They are an elite group of nerd assassin's.
Assassins creed is based on thorzains play.
Forum Index > SC2 General |
Jisall
United States2054 Posts
They are an elite group of nerd assassin's. Assassins creed is based on thorzains play. | ||
RouaF
France4120 Posts
![]() | ||
Eee
Sweden2712 Posts
On January 28 2012 06:34 LlamaNamedOsama wrote: Show nested quote + On January 28 2012 06:10 Eee wrote: On January 28 2012 06:03 LlamaNamedOsama wrote: These threads are honestly getting kind of tiring...the problem is that they just aren't written that well - and yes, I know it's supposed to humorous, but it just isn't that funny, it's a rather generic of "insert generic hyperbole/standard outrageous claim about strength/sexual appeal/wealthiness/success and briefly skim over players that the OP doesn't know that well." The latter part on skimming over players is particularly annoying, as you'd think it'd at least give writers greater license for creativity, but none is usually demonstrated. It's also worse when it's a generally well-known player (like Hasuobs getting barely three lines at most) but it's obvious that the OP just isn't a player that actually follows the team that in-depth, and is just making the thread to bandwagon/mimic the current trend. It takes more than three sentences of that generic formula to make a writeup imo. Either input some somewhat serious analysis, or at least have some small semblence of creativity - for instance, the "Romance of the Three Kingdoms-esque" theme in that one thread about MMA and DRG. Do you think the majority would prefer (and even bother reading?) an in-depth analysis of the team? I dont really think so. But yes you have a point. People wouldnt take me serious if i wrote an analysis, because I'm nobody, even if were a GM on all servers if wouldnt matter because that doesnt make me a qualified person according to the vocal majority. It doesn't even have to be a serious analysis - just some originality/greater effort in such a thread would be enough ^^. This is, of course, not to single you out - this has pretty much been a problem with all of these ttypes of threads, and it's great that you have the enthusiasm for showing such support. Also, I think you're overly concerned about "not being qualified," I've never seen such a thread criticized because the author is "not qualified," as long as you make substantive statements and provide evidence/reasoning you'd be fine - people will inevitably disagree, but only because it is natural to have differing opinions. I guess you're right. ![]() | ||
DKR
United Kingdom622 Posts
| ||
Eee
Sweden2712 Posts
On January 28 2012 06:47 DKR wrote: This is pretty poor :/ these copy cat team run downs seem to be getting worse and worse IMO Sorry man! | ||
VirgilSC2
United States6151 Posts
I'm sorry guys. | ||
HolydaKing
21253 Posts
On January 28 2012 06:51 VirgilSC2 wrote: God, I started something horrible in the SC2 General forum. I'm sorry guys. no it's actually fine. some teams deserve these threads. i'm fine with it as long as it are just the best ones, like the GSTL teams and mouz/empire/EG/dignitas/fnatic/quantic. as long as those threads are well written i don't see why they shouldn't exist, although others might hate it. i'm pretty sure most of them disappear in some days anyway, as in no one posts in them. | ||
Noocta
France12578 Posts
| ||
SpiZe
Canada3640 Posts
On January 28 2012 06:51 VirgilSC2 wrote: God, I started something horrible in the SC2 General forum. I'm sorry guys. This will never be forgiven. joke joke ![]() | ||
HolydaKing
21253 Posts
edit: yeah do that. the pictures are really well chosen anyway, lol. | ||
Eee
Sweden2712 Posts
On January 28 2012 07:08 HolydaKing wrote: It wasn't really written that bad.. you could've edited it for the better later on. I don't think it was worth deleting it =( Hmm maybe i should change it back and just let i die then. although i do agree with LlamaNamedOsamas posts. | ||
![]()
opterown
![]()
Australia54784 Posts
On January 28 2012 06:51 VirgilSC2 wrote: God, I started something horrible in the SC2 General forum. I'm sorry guys. hey, you complimented my MvP thread... ![]() | ||
xlava
United States676 Posts
definitely a far cry from the others I've seen. hahaha | ||
OFCORPSE
Sweden355 Posts
| ||
Keone
United States812 Posts
![]() This photo... it cannot be real. That face on the right CANNOT BE REAL OMG | ||
dizzy101
Netherlands2066 Posts
| ||
xrapture
United States1644 Posts
| ||
Vadrigar
Bulgaria2379 Posts
On January 28 2012 06:34 LlamaNamedOsama wrote: Show nested quote + On January 28 2012 06:10 Eee wrote: On January 28 2012 06:03 LlamaNamedOsama wrote: These threads are honestly getting kind of tiring...the problem is that they just aren't written that well - and yes, I know it's supposed to humorous, but it just isn't that funny, it's a rather generic of "insert generic hyperbole/standard outrageous claim about strength/sexual appeal/wealthiness/success and briefly skim over players that the OP doesn't know that well." The latter part on skimming over players is particularly annoying, as you'd think it'd at least give writers greater license for creativity, but none is usually demonstrated. It's also worse when it's a generally well-known player (like Hasuobs getting barely three lines at most) but it's obvious that the OP just isn't a player that actually follows the team that in-depth, and is just making the thread to bandwagon/mimic the current trend. It takes more than three sentences of that generic formula to make a writeup imo. Either input some somewhat serious analysis, or at least have some small semblence of creativity - for instance, the "Romance of the Three Kingdoms-esque" theme in that one thread about MMA and DRG. Do you think the majority would prefer (and even bother reading?) an in-depth analysis of the team? I dont really think so. But yes you have a point. People wouldnt take me serious if i wrote an analysis, because I'm nobody, even if were a GM on all servers if wouldnt matter because that doesnt make me a qualified person according to the vocal majority. It doesn't even have to be a serious analysis - just some originality/greater effort in such a thread would be enough ^^. This is, of course, not to single you out - this has pretty much been a problem with all of these ttypes of threads, and it's great that you have the enthusiasm for showing such support. Also, I think you're overly concerned about "not being qualified," I've never seen such a thread criticized because the author is "not qualified," as long as you make substantive statements and provide evidence/reasoning you'd be fine - people will inevitably disagree, but only because it is natural to have differing opinions. Don't be so stuck up. This thread is worth it even if it was only for the pictures. Don't like the thread- don't post in it. When you post you keep it alive longer. Thanks. | ||
TheDougler
Canada8302 Posts
Well done though...I think it's a decent start. | ||
Forgottenfrog
United States1268 Posts
| ||
| ||
![]() StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War League of Legends Counter-Strike Super Smash Bros Other Games Organizations
StarCraft 2 • Berry_CruncH270 StarCraft: Brood War• practicex ![]() • AfreecaTV YouTube • intothetv ![]() • Kozan • IndyKCrew ![]() • LaughNgamezSOOP • Migwel ![]() • sooper7s League of Legends |
Online Event
HupCup
Tenacious Turtle Tussle
Kung Fu Cup
SOOP
Dark vs MaxPax
Replay Cast
PiG Sty Festival
Serral vs MaxPax
ByuN vs Clem
PiG Sty Festival
herO vs Zoun
Classic vs SHIN
The PondCast
[BSL 2025] Weekly
[ Show More ] Online Event
PiG Sty Festival
Sparkling Tuna Cup
Online Event
Wardi Open
WardiTV Qualifier
|
|