EPTMLG Pros' Choice Awards - Page 8
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
JohnnyBanana
Canada493 Posts
| ||
|
Spaceneil8
United States317 Posts
| ||
|
gcAviator
New Zealand68 Posts
| ||
|
Moxi
708 Posts
| ||
|
CeriseCherries
6170 Posts
On December 25 2011 10:34 AngryMoose wrote: Why is MC in the most underrated section? He was slumping hard for a bit so maybe thats why... idk don't agree with a lot but it doesnt mean much... | ||
|
MooMooMugi
United States10531 Posts
LOL 1/1/1 wins games :D | ||
|
EtherealDeath
United States8366 Posts
| ||
|
emc
United States3088 Posts
| ||
|
Kralic
Canada2628 Posts
On December 25 2011 15:05 emc wrote: biased that they only have 3 options for each category? like how did those players get chosen? Players ranked in the top 64 in MLG got to vote. They are the top 3 chosen off a list. Like 3 points for a first place vote, 2 points for a second place vote, and 1 point for any other vote. | ||
|
StyLeD
United States2965 Posts
On December 25 2011 09:26 JohnnyBanana wrote: I can't believe you wrote an essay for a trivial poll lol That's hardly an essay. It's a stream of consciousness (or wall of text), and when you can write multiple paragraphs without feeling as if you just wrote, well, multiple paragraphs..then you know you're a fan. | ||
|
double620
China804 Posts
On December 25 2011 08:29 Olinimm wrote: Naniwa is 1-12 in GSL, that's all you need to know to realize that he isn't the best Protoss. He's had 3 chances in Code A and went 0-4 in Blizzard cup. its fan's vote man. take it easy. see the pro's vote? Mc is pro's choice. | ||
|
Warlock40
601 Posts
| ||
|
TheShadower
United States94 Posts
On December 25 2011 02:11 Ninjahoe wrote: If these votes are based on MLG results there is no question about it, NaNi was definitly the protoss with best results. MC not even close "No question" might be a slight stretch. Dallas: Huk 10th, Naniwa 1st Columbus: Huk N/a, Naniwa 6th Anaheim: Huk 7th, Naniwa 8th Raleigh: Huk 7th, Naniwa 12th Orlando: Huk 1st, Naniwa N/a Providence: Huk 5th, Naniwa 2nd Literal cumulative total : Huk 30, Naniwa 29 (note: not entirely meaningful as higher results tend to be weighted more in people's eyes) The first MLG/GSL exchange program (and the influx of Koreans) came at MLG Columbus. Dallas (the prior event) was Huk's worst result, while it was Naniwa's best (by placing). Naniwa did worse and worse at each MLG with Koreans until providence, while Huk's got better (again, until providence). Their head to head was 4-4 by my count. I suppose it depends on what you think is more impressive. I would say that when the Koreans came in full force (Columbus and beyond) Huk has been more impressive and therefore I would give him the nod. Personal preference I suppose, but "definitly," hell no. | ||
|
Spaceneil8
United States317 Posts
On December 25 2011 15:23 Warlock40 wrote: Wow, poll voters are so fanboy-biased it's incredible. I mean, I'll admit that I voted for Boxer as "most unpredictable player" even though he tends to use the same builds over and over again just because I'm a big SlayerS fanboy, but Nestea losing out to DRG as best Zerg? Naniwa getting 40% of the "Best Protoss" vote? At least the Teran category shows there is justice in the world with MVP getting a dominating 60% of the vote. (I voted for MMA, of course.) The fan votes don't really matter that much. The Pro votes are what really mean something. | ||
|
Naniwa
Sweden477 Posts
| ||
|
zaii
Guam2611 Posts
On December 25 2011 17:48 Naniwa wrote: yea cuz i have more fans than huk lol wait I'll always root for you over Huk, <3 | ||
|
lisward
Singapore959 Posts
| ||
|
Qaatar
1409 Posts
On December 23 2011 14:20 TBone- wrote: wtf? why was mvp 70% voted best macro? he's constantly over queueing scvs(sometimes to 4 at each cc), macro slips to 1000 more than three times before the 20 minute mark passes, just general stuff like that he really lacks on. You could say that about any SC2 player in existence. I've watched most of MVP's replays, and the replays of many other Terrans, and although I didn't go through the trouble of calculating SQ, just in general, MVP's macro is probably the cleanest I've seen. Bomber might have been more efficient 5 months ago, but as of right now, I no longer think he has the edge over MVP. However, MVP does have more "off games" than people think - carpal tunnel, exhaustion, etc. are probably all contributing factors. For example, his play at Providence was especially lackluster for some reason (many of his replays at that event showed those symptoms you mentioned). *Note, these are all tournament games. Of course, player XYZ might be a better macro player at home while not under tournament pressure, but that's not relevant nor is it meaningful. | ||
|
Spaceneil8
United States317 Posts
On December 25 2011 17:48 Naniwa wrote: yea cuz i have more fans than huk lol wait lol, <3. If this whole thing was fan based, it would be so bad lol. | ||
|
RusHXceL
United States1004 Posts
WTH is Nestea!!!!!!!! some kid made this gotta be.!!! | ||
| ||
