| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
Snake.69
Canada140 Posts
Hint: In ZvT lately i tend to favor double evo upgrades mass ling infestor into ultra ling infestor, sometimes broodlords. I just dont like the weakness of mutas in a 1:1 brute force battle, and i hate the lack of mobility of freakin broodlords. In ZvP, most of the time i favor muta plays with static defense expand all over the place mid game into a huge tech switch into lots of broodlords, sometimes ultra lings. In ZvZ; i make units and expand. lulz | ||
|
skatbone
United States1005 Posts
On February 14 2012 06:22 Superouman wrote: Me gusta edit: they could at least fix the lightings on the preview picture, it takes 5 seconds -.- Congrats, Dude! Been playing customs on Cloud Kingdom and loving it so far. | ||
|
onPHYRE
Bulgaria923 Posts
| ||
|
Zaphid
Czech Republic1860 Posts
On February 14 2012 08:15 Snake.69 wrote: What do you guys think i should veto as a zerg? Hint: In ZvT lately i tend to favor double evo upgrades mass ling infestor into ultra ling infestor, sometimes broodlords. I just dont like the weakness of mutas in a 1:1 brute force battle, and i hate the lack of mobility of freakin broodlords. In ZvP, most of the time i favor muta plays with static defense expand all over the place mid game into a huge tech switch into lots of broodlords, sometimes ultra lings. In ZvZ; i make units and expand. lulz Whatever you are sick of, I wouldn't look into the balance numbers much yet. The magic of new maps is that you get to try new stuff. | ||
|
Kieds
Chile116 Posts
On February 14 2012 08:15 Snake.69 wrote: What do you guys think i should veto as a zerg? Hint: In ZvT lately i tend to favor double evo upgrades mass ling infestor into ultra ling infestor, sometimes broodlords. I just dont like the weakness of mutas in a 1:1 brute force battle, and i hate the lack of mobility of freakin broodlords. In ZvP, most of the time i favor muta plays with static defense expand all over the place mid game into a huge tech switch into lots of broodlords, sometimes ultra lings. In ZvZ; i make units and expand. lulz I'll veto Shattered Temple, Shakuras plateu and Entombed valley. | ||
|
Badfatpanda
United States9719 Posts
| ||
|
KimJongChill
United States6429 Posts
On February 14 2012 08:33 Kieds wrote: I'll veto Shattered Temple, Shakuras plateu and Entombed valley. I'm vetoing antiga, metalopolis. Third will probably be Korhal (don't like the looks of it, is it any good?), entombed, or shattered. | ||
|
XiGua
Sweden3085 Posts
GM here I come... | ||
|
-TesteR-
Canada1165 Posts
On February 14 2012 06:55 Whitewing wrote: Ouch, Korhal is terrible PvZ. how so? | ||
|
bokchoi
Korea (South)9498 Posts
| ||
|
steelcurtain09
United States87 Posts
| ||
|
namste
Finland2292 Posts
 Still would've preferred that Daybreak over any other map, but hey it wasn't in any map making competitions so what are you gonna do.  | ||
|
zyce
United States649 Posts
| ||
|
MercilessMonkey
Canada150 Posts
| ||
|
Xivsa
United States1009 Posts
On February 14 2012 08:46 KimJongChill wrote: I'm vetoing antiga, metalopolis. Third will probably be Korhal (don't like the looks of it, is it any good?), entombed, or shattered. KC is pretty good, actually. The thirds and fourths aren't towards the opponent base; it's reasonable to defend and/or attack them. Good distance between mains as well. I'll be vetoing ST again and Shakuras for the first time. I think I'll leave it at two but I might veto Metal or Entombed if either becomes too annoying, or in the case of Metal too trite. | ||
Whitewing
United States7483 Posts
Expansion is really hard to wall off, making FFE really difficult. Lot of open space too for zerg surrounds too. | ||
|
skatblast
United States784 Posts
| ||
|
Spieltor
327 Posts
On February 14 2012 09:57 Xivsa wrote: KC is pretty good, actually. The thirds and fourths aren't towards the opponent base; it's reasonable to defend and/or attack them. Good distance between mains as well. I'll be vetoing ST again and Shakuras for the first time. I think I'll leave it at two but I might veto Metal or Entombed if either becomes too annoying, or in the case of Metal too trite. exactly, ST and shak are just bad maps for zerg, mostly cause zerg cant put up a siege based on its natural race inferiority, but they're two maps which exacerbate that point. | ||
|
Piledriver
United States1697 Posts
| ||
|
IMBAkorean
Canada835 Posts
is korhal good map? | ||
| ||
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 Counter-Strike Super Smash Bros Other Games |
|
Replay Cast
Replay Cast
The PondCast
OSC
Replay Cast
RSL Revival
OSC
Korean StarCraft League
RSL Revival
BSL
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
