EPTWhy Mouz Will Win the NASTL/IPL TAC/and lots of ot - Page 2
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
Bagration
United States18282 Posts
| ||
|
-ReD-
Canada167 Posts
| ||
|
Aterons_toss
Romania1275 Posts
But srsly EU hwating ! | ||
|
Eee
Sweden2712 Posts
On January 28 2012 05:52 -ReD- wrote: Mouz has everything going for them, except a full team. They've got 4 world class players, mana, thorzain, hasu and morrow, and then bigs. Thing is most team leagues are bo9 so they're forced to use bigs a lot. Has this guy ever produced any results? Seems to me they should hire another player (eg has how many members?) and they'd be set. He's pretty strong online but he has nerve issues offline. He's played pretty good in the teamleagues, he managed to beat Ryung and Alicia in last seasons IPL TAC. Edit: Added a link for you. | ||
|
LlamaNamedOsama
United States1900 Posts
| ||
|
p1cKLes
United States342 Posts
| ||
|
Diizzy
United States828 Posts
| ||
|
Pyloss
Germany1515 Posts
I really hope that they wil win all Teamleguaes which are out there! | ||
|
Eee
Sweden2712 Posts
On January 28 2012 06:03 LlamaNamedOsama wrote: These threads are honestly getting kind of tiring...the problem is that they just aren't written that well - and yes, I know it's supposed to humorous, but it just isn't that funny, it's a rather generic of "insert generic hyperbole/standard outrageous claim about strength/sexual appeal/wealthiness/success and briefly skim over players that the OP doesn't know that well." The latter part on skimming over players is particularly annoying, as you'd think it'd at least give writers greater license for creativity, but none is usually demonstrated. It's also worse when it's a generally well-known player (like Hasuobs getting barely three lines at most) but it's obvious that the OP just isn't a player that actually follows the team that in-depth, and is just making the thread to bandwagon/mimic the current trend. It takes more than three sentences of that generic formula to make a writeup imo. Either input some somewhat serious analysis, or at least have some small semblence of creativity - for instance, the "Romance of the Three Kingdoms-esque" theme in that one thread about MMA and DRG. Do you think the majority would prefer (and even bother reading?) an in-depth analysis of the team? I dont really think so. But yes you have a point. People wouldnt take me serious if i wrote an analysis, because I'm nobody, even if were a GM on all servers if wouldnt matter because that doesnt make me a qualified person according to the vocal majority. | ||
|
Gator
United States3432 Posts
| ||
|
LeLfe
France3160 Posts
 | ||
|
cellblock
Sweden206 Posts
| ||
|
Dark supplydepo
Sweden103 Posts
| ||
|
nam nam
Sweden4672 Posts
On January 28 2012 06:21 cellblock wrote: Tbh Mana, Morrow, Thorzain are the only worthy progamers in Mouz. Worthy of what? | ||
|
Elefanto
Switzerland3584 Posts
On January 28 2012 06:10 Eee wrote: Do you think the majority would prefer (and even bother reading?) an in-depth analysis of the team? I dont really think so. But yes you have a point. People wouldnt take me serious if i wrote an analysis, because I'm nobody, even if were a GM on all servers if wouldnt matter because that doesnt make me a qualified person according to the vocal majority. Of course they would, search in the BW forums for these kind of threads, there'll see you well received they are. | ||
|
CounterOrder
Canada457 Posts
[QUOTE]On January 28 2012 06:03 LlamaNamedOsama wrote: Do you think the majority would prefer (and even bother reading?) an in-depth analysis of the team?. [/QUOTE] Yes. These threads suck. Who cares about these teams/players that doesnt know any of this already? Something in-depth would be alot more interesting. Guess im the minority. | ||
|
Vadrigar
Bulgaria2379 Posts
| ||
|
EdouarKiLL
Russian Federation112 Posts
 | ||
|
Eee
Sweden2712 Posts
| ||
|
LlamaNamedOsama
United States1900 Posts
On January 28 2012 06:10 Eee wrote: Do you think the majority would prefer (and even bother reading?) an in-depth analysis of the team? I dont really think so. But yes you have a point. People wouldnt take me serious if i wrote an analysis, because I'm nobody, even if were a GM on all servers if wouldnt matter because that doesnt make me a qualified person according to the vocal majority. It doesn't even have to be a serious analysis - just some originality/greater effort in such a thread would be enough ^^. This is, of course, not to single you out - this has pretty much been a problem with all of these ttypes of threads, and it's great that you have the enthusiasm for showing such support. Also, I think you're overly concerned about "not being qualified," I've never seen such a thread criticized because the author is "not qualified," as long as you make substantive statements and provide evidence/reasoning you'd be fine - people will inevitably disagree, but only because it is natural to have differing opinions. | ||
| ||
