EPTSC2CON's response to FXO's withdrawal - Page 4
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
Ronald_McD
Canada807 Posts
| ||
|
Madera
Sweden2672 Posts
| ||
|
Scereye
Austria154 Posts
On August 14 2011 20:13 MaderA wrote: Am I the only one confused about what SC2CON even is? Have I missed something? Afaik they are selected people of players/teammanagers/GOMmember Someone PLEASE feel free to explain it a bit more what sc2con is exactly, and what they are supposed to do. | ||
|
AlissyXOXO
United States49 Posts
| ||
|
Shinobi1982
1605 Posts
On August 14 2011 20:26 AlissyXOXO wrote: You guys realize that the SC2Con members won't be very good at English, and they'd probably at best have to work through a translator, which is why they would rather work with FXO's Korean branch cos there's less misunderstandings there, and even then there were heaps of misunderstandings. That would be cool if those "conversations" were not at past midnight hour... | ||
|
saritenite
Singapore1680 Posts
| ||
|
FunnelC4kes
Ireland462 Posts
On August 14 2011 18:00 StyLeD wrote: I think FXOpen shouldn't have used "SC2con" because they talked to only one person. Yes, that person is the sc2con representative, but like FXOpen stated one person does not equal the whole, even if he is supposedly a representative of it...it doesn't make much sense but I think that the representative's attitude was a personal vendetta and not a group vendetta. When you're speaking to the representative of an organisation, it goes without saying that they REPRESENT the body for which they are representing, hence they are the REPRESENTATIVE. | ||
|
Soma.bokforlag
Sweden448 Posts
+1 to choya fanclub | ||
|
radiatoren
Denmark1907 Posts
As I see it sc2con is taking a confrontational and dictatorial approach in matters, when in fact they need to act as a diplomatic advisory or negotiation leaders in all matters. Having any organisation imposing non-negotiable and specific demands upon their members seem unbenificial no matter what in Starcraft 2. You rather need support from such an organisation to get positive input on behaviour and interaction in any twist. | ||
|
OPL3SA2
United States378 Posts
On August 14 2011 20:46 saritenite wrote: Um guys, if every detail has not been laid bare yet, we should not prejudge. Every detail is not needed in order to form an opinion. "Pre-judge" is judging with no basis. There's a basis here. But thanks for the heads up, Coach lee | ||
|
esotericc
449 Posts
| ||
|
Gurblechev
188 Posts
| ||
|
garlicface
Canada4196 Posts
| ||
|
awu25
United States2003 Posts
That's why we always get Korea's side of the story late | ||
| ||
