On October 12 2010 03:15 Inori wrote:
[quote]
You're forgetting that the time it shows in match results is ingame time, which is 33% faster than IRL.

Everything I did was calculated in real time not game time.

Then you can cut all the times in like half. I dunno at what level you're playing, but at 1500 diamond LONG games take about 15 mins IRL. Average is 5-7. Cheese is about 3 mins, maybe faster.

What league are you in where long games are 15 minutes?

Then you can cut all the times in like half. I dunno at what level you're playing, but at 1500 diamond LONG games take about 15 mins IRL. Average is 5-7. Cheese is about 3 mins, maybe faster.

Take a wild guess.

15 minutes IRL is about 22-25 minutes in-game (in match results, what have you), which is long for an average ladder game.

8 minutes realtime is still too long.

+ Show Spoiler +

FFS this is like the third time I've had to post that.

Stop thinking you're the smartest one around.
8 minutes for an average ladder game where you don't aim for a win asap (cheese or not), not minimum. That and the fact that he can leave as soon as he senses a loss will cut down A LOT in your calculations.

Some numbers would help your argument. Until then, I'll continue looking at my own calculations which clearly point to some foul play here.

Also, you keep lowering the playtime for an "average" game. It's getting pretty laughable.

Are you a troll?

What more numbers do you need? Do some research? Actually look up the guys info before accusing him of something and/or making a fool out of yourself on the forums? Your calculations can be cut in like 3/4th without even assuming that he cheesed 24/7.

I dunno, maybe at 700 diamond it's a turtle fest and average games really do take 15 minutes+, I wouldn't know. Although cheese is still cheese, shouldn't take any longer.

You have an opinion, I have math. Everyone is entitled to an opinion, even if yours is wrong.

Go to the start menu and hit "all programs" you'll find a folder there named "accessories". Hit the calculator option and get to it.

Your math isn't the problem here, but that 15 minute average game time. Even if you use math it's just an opinion if you pull the numbers out of your ass.

Kinky

United States4126 Posts

October 11 2010 20:04 GMT

#184

On October 11 2010 18:37 backtoback wrote:

Show nested quote +

you say it like it's hard ROFL

To play thousands of games to get achievements in diamond? Yea, it's pretty hard. The people who did it on US did it in bronze.

leeznon

United States255 Posts

October 11 2010 20:21 GMT

#185

wow

Pobearo

United States351 Posts

October 11 2010 20:41 GMT

#186

This guy really likes starcraft. A lot.

Megaman

United States19 Posts

October 11 2010 20:46 GMT

#187

This is some extensive goal completion.

Also, there is a surplus of disparaging comments in this thread, as is often found online.

NeXiLe

Canada262 Posts

October 11 2010 20:52 GMT

#188

Am I the only one that things they should made all those achievements add up to 5000, not 4960?

GenesisX

Canada4267 Posts

October 11 2010 20:56 GMT

#189

On October 12 2010 05:52 NeXiLe wrote:
Am I the only one that things they should made all those achievements add up to 5000, not 4960?

Nope, 4 more achivements pls Blizzard.

GenesisX

Canada4267 Posts

October 11 2010 20:57 GMT

#190

oops double post

Phanekim

United States777 Posts

October 11 2010 21:01 GMT

#191

did he do this legitly?

kojinshugi

Estonia2559 Posts

October 11 2010 21:17 GMT

#192

On October 12 2010 05:41 Pobearo wrote:
This guy really likes starcraft. A lot.

Don't we all? If I wasn't working I'd play way more than is probably healthy. Especially with the weather getting cold and all.

Combine

United States812 Posts

October 11 2010 21:19 GMT

#193

On October 12 2010 05:52 NeXiLe wrote:
Am I the only one that things they should made all those achievements add up to 5000, not 4960?

Yeah. Quite a random number to end on.

Gillatron

Canada3 Posts

October 11 2010 21:19 GMT

#194

Haha he is probably just really good at cheesing and if he isn't gonna win the game he just leaves...I can't think of another way someone could possibly get so many wins so quickly.

jjun212

Canada2208 Posts

October 11 2010 21:21 GMT

#195

On October 12 2010 06:19 Combine wrote:

Show nested quote +

Yeah. Quite a random number to end on.

lol watch there be a "hidden" achievement that's worth 40.

you dont even know what it is until it randomly pops up when you've accomplished it >=D

TheMafia

Canada7 Posts

October 13 2010 13:46 GMT

#196

http://tcpm.mrlazyinc.com/?m=news&nid=56

Thats what i think about that....

Offhand

United States1869 Posts

October 13 2010 13:50 GMT

#197

On October 12 2010 06:01 Phanekim wrote:
did he do this legitly?

In all probability? No.

Bob300

United States505 Posts

October 13 2010 14:07 GMT

#198

Wow... thats ridiculous. Did he do it legit? or with that achievement hack thats out there?

DatsyuK

United States28 Posts

October 13 2010 14:44 GMT

#199

That's dedication

Squisher

Canada8 Posts

October 13 2010 14:58 GMT

#200

Its not legit, judging by the FFA wins. This is the sticking point. He won 400 FFAs in 24-47 hours. You are looking at less than 8.5 minutes per ffa. He must have used a team. If all members are in the game the rest leave for a fast win. If not, its a gang bang on the remaining players.