I love Inca's honesty. Dude is like a mini-MC, and until people learn to play against their hyper-aggressive style they'll keep having success.

He has little hope against Nestea, but second place in the GSL is still something to be proud of

taintmachine

United States431 Posts

May 11 2011 18:53 GMT

#170

did all of you whiners stop to think that you are crying way more about nada getting cheesed than you should? i doubt getting cheesed is something nada is unused to. o and inca roflstomping 4-5 bunkers with archons and HTs was awesome.

sVnteen

Germany2238 Posts

May 11 2011 18:55 GMT

#171

INca will win this
P imba lolol

PhantomHybrid

United Kingdom47 Posts

May 11 2011 18:56 GMT

#172

I love InCa's honesty. SC not winning makes me sad but Nestea should destroy Inca.

omnikaush

United States49 Posts

May 11 2011 19:03 GMT

#173

Inca is a boss. I'm rooting for Inca to stomp all over Nestea in the finals

MAX BEAST!

Gotmog

Serbia899 Posts

May 11 2011 19:11 GMT

#174

Nestea should destroy inca....it shouldn't even be a competition.

dragonblade369

Canada464 Posts

May 11 2011 19:15 GMT

#175

On May 12 2011 03:07 Jepsyn wrote:
Im sorry but cheesing downgrades the win.. it does

God, when will people stop labelling 4-gate as cheese. It is NOT a cheese!!!!

mierin

United States4943 Posts

May 11 2011 19:31 GMT

#176

On May 12 2011 01:29 BoxersGosuGarden wrote:
Isn't cheese only an excuse for people who can't play mid to late game?

JD's double 4 pool says no.

Anyways, as one of Nestea's bigger fans I always enjoy his interviews. I wonder why people bash IdrA so much for "balance whining" when Nestea himself says things like "I've concluded ZvP is impossible on X'NF?"

DarkRise

1644 Posts

May 11 2011 20:21 GMT

#177

i think nestea got this, Nestea has one of the best ZVP. The problem with other zerg is that they dont react fast enough and that is Nestea's big points. He plays safe and can tech switch according to opponent's army composition.

Meteora.GB

Canada2479 Posts

May 11 2011 20:25 GMT

#178

On May 12 2011 04:31 mierin wrote:

Show nested quote +

I don't know. IdrA just seems to attract all sorts of controversy and haters based off of his personality. Besides the point, I suppose Nestea is more accomplished and doesn't seem to have the tendency to make imba calls as much as IdrA (even though both Nestea and MVP admit that they are both whiners, heh).

Gustaf

Sweden20 Posts

May 11 2011 20:38 GMT

#179

As i didnt watched any BW at all i dont have the same respect for NaDa as everyone else seem to have, altough i still think hes a great player. But i don't really understand all this whine about InCa's all-ins (or anyones all-ins for that matter).

I enjoy watching both early all-in games as much as I enjoy macro-games.

If you cannot survive earlygame aggressions, cheeses, all-ins, or whatever, it doesnt matter how good ur lategame and macro is, because u dont deserve to get there, simple as that.

These guys are proffessional and WILL play to win, and the best player is the one who wins, not the one who is the prettiest to look at or has the better macro, micro, etc (altough these often coincides).

I come from a WC3-background and maybe that "clouds" my mind in most of these matters as SC2 and WC3 are 2 completely different games, but this is the way i look at it.

Zdrastochye

Ivory Coast6262 Posts

May 11 2011 20:41 GMT

#180

And so I ask the steamy TL elitists reading this thread...

If you could be the first SC2 bonjwa, win multiple GSLs/MLGs/[insert any big tournament here] but did so doing mostly all-ins and heavy pressure builds in favor of macro-oriented play, would you do it?