even the star wars knock off based on the same engine (galactic battlegrounds) let you save a multiplayer game mid way through, and come back to it later on.
戦いの中に答えはある
NeMeSiS3
Profile Blog Joined February 2012
Canada2972 Posts
April 13 2012 10:35 GMT
#193
On April 13 2012 14:29 Soft`Soap wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 13 2012 14:22 zhurai wrote:
On April 13 2012 14:09 Soft`Soap wrote:
I think that putting a link to download hacks is against the tl.net code
I think that leaving your findings is fine, but you should probably delete the download links.

there are multiple meanings of "hack" you know.


It's still a 3rd party program that Blizzard doesn't approve of


I'm sorry, how do you know they don't approve? They approve of other third parties like stronger team colour... This isn't harming anyone, relax.
FoTG fighting!
DigitalDevil
Profile Joined October 2011
219 Posts
April 13 2012 10:35 GMT
#194
On April 13 2012 19:29 Exempt. wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 13 2012 19:25 DigitalDevil wrote:
On April 13 2012 19:12 Exempt. wrote:
On April 13 2012 19:09 DigitalDevil wrote:
On April 13 2012 18:53 Exempt. wrote:
On April 13 2012 15:11 DigitalDevil wrote:
On April 13 2012 15:06 hegeo wrote:
On April 13 2012 15:04 DigitalDevil wrote:
One programmer can do this within such a short span of time and Blizz can't implement something decent for who knows how long?


I'm wondering - did they ever say they couldn't? I don't think so.

Who cares if they ever said they could or couldn't? The fact that it's not implemented speaks for itself, and if it is technically this easy to implement, then there is unlikely to be good justification to not have it implemented. Blizz is either lazy or incompetent.


it's not incompetence. Stop being ignorant. Go learn some basics of computer science so you have some common sense on the issue or don't post.

Did you completely miss the posts I made further in the thread?


What, did you contradict yourself later? If so my mistake for calling you out, otherwise it doesn't matter. It's a highly silly viewpoint to think blizzard couldn't write code to do the same thing if they wanted to.

Anyways on a side note I'm not detracting from the OP, like I said earlier it's impressive that he wrote it.

Pathetic that there can't be a thread without fucking blizzard bashing.

Are you trying to troll? If anything, my later posts contradict your initial claim. And I clearly said Blizzard is either lazy or incompetent. They can be skillfully competent and lazy for all I know. What I do know is that someone created a proof of concept clearly showing how simple and feasible it is. On the other hand, convince me that Blizzard's decision making is perfect and all knowing.


Here's blizzard's decision making buddy: Make money.

They do that by making HOTS and Blizzard Dota. Not from implementing random features. Should be pretty straightforward.

It's not a random feature. It's important to the community and to the legitimacy of the sport as evidenced by the public outrage. Are you somehow religiously committed to anything Blizzard does? Can Blizzard do anything wrong?
kayrice
Profile Joined April 2012
United States17 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-04-13 10:39:14
April 13 2012 10:38 GMT
#195
I would say this feature does qualify as a monetary interest. Obviously Blizzard has resources they are utilizing on SC2: WoL as they make changes to the game still with frequency. They work closely and have an interest in the competitive scene which has been effected by this. I'm not trying to bash Blizzard, but when they drop the ball you have to be honest and call it like you see it.
This sentence you are reading is false
Exempt.
Profile Joined May 2011
United States470 Posts
April 13 2012 10:38 GMT
#196
On April 13 2012 19:32 Roflhaxx wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 13 2012 19:13 Exempt. wrote:
On April 13 2012 19:11 kayrice wrote:
you really think blizzard is too incompetent to write this?


Judging by the high demand and lack of implementation with the abundance of resources, what would you classify it as other than incompetence?


I dunno Mr. Master's degree, enlighten a poor undergraduate CS student such as myself since you seem to know so much more than one of the largest gaming companies.

You are obviously either looking for a fight or just..I dont even know to be honest, you'd need a doctor to look at you at least. What he is saying is that it is incompetent of them to implement this. NOT that they are not ABLE to! How hard is that to understand?


Yeah I need a doctor because I'm willing to defend a gaming company that has proven themselves over the past 20 years over posters who say they "know" what they're talking about.

What ignorance, I can't see how game developers put up with it. It's probably why they don't waste time trying to please the community coding these types of things.
brachester
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
Australia1786 Posts
April 13 2012 10:40 GMT
#197
It's obvious that if one guy can do it, then hundred of professional programmer who are working for one of the biggest gaming company in the world (whom made the game) should be able to implement this feature with no troubles at all. The question is, why aren't they doing it?
I hate all this singing
kayrice
Profile Joined April 2012
United States17 Posts
April 13 2012 10:40 GMT
#198
I never claimed I "know" what I'm talking about. I presented logical arguments that reinforce my position. I could see how you arrived at the conclusion I know what I'm talking about though and thanks for the freudian complement.
This sentence you are reading is false
SoundProof
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
Sweden99 Posts
April 13 2012 10:41 GMT
#199
Well this has gotten vile can't we just agree that it is a good thing that should get pushed by the community.
"Jag är för stark helt enkelt"
SoundProof
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
Sweden99 Posts
April 13 2012 10:43 GMT
#200
I wouldn't recommend using it atm, but it's a great thing it was made so props to the OP.
"Jag är för stark helt enkelt"
Prev 1 8 9 10 11 12 39 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 9h 7m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
RuFF_SC2 169
StarCraft: Brood War
Rain 2114
GuemChi 1440
Artosis 667
Light 159
ProTech152
Terrorterran 14
Force[name] 4
Dota 2
monkeys_forever429
NeuroSwarm241
League of Legends
Doublelift5029
JimRising 709
Trikslyr49
Counter-Strike
taco 218
Super Smash Bros
hungrybox331
Other Games
summit1g10717
shahzam608
C9.Mang0325
PiGStarcraft262
Maynarde109
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick1191
[ Show 11 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• RyuSc2 26
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• Azhi_Dahaki14
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Other Games
• Scarra1041
Upcoming Events
IntoTheTV X SOOP
9h 7m
ByuN vs Lambo
MaxPax vs Bunny
PiGosaur Cup
22h 7m
The PondCast
1d 8h
Kung Fu Cup
1d 9h
IntoTheTV X SOOP
2 days
SHIN vs GuMiho
Clem vs Classic
OSC
2 days
WardiTV Invitational
3 days
GSL
3 days
Epic.LAN
3 days
Replay Cast
3 days
[ Show More ]
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
Epic.LAN
4 days
Yamato Cup
5 days
Map Test Tournament
5 days
WardiTV Weekly
6 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Rogue vs Classic
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Acropolis #5 - GSC
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
HCC Season 3

Ongoing

Acropolis #5
KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 4
ShieldBattery League 1
BSL Season 23
PGL Masters Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 5
1win Private Club #2
Thunderpick World Champ. '26
ESL Pro League Season 24
Stake Ranked Episode 4
1win Private Club #1
Logitech G Play Connect 2026
SL StarSeries Fall 2026
FISSURE Playground #3
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026

Upcoming

IPSL Winter 2026-27
SC4ALL II: Brood War
BSL 23: Non-Korean Championship
HSC XXX
Stellar Fest 2: Lunar Cup
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
RSL Offline Finals
eXTREMESLAND 2026
PGL Major Singapore 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 6
BLAST Rivals Fall 2026
IEM Beijing 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.