EPTNorth American GM Ladder released. - Page 4
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
Pandain
United States12984 Posts
| ||
|
Omer
Israel442 Posts
| ||
|
Heraklitus
United States553 Posts
On December 28 2011 00:03 Omer wrote: it's bugged, i had pretty high mmr last season playing people like idra ret and others but stopped playing 2 weeks before season locked, my laptop can't play sc2 past t he 5 minute mark so i just joined a game and left it and got promoted to GM, this was my placements There's nothing about this that makes it sound bugged. | ||
|
SyNc`
333 Posts
| ||
|
Omer
Israel442 Posts
On December 28 2011 00:09 OldManZerg wrote: There's nothing about this that makes it sound bugged. i played 0 games in the last 4 weeks, lost my first game, and got placed into GM | ||
|
Hummingb1rd
United States97 Posts
| ||
|
Racer
103 Posts
| ||
|
Zoku
307 Posts
On December 27 2011 23:09 KawaiiRice wrote: pretty sure it's glitched when zilea the headhunter got in gm oo It's funny cause I said the exact same thing. | ||
|
Kireak
Sweden358 Posts
| ||
|
SyNc`
333 Posts
On December 28 2011 00:11 Hummingb1rd wrote: I believe everything is working as planned, besides the fact the system isn't filtering out for 90+ bonus pool. How the 1-0/0-1's are getting in is because their MMRs are higher than the bottom of the original top 200 MMR active players on the server, therefore knocking one of them out. GM isn't supposed to fill up in 3 hours lol, when this happened last time and they kicked over 100 people it took the whole day for the 100-120 slots to just fill up. | ||
|
Heraklitus
United States553 Posts
On December 28 2011 00:11 Omer wrote: i played 0 games in the last 4 weeks, lost my first game, and got placed into GM That doesn't matter. It's based on MMR, and if you were being matched against Idra and Ret, of course you got in. This stuff about having to win your placement match is a myth. It just doesn't work that way. Otherwise if say Idra gets cheesed on his placement match and loses, he doesn't make GM, and that would be silly. | ||
|
FallDownMarigold
United States3710 Posts
On December 27 2011 22:55 Sterling wrote: I'm pretty sure its glitched... I've already played some "GM" who were nowhere near top 200 NA. The entire system sucks obviously. They should just call the top 200 point masters GM, and publish a list once a week with their names, calling them GM. That's far too simple and logical. Given Bnet 2.0, it seems like Blizzard's habit is to overly complicate things that could be easy and efficient. | ||
|
Hummingb1rd
United States97 Posts
| ||
|
HuKPOWA
United States1604 Posts
| ||
|
Omer
Israel442 Posts
On December 28 2011 00:16 OldManZerg wrote: That doesn't matter. It's based on MMR, and if you were being matched against Idra and Ret, of course you got in. This stuff about having to win your placement match is a myth. It just doesn't work that way. Otherwise if say Idra gets cheesed on his placement match and loses, he doesn't make GM, and that would be silly. ill bet you 50$ me and most of the other 1-0 and 0-1s will get kicked out come next week | ||
|
VPCursed
1044 Posts
 | ||
|
MooMooMugi
United States10531 Posts
| ||
|
Specialist
United States803 Posts
On December 28 2011 00:16 OldManZerg wrote: That doesn't matter. It's based on MMR, and if you were being matched against Idra and Ret, of course you got in. This stuff about having to win your placement match is a myth. It just doesn't work that way. Otherwise if say Idra gets cheesed on his placement match and loses, he doesn't make GM, and that would be silly. old argument look at last season's thread | ||
|
Catatonic
United States699 Posts
On December 27 2011 22:19 Darksoldierr wrote: Yes they are, its all about the MMR not about the stat. Though a requirement for GM was to be active :l 0-1 shows the opposite of being active | ||
|
Boyo
United States226 Posts
| ||
| ||
