EPTSeason 5 live on SEA - Page 4
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
Zaurus
Singapore676 Posts
| ||
|
jnkw
Canada347 Posts
On December 20 2011 17:49 Roxy wrote: Arid Plateau - Cant FFE v zerg Definitely possible to FFE on Arid, even though it's a bit ugly. See my post here. | ||
|
bgx
Poland6595 Posts
| ||
|
memcpy
United States459 Posts
On December 20 2011 18:32 Doganaws wrote: Hi there. 16° EU gold terran here 496 points. I know that mabye this is not the correct thread to talk abuot pomotion but... do you think someone whit this account can be promoted to plat in season 5 ??? http://www.sc2ranks.com/eu/2256706/Doganaws Probably not unfortunately, sc2ranks shows all the top gold league players having 800+ points. You probably need to be somewhere around there (assuming you used all your bonus pool). http://www.sc2ranks.com/ranks/eu/gold | ||
|
Doganaws
Italy52 Posts
On December 20 2011 19:30 memcpy wrote: Probably not unfortunately, sc2ranks shows all the top gold league players having 800+ points. You probably need to be somewhere around there (assuming you used all your bonus pool). http://www.sc2ranks.com/ranks/eu/gold TNX man btw NOONE in my ladder reached the threshold given by blixxard (710 points from g to p)... so noone will pass? | ||
|
Unnamed Player
Australia89 Posts
On December 20 2011 08:01 Luckbox wrote: OP plays zerg? :D ( from downvoted maps appearance ). Yerp  | ||
|
Trealador
United States207 Posts
| ||
|
Unnamed Player
Australia89 Posts
On December 20 2011 22:03 Trealador wrote: I can do my placement on NA but the maps are still the same. Halp? No Arid or Entombed and still Narazim and Abysmal? | ||
|
y0su
Finland7871 Posts
On December 20 2011 22:03 Trealador wrote: I can do my placement on NA but the maps are still the same. Halp? try relogging, the (new) maps show up for my NA account. | ||
|
Lonyo
United Kingdom3884 Posts
| ||
|
KeksX
Germany3634 Posts
And you didn't downvote shak and taldarim where taking a third is next to impossible ZvP and attacking into the natural a pain in the arse? But you did downvote xel naga caverns because it has the exact same problems, I guess? | ||
|
KalWarkov
Germany4126 Posts
On December 20 2011 23:56 KeksX wrote: And you didn't downvote shak and taldarim where taking a third is next to impossible ZvP and attacking into the natural a pain in the arse? But you did downvote xel naga caverns because it has the exact same problems, I guess? taking a 3rd is impossible ZvP on Shak? I dont know what league u play, but my opponents build their 3rd base at minute 4:30 - pretty safely. Im protoss, my vetos will be: Metalopolis (for zergs christ), XelNaga (too short), Arid Plateau (the natural looks like a big joke for protoss to take) | ||
|
KeksX
Germany3634 Posts
On December 21 2011 00:00 KalWarkov wrote: taking a 3rd is impossible ZvP on Shak? I dont know what league u play, but my opponents build their 3rd base at minute 4:30 - pretty safely. Just watch usual ZvPs on Shak where the zerg gets a very quick third. I recommend korean games though as they show the full potential of abusing this. Personally, I veto'd xel, taldarim and shak because of this. I hate losing!>: Thinking about letting taldarim go though because taking the 4th instead of the third isn't nearly as dangerous on certain positions as on shak and I need another veto for valley. But as you can see, people have different opinions. | ||
|
blae000
Norway1640 Posts
| ||
|
Arcanefrost
Belgium1257 Posts
| ||
|
Tobberoth
Sweden6375 Posts
On December 21 2011 00:20 blae000 wrote: Is it announced when it's going live on EU somewhere?! ^^ checking* It was mentioned earlier in the thread, wednesday morning. | ||
|
ArtisaBang
195 Posts
forge expand for protoss on both maps: + Show Spoiler + ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/VgBpW.jpg) ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/W6I9J.jpg) i think Entombed Valley is definitely Terran map,siege positions good as Altarim. Entombed Valley: PvT > T favored with siege tank timings and positioning. PvZ > i think zerg favored because its pretty easy to taking 3rd. TvZ > terran favored imo! Arid Plateu hmm...i think this map is not good for zerg playes  pretty okey for terran and protoss. | ||
|
TiTanIum_
Brazil1335 Posts
On December 21 2011 00:28 ArtisaBang wrote: just checked maps! forge expand for protoss on both maps: + Show Spoiler + i think Entombed Valley is definitely Terran map,siege positions good as Altarim. Entombed Valley: PvT > T favored with siege tank timings and positioning. PvZ > i think zerg favored because its pretty easy to taking 3rd. TvZ > terran favored imo! Arid Plateu hmm...i think this map is not good for zerg playes pretty okey for terran and protoss.Yeah.... Terran is so imba... | ||
|
Roxy
Canada753 Posts
On December 20 2011 19:16 jnkw wrote: Definitely possible to FFE on Arid, even though it's a bit ugly. See my post here. My problem with FFE is that as far as I can see it, you need 3 canons to stop roach agression. In the pictures you provided, they can pick off the cyber core (gg) or the gateway (and run into your main) pretty much uncontested. Also, that picture has 2 artosis pylons in it. I think you have the titles of entombed and arid mixed up on the two pictures. | ||
|
Roxy
Canada753 Posts
The maps right now are garbage. At best you can take 3 bases (and it certainly requires destroying rocks). The maps are all early game zerg favored. The maps are stale and havent been changed in about 3 seasons  | ||
| ||
