EPTExcellent
Terrible
Average
Good
GSL Casters Survey - Page 20
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
SovSov
United States755 Posts
Excellent Terrible Average Good | ||
|
tdt
United States3179 Posts
Excellent Terrible Average Good | ||
|
Jonny55
United States22 Posts
| ||
|
Pred8oar
Germany281 Posts
| ||
|
Jandos
Czech Republic928 Posts
Tasteless excelent Kelly bad DOA avarage Moletrap terrible - all he does is screaming into mic and knows nothing about the game | ||
|
scatmango2
United States408 Posts
Tastosis both = 10/10 excellent Doa = 7.5/10 better than average Moletrap = 4/10 pretty exciting commentator just does not work well with others all in all pretty bad for GSL. | ||
|
Hypemeup
Sweden2783 Posts
On May 19 2011 07:48 PhantomHybrid wrote: Excellent Excellent Horrible Average Average Reflected my thoughts, It sort of takes away from the cast if you can barely understand the caster T_T. | ||
|
dunc
Netherlands1105 Posts
Excellent Average Average Horrible | ||
|
ampson
United States2355 Posts
Excellent Excellent Average Good Good | ||
Astans
205 Posts
| ||
|
Mojar
Australia185 Posts
Excellent Horrible Average Average Tastosis is amazing simply put. To be honest i just cant understand Kelly a lot of the time and it means i don't get anything from her at all. Doa and Moletrap have their moments but to be honest i don't like their style at all and in fact have hardly watched GSTL or only watched it on mute because of this. Each to their own of course. | ||
|
enrOo
Finland23 Posts
and cmon doatrap combo is good aswell... they just godda get warmed up ... and stop trying to make artosis jokes.. :D | ||
|
Gracksaurusrex
United Kingdom171 Posts
I have a personal distaste for tasteless (lol?) He doesn't really add much to the casts and has a particularly dry sense of humour Kelly, sorry girl you dont know enough about the game to get casting a top tournament like the GSL Doa is a fairly average caster, knows what he is talking about some what, however he doesn't really give me as much inspiration as Artosis does Moletrap, again is a very average caster | ||
|
Bunnypanda
United States103 Posts
On May 19 2011 19:32 Astans wrote: Kelly's game analysis is pretty good. I think people rate her wrongly because of her english/voice. Not really, they rate her poorly because the option is "Horrible (takes away from the game)" Many people out there, me included, rely on casters being accurate and knowledgeable about the game. When you get a caster like Kelly slurring words and showing poor general knowledge, it really does take away from the game. I think she could be good, but right now she is not even close to ready for prime time. I also don't understand how the "defense" of "they just don't like her voice/accent" is a valid retort when her voice and accent are extremely different from, well, every other caster that is in those leagues. (And not in a good way) Casters rely on their voice being pleasing and non-intrusive in most cases to relay the information they know. You have to think about the big picture here, they need to capture a vast range of players. If you only attract a small niche then you just aren't the right choice for the task. | ||
|
Liveon
Netherlands1083 Posts
good horrible good average Really like Doa better than Moletrap, got a nicer voice and is not screaming. On May 19 2011 19:01 Jonny55 wrote: Tasteless + Artosis > Any other casting combo ever. I'm not even watching the GSTL because it's done by bad commentators. I personally think that if you watch for the commentary instead of watching for the game, you're watching the wrong stuff. Go watch a comedian or something. The GSTL has superawesome games, way better than normal GSL. | ||
|
karpo
Sweden1998 Posts
On May 19 2011 19:52 Bunnypanda wrote: Not really, they rate her poorly because the option is "Horrible (takes away from the game)" Many people out there, me included, rely on casters being accurate and knowledgeable about the game. When you get a caster like Kelly slurring words and showing poor general knowledge, it really does take away from the game. I think she could be good, but right now she is not even close to ready for prime time. I also don't understand how the "defense" of "they just don't like her voice/accent" is a valid retort when her voice and accent are extremely different from, well, every other caster that is in those leagues. (And not in a good way) Casters rely on their voice being pleasing and non-intrusive in most cases to relay the information they know. You have to think about the big picture here, they need to capture a vast range of players. If you only attract a small niche then you just aren't the right choice for the task. I agree, saying she's got good game knowledge like it's the only required skill for a caster is pretty flawed. She could have Artosis level analysis and i would still cringe att the slurry pronounciation and the shrieking whenever something interesting happens ingame. | ||
|
Dfgj
Singapore5922 Posts
Plus Singaporeans aren't huge fans either, so if some people 'just aren't fans of her accent'... then who is? | ||
|
Drayne
Canada239 Posts
.I think Moletrap and diggity could be GREAT ! maybe put moletrap with incontrol, or even chill... that would be some good laughs. | ||
|
uzas
Croatia52 Posts
| ||
|
Talin
Montenegro10532 Posts
Others are just not in that category at all. As I said in the other thread, GOM just didn't take this issue seriously enough - their selection of backup commentators makes as much sense as inviting a Diamond player into Code S. I would try getting Apollo and/or Painuser. | ||
| ||
